Vertical Dispersion from Surface and Elevated Releases: An Investigation of a Non-Gaussian Plume Model

Michael J. Brown Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Michael J. Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. Pal Arya Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

Search for other papers by S. Pal Arya in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
William H. Snyder Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, Air Resources L4boratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Search for other papers by William H. Snyder in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The vertical diffusion of a passive tracer released from surface and elevated sources in a neutrally stratified boundary layer has been studied by comparing field and laboratory experiments with a non-Gaussian K-theory model that assumes power-law profiles for the mean velocity and vertical eddy diffusivity. Several important differences between model predictions and experimental data were discovered: 1) the model overestimated ground-level concentrations from surface and elevated releases at distances beyond the peak concentration; 2) the model overpredicted vertical mixing near elevated sources, especially in the upward direction; 3) the model-predicted exponent α in the exponential vertical concentration profile for a surface release [C̄(z) exp(−zα)] was smaller than the experimentally measured exponent. Model closure assumptions and experimental shortcomings are discussed in relation to their probable effect on model predictions and experimental measurements.

Abstract

The vertical diffusion of a passive tracer released from surface and elevated sources in a neutrally stratified boundary layer has been studied by comparing field and laboratory experiments with a non-Gaussian K-theory model that assumes power-law profiles for the mean velocity and vertical eddy diffusivity. Several important differences between model predictions and experimental data were discovered: 1) the model overestimated ground-level concentrations from surface and elevated releases at distances beyond the peak concentration; 2) the model overpredicted vertical mixing near elevated sources, especially in the upward direction; 3) the model-predicted exponent α in the exponential vertical concentration profile for a surface release [C̄(z) exp(−zα)] was smaller than the experimentally measured exponent. Model closure assumptions and experimental shortcomings are discussed in relation to their probable effect on model predictions and experimental measurements.

Save