Estimating Cloud Type from Pyranometer Observations

Claude E. Duchon School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Claude E. Duchon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Mark S. O’Malley School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Mark S. O’Malley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

In this paper the authors evaluate an inexpensive and automatable method to estimate cloud type at a given location during daylight hours using the time series of irradiance from a pyranometer. The motivation for this investigation is to provide ground-based estimates of cloud type at locations where there are no human observations of sky condition. A pyranometer naturally measures the effect of intervening clouds along the solar beam path to the sensor. Because a daily time series of irradiance is nonstationary, it is appropriately scaled to yield a stationary time series. From the latter, the standard deviation and ratio of observed irradiance to clear-sky irradiance derived from a 21-min moving window are related to one of the following cloud types or conditions:cirrus, cumulus, cirrus and cumulus, stratus, precipitation or fog, no clouds, and other clouds. Comparisons with human observations at the Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Calibration and Radiation Testbed site in northern Oklahoma show that the pyranometer method and human observations are in agreement about 45% of the time. Many of the differences can be attributed to two factors: 1) the pyranometer method is weighted toward clouds crossing the sun’s path, while the human observer can view clouds over the entire sky, and 2) the presence of aerosols causes the pyranometer to overestimate the occurrence of cirrus and cirrus plus cumulus. When attenuation of the solar beam by aerosols is negligible or can be accounted for, the pyranometer method should be especially useful for cloud-type assessment where no other sky observations are available.

Corresponding author address: Prof. Claude E. Duchon, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 1310 Energy Center, 100 East Boyd, Norman, OK 73019-0470.

Abstract

In this paper the authors evaluate an inexpensive and automatable method to estimate cloud type at a given location during daylight hours using the time series of irradiance from a pyranometer. The motivation for this investigation is to provide ground-based estimates of cloud type at locations where there are no human observations of sky condition. A pyranometer naturally measures the effect of intervening clouds along the solar beam path to the sensor. Because a daily time series of irradiance is nonstationary, it is appropriately scaled to yield a stationary time series. From the latter, the standard deviation and ratio of observed irradiance to clear-sky irradiance derived from a 21-min moving window are related to one of the following cloud types or conditions:cirrus, cumulus, cirrus and cumulus, stratus, precipitation or fog, no clouds, and other clouds. Comparisons with human observations at the Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Calibration and Radiation Testbed site in northern Oklahoma show that the pyranometer method and human observations are in agreement about 45% of the time. Many of the differences can be attributed to two factors: 1) the pyranometer method is weighted toward clouds crossing the sun’s path, while the human observer can view clouds over the entire sky, and 2) the presence of aerosols causes the pyranometer to overestimate the occurrence of cirrus and cirrus plus cumulus. When attenuation of the solar beam by aerosols is negligible or can be accounted for, the pyranometer method should be especially useful for cloud-type assessment where no other sky observations are available.

Corresponding author address: Prof. Claude E. Duchon, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 1310 Energy Center, 100 East Boyd, Norman, OK 73019-0470.

Save
  • Atwater, M. A., and P. S. Brown, 1974: Numerical computations of the latitudinal variation of solar radiation for an atmosphere of varying opacity. J. Appl. Meteor.,13, 289–297.

  • ——, and J. T. Ball, 1981: A surface solar radiation model for cloudy atmospheres. Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 878–888.

  • Barnett, T. P., J. Ritchie, J. Foat, and G. Stokes, 1998: On the space–time scales of the surface solar radiation field. J. Climate,11, 88–96.

  • Bland, W. L., 1996: Uncertainty of daily insolation estimates from a mesoscale pyranometer network. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,13, 255–261.

  • Brock, F. V., K. C. Crawford, R. L. Elliott, G. W. Cuperus, S. J. Stadler, H. L. Johnson, and M. D. Eilts, 1995: The Oklahoma Mesonet: A technical review. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,12, 5–19.

  • Coakley, J. A., R. D. Cess, and F. B. Yurevich, 1983: The effect of tropospheric aerosols on the earth’s radiation budget: A parameterization for climate models. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 116–138.

  • Eppley Laboratory, Inc., 1976: Instrumentation for the measurement of the components of solar and terrestrial radiation. Eppley Laboratory, Inc., Newport, RI, 12 pp.

  • Harrison, L., and J. Michalsky, 1994: Objective algorithms for the retrieval of optical depths from ground-based measurements. Appl. Opt.,33, 5126–5132.

  • Iqbal, M., 1983: An Introduction to Solar Radiation. Academic Press, 390 pp.

  • Kondratyev, K. Ya., 1969: Radiation in the Atmosphere. Academic Press, 912 pp.

  • List, R. J., 1968: Smithsonian Meteorological Tables. 6th ed. Smithsonian Institution Press, 527 pp.

  • McDonald, J. E., 1960: Direct absorption of solar radiation by atmospheric water vapor. J. Meteor.,17, 319–328.

  • Meyers, T. P., and R. F. Dale, 1983: Predicting daily insolation with hourly cloud height and coverage. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,22, 537–545.

  • Michalsky, J. J., 1988: The Astronomical Almanac’s algorithm for approximate solar position (1950–2050). Sol. Energy,40, 227–235.

  • O’Malley, M. S., 1996: Determining daytime radiation and cloud climatologies from time series of surface irradiances from the ARM/CART Central Facility. M.S. thesis, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 109 pp. [Available from School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019.].

  • Rossow, W. B., and R. A. Schiffer, 1991: ISCCP cloud data products. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,72, 2–20.

  • Smith, W. L., 1966: Note on the relationship between total precipitable water and surface dewpoint. J. Appl. Meteor.,5, 726–727.

  • Stokes, G. M., and S. E. Schwartz, 1994: The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program: Programmatic background and design of the cloud and Radiation test bed. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,75, 1201–1221.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1288 571 73
PDF Downloads 855 284 20