| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 284 | 77 | 5 |
| PDF Downloads | 104 | 15 | 0 |
Displayed acceptance dates for articles published prior to 2023 are approximate to within a week. If needed, exact acceptance dates can be obtained by emailing amsjol@ametsoc.org.
Three plume rise formulas are compared in their ability to model the final rise of hot, buoyant plumes from tall stacks. The model proposed by Briggs (1969), later modified by revisions in Briggs (1971, 1972), best predicted the observed final rise during periods of low wind speed. At higher wind speeds, the model suggested by Montgomery et al. (1972) performed best.
Three plume rise formulas are compared in their ability to model the final rise of hot, buoyant plumes from tall stacks. The model proposed by Briggs (1969), later modified by revisions in Briggs (1971, 1972), best predicted the observed final rise during periods of low wind speed. At higher wind speeds, the model suggested by Montgomery et al. (1972) performed best.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 284 | 77 | 5 |
| PDF Downloads | 104 | 15 | 0 |
AMS Publications
Get Involved with AMS
Follow Us
Contact Us
Email: amsjol@ametsoc.org
Phone: 617-227-2425
Fax: 617-742-8718
Headquarters:
45 Beacon Street
Boston, MA 02108-3693
DC Office:
1200 New York Ave NW
Suite 500
Washington, DC 200005-3928