Results of the South African Cloud-Seeding Experiments Using Hygroscopic Flares

G. K. Mather CloudQuest, Nelspruit, South Africa

Search for other papers by G. K. Mather in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. E. Terblanche Weather Bureau, Bethlehem, South Africa

Search for other papers by D. E. Terblanche in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
F. E. Steffens Unisa, Pretoria, South Africa

Search for other papers by F. E. Steffens in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
L. Fletcher Unisa, Pretoria, South Africa

Search for other papers by L. Fletcher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A new method of seeding convective clouds for the purpose of augmenting rainfall is being developed in South Africa. Flares that produce small salt particles (0.5-μm mean diameter) are attached to the trailing edge of the wings of seeding aircraft and ignited in updrafts below the cloud base of convective storms. This method of delivery overcomes most of the difficulties encountered in the handling and the use of hygroscopic materials, difficulties that made seeding with ice nuclei (AgI) a more attractive option.

The research that has led to the development of this new technique was prompted by an encounter with a storm with dramatically altered microphysics that was growing over a Kraft paper mill in the research area. Hygroscopic seeding flares were subsequently developed, and seeding trials began in October 1990. Successful seeding trials quickly led to the design and execution of a randomized convective cloud-seeding experiment, the results of which show convincing evidence of increases in the radar-measured rain mass from seeded storms when compared to the control or unseeded storms.

Heightened reflectivities aloft seen by the real-time storm-tracking software and observed in the exploratory analysis raises the possibility of developing a radar-measured seeding algorithm that can recognize in almost real time a successful convective seeding event. The implications of such a development would have far-reaching effects on the conduct of future convective cloud-seeding experiments and operations.

The authors’ seeding hypothesis postulates that the hygroscopic seeding at cloud base accelerates the growth of large hydrometeors in the treated clouds, which harvest more of the available supercooled water before it is expelled into the anvils by the strong updrafts that are a characteristic of the local storms, thereby increasing the efficiency of the rainfall process. The validity of this hypothesis is supported by microphysical measurements made from an instrumented Learjet and the results of the randomized experiment, both of which are supported by numerical condensation–coalescence calculations. There are also indications that the hygroscopic seeding may have an impact upon the dynamics of the treated storms, lengthening their lifetimes by strengthening the coupling of the updraft–downdraft storm propagation mechanism.

The apparent sensitivity of rainfall in convective clouds to the aerosol concentration, size, and chemical content may have climatic implications. Higher concentrations of small aerosols produced by pollution, biomass burning, etc., could adversely affect the efficiency of the rainfall process. The negative consequences of this effect would be magnified in regions that depend upon convective storms to provide the bulk of their annual rainfall.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Graeme K. Mather, CloudQuest, P.O. Box 1135, Nelspruit 1200, South Africa.

Abstract

A new method of seeding convective clouds for the purpose of augmenting rainfall is being developed in South Africa. Flares that produce small salt particles (0.5-μm mean diameter) are attached to the trailing edge of the wings of seeding aircraft and ignited in updrafts below the cloud base of convective storms. This method of delivery overcomes most of the difficulties encountered in the handling and the use of hygroscopic materials, difficulties that made seeding with ice nuclei (AgI) a more attractive option.

The research that has led to the development of this new technique was prompted by an encounter with a storm with dramatically altered microphysics that was growing over a Kraft paper mill in the research area. Hygroscopic seeding flares were subsequently developed, and seeding trials began in October 1990. Successful seeding trials quickly led to the design and execution of a randomized convective cloud-seeding experiment, the results of which show convincing evidence of increases in the radar-measured rain mass from seeded storms when compared to the control or unseeded storms.

Heightened reflectivities aloft seen by the real-time storm-tracking software and observed in the exploratory analysis raises the possibility of developing a radar-measured seeding algorithm that can recognize in almost real time a successful convective seeding event. The implications of such a development would have far-reaching effects on the conduct of future convective cloud-seeding experiments and operations.

The authors’ seeding hypothesis postulates that the hygroscopic seeding at cloud base accelerates the growth of large hydrometeors in the treated clouds, which harvest more of the available supercooled water before it is expelled into the anvils by the strong updrafts that are a characteristic of the local storms, thereby increasing the efficiency of the rainfall process. The validity of this hypothesis is supported by microphysical measurements made from an instrumented Learjet and the results of the randomized experiment, both of which are supported by numerical condensation–coalescence calculations. There are also indications that the hygroscopic seeding may have an impact upon the dynamics of the treated storms, lengthening their lifetimes by strengthening the coupling of the updraft–downdraft storm propagation mechanism.

The apparent sensitivity of rainfall in convective clouds to the aerosol concentration, size, and chemical content may have climatic implications. Higher concentrations of small aerosols produced by pollution, biomass burning, etc., could adversely affect the efficiency of the rainfall process. The negative consequences of this effect would be magnified in regions that depend upon convective storms to provide the bulk of their annual rainfall.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Graeme K. Mather, CloudQuest, P.O. Box 1135, Nelspruit 1200, South Africa.

Save
  • Biswas, K. R., and A. S. Dennis, 1971: Formation of a rain shower by salt seeding. J. Appl. Meteor.,10, 780–784.

  • Braham, R. R., Jr., 1964: What is the role of ice in summer rain showers? J. Atmos. Sci.,21, 640–645.

  • Cooper, W. A., R. T. Bruintjes, and G. K. Mather, 1997: Somecalculations pertaining to hygroscopic seeding with flares. J. Appl. Meteor.,36, 1449–1469.

  • Cunning, J. B., Jr., 1976: Comparison of the Z–R relationship for seeded and nonseeded Florida cumuli. J. Appl. Meteor.,15, 1121–1125.

  • Dennis, A. S., E. W. Holroyd III, W. E. Howell, D. A. Matthews, B. A. Silverman, and A. B. Super, 1984: HIPLEX: A co-operative program on rain augmentation in the High Plains. Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO, 55 pp. [Available from Water Research Commission, P.O. Box 824, Pretoria 001, South Africa.].

  • Dixon, M. J., and G. K. Mather, 1986: Program for atmospheric water supply—Phase I, 1983–86, Vol. III. WRC Rep. 133/3/88, Pretoria, South Africa, 55 pp. [Available from Water Research Commission, P. O. Box 824, Pretoria 001, South Africa.].

  • ——, and G. Wiener, 1993: TITAN: Thunderstorm identification, tracking, analysis and nowcasting—A radar-based methodology. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,10, 785–797.

  • Eagan, R. C., P. V. Hobbs, and L. F. Radke, 1974: Particle emissions for a large Kraft paper mill and their effects on the microstructure of warm clouds. J. Appl. Meteor.,13, 535–552.

  • Garstang, M., G. D. Emmitt, and B. Kelbe, 1981: Rain augmentation in Nelspruit (RAIN). Report to the WRC, Pretoria, South Africa, 266 pp. [Available from Water Research Commission, P.O. Box 824, Pretoria 001, South Africa.].

  • Hindman, E. E., 1978: Water droplet fogs formed from pyrotechnically generated condensation nuclei. J. Wea. Modif.,10, 77–96.

  • Johnson, D. B., 1987: On the relative efficiency of coalescence and riming. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 1671–1680.

  • Klazura, G. E., and C. J. Todd, 1978: A model of hygroscopic seeding in cumulus clouds. J Appl. Meteor.,17, 1758–1768.

  • Marshall, J. S., and W. M. K. Palmer, 1948: The distribution of rain drops with size. J. Meteor.,5, 165–166.

  • Mather, G. K., 1991: Coalescence enhancement in large multicell storms caused by the emissions from a Kraft paper mill. J. Appl. Meteor.,30, 1134–1146.

  • ——, M. J. Dixon, and J. M. de Jager, 1996: Assessing the potential for rain augmentation—The Nelspruit randomised convective cloud seeding experiment. J. Appl. Meteor.,35, 1465–1482.

  • Morgan, G., B. J. Morrison, and G. K. Mather, 1989: Measurement of total and condensed water mixing ratios in warm based cumulus clouds by a jet engine evaporation technique. Theor. Appl. Climatol.,40, 187–199.

  • Reisin, T., S. Tzivion, and Z. Levin, 1996: Seeding convective clouds with ice nuclei or hygroscopic particles: A numerical study using a model with detailed microphysics. J. Appl. Meteor.,35, 1416–1434.

  • Srivastava, R. C., 1967: On the role of coalescence between rain drops in shaping their size distributions. J. Atmos. Sci.,24, 287–292.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 14138 5968 281
PDF Downloads 8007 3126 154