Estimates of Root-Mean-Square Random Error for Finite Samples of Estimated Precipitation

George J. Huffman NASA/GSFC Laboratory for Atmospheres and Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by George J. Huffman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The random errors contained in a finite set E of precipitation estimates result from both finite sampling and measurement–algorithm effects. The expected root-mean-square random error associated with the estimated average precipitation in E is shown to be σr = [(Hp)/pNI]1/2, where is the space–time-average precipitation estimate over E, H is a function of the shape of the probability distribution of precipitation (the nondimensional second moment), p is the frequency of nonzero precipitation in E, and NI is the number of independent samples in E. All of these quantities are variables of the space–time-average dataset. In practice H is nearly constant and close to the value 1.5 over most of the globe. An approximate form of σr is derived that accommodates the limitations of typical monthly datasets, then it is applied to the microwave, infrared, and gauge precipitation monthly datasets from the Global Precipitation Climatology Project. As an aid to visualizing differences in σr for various datasets, a “quality index” is introduced. Calibration in a few locations with dense gauge networks reveals that the approximate form is a reasonable first step in estimating σr.

Corresponding author address: George J. Huffman, Code 912, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771.

Abstract

The random errors contained in a finite set E of precipitation estimates result from both finite sampling and measurement–algorithm effects. The expected root-mean-square random error associated with the estimated average precipitation in E is shown to be σr = [(Hp)/pNI]1/2, where is the space–time-average precipitation estimate over E, H is a function of the shape of the probability distribution of precipitation (the nondimensional second moment), p is the frequency of nonzero precipitation in E, and NI is the number of independent samples in E. All of these quantities are variables of the space–time-average dataset. In practice H is nearly constant and close to the value 1.5 over most of the globe. An approximate form of σr is derived that accommodates the limitations of typical monthly datasets, then it is applied to the microwave, infrared, and gauge precipitation monthly datasets from the Global Precipitation Climatology Project. As an aid to visualizing differences in σr for various datasets, a “quality index” is introduced. Calibration in a few locations with dense gauge networks reveals that the approximate form is a reasonable first step in estimating σr.

Corresponding author address: George J. Huffman, Code 912, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771.

Save
  • Adler, R. F., G. J. Huffman, and P. R. Keehn, 1994: Global rain estimates from microwave-adjusted geosynchronous IR data. Remote Sens. Rev.,11, 125–152.

  • Bell, T. L., A. Abdullah, R. L. Martin, and G. R. North, 1990: Sampling errors for satellite-derived tropical rainfall: Monte Carlo study using a space-time stochastic model. J. Geophys. Res.,95, 2195–2205.

  • ——, P. K. Kundu, and C. Kummerow, 1996: Sampling error of satellite estimates of gridded rainfall. Preprints, 13th Conf. on Probability and Statistics in the Atmospheric Sciences, San Francisco, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 296–300.

  • Daly, C., R. P. Neilson, and D. L. Phillips, 1994: A statistical-topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. J. Appl. Meteor.,33, 140–158.

  • Huffman, G. J., R. F. Adler, B. Rudolf, U. Schneider, and P. R. Keehn, 1995: Global precipitation estimates based on a technique for combining satellite-based estimates, rain gauge analysis, and NWP model precipitation information. J. Climate,8, 1284–1295.

  • ——, ——, P. Arkin, A. Chang, R. Ferraro, A. Gruber, J. Janowiak, A. McNab, B. Rudolf, and U. Schneider, 1997: The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Combined Precipitation Dataset. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,78, 5–20.

  • Kedem, B., L. S. Chiu, and G. R. North, 1990: Estimation of mean rain rate: Application to satellite observations. J. Geophys. Res.,95, 1965–1972.

  • Morrissey, M. L., M. A. Schafer, S. E. Postawko, and B. Gibson, 1995: The Pacific rain gage rainfall database. Water Resour. Res.,31, 2111–2113.

  • North, G. R., and S. Nakamoto, 1989: Formalism for comparing rain estimation designs. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,6, 985–992.

  • ——, S. S. P. Shen, and R. B. Upson, 1991: Combining rain gages with satellite measurements for optimal estimates of area-time averaged rain rates. Water Resour. Res.,27, 2785–2790.

  • Simpson, J., R. F. Adler, and G. R. North, 1988: A proposed Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission satellite. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,69, 278–295.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 3356 1895 41
PDF Downloads 755 160 13