Discrimination between Rain and Snow with a Polarimetric Radar

A. V. Ryzhkov Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by A. V. Ryzhkov in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
D. S. Zrnic National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by D. S. Zrnic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Polarimetric signatures of snow precipitation for six Oklahoma snowstorms are examined. The available data consist of specific differential phase KDP, differential reflectivity ZDR, cross-correlation coefficient ρhv, and radar reflectivity factor Z. These data were obtained with the 10-cm-wavelength Cimarron polarimetric weather radar. The data suggest that in pure snow the average values of KDP and ZDR do not follow a systematic trend with change of the radar reflectivity factor if Z < 35 dBZ; this is not the case in rain. Precipitation is qualified as snow if the average ZDR is less than 0.2 dB for Z < 35 dBZ. The presence of a bright band with a pronounced ρhv minimum and ZDR maximum is a good discernible feature for discriminating between snow and rain. Thus, a localized deep minimum of the cross-correlation coefficient delineates the transition region between snow and rain in the horizontal direction if sufficiently large snowflakes are generated in the transition area. Otherwise, a sharp change of ZDR can be used to localize the position of the snow–rain line.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Alexander V. Ryzhkov, CIMMS, NOAA/NSSL, 1313 Halley Circle, Norman, OK 73069.

Abstract

Polarimetric signatures of snow precipitation for six Oklahoma snowstorms are examined. The available data consist of specific differential phase KDP, differential reflectivity ZDR, cross-correlation coefficient ρhv, and radar reflectivity factor Z. These data were obtained with the 10-cm-wavelength Cimarron polarimetric weather radar. The data suggest that in pure snow the average values of KDP and ZDR do not follow a systematic trend with change of the radar reflectivity factor if Z < 35 dBZ; this is not the case in rain. Precipitation is qualified as snow if the average ZDR is less than 0.2 dB for Z < 35 dBZ. The presence of a bright band with a pronounced ρhv minimum and ZDR maximum is a good discernible feature for discriminating between snow and rain. Thus, a localized deep minimum of the cross-correlation coefficient delineates the transition region between snow and rain in the horizontal direction if sufficiently large snowflakes are generated in the transition area. Otherwise, a sharp change of ZDR can be used to localize the position of the snow–rain line.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Alexander V. Ryzhkov, CIMMS, NOAA/NSSL, 1313 Halley Circle, Norman, OK 73069.

Save
  • Aydin, K., T. A. Seliga, and V. Balaji, 1986: Remote sensing of hail with a dual linear polarization radar. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,25, 1475–1484.

  • Balakrishnan, N., and D. S. Zrnic, 1990: Estimation of rain and hail rates in mixed-phase precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 565–583.

  • Brown, P., and P. Francis, 1995: Improved measurements of the ice water content in cirrus using a total-water probe. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,12, 410–414.

  • Fabry, F., and I. Zawadzki, 1995: Long-term observations of the melting layer of precipitation and their interpretation. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 838–851.

  • Gunn, K. L. S., and J. S. Marshall, 1958: The distribution with size of aggregate snowflakes. J. Meteor.,15, 452–461.

  • Hall, M., J. Goddard, and S. Cherry, 1984: Identification of hydrometeors and other targets by dual-polarization radar. Radio Sci.,19, 132–140.

  • Leitao, M. J., and P. A. Watson, 1984: Application of dual linearly polarized radar data to prediction of microwave path attenuation. Radio Sci.,19, 209–221.

  • Maekawa, Y., S. Fukao, Y. Sonoi, and F. Yoshino, 1993: Distribution of ice particles in wintertime thunderclouds detected by a C band dual polarization radar: A case study. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 16 613–16 622.

  • Martner, B. E., J. Snyder, R. Zamora, G. Byrd, T. Nizol, and P. Joe, 1993: A remote-sensing view of a freezing-rain storm. Mon. Wea Rev.,121, 2562–2577.

  • Meischner, P., V. N. Bringi, M. Hagen, and H. Holler, 1991: Multiparameter radar characterization of a melting layer compared with in situ measurements. Preprints, 25th Int. Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Paris, France, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 721–724.

  • Ryzhkov, A. V., and D. S. Zrnic, 1996: Assessment of rainfall measurement that uses specific differential phase. J. Appl. Meteor.,35, 2080–2090.

  • ——, and ——, 1998: Polarimetric method for ice water content determination. J. Appl. Meteor.,37, 125–134.

  • Stewart, R. E., 1992: Precipitation types in the transition region of winter storms. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,73, 287–296.

  • ——, J. D. Marwitz, J. C. Pace, and R. E. Carbone, 1984: Characteristics through the melting layer of stratiform clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 3227–3237.

  • Vivekanandan, J., V. N. Bringi, M. Hagen, and P. Meischner, 1994: Polarimetric radar studies of atmospheric ice particles. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,32, 1–10.

  • Willis, T. W., and A. J. Heymsfield, 1989: Structure of the melting layer in mesoscale convective system stratiform precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 2008–2025.

  • Zahrai, A., and D. S. Zrnic, 1993: The 10-cm wavelength polarimetric weather radar at NOAA’s National Severe Storms Laboratory. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,10, 649–662.

  • Zrnic, D. S., N. Balakrishnan, C. Ziegler, V. Bringi, K. Aydin, and T. Matejka, 1993: Polarimetric signatures in the stratiform region of a mesoscale convective system. J. Appl. Meteor.,32, 678–693.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1689 426 29
PDF Downloads 687 144 13