A U.S. CLIVAR Project to Assess and Compare the Responses of Global Climate Models to Drought-Related SST Forcing Patterns: Overview and Results
aGlobal Modeling and Assimilation Office, Science and Exploration Directorate, NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, Maryland
bDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
cGoddard Earth Sciences and Technology Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland
dNational Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
eNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
fJackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
gNOAA/NWS/NCEP/Climate Prediction Center, Washington, D.C
hNOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado
iRosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
jU.S. Climate Variability and Predictability Research Program, Washington, D.C
kDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
lInternational Research Institute for Climate and Society, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York
mCenter for Atmospheric Sciences, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
nDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland
oNOAA/National Integrated Drought Information System, Boulder, Colorado
pNASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York
qLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York
rDepartment of Environment and Geography, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
sEnvironmental Protection Agency, Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia
tNOAA/Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory/Physical Oceanography Division, Miami, Florida
| Abstract |
|---|
The U.S. Climate Variability and Predictability (CLIVAR) working group on drought recently initiated a series of global climate model simulations forced with idealized SST anomaly patterns, designed to address a number of uncertainties regarding the impact of SST forcing and the role of land–atmosphere feedbacks on regional drought. The runs were carried out with five different atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs) and one coupled atmosphere–ocean model in which the model was continuously nudged to the imposed SST forcing. This paper provides an overview of the experiments and some initial results focusing on the responses to the leading patterns of annual mean SST variability consisting of a Pacific El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-like pattern, a pattern that resembles the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation (AMO), and a global trend pattern.
One of the key findings is that all of the AGCMs produce broadly similar (though different in detail) precipitation responses to the Pacific forcing pattern, with a cold Pacific leading to reduced precipitation and a warm Pacific leading to enhanced precipitation over most of the United States. While the response to the Atlantic pattern is less robust, there is general agreement among the models that the largest precipitation response over the United States tends to occur when the two oceans have anomalies of opposite signs. Further highlights of the response over the United States to the Pacific forcing include precipitation signal-to-noise ratios that peak in spring, and surface temperature signal-to-noise ratios that are both lower and show less agreement among the models than those found for the precipitation response. The response to the positive SST trend forcing pattern is an overall surface warming over the world’s land areas, with substantial regional variations that are in part reproduced in runs forced with a globally uniform SST trend forcing. The precipitation response to the trend forcing is weak in all of the models.
It is hoped that these early results, as well as those reported in the other contributions to this special issue on drought, will serve to stimulate further analysis of these simulations, as well as suggest new research on the physical mechanisms contributing to hydroclimatic variability and change throughout the world.
Keywords: General circulation models, Model comparison, Model evaluation/performance, Drought, Sea surface temperature
Received: January 29, 2009; Accepted: April 24, 2009
Cited by
Online publication date: 1-Nov-2011.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (3843 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Oct-2011.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (6979 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Oct-2011.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (1951 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Sep-2011.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (1739 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2011.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (2142 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2011.
CrossRef
Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (4524 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (2167 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2011.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (2844 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
CrossRef
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
CrossRef
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
CrossRef
Great Plains Precipitation and Its SST Links in Twentieth-Century Climate Simulations, and Twenty-First- and Twenty-Second-Century Climate Projections. Journal of Climate 23:23, 6409-6429Online publication date: 1-Dec-2010.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (3755 KB)
Mechanisms of Tropical Atlantic SST Influence on North American Precipitation Variability. Journal of Climate 23:21, 5610-5628Online publication date: 1-Nov-2010.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (7708 KB)
Online publication date: 31-Aug-2010.
CrossRef
Multimodel Estimates of Atmospheric Response to Modes of SST Variability and Implications for Droughts. Journal of Climate 23:16, 4327-4341Online publication date: 1-Aug-2010.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (5007 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Jul-2010.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (2797 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2010.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (4568 KB)
Online publication date: 15-May-2010.
CrossRef
SST–North American Hydroclimate Links in AMIP Simulations of the Drought Working Group Models: A Proxy for the Idealized Drought Modeling Experiments. Journal of Climate 23:10, 2585-2598Online publication date: 1-May-2010.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (2538 KB)
Online publication date: 9-Apr-2010.
CrossRef
Great Plains Drought in Simulations of the Twentieth Century. Journal of Climate 23:8, 2178-2196Online publication date: 1-Apr-2010.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (7105 KB)
The Physical Mechanisms by Which the Leading Patterns of SST Variability Impact U.S. Precipitation. Journal of Climate 23:7, 1815-1836Online publication date: 1-Apr-2010.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (16051 KB)
Regional Aspects of Prolonged Meteorological Droughts over Mexico and Central America. Journal of Climate 23:5, 1175-1188Online publication date: 1-Mar-2010.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (2129 KB)
Impact of Common Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies on Global Drought and Pluvial Frequency. Journal of Climate 23:3, 485-503Online publication date: 1-Feb-2010.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (7336 KB)
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010.
CrossRef
Influence of ENSO and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation on Drought over the United States. Journal of Climate 22:22, 5962-5982Online publication date: 1-Nov-2009.
Abstract . Full Text . PDF (3494 KB)

