Measurements of Raindrop Size Distributions over the Pacific Warm Pool and Implications for ZR Relations

Sandra E. Yuter
Search for other papers by Sandra E. Yuter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Robert A. Houze Jr.
Search for other papers by Robert A. Houze Jr. in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Raindrop images obtained on research flights of the NCAR Electra aircraft in the Tropical Oceans Global Atmosphere Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment (TOGA COARE) are analyzed. The drop size distributions, based on the images obtained in 6-s samples (about 750 m of flight track), are used to calculate both radar reflectivity Z and rain rate R. Airborne radar data from the NOAA P-3 aircraft flying in coordination with the Electra are used to categorize the particle-image data according to whether the drop images were obtained in regions of convective or stratiform precipitation.

Within stratiform precipitation, the same rain rate could be produced by a drop spectrum dominated by numerous small drops (lower reflectivity) or by a few large drops (higher reflectivity). The reflectivity values varied by as much as 9 dB for a given rain rate. Reflectivity data from the airborne radar and flight-level data reveal that the stratiform regions often contain fallstreaks of about 0.1–2 km in horizontal dimension. The fallstreaks are associated with large-drop spectra and local maxima in reflectivity up to approximately 40 dBZ and in rain rates up to 25 mm h−1. The fallstreaks extend downward from the melting band and bend with the low-level wind shear, but do not usually reach the surface. Thus, although relatively more uniform than convective regions, stratiform regions can be variable in reflectivity and rain rate at fine spatial scales in both the horizontal and vertical directions. Stratiform regions are therefore best characterized by their ensemble properties rather than the values of individual high-resolution measurements.

The variability of stratiform drop size spectra arises primarily from the occurrence of fallstreaks and the discontinuous nature of regions favoring aggregation of snow crystals, and it implies that ZR distributions associated with convective and stratiform precipitation are not statistically distinct. Thus, separate ZR relations for convective and stratiform precipitation are not justified, and techniques to distinguish between convective and stratiform precipitation based solely on the characteristics of drop size distributions are not likely to be accurate.

The variability of the drop size spectra in tropical precipitation makes an exponential fit to the ZR relation sensitive to the spatial scale over which Z and R are determined. This sensitivity can be avoided by using a probability-matched ZR relation. The probability-matched ZR relation for all the raindrop image data from the Electra collected between altitudes of 2.7 and 3.3 km in TOGA COARE is similar to the ZR relation obtained at the sea surface in the Global Atmospheric Research Program Atlantic Tropical Experiment.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Sandra E. Yuter, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351640, Seattle, WA 98195.

Abstract

Raindrop images obtained on research flights of the NCAR Electra aircraft in the Tropical Oceans Global Atmosphere Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment (TOGA COARE) are analyzed. The drop size distributions, based on the images obtained in 6-s samples (about 750 m of flight track), are used to calculate both radar reflectivity Z and rain rate R. Airborne radar data from the NOAA P-3 aircraft flying in coordination with the Electra are used to categorize the particle-image data according to whether the drop images were obtained in regions of convective or stratiform precipitation.

Within stratiform precipitation, the same rain rate could be produced by a drop spectrum dominated by numerous small drops (lower reflectivity) or by a few large drops (higher reflectivity). The reflectivity values varied by as much as 9 dB for a given rain rate. Reflectivity data from the airborne radar and flight-level data reveal that the stratiform regions often contain fallstreaks of about 0.1–2 km in horizontal dimension. The fallstreaks are associated with large-drop spectra and local maxima in reflectivity up to approximately 40 dBZ and in rain rates up to 25 mm h−1. The fallstreaks extend downward from the melting band and bend with the low-level wind shear, but do not usually reach the surface. Thus, although relatively more uniform than convective regions, stratiform regions can be variable in reflectivity and rain rate at fine spatial scales in both the horizontal and vertical directions. Stratiform regions are therefore best characterized by their ensemble properties rather than the values of individual high-resolution measurements.

The variability of stratiform drop size spectra arises primarily from the occurrence of fallstreaks and the discontinuous nature of regions favoring aggregation of snow crystals, and it implies that ZR distributions associated with convective and stratiform precipitation are not statistically distinct. Thus, separate ZR relations for convective and stratiform precipitation are not justified, and techniques to distinguish between convective and stratiform precipitation based solely on the characteristics of drop size distributions are not likely to be accurate.

The variability of the drop size spectra in tropical precipitation makes an exponential fit to the ZR relation sensitive to the spatial scale over which Z and R are determined. This sensitivity can be avoided by using a probability-matched ZR relation. The probability-matched ZR relation for all the raindrop image data from the Electra collected between altitudes of 2.7 and 3.3 km in TOGA COARE is similar to the ZR relation obtained at the sea surface in the Global Atmospheric Research Program Atlantic Tropical Experiment.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Sandra E. Yuter, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351640, Seattle, WA 98195.

Save
  • Atlas, D., P. Willis, and F. Marks, 1995: The effects of convective updrafts and downdrafts on reflectivity–rain rate relations and water budgets. Preprints, 27th Conf. on Radar Meteor., Vail, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 19–22.

  • Austin, P. M., 1987: Relation between measured radar reflectivity and surface rainfall. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 1053–1070.

  • ——, and S. G. Geotis, 1979: Raindrop sizes and related parameters for GATE. J. Appl. Meteor.,18, 569–575.

  • Battan, L. J., 1973: Radar Observation of the Atmosphere. University of Chicago Press, 324 pp.

  • Baumgardner, D., 1989: Airborne measurements for cloud microphysics. Research Aviation Facility Bulletin 24, 22 pp. [Available from NCAR, P. O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • Best, A. C., 1952: The evaporation of raindrops. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,78, 200–225.

  • Black, R. A., and J. Hallett, 1986: Observations of the distribution of ice in hurricanes. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 802–822.

  • Bond, G., and D. Alexander, 1994: TOGA COARE Meteorological Atlas. TOGA COARE International Project Office, 370 pp.

  • Braun, S. A., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1994: The transition zone and secondary maximum of radar reflectivity behind a midlatitude squall line: Results retrieved from Doppler radar data. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 2733–2755.

  • ——, and ——, 1996: The heat budget of a midlatitude squall line and implications for potential vorticity production. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 1217–1240.

  • Calheiros, R. V., and I. Zawadzki, 1987: Reflectivity–rain rate relationships for radar hydrology in Brazil. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,26, 118–132.

  • Churchill, D. D., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1984: Development and structure of winter monsoon cloud clusters on 10 December 1978. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 933–960.

  • Corbet, J., C. Mueller, C. Burghart, K. Gould, and G. Granger, 1994: Zeb: Software for geophysical data integration, display, and management of diverse environmental datasets. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,75, 783–792.

  • Durden, S. L., E. Im, F. K. Li, W. Ricketts, A. Tanner, and W. Wilson, 1994: ARMAR: An airborne rain-mapping radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,11, 727–737.

  • Fletcher, N. H., 1966: The Physics of Rainclouds. Cambridge University Press, 390 pp.

  • Friehe, C. A., S. P. Burns, D. Khelif, and X. Song, 1996: Meteorological and flux measurements from the NOAA WP3D aircraft in TOGA COARE. Preprints, Eighth Conf. on Air–Sea Interaction, Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor.Soc., 42–45.

  • Gamache, J. F., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1983: Water budget of a mesoscale convective system in the Tropics. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 1835–1850.

  • Gunn, R., and G. D. Kinzer, 1949: The terminal velocity of fall for water droplets in stagnant air. J. Meteor.,6, 243–248.

  • Hauser, D., and P. Amayenc, 1983: Exponential size distributions of raindrops and vertical air motions deduced from vertically pointing Doppler data using a new method. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,22, 407–418.

  • Hildebrand, P. H., C. A. Walther, C. L. Frush, J. Testud, and F. Baudin, 1994: The ELDORA/ASTRAIA airborne Doppler weather radar: Goals, design, and first field tests. Proc. IEEE,82, 1873–1890.

  • Hobbs, P. V., S. Chang, and J. D. Locatelli, 1974: The dimensions and aggregation of ice crystals in natural clouds. J. Geophys. Res.,79, 2199–2206.

  • Houghton, H. G., 1968: On precipitation mechanisms and their artificial modification. J. Appl. Meteor.,7, 851–859.

  • Houze, R. A., 1989: Observed structure of mesoscale convective systems and implication for large-scale heating. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,115, 425–461.

  • ——, 1993: Cloud Dynamics. Academic Press, 573 pp.

  • ——, and D. D. Churchill, 1987: Mesoscale organization and cloud microphysics in a Bay of Bengal depression. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 1845–1867.

  • Hu, Z., and R. C. Srivastava, 1995: Evolution of raindrop size distribution by coalescence, breakup, and evaporation: Theory and observations. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 1761–1783.

  • Hudlow, M. D., 1979: Mean rainfall patterns for the three phases of GATE. J. Appl. Meteor.,18, 1656–1669.

  • Huggel, A., W. Schmid, and A. Waldvogel, 1996: Raindrop size distributions and the radar bright band. J. Appl. Meteor.,35, 1688–1701.

  • Joss, J., and A. Waldvogel, 1967: Ein Spectrograph für Niederschlagstropfen mit automatischer Auswertung. Pure Appl. Geophys.,68, 240–246.

  • Kucera, P. A., and Coauthors, 1995: COARE IOP rainfall from shipborne radars: 2. Analysis and comparison of gridded fields. Preprints, 27th Conf. on Radar Meteor., Vail, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 681–683.

  • Leary, C. A., 1984: Precipitation structure of the cloud clusters in a tropical easterly wave. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 313–325.

  • Levin, Z., G. Feingold, S. Tzivion, and A. Waldvogel, 1991: The evolution of raindrop spectra: Comparisons between modeled and observed spectra along a mountain slope in Switzerland. J. Appl. Meteor.,30, 893–900.

  • Lilly, D. K., 1988: Cirrus outflow dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1594–1605.

  • List, R., and J. R. Gillespie, 1976: Evolution of raindrop spectra with collision-induced breakup. J. Atmos. Sci.,33, 2007–2013.

  • Locatelli, J. D., and P. V. Hobbs, 1974: Fall speeds and masses of solid precipitation particles. J. Geophys. Res.,79, 2185–2197.

  • Mapes, B. E., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1992: Satellite-observed cloud clusters in the TOGA COARE domain. TOGA Notes, April, 5–7.

  • ——, and ——, 1995: Diabatic divergence profiles in westernPacific mesoscale convective systems. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 1807–1828.

  • Mason, B. J., and R. Ramanadham, 1954: Modification of the size distribution of falling raindrops by coalescence. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,80, 388–394.

  • May, P. T., and D. K. Rajopadhyaya, 1996: Wind profiler observations of vertical motion and precipitation microphysics of a tropical squall line. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 621–633.

  • Rappaport, E. N., 1982: Structure and dynamics of an atypical tropical squall-line system M.S. thesis, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, 266 pp. [Available from University Microfilms, 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48103.].

  • Rigby, E. C., J. S. Marshall, and W. Hitschfeld, 1954: The development of the size distribution of raindrops during their fall. J. Meteor.,11, 362–372.

  • Rosenfeld, D., D. Atlas, D. B. Wolff, and E. Amitai, 1992: Beamwidth effects on ZR relations and area-integrated rainfall. J. Appl. Meteor.,31, 454–464.

  • ——, D. B. Wolff, and D. Atlas, 1993: General probability-matched relations between radar reflectivity and rain rate. J. Appl. Meteor.,32, 50–72.

  • Rousseuw, P. J., and A. M. Leroy, 1987: Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. Wiley and Sons, 329 pp.

  • Short, D. A., T. Kozu, and K. Nakamura, 1990: Rain rate and raindrop size distribution observations in Darwin Australia. Proc. URSI Commission F Open Symp. on Regional Factors in Predicting Radiowave Attenuation Due to Rain, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, International Union of Radio Science Commission, 35–40.

  • Smith, P. L., Z. Liu, and J. Joss, 1993: A study of sampling variability effects in raindrop size observations. J. Appl. Meteor.,32, 1259–1269.

  • Steiner, M., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1997: Sensitivity of the estimated monthly convective rain fraction to the choice of ZR relation. J. Appl. Meteor.,36, 452–462.

  • ——, ——, and S. E. Yuter, 1995: Climatological characterization of three-dimensional storm structure from operational radar and rain gauge data. J. Appl. Meteor.,34, 1978–2007.

  • Tokay, A., and D. A. Short, 1996: Evidence from tropical raindrop spectra of the origin of rain from stratiform versus convective clouds. J. Appl. Meteor.,35, 355–371.

  • Waldvogel, A., 1974: The No jump in raindrop spectra. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 1067–1078.

  • ——, W. Henrich, and W. Schmid, 1995: Raindrop size distributions and radar reflectivity profiles. Preprints, 27th Conf. on Radar Meteor., Vail, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 26–28.

  • Webster, P. J., and R. Lukas, 1992: TOGA COARE: The Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,73, 1377–1416.

  • Willis, P. T., R. A. Black, and F. D. Marks Jr., 1995: Airborne rain drop size distributions in TOGA COARE. Preprints, 21th Conf. on Hurricanes, Miami, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 431–433.

  • Yuter, S. E., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1995a: Three-dimensional kinematic and microphysical evolution of Florida cumulonimbus. Part I: Spatial distribution of updrafts, downdrafts, and precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 1921–1940.

  • ——, and ——, 1995b: Three-dimensional kinematic and microphysical evolution of Florida cumulonimbus. Part II: Frequency distributions of vertical velocity, reflectivity, and differential reflectivity. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 1941–1963.

  • ——, and ——, 1995c: Three-dimensional kinematic and microphysical evolution of Florida cumulonimbus. Part III: Vertical mass transport, mass divergence, and synthesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 1964–1983.

  • ——, ——, B. F. Smull, F. D. Marks Jr., J. R. Daugherty, and S. R. Brodzik, 1995: TOGA COARE aircraft mission summary images: An electronic atlas. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,76, 319–328.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2155 1401 29
PDF Downloads 579 172 4