Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

VALDRIFT—A Valley Atmospheric Dispersion Model

K. Jerry Allwine Allwine Environmental Services, Richland, Washington

Search for other papers by K. Jerry Allwine in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Xindi Bian Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

Search for other papers by Xindi Bian in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
C. David Whiteman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

Search for other papers by C. David Whiteman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Harold W. Thistle USDA Forest Service, Missoula, Montana

Search for other papers by Harold W. Thistle in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Aug 1997
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1076:VAVADM>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1076–1087
Restricted access

Abstract

VALDRIFT (valley drift) is a valley atmospheric transport, diffusion, and deposition model. The model is phenomenological—that is, the dominant meteorological processes governing the behavior of the valley atmosphere are formulated explicitly in the model, although in a highly parameterized fashion. The key meteorological processes treated are 1) nonsteady and nonhomogeneous along-valley winds and turbulent diffusivities, 2) convective boundary layer growth, 3) inversion descent, and 4) nocturnal temperature inversion breakup. The model is applicable under relatively cloud-free, undisturbed synoptic conditions in which the winds in the valley are predominantly along the valley’s axis. The model is configured to operate through one diurnal cycle for a single narrow valley. The inputs required are the valley topographic characteristics, pollutant release rate as a function of time and space, wind speed and direction as functions of time measured at one height, lateral and vertical turbulent eddy diffusivities as functions of stability, and the valley temperature inversion characteristics at sunrise. The outputs are three-dimensional concentration fields and ground-level deposition fields as functions of time. The scientific foundations of VALDRIFT are given in this paper along with a brief discussion of the model inputs and outputs. Air concentrations estimated by VALDRIFT compare favorably with results from a tracer experiment conducted in a deep mountain valley.

Corresponding author address: Dr. K. Jerry Allwine, Allwine Environmental Services, 1763 Duluth Street, Richland, WA 99352.

Abstract

VALDRIFT (valley drift) is a valley atmospheric transport, diffusion, and deposition model. The model is phenomenological—that is, the dominant meteorological processes governing the behavior of the valley atmosphere are formulated explicitly in the model, although in a highly parameterized fashion. The key meteorological processes treated are 1) nonsteady and nonhomogeneous along-valley winds and turbulent diffusivities, 2) convective boundary layer growth, 3) inversion descent, and 4) nocturnal temperature inversion breakup. The model is applicable under relatively cloud-free, undisturbed synoptic conditions in which the winds in the valley are predominantly along the valley’s axis. The model is configured to operate through one diurnal cycle for a single narrow valley. The inputs required are the valley topographic characteristics, pollutant release rate as a function of time and space, wind speed and direction as functions of time measured at one height, lateral and vertical turbulent eddy diffusivities as functions of stability, and the valley temperature inversion characteristics at sunrise. The outputs are three-dimensional concentration fields and ground-level deposition fields as functions of time. The scientific foundations of VALDRIFT are given in this paper along with a brief discussion of the model inputs and outputs. Air concentrations estimated by VALDRIFT compare favorably with results from a tracer experiment conducted in a deep mountain valley.

Corresponding author address: Dr. K. Jerry Allwine, Allwine Environmental Services, 1763 Duluth Street, Richland, WA 99352.

Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Allwine, K. J., 1992: Atmospheric dispersion in mountain valleys and basins. PNL-7922, 207 pp. [Available from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352.].

  • ——, 1993: Atmospheric dispersion and tracer ventilation in a deep mountain valley. J. Appl. Meteor.,32, 1017–1037.

  • ——, X. Bian, and C. D. Whiteman, 1995: VALDRIFT 1.0—A valley atmospheric dispersion model with deposition. PNL-10586, 136 pp. [Available from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352.].

  • Bader, D. C., and T. B. McKee, 1985: Effects of shear, stability and valley characteristics on the destruction of temperature inversions. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,24, 822–832.

  • ——, and C. D. Whiteman, 1989: Numerical simulation of cross-valley plume dispersion during the morning transition period. J. Appl. Meteor.,28, 652–664.

  • Bilanin, A. J., M. E. Teske, J. W. Barry, and R. B. Ekblad, 1989: AGDISP: The aircraft spray dispersion model, code development and experimental validation. Trans. ASAE,32, 327–334.

  • Businger, J. A., J. C. Wyngaard, Y. Izumi, and E. F. Bradley, 1971: Flux profile relations in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,28, 181–189.

  • Clements, W. E., J. A. Archuleta, and P. H. Gudiksen, 1989a: Experimental design of the 1984 ASCOT field study. J. Appl. Meteor.,28, 405–413.

  • ——, ——, and D. E. Hoard, 1989b: Mean structure of the nocturnal drainage flow in a deep valley. J. Appl. Meteor.,28, 457–462.

  • Doran, J. C., T. W. Horst, and C. D. Whiteman, 1990: The development and structure of nocturnal slope winds in a simple valley. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,52, 41–68.

  • Ekblad, R. B., and J. W. Barry, 1990: Selection and verification of complex terrain wind flow model for spray transport—Briefing paper and progress report. USDA Forest Service Rep. 5E52P29 WIND, 100 pp. [Available from Missoula Technology Development Center, Fort Missoula, Building 1, Missoula, MT 59801.].

  • ——, C. D. Whiteman, K. J. Allwine, and J. W. Barry, 1991: Wind flow model for spray transport in complex terrain. 1991 Proc. Int. Summer Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Albuquerque, NM, ASAE, 1–13.

  • Gryning, S.-E., and E. Lyck, 1983: A tracer investigation of the atmospheric dispersion in the Drynaes Valley, Greenland. RISO-R-481, 67 pp. [Available from RISO National Laboratory, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.].

  • Gudiksen, P. H., G. J. Ferber, M. M. Fowler, W. L. Eberhard, M. A. Fosberg, and W. R. Knuth, 1984: Field studies of transport and dispersion of atmospheric tracers in nocturnal drainage flows. Atmos. Environ.,18, 713–732.

  • Hanna, S. R., G. A. Briggs, and R. P. Hosker, 1982: Handbook on atmospheric diffusion. DOETIC-11223, 102 pp. [NTIS DE82 002 045.].

  • Hewson, E. W., and G. C. Gill, 1944: Meteorological investigations in Columbia River valley near Trail, B.C. Bur. Mines Bull.,453, 23–228.

  • McNider, R. T., 1981: Investigation of the impact of topographic circulations on the transport and dispersion of air pollutants. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia, 185 pp. [Available from UniversityMicrofilms, 300 Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.].

  • Panofsky, H. A., and J. A. Dutton, 1984: Atmospheric Turbulence, Models and Methods for Engineering Applications. John Wiley and Sons, 397 pp.

  • Segal, M., C. H. Yu, R. W. Arritt, and R. A. Pielke, 1988: On the impact of valley/ridge thermally induced circulations on regional pollutant transport. Atmos. Environ.,22, 471–486.

  • Start, G. E., C. R. Dickson, and L. L. Wendell, 1975: Diffusion in a canyon within rough mountainous terrain. J. Appl. Meteor.,14, 333–346.

  • Teske, M. E., J. F. Bowers, J. E. Rafferty, and John W. Barry, 1993: FSCBG: An aerial spray dispersion model for predicting the fate of released material behind aircraft. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.,12, 453–464.

  • Tyson, P. D., 1969: Air pollution fumigation conditions associated with the dissipation of the mountain wind and onset of the valley wind over Pietermaritzburg. South. Afr. Geogr. J.,51, 99–105.

  • Vergeiner, I., E. Dreiseitl, and C. D. Whiteman, 1987: Dynamics of katabatic winds in Colorado’s Brush Creek valley. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 148–157.

  • Wanner, H., and J. Hertig, 1984: Studies of urban climates and air pollution in Switzerland. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,23, 1614–1625.

  • Whiteman, C. D., 1989: Morning transition tracer experiments in a deep narrow valley. J. Appl. Meteor.,28, 626–635.

  • ——, 1990: Effects of valley meteorology on forest pesticide spraying. PNL-7332, 19 pp. [Available from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352.].

  • ——, and T. B. McKee, 1982: Breakup of temperature inversions in deep mountain valleys: Part II. Thermodynamic model. J. Appl. Meteor.,21, 290–302.

  • ——, and K. J. Allwine, 1985: VALMET—A valley air pollution model. PNL-4728 Rev. 1, 190 pp. [Available from Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352.].

  • ——, and ——, 1986: Extraterrestrial solar radiation on inclined surfaces. Environ. Software,1, 164–169.

  • Willson, R., F. Shair, B. Reynolds, and W. Greene, 1983: Characterization of the transport and diffusion of pollutants in a narrow mountain valley region by means of an atmospheric tracer. Atmos. Environ.,17, 1633–1647.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 489 151 63
PDF Downloads 155 57 3