Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

An Examination of Local versus Nonlocal Aspects of a TKE-Based Boundary Layer Scheme in Clear Convective Conditions

Stéphane Bélair Recherche en Prévision Numérique, Atmospheric Environment Service, Dorval, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by Stéphane Bélair in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Jocelyn Mailhot Recherche en Prévision Numérique, Atmospheric Environment Service, Dorval, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by Jocelyn Mailhot in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
J. Walter Strapp Cloud Physics Research Division, Atmospheric Environment Service, Downsview, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by J. Walter Strapp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
J. Ian MacPherson Institute for Aerospace Research, National Research Council, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by J. Ian MacPherson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Oct 1999
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<1499:AEOLVN>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1499–1518
Restricted access

Abstract

In this study, the ability of a turbulent kinetic energy (TKE)–based boundary layer scheme to reproduce the rapid evolution of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) observed during two clear convective days is examined together with the impact of including nonlocal features in the boundary layer scheme. The two cases are chosen from the Montreal-96 Experiment on Regional Mixing and Ozone (MERMOZ): one is characterized by strong buoyancy, a strong capping inversion, and weak vertical wind shear; the other displays moderate buoyancy, a weaker subsidence inversion, and significant wind shear near the PBL top. With the original local version of the turbulence scheme, the model reproduces the vertical structures and turbulent quantities observed in the well-developed boundary layer for the first case. For the second case, the model fails to reproduce the rapid evolution of the boundary layer even though the TKE and sensible heat fluxes are greatly overpredicted.

Some nonlocal aspects of the turbulence scheme are tested for these two cases. Inclusion of nonlocal (countergradient) terms in the vertical diffusivity equation has little impact on the simulated PBL. In contrast, alternative formulations of the turbulent length scales that follow the strategy proposed by Bougeault and Lacarrère have a greater influence. With the new turbulent lengths, entrainment at the top of the boundary layer is enhanced so that the depth of the well-mixed layer is much larger compared to that of the local simulations even though the turbulent sensible heat fluxes are smaller. Comparison with observations reveals, however, that the inclusion of these modifications does not improve all aspects of the simulation. To improve the performance and reduce somewhat the arbitrariness in the Bougeault–Lacarrère technique, a relationship between the two turbulent length scales (mixing and dissipation) used in the turbulence scheme is proposed. It is shown that, in addition to reducing the sensitivity of the results to the particular formulations, the simulated boundary layer agrees better with observations.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Stéphane Bélair, Recherche en Prévision Numérique, 2121 Trans-Canada Highway, Room 500, Dorval, PQ H9P 1J3, Canada.

Abstract

In this study, the ability of a turbulent kinetic energy (TKE)–based boundary layer scheme to reproduce the rapid evolution of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) observed during two clear convective days is examined together with the impact of including nonlocal features in the boundary layer scheme. The two cases are chosen from the Montreal-96 Experiment on Regional Mixing and Ozone (MERMOZ): one is characterized by strong buoyancy, a strong capping inversion, and weak vertical wind shear; the other displays moderate buoyancy, a weaker subsidence inversion, and significant wind shear near the PBL top. With the original local version of the turbulence scheme, the model reproduces the vertical structures and turbulent quantities observed in the well-developed boundary layer for the first case. For the second case, the model fails to reproduce the rapid evolution of the boundary layer even though the TKE and sensible heat fluxes are greatly overpredicted.

Some nonlocal aspects of the turbulence scheme are tested for these two cases. Inclusion of nonlocal (countergradient) terms in the vertical diffusivity equation has little impact on the simulated PBL. In contrast, alternative formulations of the turbulent length scales that follow the strategy proposed by Bougeault and Lacarrère have a greater influence. With the new turbulent lengths, entrainment at the top of the boundary layer is enhanced so that the depth of the well-mixed layer is much larger compared to that of the local simulations even though the turbulent sensible heat fluxes are smaller. Comparison with observations reveals, however, that the inclusion of these modifications does not improve all aspects of the simulation. To improve the performance and reduce somewhat the arbitrariness in the Bougeault–Lacarrère technique, a relationship between the two turbulent length scales (mixing and dissipation) used in the turbulence scheme is proposed. It is shown that, in addition to reducing the sensitivity of the results to the particular formulations, the simulated boundary layer agrees better with observations.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Stéphane Bélair, Recherche en Prévision Numérique, 2121 Trans-Canada Highway, Room 500, Dorval, PQ H9P 1J3, Canada.

Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Abdella, K., and N. McFarlane, 1997: A new second-order turbulence closure scheme for the planetary boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 1850–1867.

  • Alapaty, K., J. E. Pleim, S. Raman, D. S. Niyogi, and D. W. Byun, 1997: Simulation of atmospheric boundary layer processes using local- and nonlocal-closure schemes. J. Appl. Meteor.,36, 214–233.

  • André, J.-C., G. De Moor, P. Lacarrère, G. Therry, and R. du Vachat, 1978: Modeling the 24-hour evolution of the mean and turbulent structures of the planetary boundary layer. J. Amos. Sci.,35, 1861–1883.

  • ——, J.-P. Goutorbe, and A. Perrier, 1986: HAPEX-MOBILHY: A hydrologic atmospheric experiment for the study of water budget and evaporation flux at the climatic scale. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,67, 138–144.

  • Barnes, S. L., 1964: A technique for maximizing details in numerical weather map analysis. J. Appl. Meteor.,3, 396–409.

  • Benoit, R., J. Côté, and J. Mailhot, 1989: Inclusion of a TKE boundary layer parameterization in the Canadian regional finite-element model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 1726–1750.

  • ——, M. Desgagné, P. Pellerin, S. Pellerin, Y. Chartier, and S. Desjardins, 1997: The Canadian MC2: A semi-Lagrangian, semi-implicit wideband atmospheric model suited for finescale process studies and simulation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 2382–2415.

  • Berkowicz, R., 1984: Spectral methods for atmospheric diffusion modeling. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,30, 201–220.

  • Bougeault, P., and J.-C. André, 1986: On the stability of the third-order turbulence closure for the modeling of the stratocumulus-topped boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 1574–1581.

  • ——, and P. Lacarrère, 1989: Parameterization of orography-induced turbulence in a mesobeta-scale model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 1872–1890.

  • Bouttier, F., J.-F. Mahfouf, and J. Noilhan, 1993: Sequential assimilation of soil moisture from atmospheric low-level parameters. Part I: Sensitivity and calibration studies. J. Appl. Meteor.,32, 1335–1351.

  • Chrobok, G., S. Raasch, and D. Etling, 1992: A comparison of local and nonlocal turbulence closure methods for the case of a cold air outbreak. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,58, 69–90.

  • Cuijpers, J. W. M., and A. A. M. Holtslag, 1998: Impact of skewness and nonlocal effects on scalar and buoyancy fluxes in convective boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 151–162.

  • Cuxart, J., P. Bougeault, P. Lacarrère, J. Noilhan, and M. R. Soler, 1994: A comparison between transilient turbulence theory and the exchange coefficient model approaches. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,67, 251–276.

  • Deardorff, J. W., 1966: The counter-gradient heat flux in the lower atmosphere and in the laboratory. J. Atmos. Sci.,23, 503–506.

  • ——, 1972: Theoretical expression for the countergradient vertical heat flux. J. Geophys. Res.,77, 5900–5904.

  • Delage, Y., 1997: Parameterising sub-grid scale vertical transport in atmospheric models under statically stable conditions. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,82, 23–48.

  • ——, and C. Girard, 1992: Stability functions correct at the free convection limit and consistent for both the surface and Ekman layers. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,58, 19–31.

  • Detering, H. W., and D. Etling, 1985: Application of the E–ϵ turbulence model to the atmospheric boundary layer. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,33, 113–133.

  • Duynkerke, P. G., and A. G. M. Driedonks, 1987: A model for the turbulent structure of the stratocumulus-topped atmospheric boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 43–64.

  • Ebert, E. E., U. Schumann, and R. B. Stull, 1989: Nonlocal turbulent mixing in the convective boundary layer evaluated from large-eddy simulation. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 2178–2207.

  • Fiedler, B. H., and C.-H. Moeng, 1985: A practical integral closure model for mean vertical transport of a scalar in a convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,42, 359–363.

  • Fouquart, Y., and B. Bonnel, 1980: Computations of solar heating of the earth’s atmosphere: A new parameterization. Contrib. Atmos. Phys.,53, 35–62.

  • Garand, L., 1983: Some improvements and complements to the infrared emissivity algorithm including parameterization of the absorption in the continuum region. J. Atmos. Sci.,40, 230–344.

  • Garratt, J. R., G. D. Hess, W. L. Physick, and P. Bougeault, 1996: The atmospheric boundary layer—Advances in knowledge and application. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,78, 9–37.

  • Giard, D., and E. Bazile, 1999: Implementation of a new assimilation scheme for soil and surface variables in a global NWP model. Mon. Wea. Rev., in press.

  • Holt, T., and S. Raman, 1988: A review and comparative evaluation of multilevel boundary layer parameterizations for first-order and turbulent kinetic energy closure schemes. Rev. Geophys.,26, 761–780.

  • Holtslag, A. A. M., and C.-H. Moeng, 1991: Eddy diffusivity and countergradient transport in the convective atmospheric boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 1690–1698.

  • ——, and B. A. Boville, 1993: Local versus nonlocal boundary-layer diffusion in a global climate model. J. Climate,6, 1825–1842.

  • ——, E. Van Meijgaard, and W. C. De Rooy, 1995: A comparison of boundary layer diffusion schemes in unstable conditions over land. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,76, 69–95.

  • Jacquemin, B., and J. Noilhan, 1990: Sensitivity study and validation of a land surface parameterization using the HAPEX-MOBILHY data set. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,52, 93–134.

  • Kuo, H. L., 1974: Further studies of the parameterization of the influence of cumulus convection on large-scale flow. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 1232–1240.

  • Lenschow, D. H., and B. B. Stankov, 1986: Length scales in the convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 1198–1209.

  • Lüpkes, C., and K. H. Schlünzen, 1996: Modelling the arctic convective boundary-layer with different turbulence parameterizations. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,79, 107–130.

  • Mahfouf, J.-F., 1991: Analysis of soil moisture from near-surface parameters: A feasibility study. J. Appl. Meteor.,30, 1534–1547.

  • ——, and B. Jacquemin, 1989: A study of rainfall interception using a land surface parameterization for mesoscale meteorological models. J. Appl. Meteor.,28, 1282–1302.

  • Mailhot, J., and R. Benoit, 1982: A finite-element model of the atmospheric boundary layer suitable for use with numerical weather prediction models. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 2249–2266.

  • ——, and Coauthors, 1998: The Montreal-96 Experiment on Regional Mixing and Ozone (MERMOZ): An overview and some preliminary results. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,79, 433–442.

  • Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1974: A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 1791–1806.

  • ——, and ——, 1982: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys.,20, 851–875.

  • Moeng, C.-H., and D. A. Randall, 1984: Problems in simulating the stratocumulus-topped boundary layer with a third-order closure model. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 1588–1600.

  • ——, and P. P. Sullivan, 1994: A comparison of shear- and buoyancy-driven planetary boundary layer flows. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 999–1022.

  • Noilhan, J., and S. Planton, 1989: A simple parameterization of land surface processes for meteorological models. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 536–549.

  • O’Brien, J. J., 1970: A note on the vertical structure of the eddy exchange coefficient in the planetary boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,27, 1213–1215.

  • Pielke, R. A., and Y. Mahrer, 1975: Representation of the heated planetary boundary layer in mesoscale models with coarse vertical resolution. J. Atmos. Sci.,32, 2288–2308.

  • Sellers, P. J., F. G. Hall, G. Asrar, D. E. Strebel, and R. E. Murphy, 1988: The First ISLSCP Field Experiment (FIFE). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,69, 22–27.

  • Stull, R., 1984: Transilient turbulence theory. Part I: The concept of eddy-mixing across finite distances. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 3351–3367.

  • ——, 1988: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic, 666 pp.

  • ——, 1993: Review of non-local mixing in turbulent atmospheres: Transilient turbulence theory. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,62, 21–96.

  • ——, and A. G. M. Driedonks, 1987: Applications of the transilient turbulence parameterization to atmospheric boundary-layer simulations. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,40, 209–239.

  • Tanguay, M., A. Robert, and R. Laprise, 1990: A semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian fully compressible regional forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 1970–1980.

  • Therry, G., and P. Lacarrère, 1983: Improving the eddy kinetic energy model for planetary boundary layer description. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,25, 63–88.

  • Troen, I. B., and L. Mahrt, 1986: A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,37, 129–148.

  • Wyngaard, J. C., and R. A. Brost, 1984: Top-down bottom-up diffusion of a scalar in the convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 102–112.

  • Zhang, Q., and R. Stull, 1992: Alternative nonlocal descriptions of boundary-layer evolution. J. Atmos. Sci.,49, 2267–2281.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 938 570 36
PDF Downloads 179 52 12