Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Toward the Operational Application of Hygroscopic Flares for Rainfall Enhancement in South Africa

Deon E. Terblanche Bethlehem Precipitation Research Project, South African Weather Bureau, Bethlehem, South Africa

Search for other papers by Deon E. Terblanche in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
François E. Steffens Centre for Applied Statistics, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa

Search for other papers by François E. Steffens in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Lizelle Fletcher Centre for Applied Statistics, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa

Search for other papers by Lizelle Fletcher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Marion P. Mittermaier Bethlehem Precipitation Research Project, South African Weather Bureau, Bethlehem, South Africa

Search for other papers by Marion P. Mittermaier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Robert C. Parsons CloudQuest, Nelspruit, South Africa

Search for other papers by Robert C. Parsons in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Nov 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)039<1811:TTOAOH>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1811–1821
Restricted access

Abstract

A major challenge of any operational cloud seeding project is the evaluation of the results. This paper describes the development of verification techniques based on data collected during the first South African operational rainfall enhancement project in which hygroscopic flares were used to seed the bases of convective storms. Radar storm properties as well as historical rainfall records were used in exploratory studies. The storm-scale analyses are viewed as extremely important, because individual storms are the units that are seeded. Their response to seeding has to be consistent with that of the seeded group in a randomized experiment using the same seeding technology before a positive effect on area rainfall can be expected. Sixty storms were selected for seeding, mostly early in their lifetimes. This permits a time-of-origin analysis in which the group of seeded storms can be compared to a “control” group of unseeded storms from the time they were first identified as 30-dBZ radar storm volumes. One such control group was obtained by selecting unseeded storms by using certain threshold criteria obtained from the seeded storms. Another control group was obtained by simply selecting the 60 largest storms from the set of unseeded storms meeting the threshold criteria. Yet another control group was obtained by matching the seeded storms, in the first 20 min of their lifetimes, before seeding effects can be expected, with a corresponding set of unseeded storms. Comparisons with the National Precipitation Research Programme’s randomized hygroscopic flare seeding experiment database show consistency in the way seeded storms reacted toward producing more rainfall. The analyses on historic rainfall suggest trends in the same direction, but it is shown that one has to be careful in interpreting these trends. The importance of quantitatively linking storm-scale seeding effects to apparent area effects is highlighted.

* Deceased.

Corresponding author address: Deon E. Terblanche, SA Weather Bureau, Bethlehem Weather Office, Private Bag X15, 9700 Bethlehem, South Africa.

deon@metsys.weathersa.co.za

Abstract

A major challenge of any operational cloud seeding project is the evaluation of the results. This paper describes the development of verification techniques based on data collected during the first South African operational rainfall enhancement project in which hygroscopic flares were used to seed the bases of convective storms. Radar storm properties as well as historical rainfall records were used in exploratory studies. The storm-scale analyses are viewed as extremely important, because individual storms are the units that are seeded. Their response to seeding has to be consistent with that of the seeded group in a randomized experiment using the same seeding technology before a positive effect on area rainfall can be expected. Sixty storms were selected for seeding, mostly early in their lifetimes. This permits a time-of-origin analysis in which the group of seeded storms can be compared to a “control” group of unseeded storms from the time they were first identified as 30-dBZ radar storm volumes. One such control group was obtained by selecting unseeded storms by using certain threshold criteria obtained from the seeded storms. Another control group was obtained by simply selecting the 60 largest storms from the set of unseeded storms meeting the threshold criteria. Yet another control group was obtained by matching the seeded storms, in the first 20 min of their lifetimes, before seeding effects can be expected, with a corresponding set of unseeded storms. Comparisons with the National Precipitation Research Programme’s randomized hygroscopic flare seeding experiment database show consistency in the way seeded storms reacted toward producing more rainfall. The analyses on historic rainfall suggest trends in the same direction, but it is shown that one has to be careful in interpreting these trends. The importance of quantitatively linking storm-scale seeding effects to apparent area effects is highlighted.

* Deceased.

Corresponding author address: Deon E. Terblanche, SA Weather Bureau, Bethlehem Weather Office, Private Bag X15, 9700 Bethlehem, South Africa.

deon@metsys.weathersa.co.za

Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Cooper, W. A., R. T. Bruintjes, and G. K. Mather, 1997: Calculations pertaining to hygroscopic seeding with flares. J. Appl. Meteor.,36, 1449–1469.

  • Dixon, M. J., and G. K. Mather, 1986: Programme for Atmospheric Water Supply—Phase 1, 1983–1986, Vol. 3. WRC Rep. 133/3/88, 55 pp. [Available from Water Research Commission, P.O. Box 824, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.].

  • ——, and G. Wiener, 1993: TITAN: Thunderstorm Identification, Tracking, Analysis, and Nowcasting—a radar-based methodology. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,10, 785–797.

  • Mather G. K., M. J. Dixon, and J. M. de Jager, 1996: Assessing the potential for rain augmentation. The Nelspruit randomized convective cloud seeding experiment. J. Appl. Meteor.,35, 1465–1482.

  • ——, D. E. Terblanche, and F. E. Steffens, 1997a: National Precipitation Research Programme: Final report for the period 1993–1996. WRC Rep. 726/1/97, 147 pp. [Available from Water Research Commission, P.O. Box 824, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.].

  • ——, ——, ——, and L. Fletcher, 1997b: Results of the South African cloud-seeding experiments using hygroscopic flares. J. Appl. Meteor.,36, 1433–1447.

  • Terblanche, D. E., 1996: A simple digital signal processing method to simulate linear and quadratic responses from a radar’s logarithmic receiver. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,13, 533–538.

  • Woodley, W. L., A. G. Barriston, J. A. Flueck, and R. Biondini, 1983:The Florida Area Cumulus Experiment’s second phase (FACE-2). Part II: Replicated and confirmatory analysis. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,22, 1529–1540.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 210 28 2
PDF Downloads 59 14 1