Lidar-Transmissometer Visibility Comparisons Over Slant and Horizontal Paths

J. L. Gaumet Direction de la Meteorologie-Etablissement d'Etudes et de Recherches Météorologiques, 78470 Magny-les-hameaux, France

Search for other papers by J. L. Gaumet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
A. Petitpa Direction de la Meteorologie-Etablissement d'Etudes et de Recherches Météorologiques, 78470 Magny-les-hameaux, France

Search for other papers by A. Petitpa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

Atmospheric visibility has been measured with the lidar technique using the “slope method.” The system is briefly described and some aspects of slant path visibility measurements for aeronautical applications are discussed. Measurements in dense fog show the existence of a structure with layers of different attenuations. Transmissometer and lidar visibilities are compared along horizontal and slant paths. Visibilities obtained with the lidar technique in fog situations show good agreement with the simultaneous transmissometer data. However, it must be noted that lidar measurements give values greater than the transmissometer data; the systematic discrepancy is ∼30 m for slant visibilities below 300 m, and cannot be explained by multiple scattering effects alone.

Abstract

Atmospheric visibility has been measured with the lidar technique using the “slope method.” The system is briefly described and some aspects of slant path visibility measurements for aeronautical applications are discussed. Measurements in dense fog show the existence of a structure with layers of different attenuations. Transmissometer and lidar visibilities are compared along horizontal and slant paths. Visibilities obtained with the lidar technique in fog situations show good agreement with the simultaneous transmissometer data. However, it must be noted that lidar measurements give values greater than the transmissometer data; the systematic discrepancy is ∼30 m for slant visibilities below 300 m, and cannot be explained by multiple scattering effects alone.

Save