• Boe, B. A., 1994: The North Dakota Tracer Experiment: Tracer applications in a cooperative thunderstorm research program. J. Wea. Modif.,26, 102–112.

  • Charba, J., 1974: Application of gravity current model to analysis of squall-line gust front. Mon. Wea. Rev.,102, 140–156.

  • Cotton, W. R., and R. A. Anthes, 1989: Storm and Cloud Dynamics. Academic Press, 592 pp.

  • Droegemeier, K. K., and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1987: Numerical simulation of thunderstorm outflow dynamics. Part I: Outflow sensitivity experiments and turbulence dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 1180–1210.

  • Fankhouser, J. C., 1982: The 22 June 1976 case study: Large-scale influences, radar echo structure and mesoscale circulations. Hailstorms of the Central High Plains, C.A. Knight and P. Squires, Eds., Colorado Associated University Press, 1–34.

  • Glancy, R. T., 1979: Aircraft observations of wind shear accompanying a severe thunderstorm gust front. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Wyoming, 140 pp. [Available from Dept. of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071.].

  • Goff, R. C., 1976: Vertical structure of thunderstorm outflows. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 1429–1440.

  • Houze, R. A., Jr., 1993: Cloud Dynamics. Academic Press, 573 pp.

  • Intrieri, J. M., A. J. Bedard, and R. M. Hardesty, 1990: Details of colliding thunderstorm outflows as observed by Doppler lidar. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 1081–1098.

  • Klingle, D. L., D. R. Smith, and M. M. Wolfson, 1987: Gust front characteristics as detected by Doppler radar. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 905–918.

  • Mahoney, W. P., III, 1988: Gust front characteristics and the kinematics associated with interacting thunderstorm outflows. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 1474–1491.

  • ——, and A. R. Rodi, 1987: Aircraft measurements on microburst development from hydrometeor evaporation. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 3037–3051.

  • Martner, B. E., and F. M. Ralph, 1993: Breaking Kelvin–Helmholtz waves and cloud-top entrainment as revealed by K-band Doppler radar. Preprints, Ninth Conf. on Atmospheric and Oceanic Waves and Stability, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 141–144.

  • ——, J. D. Marwitz, and R. A. Kropfli, 1992: Radar observations of transport and diffusion in clouds and precipitation using TRACIR. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,9, 226–241.

  • Mitchell, K. E., and J. B. Hovermale, 1977: A numerical investigation of the severe thunderstorm gust front. Mon. Wea. Rev.,105, 657–675.

  • Mueller, C. K., and R. E. Carbone, 1987: Dynamics of a thunderstorm outflow. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 1879–1898.

  • Ralph, F. M., C. Mazaundier, M. Crochet, and S. V. Venkateswaran, 1993: Doppler sodar and wind-profiler observations of gravity-wave activity associated with a gravity current. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 444–463.

  • Shapiro, M. A., 1984: Meteorological tower measurements of a surface cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 1634–1639.

  • Simpson, J. E., 1987: Gravity Currents in the Environment and the Laboratory. John Wiley and Sons, 244 pp.

  • Sinclair, P. C., and P. M. Kuhn, 1991: Aircraft low altitude wind shear detection and warning system. J. Appl. Meteor.,30, 3–16.

  • Wakimoto, R. M., 1982: The life cycle of thunderstorm gust fronts as viewed with Doppler radarand rawinsonde data. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 1060–1082.

  • Wilson, J. M., and W. E. Schreiber, 1986: Initiation of convective storms at radar-observed boundary-layer convergence lines. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 2516–2536.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 803 440 12
PDF Downloads 278 83 9

Vertical Velocities in a Thunderstorm Gust Front and Outflow

Brooks E. MartnerNOAA/Environmental Technology Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Brooks E. Martner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Continuous vertically pointing measurements of a thunderstorm outflow, including its gust front, were obtained with a Doppler radar near New Salem, North Dakota. The measurements provide a high-resolution depiction of the vertical structure of reflectivity and vertical velocity within the gust front, the outflow, and the parent storm. Earlier gust front remote sensing studies have used Doppler observations obtained with low-elevation-angle scans to accurately measure the horizontal flow pattern from which vertical velocities were subsequently estimated by integrating the continuity equation. In contrast, the New Salem case provides direct, rather than derived, Doppler measurement of vertical velocities with better vertical resolution and vastly superior temporal resolution. The gust front’s vertical structure is in general agreement with earlier observations and numerical simulations, except that the transition from strong upward to strong downward motion was more abrupt. The maximum updraft, of almost 10 m s−1, was measured in the gust front at 1.35 km above ground level and was followed by equally strong downward motion only 1 min later at a slightly higher altitude.The observations support the earlier use of the continuity method for deriving the basic pattern of vertical motions in density currents from quasi-horizontal scan data.

Corresponding author address: Brooks E. Martner, NOAA/ETL, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80303.

bmartner@etl.noaa.gov

Abstract

Continuous vertically pointing measurements of a thunderstorm outflow, including its gust front, were obtained with a Doppler radar near New Salem, North Dakota. The measurements provide a high-resolution depiction of the vertical structure of reflectivity and vertical velocity within the gust front, the outflow, and the parent storm. Earlier gust front remote sensing studies have used Doppler observations obtained with low-elevation-angle scans to accurately measure the horizontal flow pattern from which vertical velocities were subsequently estimated by integrating the continuity equation. In contrast, the New Salem case provides direct, rather than derived, Doppler measurement of vertical velocities with better vertical resolution and vastly superior temporal resolution. The gust front’s vertical structure is in general agreement with earlier observations and numerical simulations, except that the transition from strong upward to strong downward motion was more abrupt. The maximum updraft, of almost 10 m s−1, was measured in the gust front at 1.35 km above ground level and was followed by equally strong downward motion only 1 min later at a slightly higher altitude.The observations support the earlier use of the continuity method for deriving the basic pattern of vertical motions in density currents from quasi-horizontal scan data.

Corresponding author address: Brooks E. Martner, NOAA/ETL, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80303.

bmartner@etl.noaa.gov

Save