Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

A Satellite-Based Climatic Description of Jet Aircraft Contrails and Associations with Atmospheric Conditions, 1977–79

James Q. DeGrand Department of Geography, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Search for other papers by James Q. DeGrand in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Andrew M. Carleton Department of Geography and Earth System Science Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Andrew M. Carleton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
David J. Travis Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin—Whitewater, Whitewater, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by David J. Travis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Peter J. Lamb Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, and School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Peter J. Lamb in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Sep 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<1434:ASBCDO>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1434–1459
Restricted access

Abstract

The possible contribution of jet aircraft condensation trails (contrails) to recent observed increases in high cloudiness constitutes a potentially important human effect on climate that has received relatively little attention. Very high resolution (0.6 km) thermal-infrared imagery from the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program polar orbiters, concentrated in the nighttime and morning hours, is interpreted to derive a climatic description of contrails over the United States and adjacent areas for the midseason months (April, July, October, and January) of 1977–79. A manual technique of identifying contrails on the imagery is validated by comparison with more recent ground-based observations. Contrail spatial distributions are mapped at a 1° lat × 1° long resolution for monthly and multimonth time periods.

Contrail incidence is widespread over the United States and adjacent areas, with highest frequencies occurring over the following regions: the extreme Southwest (particularly southern California), the Southeast (especially southeast Georgia and northeast Florida), the west coast of British Columbia and Vancouver Island, and the eastern Midwest centered on southeast Indiana and western Kentucky. Contrails are most frequent during the transition-season months (April and October), and are least frequent in July. Latitudinally, contrail incidence peaks over the northern (southern) regions in July (January), suggesting a first-order association with the seasonal variation of upper-tropospheric westerly winds. Analysis of synoptic-scale midtropospheric circulation patterns confirms that the highest contrail frequencies occur in association with baroclinic phenomena, particularly cyclone waves and jet streams. Moreover, contrails tend frequently to occur in conjunction with other clouds, including the cirrus associated with jet-stream and frontal systems.

Analyses of rawinsonde data for three representative contrail “outbreak” (multiple occurrence) events during the study months confirm some earlier studies that suggest contrails form below a cold, elevated tropopause (i.e., around ridgelines in the geopotential height field), in contrast with noncontrail days. Accordingly, the temperature advection in the troposphere accompanying the contrail outbreaks is positive, or warm, and relatively weak. This contrail climatic description provides a context within which recent surface climate changes at regional and subregional scales may be cast.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Andrew M. Carleton, Dept. of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, 302 Walker Bldg., University Park, PA 16802.

Abstract

The possible contribution of jet aircraft condensation trails (contrails) to recent observed increases in high cloudiness constitutes a potentially important human effect on climate that has received relatively little attention. Very high resolution (0.6 km) thermal-infrared imagery from the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program polar orbiters, concentrated in the nighttime and morning hours, is interpreted to derive a climatic description of contrails over the United States and adjacent areas for the midseason months (April, July, October, and January) of 1977–79. A manual technique of identifying contrails on the imagery is validated by comparison with more recent ground-based observations. Contrail spatial distributions are mapped at a 1° lat × 1° long resolution for monthly and multimonth time periods.

Contrail incidence is widespread over the United States and adjacent areas, with highest frequencies occurring over the following regions: the extreme Southwest (particularly southern California), the Southeast (especially southeast Georgia and northeast Florida), the west coast of British Columbia and Vancouver Island, and the eastern Midwest centered on southeast Indiana and western Kentucky. Contrails are most frequent during the transition-season months (April and October), and are least frequent in July. Latitudinally, contrail incidence peaks over the northern (southern) regions in July (January), suggesting a first-order association with the seasonal variation of upper-tropospheric westerly winds. Analysis of synoptic-scale midtropospheric circulation patterns confirms that the highest contrail frequencies occur in association with baroclinic phenomena, particularly cyclone waves and jet streams. Moreover, contrails tend frequently to occur in conjunction with other clouds, including the cirrus associated with jet-stream and frontal systems.

Analyses of rawinsonde data for three representative contrail “outbreak” (multiple occurrence) events during the study months confirm some earlier studies that suggest contrails form below a cold, elevated tropopause (i.e., around ridgelines in the geopotential height field), in contrast with noncontrail days. Accordingly, the temperature advection in the troposphere accompanying the contrail outbreaks is positive, or warm, and relatively weak. This contrail climatic description provides a context within which recent surface climate changes at regional and subregional scales may be cast.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Andrew M. Carleton, Dept. of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, 302 Walker Bldg., University Park, PA 16802.

Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Ackerman, A. S., O. W. Toon, and P. V. Hobbs, 1995: Numerical modeling of ship tracks produced by injections of cloud condensation nuclei into marine stratiform clouds. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 7121–7133.

  • Air Weather Service, 1956: Forecasting of aircraft condensation trails. Air Weather Service Manual 105-100 (REV), Air Weather Service, Scott AFB, IL, 17pp.

  • Allard, J., 1997: The climatic impacts of jet airplane condensation trails (contrails) in the Northeast U.S. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, 152 pp. [Available from Dept. of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.].

  • Angell, J. K., 1990: Variation in United States cloudiness and sunshine duration between 1950 and the drought year of 1988. J. Climate,3, 296–308.

  • Angell, J. K., J. Korshover, and G. F. Cotton, 1984: Variation in United States cloudiness and sunshine, 1950–82. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,23, 752–761.

  • Appleman, H., 1953: The formation of exhaust condensation trails by jet aircraft. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,34, 14–20.

  • Arking, A., 1991: The radiative effects of clouds and their impact on climate. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,72, 795–813.

  • Bakan, S., M. Betancor, V. Gayler, and H. Grassl, 1994: Contrail frequency over Europe from NOAA-satellite images. Ann. Geophys.,12, 962–968.

  • Beckwith, W. B., 1972: Future patterns of aircraft operations and fuel burnouts with remarks on contrail formation over the United States. Preprints, Int. Conf. on Aerospace and Aeronautical Meteorology, Washington, DC, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 422–426.

  • Boin, M., and L. Levkov, 1994: A numerical study of contrail development. Ann. Geophys.,12, 969–978.

  • Brogniez, G., J. C. Buriez, V. Giraud, F. Parol, and C. Vanbauce, 1995: Determination of effective emittance and a radiatively equivalent microphysical model of cirrus from ground-based and satellite observations during the International Cirrus Experiment:The 18 October 1989 case study. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 1025– 1036.

  • Bryson, R. A., and W. M. Wendland, 1975: Climatic effects of atmospheric pollution. The Changing Global Environment, S. F. Singer, Ed., Reidel, 139–147.

  • Busen, R., and U. Schumann, 1995: Visible contrail formation from fuels with different sulfur contents. Geophys. Res. Lett.,22, 1357–1360.

  • Cairns, B., 1993: Inter and intra-annual cloud variations from satellite-based climatologies. Preprints, Fourth Symp. on Global Change Studies, Anaheim, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 245–248.

  • Carleton, A. M., 1988: Meridional transport of eddy sensible heat in winters marked by extremes of the North Atlantic Oscillation, 1948/49–1979/80. J. Climate,1, 212–223.

  • Carleton, A. M., and P. J. Lamb, 1986: Jet contrails and cirrus cloud: A feasibility study employing high-resolution satellite imagery. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,67, 301–309.

  • Carlson, T. N., 1991: Mid-Latitude Weather Systems. HarperCollins Academic, 507 pp.

  • Cerveny, R. S., and R. C. Balling Jr., 1990: Inhomogeneities in the long-term United States’ sunshine record. J. Climate,3, 1045– 1048.

  • Changnon, S. A., 1981: Midwestern cloud, sunshine and temperature trends since 1901: Possible evidence of jet contrail effects. J. Appl. Meteor.,20, 496–508.

  • Changnon, S. A., R. G. Semonin, and W. M. Wendland, 1980: Effect of contrail cirrus on surface weather conditions in the Midwest: Phase I. Final Report of NSF Grant ATM 78-09568, Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, 141 pp. [Available from Atmospheric Sciences Division, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Dr., Champaign, IL 61820-7495.].

  • Chlond, A., 1998: Large-eddy simulation of contrails. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 796–819.

  • Coakley, J. A., Jr., R. L. Bernstein, and P. A. Durkee, 1987: Effect of ship-stack effluents on cloud reflectivity. Science,237, 1020– 1022.

  • Croke, M. S., R. D. Cess, and S. Hameed, 1999: Regional cloud cover change associated with global climate change: Case studies for three regions of the United States. J. Climate,12, 2128–2134.

  • DeGrand, J. Q., 1991: A satellite-derived mid-season climatology of jet condensation trails: April 1977–October 1979. M.A. thesis, Dept. of Geography, Indiana University, 117 pp. [Available from Dept. of Geography, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.].

  • Detwiler, A., 1983: Effects of artificial and natural cirrus clouds on temperatures near the ground. J. Wea. Modif.,15, 45–55.

  • Detwiler, A., and R. Pratt, 1984: Clear-air seeding: Opportunities and strategies. J. Wea. Modif.,16, 46–60.

  • Dowling, D. R., and L. F. Radke, 1990: A summary of the physical properties of cirrus clouds. J. Appl. Meteor.,29, 970–978.

  • Duda, D. P., J. D. Spinhirne, and W. D. Hart, 1998: Retrieval of contrail microphysical properties during SUCCESS by the split-window method. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 1149–1152.

  • Elliott, W. P., and D. J. Gaffen, 1991: On the utility of radiosonde humidity archives for climate studies. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,72, 1507–1520.

  • Engelstad, M., S. K. Sengupta, T. Lee, and R. M. Welch, 1992: Automated detection of jet contrails using the AVHRR split window. Int. J. Remote Sens.,13, 1391–1412.

  • Federal Aviation Administration, 1979: Current aviation statistics— air traffic activity: Enroute IFR air traffic survey, peak day— fiscal year 1977. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC, 53 pp.

  • Fett, R. W., and W. F. Mitchell, 1977: Anomalous grey shades— aircraft condensation trails. Navy Tactical Applications Guide, Vol. 1, Techniques and Applications of Image Analysis, Naval Environmental Prediction Research Facility, 35.

  • Fortuin, J. P. F., R. Van Dorlund, W. M. F. Wauben, and H. Kelder, 1995: Greenhouse effects of aircraft emissions as calculated by a radiative transfer model. Ann. Geophys.,13, 413–418.

  • Freeman, K. P., and K.-N. Liou, 1979: Climatic effects of cirrus clouds. Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 21, Academic Press, 231– 287.

  • Garand, L., C. Grassotti, J. Halle, and G. L. Klein, 1992: On differences in radiosonde humidity-reporting practices and their implications for numerical weather prediction and remote sensing. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,73, 1417–1423.

  • Gayet, J.-F., G. Febvre, G. Brogniez, H. Chepfer, W. Renger, and P. Wendling, 1996: Microphysical and optical properties of cirrus and contrails: Cloud field study on 13 October 1989. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 126–138.

  • Gothe, M. B., and H. Grassl, 1993: Satellite remote sensing of the optical depth and mean crystal size of thin cirrus and contrails. Theor. Appl. Climatol.,48, 101–113.

  • Grassl, H., 1990: Possible climatic effects of contrails and additional water vapour. Air Traffic and the Environment—Background, Tendencies and Potential Global Atmospheric Effects, U. Schumann, Ed., Springer Verlag, 124–137.

  • Hall, F. H., 1970: Pollution in the upper troposphere by soot from jet aircraft and its relation to cirrus clouds (abstract). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,51, 101.

  • Hanson, H. M., and D. M. Hanson, 1995: A reexamination of the formation of exhaust condensation trails by jet aircraft. J. Appl. Meteor.,34, 2400–2405.

  • Harami, K., 1968: Utilization of condensation trails for weather forecasting. J. Meteor. Res. Japan,20, 55–63.

  • Henderson-Sellers, A., 1992: Continental cloudiness changes this century. GeoJournal,27, 255–262.

  • Henderson-Sellers, A., and K. McGuffie, 1989: Diagnosis of cloud amount increase from an analogue model of a warming world. Atmosfera,2, 67– 101.

  • Heymsfield, A. J., L. M. Miloshevich, C. Twohy, G. Sachse, and S. Oltmans, 1998: Upper-tropospheric relative humidity observations and implications for cirrus ice nucleation. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 1343–1346.

  • Hoinka, K. P., M. E. Reinhardt, and W. Metz, 1993: North Atlantic air traffic within the lower stratosphere: Cruising times and corresponding emissions. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 23113–23131.

  • Hudson, J. G., and Y. Xie, 1998: Cloud condensation nuclei measurements in the high troposphere and in jet aircraft exhaust. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 1395–1398.

  • Hunter, D. E., S. E. Schwartz, R. Wagener, and C. M. Benkovitz, 1993: Seasonal, latitudinal, and secular variations in temperature trend: Evidence for influence of anthropogenic sulfate. Geophys. Res. Lett.,20, 2455–2458.

  • Hutchison, K. D., K. R. Hardy, and B. C. Gao, 1995: Improved detection of optically thin cirrus clouds in nighttime multispectral meteorological satellite imagery using total integrated water vapor information. J. Appl. Meteor.,34, 1161–1168.

  • Jacobs, J. D., 1971: Aircraft contrail effects on the surface radiation budget in an Arctic region. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,52, 1101– 1102.

  • Jasperson, W. H., G. D. Nastrom, R. E. Davis, and J. D. Holdeman, 1985: Variability of cloudiness at airline cruise altitudes from GASP measurements. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,24, 74–82.

  • Jensen, E. J., A. S. Ackerman, D. E. Stevens, O. B. Toon, and P. Minnis, 1998: Spreading and growth of contrails in a sheared environment. J. Geophys. Res.,103, 31557–31567.

  • Joseph, J. H., Z. Levin, Y. Mekler, G. Ohring, and J. Otterman, 1975:Study of contrails observed from the ERTS I satellite imagery. J. Geophys. Res.,80, 366–372.

  • Kaiser, D. P., and V. N. Razuvaev, 1995: Cloud cover and type over the former USSR, 1936–83; trends derived from the RIHMI-WDC 223-station 6- and 3-hourly meteorological database. Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Statistical Climatology, Galway, Ireland, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 419–422.

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 437–471.

  • Karl, T. R., and P. M. Steurer, 1990: Increased cloudiness in the United States during the first half of the twentieth century: Fact or fiction? Geophys. Res. Lett.,17, 1925–1928.

  • Karl, T. R., R. W. Knight, D. R. Easterling, and R. G. Quayle, 1996: Indices of climate change for the United States. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 279–292.

  • Khvorostyanov, V., and K. Sassen, 1998: Cloud model simulation of a contrail case study: Surface cooling against upper tropospheric warming. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 2145–2148.

  • Knollenberg, R. G., 1972: Measurements of the growth of the ice budget in a persisting contrail. J. Atmos. Sci.,29, 1367–1374.

  • Kuhn, P. M., 1970: Airborne observations of contrail effects on the thermal radiation budget. J. Atmos. Sci.,27, 937–942.

  • Kuo, K. S., R. M. Welch, and S. K. Sengupta, 1988: Structural and textural characteristics of cirrus clouds observed using high spatial resolution LANDSAT imagery. J. Appl. Meteor.,27, 1242– 1260.

  • Lawrence, M. G., 1993: An empirical analysis of the strength of the phytoplankton–dimethylsulfide&ndash/oud&ndash/imate feedback cycle. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 20663–20673.

  • Lee, J. E., and S. D. Johnson, 1985: Expectancy of cloudless photographic days in the contiguous United States. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens.,51, 1883–1891.

  • Lee, T. F., 1989: Jet contrail identification using the AVHRR infrared split window. J. Appl. Meteor.,28, 993–995.

  • Liou, K.-N., 1986: Influence of cirrus clouds on weather and climate processes. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 1167–1199.

  • Liou, K.-N., S. C. Ou, and G. Koenig, 1990: An investigation on the climatic effect of contrail cirrus. Air Traffic and the Environment—Background, Tendencies and Potential Global Atmospheric Effects, U. Schumann, Ed., Springer Verlag, 154–169.

  • Liou, K.-N., P. Yang, Y. Takano, K. Sassen, T. Charlock, and W. Arnott, 1998: On the radiative properties of contrail cirrus. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 1161–1164.

  • Ludlum, F. H., 1980: Clouds and Storms. The Pennsylvania State University Press, 405 pp.

  • Machta, L., and T. Carpenter, 1971: Trends in high cloudiness at Denver and Salt Lake City. Man’s Impact on the Environment, W. H. Mathews, W. W. Kellogg, and G. D. Robinson, Eds., The MIT Press, 410–415.

  • Machta, L., and K. Telegadas, 1974: Inadvertent large-scale weather modification. Weather and Climate Modification, W. N. Hess, Ed., John Wiley and Sons, 687–725.

  • Manabe, S., 1975: Cloudiness and the radiative convective equilibrium. The Changing Global Environment, S. F. Singer, Ed., Reidel, 175–176.

  • Mannstein, H., R. Meyer, and P. Wendling, 1999: Operational detection of contrails from NOAA-AVHRR data. Int. J. Remote Sens.,20, 1641–1660.

  • Mazin, I. P., S. N. Burkovskaya, and E. T. Ivanova, 1993: On the climatology of upper-level clouds. J. Climate,6, 1812–1821.

  • McIntosh, D. H., and A. S. Thom, 1969: Essentials of Meteorology. Wykeham Publications, 238 pp.

  • Mims, F. M., and D. J. Travis, 1997: Aircraft contrails reduce solar irradiance. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union,78, 448.

  • Minnis, P., J. K. Ayers, and S. P. Weaver, 1997: Surface-based observations of contrail occurrence frequency over the U.S., April 1993–April 1994. NASA Ref. Publ. 1404, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 12 pp.

  • Minnis, P., D. F. Young, D. P. Garber, L. Nguyen, W. L Smith Jr., and R. Palikonda, 1998: Transformation of contrails into cirrus during SUCCESS. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 1157–1160.

  • Molnar, G., 1993: Greenhouse sensitivity to tropical water vapor distribution and cirrus property changes. Preprints, Fourth Symp. on Global Change Studies, Anaheim, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 104–111.

  • Namias, J., and P. F. Clapp, 1951: Observational studies of general circulation patterns. Compendium of Meteorology, T. F. Malone, Ed., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 551–567.

  • NASA/NOAA/UKDOE/UNEP/WMO, 1991: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 1991 Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project–Report No. 25. WMO, 295 pp.

  • Nicodemus, M. L., and J. D. McQuigg, 1969: A simulation model for studying possible modification of surface temperature. J. Appl. Meteor.,8, 199–204.

  • NMC, 1990: NMC Grid Point Data Set. Version 2, Dept. of Atmos. Sci., University of Washington, and Data Support Section, NCAR, CD-ROM.

  • Parol, F., J. C. Buriez, G. Brogniez, and Y. Fouquart, 1991: Information content of AVHRR channels 4 and 5 with respect to the effective radius of cirrus cloud particles. J. Appl. Meteor.,30, 973–984.

  • Parungo, F., J. F. Boatman, H. Sievering, S. W. Wilkison, and B. B. Hicks, 1994: Trends in global marine cloudiness and anthropogenic sulfur. J. Climate,7, 434–440.

  • Peixoto, J. P., and A. H. Oort, 1996: The climatology of relative humidity in the atmosphere. J. Climate,9, 3443–3463.

  • Peters, J. L., 1993: New techniques for contrail forecasting. Air Weather Service AWS/TR-93/001, AD-A269686, Air Weather Service, Scott Air Force Base, IL, 31 pp.

  • Petersen, M. S., P. J. Lamb, and K. E. Kunkel, 1995: Implementation of a semiphysical model for examining solar radiation in the Midwest. J. Appl. Meteor.,34, 1905–1915.

  • Pilié, R. J., and J. E. Jiusto, 1958: A laboratory study of contrails. J. Meteor.,15, 149–154.

  • Plantico, M. S., T. R. Karl, G. Kukla, and J. Gavin, 1990: Is recent climate change across the United States related to rising levels of anthropogenic greenhouse gases? J. Geophys. Res.,95, 16617–16637.

  • Platnick, S., and S. Twomey, 1994: Determining the susceptibility of cloud albedo to changes in droplet concentration with the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer. J. Appl. Meteor.,33, 334–347.

  • Platt, C. M. R., 1989: The role of cloud microphysics in high-cloud feedback effects on climate change. Nature,341, 428–429.

  • Poellot, M. R., W. P. Arnott, and J. Hallett, 1999: In situ observations of contrail microphysics and implications for their radiative impact. J. Geophys. Res.,104, 12077–12084.

  • Poetzsch-Heffter, C., Q. Liu, E. Ruprecht, and C. Simmer, 1995: Effect of cloud types on the earth radiation budget calculated with the ISCCP C1 dataset: Methodology and initial results. J. Climate,8, 829–843.

  • Ponater, M., S. Brinkop, R. Sausen, and U. Schumann, 1996: Simulating the global atmospheric response to aircraft water vapor emissions and contrails: A first approach using a GCM. Ann. Geophys.,14, 941–960.

  • Radke, L. F., J. A. Coakley, and M. D. King, 1989: Direct and remote sensing observations of the effects of ships on clouds. Science,246, 1146–1149.

  • Randel, D. L., T. H. Vonder Haar, M. A. Ringerud, G. L. Stephens, T. J. Greenwald, and C. L. Combs, 1996: A new global water vapor dataset. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 1233–1246.

  • Reinking, R. F., 1968: Insolation reduction by contrails. Weather,23, 171–173.

  • Rind, D., P. Lonergan, and K. Shah, 1996: Climatic effect of water vapor release in the upper troposphere. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 29395–29405.

  • Sassen, K., 1991: Aircraft-produced ice particles in a highly supercooled altocumulus cloud. J. Appl. Meteor.,30, 765–775.

  • Sassen, K., 1997: Contrail-cirrus and their potential for regional climate change. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,78, 1885–1903.

  • Sassen, K., and C.-Y. Hsueh, 1998: Contrail properties derived from high-resolution polarization lidar studies during SUCCESS. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 1165–1168.

  • Sassen, K., M. K. Griffin, and G. C. Dodd, 1989: Optical scattering and microphysical properties of subvisual cirrus clouds, and climatic implications. J. Appl. Meteor.,28, 91–98.

  • Schrader, M. L., 1997: Calculations of aircraft contrail formation critical temperatures. J. Appl. Meteor.,36, 1725–1728.

  • Schulz, J., 1998: On the effect of cloud inhomogeneity on area-averaged radiative properties of contrails. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 1427–1430.

  • Schumann, U., 1994: On the effects of emissions from aircraft engines on the state of the atmosphere. Ann. Geophys.,12, 365–384.

  • Schumann, U., 1996: On conditions for contrail formation from aircraft exhausts. Meteor. Z.,5, 4–23.

  • Schumann, U., and P. Wendling, 1990: Determination of contrails from satellite data and observational results. Air Traffic and the Environment— Background, Tendencies and Potential Global Atmospheric Effects, U. Schumann, Ed., Springer Verlag, 138–153.

  • Scorer, R. S., 1978: Environmental Aerodynamics. Ellis Horwood, 488 pp.

  • Seaver, W. L., and J. E. Lee, 1987: A statistical examination of sky cover changes in the contiguous United States. J. Appl. Meteor.,26, 88–95.

  • Sohn, B.-J., and E. A. Smith, 1992a: The significance of cloud–radiative forcing to the general circulation on climate time scales—a satellite interpretation. J. Atmos. Sci.,49, 845–860.

  • Sohn, B.-J., and E. A. Smith, 1992b: Global energy transports and the influence of clouds on transport requirements—a satellite analysis. J. Climate,5, 717–734.

  • Strauss, B., R. Meerkoetter, B. Wissinger, P. Wendling, and M. Hess, 1997: On the regional climatic impact of contrails—microphysical and radiative properties of contrails and cirrus. Ann. Geophys.,15, 1457–1467.

  • Travis, D. J., 1994: Jet aircraft condensation trails: Their radiative impacts and association with atmospheric conditions. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, 118 pp. [Available from Dept. of Geography, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.].

  • Travis, D. J., 1996a: Diurnal temperature range modifications induced by contrails. Preprints, 13th Conf. on Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification, Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 110– 111.

  • Travis, D. J., 1996b: Variations in contrail morphology and relationships to atmospheric conditions. J. Wea. Modif.,28, 50–58.

  • Travis, D. J., and S. A. Changnon, 1997: Evidence of jet contrail influences on regional-scale diurnal temperature range. J. Wea. Modif.,29, 74–83.

  • Travis, D. J., A. M. Carleton, and S. A. Changnon, 1997: An empirical model to predict widespread occurrences of contrails. J. Appl. Meteor.,36, 1211–1220.

  • Tselioudis, G., and W. B. Rossow, 1994: Multiyear variations of optical thickness with temperature in low and cirrus clouds. Geophys. Res. Lett.,21, 2211–2214.

  • Tselioudis, G., A. A. Lacis, D. Rind, and W. B. Rossow, 1993: Potential effects of cloud optical thickness on climate warming. Nature,366, 670–672.

  • Twohy, C. H., P. A. Durkee, B. J. Huebert, and R. J. Charlson, 1995:Effects of aerosol particles on the microphysics of coastal stratiform clouds. J. Climate,8, 773–783.

  • Wagner, A. J., 1978: Weather and circulation of January 1978. Mon. Wea. Rev.,106, 579–585.

  • Wagner, A. J., 1979: Weather and circulation of January 1979. Mon. Wea. Rev.,107, 499–506.

  • Wallace, J. M., and P. V. Hobbs, 1977: Atmospheric Science: An Introductory Survey. Academic Press, 467 pp.

  • Wang, P.-H., P. Minnis, M. P. McCormick, G. S. Kent, and K. M. Skeens, 1996: A 6-year climatology of cloud occurrence frequency from Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment II observations (1985–1990). J. Geophys. Res.,101, 29407–29429.

  • Wendland, W. M., and R. G. Semonin, 1982: Effect of contrail cirrus on surface weather conditions in the Midwest: Phase II. Final Report of NSF Grant ATM 8008812, Illinois State Water Survey, 95 pp. [Available from Atmospheric Sciences Division, Illinois State Water Survey, 2204 Griffith Dr., Champaign, IL 61820-7495.].

  • Wielicki, B. A., R. D. Cess, M. D. King, D. A. Randall, and E. F. Harrison, 1995: Mission to Planet Earth: Role of clouds and radiation in climate. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,76, 2125–2153.

  • Woodbury, G. E., and M. P. McCormick, 1986: Zonal and geographic distributions of cirrus clouds determined from SAGE data. J. Geophys. Res.,91, 2775–2785.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1673 946 64
PDF Downloads 377 84 6