Numerical Comparison of Two Ice Crystal Formation Mechanisms on Snowfall Enhancement from Ground-Based Aerosol Generators

Zhidong Li Desert Research Institute, Atmospheric Science Center, University and Community College System of Nevada, Reno, Nevada

Search for other papers by Zhidong Li in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
R. L. Pitter Desert Research Institute, Atmospheric Science Center, University and Community College System of Nevada, Reno, Nevada

Search for other papers by R. L. Pitter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Two mechanisms of ice crystal formation, contact freezing and very rapid condensation freezing, were applied to numerical simulations of ground-based seeding with the Guide Model, an orographic cloud model, to study whether different mechanisms of ice crystal formation substantially affect precipitation patterns and intensities. Although the numerical model has limitations, it was expected to indicate how different ice crystal formation rates lead to differences in precipitation patterns and intensities between the two mechanisms.

Numerical simulations of two case studies are presented. One is characterized by moderate wind speeds and colder cloud temperatures, the other by stronger winds and warmer cloud temperatures. The moderate wind field and colder cloud temperatures yielded nearly half an order of magnitude more precipitation than the strong wind field and warmer cloud temperatures. Sensitivity analysis showed that snowfall as a result of forced condensation freezing is strongly dependent on the ambient temperature at the ground-based generator site, while generator site temperature had less effect on the precipitation as a result of contact freezing. Snowfall resulting from contact freezing, however, was found to be strongly dependent on the cloud drop concentration. Liquid water content did not significantly affect the precipitation resulting from ice crystal formation by either mechanism. Precipitation rates induced by forced condensation freezing are about two orders of magnitude greater than those induced by contact freezing in the cases simulated, over the Sierra crest, because of the limited time available for ice particles to grow and precipitate.

Current affiliation: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Zhidong Li, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign, 205 N. Matthews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801.

Abstract

Two mechanisms of ice crystal formation, contact freezing and very rapid condensation freezing, were applied to numerical simulations of ground-based seeding with the Guide Model, an orographic cloud model, to study whether different mechanisms of ice crystal formation substantially affect precipitation patterns and intensities. Although the numerical model has limitations, it was expected to indicate how different ice crystal formation rates lead to differences in precipitation patterns and intensities between the two mechanisms.

Numerical simulations of two case studies are presented. One is characterized by moderate wind speeds and colder cloud temperatures, the other by stronger winds and warmer cloud temperatures. The moderate wind field and colder cloud temperatures yielded nearly half an order of magnitude more precipitation than the strong wind field and warmer cloud temperatures. Sensitivity analysis showed that snowfall as a result of forced condensation freezing is strongly dependent on the ambient temperature at the ground-based generator site, while generator site temperature had less effect on the precipitation as a result of contact freezing. Snowfall resulting from contact freezing, however, was found to be strongly dependent on the cloud drop concentration. Liquid water content did not significantly affect the precipitation resulting from ice crystal formation by either mechanism. Precipitation rates induced by forced condensation freezing are about two orders of magnitude greater than those induced by contact freezing in the cases simulated, over the Sierra crest, because of the limited time available for ice particles to grow and precipitate.

Current affiliation: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Zhidong Li, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign, 205 N. Matthews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801.

Save
  • Blumenstein, R. R., R. M. Rauber, L. O. Grant, and W. G. Finnegan, 1987: Application of ice nucleation kinetics in orographic clouds. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,26, 1363–1376.

  • Brown, S. R., 1970: Terminal velocities of ice crystals. Atmospheric Science Paper 170, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 71 pp.

  • Bruintjes, R. T., T. L. Clark, and W. D. Hall, 1994: Interactions between topographic airflow and cloud/precipitation development during the passage of a winter storm in Arizona. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 48–67.

  • Chai, S. K., W. G. Finnegan, R. L. Pitter, and J. A. Warburton, 1989: A mechanistic interpretation of a winter orographic cloud seeding program. Preprints, Fifth WMO Sci. Conf. on Weather Modification and Applied Meteorology, Beijing, China, World Meteor. Org., 179–182.

  • Davis, C. I., 1974: Ice nucleating characteristics of various AgI aerosols. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wyoming, 267 pp.

  • DeMott, P. J., 1988: Comparisons of the behavior of AgI-type ice nucleating aerosols in laboratory-simulated clouds. J. Wea. Mod.,20, 4450.

  • ——, 1995: Quantitative descriptions of ice formation mechanisms of silver iodide-type aerosols. Atmos. Res.,38, 63–99.

  • ——, W. G. Finnegan, and L. O. Grant, 1983: An application of chemical kinetic theory and methodology to characterize the ice nucleating properties of aerosols used in weather modification. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,22, 1190–1203.

  • ——, A. B. Super, G. Langer, D. C. Rogers, and J. T. McPartland, 1995: Comparative characterizations of the ice nucleus ability of AgI aerosols by three methods. J. Wea. Mod.,27, 1–16.

  • Deshler, T., D. W. Reynolds, and A. W. Huggins, 1990: Physical response of winter orographic clouds over the Sierra Nevada to airborne seeding using dry ice or silver iodide. J. Appl. Meteor.,29, 288–330.

  • Feng, D., and W. G. Finnegan, 1989: An efficient, fast functioning nucleating agent—AgI·AgCl·4NaCl. J. Wea. Mod.,21, 41–45.

  • Finnegan, W. G., and R. L. Pitter, 1988: Rapid ice nucleation by acetone-silver iodide generator aerosols. J. Wea. Mod.,20, 51–53.

  • ——, D.-X. Feng, and L. O. Grant, 1984: Composite AgI·AgCl·NaCl nuclei: Efficient fast-functioning aerosols for weather modification experimentation. Preprints, Ninth Conf. on Weather Modification, Park City, UT, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 3.

  • Heggli, M. F., 1986: A ground based approach used to determine cloud seeding opportunity. Preprints, 10th Conf. on Weather Modification, Arlington, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 64–67.

  • ——, and D. W. Reynolds, 1985: Radiometric observations of supercooled liquid water within a split front over the Sierra Nevada. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,24, 1258–1261.

  • ——, and R. M. Rauber, 1988: Characteristics and evolution of supercooled water in wintertime storms over the Sierra Nevada. J. Appl. Meteor.,27, 989–1015.

  • ——, L. Vardiman, R. E. Stewart, and A. W. Huggins, 1983: Supercooled liquid water and ice crystal distributions within Sierra Nevada winter storms. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,22, 1875–1886.

  • Heimbach, J. A., Jr., and A. B. Super, 1988: The Bridger Range, Montana, 1986–1987 snow pack augmentation program. J. Wea. Mod.,20, 19–26.

  • Hill, G. E., 1982: Analysis of precipitation augmentation potential in winter orographic clouds by use of aircraft icing reports. J. Appl. Meteor.,21, 165–170.

  • ——, 1986: Seedability of winter orographic clouds. Precipitation Enhancement—A Scientific Challenge, Meteor. Monogr., No. 43, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 127–136.

  • Hobbs, P. V., 1975: The nature of winter clouds and precipitation in the Cascade Mountains and their modification by artificial seeding. Part I: Natural conditions. J. Appl. Meteor.,14, 783–803.

  • Holroyd, E. W., III, J. A. Heimbach, and A. B. Super, 1995: Observations and model simulation of AgI seeding within a winter storm over Utah’s Wasatch Plateau. J. Wea. Mod.,27, 36–56.

  • Isaac, G. A., and R. H. Douglas, 1972: Another “time lag” in the activation of atmospheric ice nuclei. J. Appl. Meteor.,11, 490–493.

  • Locatelli, J. D., and P. V. Hobbs, 1974: Fall speeds and masses of solid precipitation particles. J. Geophys. Res.,79, 2185–2197.

  • Martner, B. E., 1986: Microphysical seeding effects in nonconvective clouds over the Sierra Nevada. Preprints, 10th Conf. on Weather Modification, Arlington, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 30–33.

  • Mitchell, D. L., R. Zhang, and R. L. Pitter, 1990: Mass-dimensional relationships for ice particles and the influence of riming on snowfall rates. J. Appl. Meteor.,29, 153–163.

  • Pitter, R. L., and H. R. Pruppacher, 1973: A wind tunnel investigation of the evolution of the freezing of small water drops falling at terminal velocity in air. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,99, 540–551.

  • ——, and W. G. Finnegan, 1989: Development of heterogeneous nucleation theory for weather modification. Preprints, Fifth WMO Sci. Conf. on Weather Modification and Applied Meteorology, Beijing, China, World Meteor. Org., 131–132.

  • Plooster, M. N., and N. Fukuta, 1975: A numerical model of precipitation from seeded and unseeded cold orographic clouds. J. Appl. Meteor.,14, 859–867.

  • Pruppacher, H. R., and J. D. Klett, 1978: Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation. D. Reidel, 714 pp.

  • Rangno, A. L., P. V. Hobbs, and L. F. Radke, 1977: Tracer and diffusion and cloud microphysical studies in the American River Basin. Final Rep. to the Bureau of Reclamation under Contract 6-07-Dr- 21140, 64 pp. [Available from Dept. of Atmospheric Science, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115.].

  • Rauber, R. M., and L. O. Grant, 1986: The characteristics and distribution of cloud water over the mountains of northern Colorado during wintertime storms. Part II: Spatial distribution and microphysical characteristics. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,25, 489–504.

  • ——, R. D. Elliott, J. O. Rhea, A. W. Huggins, and D. W. Reynolds, 1988: A diagnostic technique for targeting during airborne seeding experiments in wintertime storms over the Sierra Nevada. J. Appl. Meteor.,27, 811–827.

  • Reynolds, D. W., 1994: Further analysis of a snowpack augmentation program using liquid propane. J. Wea. Mod.,26, 12–18.

  • ——, and A. S. Dennis, 1986: A review of the Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,67, 513–523.

  • ——, and A. P. Kuciauskas, 1988: Remote and in situ observations of Sierra Nevada winter mountain clouds: Relationships between mesoscale structure, precipitation and liquid water. J. Appl. Meteor.,27, 140–156.

  • Rilling, R. R., R. R. Blumenstein, W. G. Finnegan, and L. O. Grant, 1984: Characteristics of silver iodide–potassium iodide ice nuclei: Rates and mechanisms and comparison to the silver iodide–sodium iodide system. Preprints, Ninth Conf. on Weather Modification, Park City, UT, Amer. Meteor. Soc. 16–17.

  • Rodi, A. R., A. S. Heymsfield, and N. Prasad, 1985: Precipitation formation in dry ice seeding plumes. Preprints, Fourth WMO Conf. on Weather Modification, Honolulu, HI, World Meteor. Org., 71–76.

  • Ryan, B. F., E. R. Wishart, and D. E. Shaw, 1976: The growth rates and densities of ice crystals between −3°C and −21°C. J. Atmos. Sci.,33, 842–850.

  • Stith, J. L., A. G. Detwiler, R. F. Reinking, and P. L. Smith, 1990: Investigating mixing and the activation of ice in cumuli with gaseous tracer techniques. J. Atmos. Res.,25, 195–216.

  • Stone, R., and J. Warburton, 1985: Phase II—The use of trace chemistry for assessing the seeding effects in the Lake Almanor Watershed. Final Rep. to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 117 pp. [Available from Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV 89506.].

  • Super, A. B., and J. A. Heimbach Jr., 1983: Evaluation of the Bridger Range winter cloud seeding experiment using control gages. J.Climate Appl. Meteor.,22, 1989–2011.

  • Twomey, S., and T. A. Wojciechuski, 1969: Observation of the geographical variation of cloud nuclei. J. Atmos. Sci.,26, 684–688.

  • Vali, G., 1985: Nucleation terminology. J. Aerosol Sci.,16, 575–576.

  • Young, K. C., 1974a: A numerical simulation of wintertime orographic precipitation. Part I: Description of model microphysics and numerical techniques. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 1735–1748.

  • ——, 1974b: A numerical simulation of wintertime, orographic precipitation. Part II: Comparison of natural and AgI-seeded conditions. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 1749–1767.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 444 112 62
PDF Downloads 117 31 1