Based on research showing that in the case of a strong aerosol forcing, this forcing establishes itself early in the historical record, a simple model is constructed to explore the implications of a strongly negative aerosol forcing on the early (pre-1950) part of the instrumental record. This model, which contains terms representing both aerosol–radiation and aerosol–cloud interactions, well represents the known time history of aerosol radiative forcing as well as the effect of the natural state on the strength of aerosol forcing. Model parameters, randomly drawn to represent uncertainty in understanding, demonstrate that a forcing more negative than −1.0 W m−2 is implausible, as it implies that none of the approximately 0.3-K temperature rise between 1850 and 1950 can be attributed to Northern Hemisphere forcing. The individual terms of the model are interpreted in light of comprehensive modeling, constraints from observations, and physical understanding to provide further support for the less negative (−1.0 W m−2) lower bound. These findings suggest that aerosol radiative forcing is less negative and more certain than is commonly believed.
Authors:
Bjorn StevensAffiliationsMax Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Received: 25 September 2014
Final Form: 27 February 2015
Published Online: 11 June 2015
June 2015
Share this Article
Featured Collections
Mountain Terrain Atmospheric Modeling and Observations (MATERHORN) -BAMS, JAMC,MWR, WAF
LatMix -BAMS, JPO, JTECH
PANDOWAE -MWR, JAS, WAF, JTECH
Most Read JCLI Articles
(past 12 months)
|
Newman et al.
June 2016, Vol. 29, No. 12
|
|
L’Ecuyer et al.
November 2015, Vol. 28, No. 21
|
|
Sardeshmukh et al.
December 2015, Vol. 28, No. 23
|
|
Poli et al.
June 2016, Vol. 29, No. 11
|
|
Cheng et al.
January 2016, Vol. 29, No. 1
|
|
Welhouse et al.
March 2016, Vol. 29, No. 5
|
Most Cited (past 12 months)
-
MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and ApplicationsRienecker et al.July 2011, Vol. 24, No. 14
-
Improvements to NOAA’s Historical Merged Land–Ocean Surface Temperature Analysis (1880–2006)Smith et al.May 2008, Vol. 21, No. 10
-
An Improved In Situ and Satellite SST Analysis for ClimateReynolds et al.July 2002, Vol. 15, No. 13
-
Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global WarmingHeld et al.November 2006, Vol. 19, No. 21
-
Daily High-Resolution-Blended Analyses for Sea Surface TemperatureReynolds et al.November 2007, Vol. 20, No. 22
-
The Community Climate System Model Version 4Gent et al.October 2011, Vol. 24, No. 19
Denotes Open Access content.


