Automated Cloud Classification of Global AVHRR Data Using a Fuzzy Logic Approach

Bryan A. Baum Atmospheric Sciences Division, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia

Search for other papers by Bryan A. Baum in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Vasanth Tovinkere Science Applications International Corporation, Hampton, Virginia

Search for other papers by Vasanth Tovinkere in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jay Titlow Science Applications International Corporation, Hampton, Virginia

Search for other papers by Jay Titlow in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ronald M. Welch Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota

Search for other papers by Ronald M. Welch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A fuzzy logic classification (FLC) methodology is proposed to achieve the two goals of this paper: 1) to discriminate between clear sky and clouds in a 32 × 32 pixel array, or sample, of 1.1-km Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) data, and 2) if clouds are present, to discriminate between single-layered and multilayered clouds within the sample. To achieve these goals, eight FLC modules are derived that are based broadly on airmass type and surface type (land or water): equatorial over land, marine tropical over land, marine tropical/equatorial over water, continental tropical over land, marine polar over land, marine polar over water, continental polar over land, and continental polar/arctic over water. Derivation of airmass type is performed using gridded analyses provided by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction.

The training and testing data used by the FLC are collected from more than 150 daytime AVHRR local area coverage scenes recorded between 1991 and 1994 over all seasons and over all continents and oceans. A total of 190 textural and spectral features are computed from the AVHRR data. A forward feature selection method is implemented to reduce the number of features used to discriminate between classes in each FLC module. The number of features selected ranges from 13 (marine tropical over land) to 24 (marine tropical/equatorial over water). An estimate of the classifier accuracy is determined using the hold-one-out method in which the classifier is trained with all but one of the data samples; the classifier is applied subsequently to the remaining sample.

The overall accuracies of the eight classification modules are calculated by dividing the number of correctly classified samples by the total number of manually labeled samples of clear-sky and single-layer clouds. Individual module classification accuracies are as follows: equatorial over land (86.2%), marine tropical over land (85.6%), marine tropical/equatorial over water (88.6%), continental tropical over land (87.4%), marine polar over land (86.8%), marine polar over water (84.8%), continental polar over land (91.1%), and continental polar/arctic over water (89.8%). Single-level cloud samples misclassified as multilayered clouds range between 0.5% (continental polar over land) and 3.4% (marine polar over land) for the eight airmass modules.

Classification accuracies for a set of labeled multilayered cloud samples range between 64% and 81% for six of the eight airmass modules (excluded are the continental polar over land and continental polar/arctic over water modules, for which multilayered cloud samples are difficult to find). The results indicate that the FLC has an encouraging ability to distinguish between single-level and multilayered clouds.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Bryan A. Baum, Atmospheric Sciences Division, NASA Langley Research Center, MS 420, Hampton, VA 23681-0001.

Abstract

A fuzzy logic classification (FLC) methodology is proposed to achieve the two goals of this paper: 1) to discriminate between clear sky and clouds in a 32 × 32 pixel array, or sample, of 1.1-km Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) data, and 2) if clouds are present, to discriminate between single-layered and multilayered clouds within the sample. To achieve these goals, eight FLC modules are derived that are based broadly on airmass type and surface type (land or water): equatorial over land, marine tropical over land, marine tropical/equatorial over water, continental tropical over land, marine polar over land, marine polar over water, continental polar over land, and continental polar/arctic over water. Derivation of airmass type is performed using gridded analyses provided by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction.

The training and testing data used by the FLC are collected from more than 150 daytime AVHRR local area coverage scenes recorded between 1991 and 1994 over all seasons and over all continents and oceans. A total of 190 textural and spectral features are computed from the AVHRR data. A forward feature selection method is implemented to reduce the number of features used to discriminate between classes in each FLC module. The number of features selected ranges from 13 (marine tropical over land) to 24 (marine tropical/equatorial over water). An estimate of the classifier accuracy is determined using the hold-one-out method in which the classifier is trained with all but one of the data samples; the classifier is applied subsequently to the remaining sample.

The overall accuracies of the eight classification modules are calculated by dividing the number of correctly classified samples by the total number of manually labeled samples of clear-sky and single-layer clouds. Individual module classification accuracies are as follows: equatorial over land (86.2%), marine tropical over land (85.6%), marine tropical/equatorial over water (88.6%), continental tropical over land (87.4%), marine polar over land (86.8%), marine polar over water (84.8%), continental polar over land (91.1%), and continental polar/arctic over water (89.8%). Single-level cloud samples misclassified as multilayered clouds range between 0.5% (continental polar over land) and 3.4% (marine polar over land) for the eight airmass modules.

Classification accuracies for a set of labeled multilayered cloud samples range between 64% and 81% for six of the eight airmass modules (excluded are the continental polar over land and continental polar/arctic over water modules, for which multilayered cloud samples are difficult to find). The results indicate that the FLC has an encouraging ability to distinguish between single-level and multilayered clouds.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Bryan A. Baum, Atmospheric Sciences Division, NASA Langley Research Center, MS 420, Hampton, VA 23681-0001.

Save
  • Bankert, R. L., 1994: Cloud classification of AVHRR imagery in maritime regions using a probabilistic neural network. J. Appl. Meteor.,33, 909–918.

  • Baum, B. A., and B. A. Wielicki, 1994: Cirrus cloud retrieval using infrared sounding data: Multilevel cloud errors. J. Appl. Meteor.,33, 107–117.

  • ——, and Coauthors, 1995: Satellite remote sensing of multiple cloud layers. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 4210–4230.

  • Brown, J. W., O. B. Brown, and R. H. Evans, 1993: Calibration of Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer infrared channels: A new approach to nonlinear correction. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 18257–18268.

  • Chatterjee, S., and S. Chatterjee, 1983: Estimation of misclassification probabilities by bootstrap methods. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comp.,12, 645–656.

  • Chen, D. W., S. K. Sengupta, and R. M. Welch, 1989: Cloud field classification based upon high spatial resolution textural features, Part 2, Simplified vector approaches. J. Geophys. Res.,94, 14749–14765.

  • Coakley, J. A., Jr., and F. P. Bretherton, 1982: Cloud cover from high resolution scanner data: Detecting and allowing for partially filled fields of view. J. Geophys. Res.,87, 4917–4932.

  • Devijer, P. A., and J. Kittler, 1982: Pattern Recognition: A Statistical Approach. Prentice Hall, 448 pp.

  • Ebert, E., 1987: A pattern recognition technique for distinguishing surface and cloud types in polar regions. J. Climate Appl. Meter.,26, 1412–1427.

  • ——, 1989: Analysis of polar clouds from satellite imagery using pattern recognition and a statistical cloud analysis scheme. J. Appl. Meteor.,28, 382–399.

  • Foley, J. D., and A. VanDam, 1984: Fundamentals of Interactive Computer Graphics. Addison-Wesley, 664 pp.

  • Garand, L., 1988: Automated recognition of oceanic cloud patterns. Part I: Methodology and application to cloud climatology. J. Climate,1, 20–39.

  • Giarratano, J., and G. Riley, 1989: Expert Systems: Principles and Programming. PWS-Kent, 632 pp.

  • Hahn, C. J., S. G. Warren, J. London, R. M. Cherrin, and R. Jenne, 1982: Atlas of simultaneousoccurrence of different cloud types over the ocean. NCAR Tech. Note TN-201+STR, 211 pp. [Available from National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • ——, ——, ——, ——, and ——, 1984: Atlas of simultaneous occurrence of different cloud types over land. NCAR Tech. Note TN-241+STR, 209 pp. [Available from National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • Haralick, R., M., K. S. Shanmugam, and I. Dinstein, 1973: Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern.,SMC-3 (6), 610–621.

  • Inoue, T., 1987: A cloud type classification with NOAA 7 split-window measurements. J. Geophys. Res.,92, 3991–4000.

  • Key, J., 1990: Cloud cover analysis with arctic AVHRR data, Part II: Classification with spectral and textural measures. J. Geophys. Res.,95, 7661–7675.

  • ——, J. A. Maslanik, and A. J. Schweiger, 1989: Classification of merged AVHRR and SMMR Arctic data with neural networks. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens.,55, 1331–1338.

  • Kidwell, K. B., 1997: NOAA polar orbiter data users guide. NOAA National Climatic Data Center, Satellite Data Services Division, 412 pp. [Available from National Climatic Data Center, 151 Patton Ave., Room 120, Asheville, NC 28801-5001.].

  • Lee, J., R. Weger, S. K. Sengupta, and R. M. Welch, 1990: A neural network approach to cloud classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,28, 846–855.

  • Menzel, W. P., D. P. Wylie, and K. I. Strabala, 1992: Seasonal and diurnal changes in cirrus clouds as seen in four years of observations with the VAS. J. Appl. Meteor.,31, 370–385.

  • Pankiewicz, G. S., 1995: Pattern recognition techniques for the identification of cloud and cloud systems. Meteor. Appl.,2, 257–271.

  • Peak, J. E., and P. M. Tag, 1992: Toward automated interpretation of satellite imagery for navy shipboard applications. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,73, 995–1008.

  • Penaloza, M. A., and R. M. Welch, 1996: Feature selection for classification of polar regions using a fuzzy expert system. Remote Sens. Environ.,58, 81–100.

  • Rabindra, P., S. K. Sengupta, and R. M. Welch, 1992: An interactive hybrid expert system for polar cloud and surface classification. Environmetrics,3, 121–148.

  • Rao, C. R. N., and J. Chen, 1994: Post-launch calibration of the visible and near-infrared channels of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer on NOAA-7, -9, and -11 spacecraft. NOAA Tech. Rep. NESDIS 78, 22 pp. [Available from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Sills Bldg., 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.].

  • Shenk, W. E., R. J. Holub, and R. A. Neff, 1976: A multispectral cloud type identification method developed for tropical ocean areas with Nimbus-3 MRIR measurements. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 284–291.

  • Simpson, J., R. F. Adler, and G. R. North, 1988: A proposed Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,69, 278–295.

  • Tian, L., and J. A. Curry, 1989: Cloud overlap statistics. J. Geophys. Res.,94, 9925–9935.

  • Tovinkere, V. R., M. Penaloza, A. Logar, J. Lee, R. C. Weger, T. A. Berendes, and R. M. Welch, 1993: An intercomparison of artificial intelligence approaches for polarscene identification. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 5001–5016.

  • Warren, S. G., C. J. Hahn, and J. London, 1985: Simultaneous occurrence of different cloud types. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,24, 658–667.

  • Welch, R. M., S. K. Gupta, and K. S. Kuo, 1988: Marine stratocumulus cloud fields off the coast of southern California observed using LANDSAT imagery. Part II: Textural analysis. J. Appl. Meteor.,27, 363–378.

  • ——, M. S. Navar, and S. K. Sengupta, 1989: The effect of spatial resolution upon texture-based cloud field classifications. J. Geophys. Res.,94, 14767–14781.

  • ——, K. S. Kuo, and S. K. Sengupta, 1990: Cloud and surface textural features in polar regions. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,28, 520–528.

  • ——, S. K. Sengupta, A. K. Goroch, P. Rabindra, N. Rangaraj, and M. S. Navar, 1992: Polar cloud and surface classification using AVHRR imagery: An intercomparison of methods. J. Appl. Meteor.,31, 405–420.

  • Weszka, J. S., C. R. Dyer, and A. Rosenfeld, 1976: A comparative study of texture measures for terrain classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern.,SMC-6 (4), 2269–2285.

  • Wielicki, B. A., R. D. Cess, M. D. King, D. A. Randall, and E. F. Harrison, 1995: Mission to planet earth: role of clouds and radiation in climate. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,76, 2125–2153.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 626 227 5
PDF Downloads 206 83 5