Mesoscale Modeling of Summertime Refractive Conditions in the Southern California Bight

Stephen D. Burk Naval Research Laboratory, Marine Meteorology Division, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by Stephen D. Burk in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
William T. Thompson Naval Research Laboratory, Marine Meteorology Division, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by William T. Thompson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Large vertical gradients of temperature and moisture, often present at the top of the atmospheric boundary layer, can result in anomalous electromagnetic propagation. Layers in which the modified refractive index M decreases with height can act to trap microwave energy depending on the frequency and angle of incidence of the signal. Here the authors examine the ability of a mesoscale model to forecast the topography of such a trapping layer and to predict temporal trends in trapping-layer structure and depth.

Data from the Variability of Coastal Atmospheric Refractivity (VOCAR) experiment are used to examine the fidelity of model forecasts. The intensive observing period of VOCAR occurred from 23 August to 3 September 1993 in the Southern California bight. The mesoscale numerical weather prediction model used has a sophisticated physics package that includes a second-order closure turbulence scheme, detailed radiative flux computations, and explicit cloud physics.

The impact of several specific mesoscale and synoptic events (e.g., sea–land breezes, a migrating low) upon the refractivity field is examined along with the model’s capacity to forecast these features. The model exhibits significant promise in its ability to forecast trends in the height of the microwave trapping layer. Furthermore, these trends in trapping-layer depth are found to correlate rather well with the temporal behavior of the measured propagation factor.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Stephen D. Burk, Naval Research Laboratory, Marine Meteorology Division, 7 Grace Hopper Avenue, Monterey, CA 93943-5006.

Abstract

Large vertical gradients of temperature and moisture, often present at the top of the atmospheric boundary layer, can result in anomalous electromagnetic propagation. Layers in which the modified refractive index M decreases with height can act to trap microwave energy depending on the frequency and angle of incidence of the signal. Here the authors examine the ability of a mesoscale model to forecast the topography of such a trapping layer and to predict temporal trends in trapping-layer structure and depth.

Data from the Variability of Coastal Atmospheric Refractivity (VOCAR) experiment are used to examine the fidelity of model forecasts. The intensive observing period of VOCAR occurred from 23 August to 3 September 1993 in the Southern California bight. The mesoscale numerical weather prediction model used has a sophisticated physics package that includes a second-order closure turbulence scheme, detailed radiative flux computations, and explicit cloud physics.

The impact of several specific mesoscale and synoptic events (e.g., sea–land breezes, a migrating low) upon the refractivity field is examined along with the model’s capacity to forecast these features. The model exhibits significant promise in its ability to forecast trends in the height of the microwave trapping layer. Furthermore, these trends in trapping-layer depth are found to correlate rather well with the temporal behavior of the measured propagation factor.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Stephen D. Burk, Naval Research Laboratory, Marine Meteorology Division, 7 Grace Hopper Avenue, Monterey, CA 93943-5006.

Save
  • Babin, S. M., 1995: A case study of subrefractive conditions at Wallops Island, Virginia. J. Appl. Meteor.,34, 1028–1038.

  • Battan, L. J., 1973: Radar Observation of the Atmosphere. University of Chicago Press, 324 pp.

  • Burk, S. D., and W. T. Thompson, 1982: Operational evaluation of a turbulence closure model forecast system. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 1535–1543.

  • ——, and ——, 1989: A vertically nested regional numerical weather prediction model with second-order closure physics. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 2305–2324.

  • ——, and ——, 1995: Mesoscale modeling of refractive conditions in a complex coastal environment.AGARD/NATO Conf. on Propagation Assessment in Coastal Environments, Bremerhaven, Germany, NATO, 1–7.

  • ——, and ——, 1996: The summertime low-level jet and marine boundary layer structure along the California coast. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 668–686.

  • Davies, H. C., 1976: A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,102, 405–418.

  • Deardorff, J. W., 1978: Efficient prediction of ground surface temperature and moisture, with inclusion of a layer of vegetation. J. Geophys. Res.,83(C4), 1889–1903.

  • Helvey, R., J. Rosenthal, L. Eddington, P. Greiman, and C. Fisk, 1995: Use of satellite imagery and other indicators to assess variability and climatology of oceanic elevated ducts. AGARD/NATO Conf. on Propagation Assessment in Coastal Environments, Bremerhaven, Germany, NATO, 1–14.

  • Hitney, H. V., 1992: Hybrid ray optics and parabolic equation methods for radar propagation modeling. Proc. Int. Radar 92 Conf., Brightons, United Kingdom, IEE, 58–61.

  • ——, 1995: Refractive effects from VHF to EHF. Part A: Propagation mechanisms. AGARD Lecture Series, AGARD-LS-196, 173 pp.

  • Hodur, R. M., 1987: Evaluation of a regional model with an update cycle. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 2707–2718.

  • Hogan, T. F., and T. E. Rosmond, 1991: The description of the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System’s spectral forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,119, 1786–1815.

  • Holt, T. R., 1996: Mesoscale forcing of a boundary layer jet along the California coast. J. Geophys. Res.,101(D2), 4235–4254.

  • Levy, M. F., and K. H. Craig, 1992: Use of mesoscale models for refractivity forecasting. AGARD/NATO Conf. on Remote Sensing of the Propagation Environment, Cesme, Turkey, NATO, 1–11.

  • Liu, W. T., K. B. Katsaros, and J. Businger, 1979: Bulk parameterization of air–sea exchange of heat and water vapor including the molecular constraints at the interface. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 1722–1735.

  • Louis, J.-F., 1979: A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,17, 187–202.

  • Lu, R., and R. P. Turco, 1994: Air pollutant transport in a coastal environment. Part I: Two-dimensional simulations of sea-breeze and mountain effects. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 2285–2308.

  • Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1974: A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 1791–1806.

  • Oliver, D. A., W. S. Lewellen, and G. G. Williamson, 1978: The interaction between turbulent and radiative transport in the development of fog and low-level stratus. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 301–316.

  • Paulus, R. A., 1995: An overview of an intensive observation period on variability of coastal atmospheric refractivity. AGARD/NATO Conf. on Propagation Assessment in Coastal Environments, Bremerhaven, Germany, NATO, 1–6.

  • Rogers, L. T., 1995: Effects of spatial and temporal variability of atmospheric refractivity on the accuracy of propagation assessments. AGARD/NATO Conf. on Propagation Assessment in Coastal Environments, Bremerhaven, Germany, NATO, 1–9.

  • Simpson, J. E., 1994: Sea Breeze and Local Winds. Cambridge University Press, 234 pp.

  • Sommeria, G., and J. W. Deardorff, 1977: Subgrid-scale condensation in models of nonprecipitating clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,34, 344–355.

  • Vogel, G. N., 1995: Performance of the navy’s second order closure version of the NORAPS in short-range refractivity forecasting during the VOCAR experiment. Naval Research Laboratory Tech. Rep. NRL/MR/7543-94-7217, 51 pp. [Available from Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA 93943-5006.].

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 510 203 38
PDF Downloads 163 36 0