An Integral Formulation for the Dispersion Parameters in a Shear–Buoyancy-Driven Planetary Boundary Layer for Use in a Gaussian Model for Tall Stacks

C. Mangia I.S.I.At.A of CNR, Lecce, Italy

Search for other papers by C. Mangia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
G. A. Degrazia Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil

Search for other papers by G. A. Degrazia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
U. Rizza I.S.I.At.A of CNR, Lecce, Italy

Search for other papers by U. Rizza in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

An integral parameterization of the dispersion coefficients σy and σz in a shear–buoyancy-driven atmospheric boundary layer is developed by using a model for the frequency spectrum of eddy energy. The formulation relies on Taylor classical diffusion theory and further developments by Pasquill. The statistical independence of Fourier components for distant frequencies allows the specification of the turbulent kinetic energy spectrum as the sum of a buoyancy- and a shear-produced part. For both components the dispersion parameters are described in terms of the frequency of spectral peak and dissipation function. In this way they are directly related to energy-containing eddies that are most responsible for turbulent transport of any scalars in an atmospheric boundary layer generated by mechanical and thermal forcing mechanisms. As a consequence, the resulting dispersion parameters are more general than those found in the literature, because they do not utilize measurements of turbulent dispersion as most parameterizations do and provide a formulation valid for the whole unstable regime. The formulations are compared with field diffusion data, along with other schemes. The new parameters are well suited for application in air pollution modeling under unstable conditions.

Corresponding author address: Cristina Mangia, ISIATA-CNR, s.p. Lecce-Monteroni km 1.2, 73100 Lecce, Italy.

c.mangia@isiata.le.cnr.it

Abstract

An integral parameterization of the dispersion coefficients σy and σz in a shear–buoyancy-driven atmospheric boundary layer is developed by using a model for the frequency spectrum of eddy energy. The formulation relies on Taylor classical diffusion theory and further developments by Pasquill. The statistical independence of Fourier components for distant frequencies allows the specification of the turbulent kinetic energy spectrum as the sum of a buoyancy- and a shear-produced part. For both components the dispersion parameters are described in terms of the frequency of spectral peak and dissipation function. In this way they are directly related to energy-containing eddies that are most responsible for turbulent transport of any scalars in an atmospheric boundary layer generated by mechanical and thermal forcing mechanisms. As a consequence, the resulting dispersion parameters are more general than those found in the literature, because they do not utilize measurements of turbulent dispersion as most parameterizations do and provide a formulation valid for the whole unstable regime. The formulations are compared with field diffusion data, along with other schemes. The new parameters are well suited for application in air pollution modeling under unstable conditions.

Corresponding author address: Cristina Mangia, ISIATA-CNR, s.p. Lecce-Monteroni km 1.2, 73100 Lecce, Italy.

c.mangia@isiata.le.cnr.it

Save
  • Batchelor, G. K., 1949: Diffusion in a field of homogeneous turbulence. I: Eulerian analysis. Aust. J. Sci. Res.,2, 437–450.

  • Berkowicz, R., and L. P. Prahm, 1984: Spectral representation of the vertical structure of turbulence in the convective boundary layer. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,110, 35–52.

  • ——, H. R. Olesen, and U. Torp, 1986: The Danish Gaussian model (OML): Description, test and sensitivity analysis in view of regulatory applications. Air Pollution Modelling and Its Application V, C. de Wispelaere, F. A. Schiermeier, and N. V. Gillani, Eds., Plenum, 453–480.

  • Bowen, B. M., 1994: Long-term tracer study at Los Alamos, New Mexico. Part II: Evaluation and comparison of several methods to determine dispersion coefficients. J. Appl. Meteor.,33, 1236–1254.

  • Briggs, G. A., 1985: Analytical parameterizations of diffusion: The convective boundary layer. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,24, 1167–1186.

  • Carras, J. N., and D. J. Williams, 1984: Experimental studies of plume dispersion in convective conditions, Pt. I. Atmos. Environ.,18, 135–144.

  • Caughey, S. J., and S. G. Palmer, 1979: Some aspects of turbulence structure through the depth of the convective boundary layer. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,105, 811–827.

  • Deardoff, J. W., and G. E. Willis, 1975: A parameterization of diffusion into the mixed layer. J. Appl. Meteor.,14, 1451–1458.

  • Degrazia, G. A., 1998: Modelling dispersion from elevated sources in a planetary boundary layer dominated by moderate convection. Nuovo Cimento,21C, 345–353.

  • ——, and O. L. L. Moraes, 1992: A model for eddy diffusivity in a stable boundary layer. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,58, 205–214.

  • ——, ——, and J. Goedert, 1991: Estimation of Lagrangian parameters from a diffusion experiment. Nuovo Cimento,14C, 615–621.

  • ——, U. Rizza, C. Mangia, and T. Tirabassi, 1997: Validation of a new turbulent parameterization for dispersion models in a convective boundary layer. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,85, 243–254.

  • ——, C. Mangia, and U. Rizza, 1998: A comparison between different methods to estimate the lateral dispersion parameter under convective conditions. J. Appl. Meteor.,37, 227–231.

  • Draxler, R. R., 1976: Determination of atmospheric diffusion parameters. Atmos. Environ.,10, 99–105.

  • Erbrink, J. J., 1995: Use of boundary-layer meteorological parameters in the Gaussian model “STACKS.” Bound.-Layer Meteor.,74, 211–235.

  • Frisch, U., 1995: Turbulence. Cambridge University Press, 296 pp.

  • Gifford, F. A., 1975: Atmospheric dispersion models for environmental pollution applications. Lectures on Air Pollution and Environmental Impact Analyses, Boston, MA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 35–58.

  • Gryning, S. E., and E. Lyck, 1984: Atmospheric dispersion from elevated sources in an urban area: Comparison between tracer experiments and model calculations. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,23, 651–660.

  • Hanna, S. R., 1986: Lateral dispersion from tall stacks. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,25, 1426–1433.

  • ——, and J. C. Chang, 1993: Hybrid Plume Dispersion Model (HPDM) improvements and testing at three field sites. Atmos. Environ.,27A, 1491–1508.

  • ——, G. A. Briggs, J. Deardoff, B. A. Egan, F. A. Gifford, and F. Pasquill, 1977: AMS Workshop on stability classification schemes and sigma curves—Summary of recommendations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,58, 1305–1309.

  • Hay, J. S., and F. Pasquill, 1959: Diffusion from a continuous source in relation to the spectrum and scale of turbulence. Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 6, Academic Press, 345–365.

  • Hicks, B. B., 1985: Behavior of turbulence statistics in the convective boundary layer. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,24, 607–614.

  • Hinze, J. O., 1975: Turbulence. McGraw-Hill, 790 pp.

  • Højstrup, J., 1982: Velocity spectra in the unstable planetary boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 2239–2248.

  • Irwin, J. S., 1983: Estimating plume dispersion—a comparison of several sigma schemes. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,22, 92–114.

  • Kaimal, J. C., 1978: Horizontal velocity spectra in an unstable surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 18–24.

  • ——, J. C. Wyngaard, D. A. Haugen, O. R. Cote, Y. Izumi, S. J. Caughey, and C. J. Readings, 1976: Turbulence structure in the convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,33, 2152–2169.

  • Moeng, C.-H., and P. P. Sullivan, 1994: A comparison of shear and buoyancy-driven planetary boundary layer flows. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 999–1022.

  • Olesen, H. R., S. E. Larsen, and J. Højstrup, 1984: Modelling velocity spectra in the lower part of the planetary boundary layer. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,29, 285–312.

  • Panofsky, H. A., H. Tennekes, D. H. Lenschow, and J. C. Wyngaard, 1977: The characteristics of turbulent velocity components in the surface layer under convective conditions. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,11, 355–361.

  • Pasquill, F., 1971: Atmospheric dispersion of pollution. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,97, 369–395.

  • Peltier, L. J., J. C. Wyngaard, S. Khanna, and J. G. Brasseur, 1996: Spectra in the unstable surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 49–61.

  • Seinfeld, J. H., and S. N. Pandis, 1997: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. John Wiley and Sons, 1326 pp.

  • Sorbjan, Z., 1989: Structure of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Prentice Hall, 300 pp.

  • Taylor, G. I., 1921: Diffusion by continuous movements. Proc. London Math. Soc.,20, 196–212.

  • Wandel, C. F., and O. Kofoed-Hansen, 1962: On the Eulerian–Lagrangian transform in the statistical theory of turbulence. J. Geophys. Res.,67, 3089–3093.

  • Weil, J. C., 1988: Dispersion in the convective boundary layer. Lectures on Air Pollution Modeling, A. Venkatram and J. C. Wyngaard, Eds., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 167–227.

  • ——, and R. P. Brower, 1984: An updated Gaussian plume model for tall stacks. J. Air. Pollut. Control Assoc.,34, 818–827.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 237 61 15
PDF Downloads 64 17 2