Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Automated Monitoring of Snow Cover over North America with Multispectral Satellite Data

Peter Romanov National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service, Office of Research and Applications, Camp Springs, Maryland

Search for other papers by Peter Romanov in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Garik Gutman National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters, Washington, District of Columbia

Search for other papers by Garik Gutman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Ivan Csiszar National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service, Office of Research and Applications, Camp Springs, Maryland

Search for other papers by Ivan Csiszar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Nov 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<1866:AMOSCO>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1866–1880
Restricted access

Abstract

Current National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) operational global- and continental-scale snow cover maps are produced interactively by visual analysis of satellite imagery. This snow product is subjective, and its preparation requires a substantial daily human effort. The primary objective of the current study was to develop an automated system that could provide NOAA analysts with a first-guess snow cover map and thus to reduce the human labor in the daily snow cover analysis. The proposed system uses a combination of observations in the visible, midinfrared, and infrared made by the Imager instrument aboard Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) and microwave observations of the Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) aboard the polar-orbiting Defense Meteorological Satellite Program platform. The devised technique was applied to satellite data for mapping snow cover for the North American continent during the winter season of 1998/99. To assess the system performance, the automatically produced snow maps were compared with the NOAA interactive operational product and were validated against in situ land surface observations. Validation tests revealed that in 85% of cases the automated snow maps fit exactly the ground snow cover reports. Snow identification with the combination of GOES and SSM/I observations was found to be more efficient than the one based solely on satellite microwave data. Comparisons between the automated maps and the NOAA operational product have shown their good agreement in the distribution of snow cover and its area coverage. The accuracy of the automated product was found to be similar to and sometimes higher than the accuracy of the operational snow cover maps manually produced at NOAA.

Corresponding author address: Peter Romanov, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA, WWB 712, 5200 Auth Road, Camp Springs, MD 20746.

promanov@nesdis.noaa.gov

Abstract

Current National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) operational global- and continental-scale snow cover maps are produced interactively by visual analysis of satellite imagery. This snow product is subjective, and its preparation requires a substantial daily human effort. The primary objective of the current study was to develop an automated system that could provide NOAA analysts with a first-guess snow cover map and thus to reduce the human labor in the daily snow cover analysis. The proposed system uses a combination of observations in the visible, midinfrared, and infrared made by the Imager instrument aboard Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) and microwave observations of the Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) aboard the polar-orbiting Defense Meteorological Satellite Program platform. The devised technique was applied to satellite data for mapping snow cover for the North American continent during the winter season of 1998/99. To assess the system performance, the automatically produced snow maps were compared with the NOAA interactive operational product and were validated against in situ land surface observations. Validation tests revealed that in 85% of cases the automated snow maps fit exactly the ground snow cover reports. Snow identification with the combination of GOES and SSM/I observations was found to be more efficient than the one based solely on satellite microwave data. Comparisons between the automated maps and the NOAA operational product have shown their good agreement in the distribution of snow cover and its area coverage. The accuracy of the automated product was found to be similar to and sometimes higher than the accuracy of the operational snow cover maps manually produced at NOAA.

Corresponding author address: Peter Romanov, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA, WWB 712, 5200 Auth Road, Camp Springs, MD 20746.

promanov@nesdis.noaa.gov

Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Allen, R. C., P. A. Durkee, and C. H. Wash, 1990: Snow/cloud discrimination with multispectral satellite measurements. J. Appl. Meteor.,29, 994–1004.

  • Basist, A., D. Garrett, R. Ferraro, N. Grody, and K. Mitchell, 1996: A comparison between snow cover products derived from visible and microwave observations. J. Appl. Meteor.,35, 163–177.

  • Cline, D. W., and T. R. Carroll, 1999: Operational automated production of daily, high resolution, cloud-free snow cover maps of the continental U.S. J. Geophys. Res.,104, 19 631–19 644.

  • DeFries, R. S., M. Hansen, J. R. C. Townshend, and R. Sohlberg, 1998: Global land cover classifications at 8 km spatial resolution:The use of training data derived from Landsat imagery in decision tree classifiers. Int. J. Remote Sens.,19, 3141–3168.

  • Dozier, J., 1989: Spectral signature of alpine snow cover from the Landsat Thematic Mapper. Remote Sens. Environ.,28, 9–22.

  • Gissel, G., 1989: An algorithm for snow and ice detection using AVHRR data. An extension to the APOLLO software package. Int. J. Remote Sens.,10, 897–905.

  • Grody, N. C., 1988: Surface identification using satellite microwave radiometers. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,26, 850–859.

  • ——, 1991: Classification of snow cover and precipitation using the Special Sensor Microwave Imager. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 7423–7435.

  • ——, and A. N. Basist, 1996: Global identification of snowcover using SSM/I measurements. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.,34, 237–249.

  • Hall, D. K., G. A. Riggs, and V. V. Salomonson, 1995: Development of methods for mapping global snow cover using moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer data. Remote Sens. Environ.,54, 127–140.

  • Hillger, D. W., 1996: Meteorological features from principal component image transformation of GOES imagery. SPIE Proc.,2812, 111–121.

  • Key, J., and R. G. Barry, 1989: Cloud cover analysis with Arctic AVHRR data. 1. Cloud detection. J. Geophys. Res.,94, 18 521–18 535.

  • Kidder, S. Q., and H.-T. Wu, 1984: Dramatic contrast between low clouds and snow cover in daytime 3.7 μm imagery. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 2345–2346.

  • Klein, A. G., D. K. Hall, and G. A. Riggs, 1998: Improving snow cover mapping in forests through the use of a canopy reflectance model. Hydrol. Processes,12, 1723–1744.

  • Li, Z., L. Moreau, J. Cihlar, and D. W. Deering, 1997: An evaluation of kernel-driven bidirectional models using PARABOLA measurements. Can. J. Remote Sens.,23, 120–130.

  • Liston, G. E., 1999: Interrelationships between snow distribution, snowmelt, and snow cover depletion: Implications for atmospheric, hydrologic, and ecologic modeling. J. Appl. Meteor.,38, 1474–1487.

  • Ramsay, B., 1998: The interactive multisensor snow and ice mapping system. Hydrol. Processes,12, 1537–1546.

  • Robinson, D. A., K. F. Dewey, and R. R. Heim, 1993: Global snow cover monitoring: An update. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,74, 1689–1696.

  • Romanov, P. Yu., and G. Gutman, 1997: Estimation of land surface emissivity using synergy of AVHRR- and ground-based measurements. IRS ’96: Current Problems in Atmospheric Radiation, A. Deepak Publishing, 1037–1041.

  • Rossow, W. B., and R. A. Schiffer, 1991: ISCCP cloud data products. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,72, 2–20.

  • Roujean, J.-L., M. Leroy, and P. Y. Deschamps, 1992: A bidirectional reflectance model of the earth’s surface for the correction of remote sensing data. J. Geophys. Res.,97, 20 455–20 468.

  • Tsonis, A. A., 1984: On the separability of various classes from the GOES visible and infrared data. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,23, 1393–1410.

  • Weinreb, M., M. Jamieson, N. Fulton, Y. Chen, J. X. Johnson, J. Bremer, C. Smith, and J. Baucom, 1997: Operational calibration of Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-8 and -9 imagers and sounders. Appl. Opt.,36, 6895–6904.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 670 250 16
PDF Downloads 340 118 5