All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 167 28 4
PDF Downloads 35 13 1

A Two-Dimensional Histogram Procedure to Analyze Cloud Cover from NOAA Satellite High-Resolution Imagery

T. PhulpinMétéorologie Nationale, EERM, Centre de Météorologie Spatiale, 22302 Lannion, France

Search for other papers by T. Phulpin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. DerrienMétéorologie Nationale, EERM, Centre de Météorologie Spatiale, 22302 Lannion, France

Search for other papers by M. Derrien in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
A. BrardMétéorologie Nationale, EERM, Centre de Météorologie Spatiale, 22302 Lannion, France

Search for other papers by A. Brard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A two-dimensional histogram method for cloud analysis from NOAA satellite high-resolution imagery is presented. The algorithm, using one visible or near-infrared channel and one infrared channel of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), applies to arrays segmented according to the temperature sounder (TOVS) grid; up to five cloud levels are identified in addition to the surface. A comparison with visual nephanalysis has been carried out for various cloud situations: the use of near-infrared radiance appears to give consistently better results than the visible radiance, leading to an agreement in about 87% of the cases for total cloud cover. Possible further improvements are discussed.

Abstract

A two-dimensional histogram method for cloud analysis from NOAA satellite high-resolution imagery is presented. The algorithm, using one visible or near-infrared channel and one infrared channel of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR), applies to arrays segmented according to the temperature sounder (TOVS) grid; up to five cloud levels are identified in addition to the surface. A comparison with visual nephanalysis has been carried out for various cloud situations: the use of near-infrared radiance appears to give consistently better results than the visible radiance, leading to an agreement in about 87% of the cases for total cloud cover. Possible further improvements are discussed.

Save