Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Idealized Simulations of Atmospheric Coastal Flow along the Central Coast of California

Zhiqiang Cui Department of Meteorology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Search for other papers by Zhiqiang Cui in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Michael Tjernström Department of Meteorology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Search for other papers by Michael Tjernström in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Branko Grisogono Department of Meteorology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Search for other papers by Branko Grisogono in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Oct 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037<1332:ISOACF>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1332–1363
Restricted access

Abstract

A fully nonlinear, primitive equation hydrostatic numerical model is utilized to study coastal flow along central California, combining a realistic atmospheric model, with a higher-order turbulence closure, with highly simplified background flow. Local terrain and surface forcing of the model are treated realistically, while the synoptic-scale forcing is constant in time and space. Several different simulations with different background wind directions were performed. The motivation is to isolate the main properties of the local flow dependent on the coastal mesoscale influence only and to facilitate a study of the structure of the coastal atmospheric boundary layer, the mean momentum budget, and the atmospheric forcing on the coastal ocean for simplified quasi-stationary but still typical conditions. The model results feature the expected summertime flow phenomena, even with this simplified forcing. A coastal jet occurs in all simulations, and its diurnal variability is realistically simulated. The coastal topography serves as a barrier, and the low-level coastal flow is essentially coast parallel.

Among the conclusions are the following. (i) The boundary layer for a northerly jet is more shallow and more variable than that for a southerly jet. One reason is an interaction between waves generated by the coastal mountains and the boundary layer. A realistic inclusion of the Sierra Nevada is important, even for the near-surface coastal atmosphere. (ii) The transition from southerly to northerly flow, when changing the background flow direction, is abrupt for a change in the latter from west to northwest and more gradual for a change east to south. (iii) The low-level flow is in general semigeostrophic. The across-coast momentum balance is geostrophic, while the along-coast momentum balance is dominated by vertical stress divergence and the pressure gradient. Local acceleration and spatial variability close to the coast arise as a consequence of the balance among the remaining terms. For southeasterly background flow, the across-coast momentum balance is dominated by the background synoptic-scale and the mesoscale pressure gradients, sometimes canceling the forcing, thus making this case transitional. (iv) Smaller-scale flow transitions arise for some background flow directions, including an early morning jet reversal north of Monterey, California, and a morning-to-noon low-level eddy formation in the Southern Californian Bight. (v) The model turbulence parameterization provides realistic patterns of the atmospheric forcing on the coastal ocean. (vi) Characteristic signals measured in propagating wind reversals related to boundary layer depth and inversion structure here are seen to correspond to different quasi-stationary conditions.

* Current affiliation: School of Geography, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Current affiliation: Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Corresponding author address: Michael Tjernström, Department of Meteorology, Uppsala University, Box 516, S-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden.

Abstract

A fully nonlinear, primitive equation hydrostatic numerical model is utilized to study coastal flow along central California, combining a realistic atmospheric model, with a higher-order turbulence closure, with highly simplified background flow. Local terrain and surface forcing of the model are treated realistically, while the synoptic-scale forcing is constant in time and space. Several different simulations with different background wind directions were performed. The motivation is to isolate the main properties of the local flow dependent on the coastal mesoscale influence only and to facilitate a study of the structure of the coastal atmospheric boundary layer, the mean momentum budget, and the atmospheric forcing on the coastal ocean for simplified quasi-stationary but still typical conditions. The model results feature the expected summertime flow phenomena, even with this simplified forcing. A coastal jet occurs in all simulations, and its diurnal variability is realistically simulated. The coastal topography serves as a barrier, and the low-level coastal flow is essentially coast parallel.

Among the conclusions are the following. (i) The boundary layer for a northerly jet is more shallow and more variable than that for a southerly jet. One reason is an interaction between waves generated by the coastal mountains and the boundary layer. A realistic inclusion of the Sierra Nevada is important, even for the near-surface coastal atmosphere. (ii) The transition from southerly to northerly flow, when changing the background flow direction, is abrupt for a change in the latter from west to northwest and more gradual for a change east to south. (iii) The low-level flow is in general semigeostrophic. The across-coast momentum balance is geostrophic, while the along-coast momentum balance is dominated by vertical stress divergence and the pressure gradient. Local acceleration and spatial variability close to the coast arise as a consequence of the balance among the remaining terms. For southeasterly background flow, the across-coast momentum balance is dominated by the background synoptic-scale and the mesoscale pressure gradients, sometimes canceling the forcing, thus making this case transitional. (iv) Smaller-scale flow transitions arise for some background flow directions, including an early morning jet reversal north of Monterey, California, and a morning-to-noon low-level eddy formation in the Southern Californian Bight. (v) The model turbulence parameterization provides realistic patterns of the atmospheric forcing on the coastal ocean. (vi) Characteristic signals measured in propagating wind reversals related to boundary layer depth and inversion structure here are seen to correspond to different quasi-stationary conditions.

* Current affiliation: School of Geography, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Current affiliation: Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Corresponding author address: Michael Tjernström, Department of Meteorology, Uppsala University, Box 516, S-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden.

Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Andrén, A., 1990: Evaluation of a turbulence closure scheme suitable for air-pollution applications. J. Appl. Meteor.,29, 224–239.

  • Banta, R. M., 1995: Sea breezes shallow and deep on the California coast. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 3614–3622.

  • ——, L. D. Olivier, and D. H. Levinson, 1993: Evolution of the Monterey Bay sea-breeze layer as observed by pulsed Doppler lidar. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 3959–3982.

  • Beardsley, R. C., C. E. Dorman, C. A. Friehe, L. K. Rosenfeld, and C. D. Winant, 1987: Local atmospheric forcing during the coastal ocean dynamics experiment. 1. A description of the marine boundary-layer and atmospheric conditions over a northern California upwelling region. J. Geophys. Res.,92, 1467–1488.

  • Bond, N. A., C. F. Mass, and J. E. Overland, 1996: Coastally trapped wind reversals along the United States west coast during the warm season. Part I: Climatology and temporal evolution. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 430–445.

  • Burk, S. D., and W. T. Thompson, 1996: The summertime low-level jet and marine boundary-layer structure along the California coast. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 668–686.

  • Dorman, C. E., 1985: Evidence of Kelvin waves in California’s marine layer and related eddy generation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 827–839.

  • ——, 1987: Possible role of gravity currents in northern California coastal summer wind reversals. J. Geophys. Res.,92, 1497–1506.

  • ——, 1988: Comments on “Coastal southerlies and alongshore surges of the west coast of North America: Evidence of mesoscale topographically trapped response to synoptic forcing.” Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 2401–2406.

  • ——, and C. D. Winant, 1995: Buoy observations of the atmosphere along the west coast of the United States, 1981–1990. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 16 029–16 044.

  • Enger, L., 1983: Numerical boundary layer modeling with applications to diffusion. Rep. 70, Department of Meteorology, Uppsala University, 54 pp. [Available from Dept. of Earth Science, Uppsala University, Villarägen 16, S-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden.].

  • ——, 1986: A higher order closure model applied to dispersion in a convective PBL. Atmos. Environ.,20, 879–894.

  • ——, 1990a: Simulation of dispersion in moderately complex terrain—Part A. The fluid dynamic model. Atmos. Environ.,24A, 2431–2446.

  • ——, 1990b: Simulation of dispersion in moderately complex terrain—Part B. The higher-order closure dispersion model. Atmos. Environ.,24A, 2447–2455.

  • ——, and M. Tjernström, 1991: Estimating the effect on the regional precipitation climate in a semi-arid region caused by an artificial lake using a mesoscale model. J. Appl. Meteor.,30, 227–250.

  • ——, D. Koracin, and X. Yang, 1993: A numerical study of the boundary layer dynamics in a mountain valley. Part 1: Model validation and sensitivity experiments. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,66, 357–394.

  • Enriques, A. G., and C. A. Friehe, 1997, Parameterization of momentum, heat, and moisture fluxes over a coastal upwelling area. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 5781–5798.

  • Gill, A. E., 1982: Atmosphere–Ocean Dynamics. Academic Press, 662 pp.

  • Grisogono, B., 1995: A generalized Ekman layer profile with gradually varying eddy diffusivities. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,121, 445–453.

  • ——, and M. Tjernström, 1996: Thermal mesoscale circulations on the Baltic coast. 2. Perturbation of surface parameters. J. Geophys. Res.,101 (D14), 18 999–19 012.

  • ——, S. C. Pryor, and R. E. Keislar, 1993: Mountain wave drag over double bell-shaped orography. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,119, 199–206.

  • Kelly, K. A., 1985: The influence of winds and topography on the sea-surface temperature patterns over the northern California slope. J. Geophys. Res.,90, 1783–1778.

  • Klemp, J. B., R. Rotunno, and W. C. Skamarock, 1994: On the dynamics of gravity currents in a channel. J. Fluid. Mech.,269, 169–198.

  • Koracin, D., and L. Enger, 1994: A numerical study of boundary-layer dynamics in a mountain valley. Part 2: Observed and simulated characteristics of atmospheric stability and local flows. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,69, 249–283.

  • Mass, C. F., and M. D. Albright, 1987: Coastal southerlies and alongshore surges of the west coast of North America: Evidence of mesoscale topographically trapped response to synoptic forcing. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 1707–1738.

  • ——, and N. A. Bond, 1996: Coastally trapped wind reversals along the United States west coast during the warm season. Part II: Synoptic evolution. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 446–461.

  • ——, M. D. Albright, and D. J. Brees, 1986: The onshore surge of marine air into the Pacific Northwest: A coastal region of complex terrain. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 2602–2627.

  • Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1974: A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 1791–1806.

  • Miranda, P. M. A., and I. N. James, 1992: Nonlinear 3-dimensional effects on gravity-wave drag—Splitting flow and breaking waves. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,118, 1057–1081.

  • Nappo, C. J., and G. Chimonas, 1992: Wave exchange between the ground surface and a boundary-layer critical-level. J. Atmos. Sci.,49, 1075–1091.

  • Nelson, C. S., and D. M. Husby, 1983: Climatology of surface heat fluxes over the California current region. NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS SSRF-763, 87 pp.

  • Overland, J. E., 1984: Scale analysis of marine winds in straits and along mountainous coasts. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 2532–2536.

  • ——, and N. Bond, 1993: The influence of coastal orography: The Yautat storm. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 1388–1397.

  • ——, and ——, 1995: Observations and scale analysis of coastal wind jets. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 2934–2941.

  • Pielke, R. A., 1984: Mesoscale Meteorological Modeling. Academic Press, 599 pp.

  • Reason, C. J. C., and D. G. Steyn, 1992: The dynamics of coastally trapped mesoscale ridges in the lower atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,49, 1677–1692.

  • Rogers, D. P., D. W. Johnson, and C. A. Friehe, 1995a: The stable internal boundary layer over a coastal sea. Part I: Airborne measurements of the mean and turbulence structure. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 667–683.

  • ——, ——, and ——, 1995b: The stable internal boundary layer over a coastal sea. Part II: Gravity waves and the momentum balance. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 684–696.

  • Rogerson, A. M., and R. M. Samelson, 1995: Synoptic forcing of coastal-trapped disturbances in the marine atmospheric boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2025–2040.

  • ——, and ——, 1996: Supercritical flow and coastal-trapped disturbances in the marine atmospheric boundary layer. AGU Ocean Science Meeting, San Diego, CA, Amer. Geophys. Union, 123.

  • Samelson, R. M., and S. J. Lentz, 1994: The horizontal momentum balance in the marine atmospheric boundary layer during CODE-2. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 3745–3757.

  • Skamarock, W. C., R. Rotunno, and J. B. Klemp, 1998: Models of coastally trapped distrubances. Preprints, Second Conf. on Coastal Atmospheric and Oceanic Prediction and Processes, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 178–185.

  • Smith, R. B., 1979: The influence of the earth’s rotation on mountain wave drag. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 177–180.

  • Svensson, G., 1996a: A numerical model for chemical and meteorological processes in the atmospheric boundary layer. Part I: A model description and a parameter study. J. Appl. Meteor.,35, 939–954.

  • ——, 1996b: A numerical model for chemical and meteorological processes in the atmospheric boundary layer. Part II: A case study of the air-quality situation in Athens, Greece. J. Appl. Meteor.35, 955–973.

  • ——, 1998: Model simulations of the air-quality in Athens, Greece, during the MEDCAPHOT-TRACE campaign. Atmos. Environ.,32, 2239–2268.

  • ——, and O. Klemm, 1998: Aircraft measurements and model simulations of the air-quality in Athens, Greece. Atmos. Environ.,32, 2269–2290.

  • Thompson, O. E., P. A. Arkin, and W. D. Bonner, 1976: Diurnal variations of the summertime wind and force field at three Midwestern locations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 1012–1022.

  • Thompson, W. T., and J. M. Bane, 1998: Modeling and observations of coastally trapped wind reversals, Preprints, Second Conf. on Coastal Atmospheric and Oceanic Prediction and Processes, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 194–201.

  • Tjernström, M., 1987a: A study of flow over complex terrain using a three-dimensional model: A preliminary model evaluation focusing on stratus and fog. Ann. Geophys.,88, 469–486.

  • ——, 1987b: A three-dimensional meso-γ-scale model for studies of stratiform boundary layer clouds: A model description. Department of Meteorology Rep. 85, Uppsala University, 44 pp. [Available from Dept. of Earth Science, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, S-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden.].

  • ——, 1988a: Numerical simulations of stratiform boundary-layer clouds on the meso-γ-scale. Part I: The influence of terrain height differences. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,44, 33–72.

  • ——, 1988b: Numerical simulations of stratiform boundary-layer clouds on the meso-γ-scale. Part II: The influence of a step change in surface roughness and surface temperature. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,44, 307–230.

  • ——, 1989: Some tests with a surface energy balance scheme, including a bulk parameterization for vegetation, in a mesoscale model. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,48, 33–68.

  • ——, and D. Koracin, 1995: Modeling the impact of stratocumulus on boundary layer structure. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 863–878.

  • ——, and B. Grisogono, 1996: Thermal mesoscale circulations on the Baltic coast. I: A numerical case study. J. Geophys. Res.,101 (D14), 18 979–18 997.

  • Winant, C. D., C. E. Dorman, C. A. Friehe, and R. C. Beardsley, 1988: The marine layer off Northern California: An example of supercritical channel flow. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 3588–3605.

  • Yamada, T., and G. Mellor, 1979: A numerical simulation of the BOMEX data using a turbulence closure model coupled with ensemble cloud relations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,105, 915–944.

  • Young, G. S., and R. A. Pielke, 1983: Application of terrain height variance spectra to mesoscale modeling. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 2555–2560.

  • Zemba, J., and C. A. Friehe, 1987: The marine atmospheric boundary-layer jet in the coastal ocean dynamics experiment. J. Geophys. Res.,92, 1489–1496.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1505 1103 40
PDF Downloads 132 39 0