Geostatistical Mapping of Precipitation from Rain Gauge Data Using Atmospheric and Terrain Characteristics

Phaedon C. Kyriakidis Regional Climate Center, Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California

Search for other papers by Phaedon C. Kyriakidis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jinwon Kim Regional Climate Center, Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California

Search for other papers by Jinwon Kim in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Norman L. Miller Regional Climate Center, Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California

Search for other papers by Norman L. Miller in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A geostatistical framework for integrating lower-atmosphere state variables and terrain characteristics into the spatial interpolation of rainfall is presented. Lower-atmosphere state variables considered are specific humidity and wind, derived from an assimilated data product from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP–NCAR reanalysis). These variables, along with terrain elevation and its gradient from a 1-km-resolution digital elevation model, are used for constructing additional rainfall predictors, such as the amount of moisture subject to orographic lifting; these latter predictors quantify the interaction of lower-atmosphere characteristics with local terrain. A “first-guess” field of precipitation estimates is constructed via a multiple regression model using collocated rain gauge observations and rainfall predictors. The final map of rainfall estimates is derived by adding to this initial field a field of spatially interpolated residuals, which accounts for local deviations from the regression-based first-guess field. Several forms of spatial interpolation (kriging), which differ in the degree of complexity of the first-guess field, are considered for mapping the seasonal average of daily precipitation for the period from 1 November 1981 to 31 January 1982 over a region in northern California at 1-km resolution. The different interpolation schemes are compared in terms of cross-validation statistics and the spatial characteristics of cross-validation errors. The results indicate that integration of low-atmosphere and terrain information in a geostatistical framework could lead to more accurate representations of the spatial distribution of rainfall than those found in traditional analyses based only on rain gauge data. The magnitude of this latter improvement, however, would depend on the density of the rain gauge stations, on the spatial variability of the precipitation field, and on the degree of correlation between rainfall and its predictors.

Corresponding author address: Phaedon C. Kyriakidis, Dept. of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, Ellison Hall 5710, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-4060. phaedon@geog.ucsb.edu

Abstract

A geostatistical framework for integrating lower-atmosphere state variables and terrain characteristics into the spatial interpolation of rainfall is presented. Lower-atmosphere state variables considered are specific humidity and wind, derived from an assimilated data product from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP–NCAR reanalysis). These variables, along with terrain elevation and its gradient from a 1-km-resolution digital elevation model, are used for constructing additional rainfall predictors, such as the amount of moisture subject to orographic lifting; these latter predictors quantify the interaction of lower-atmosphere characteristics with local terrain. A “first-guess” field of precipitation estimates is constructed via a multiple regression model using collocated rain gauge observations and rainfall predictors. The final map of rainfall estimates is derived by adding to this initial field a field of spatially interpolated residuals, which accounts for local deviations from the regression-based first-guess field. Several forms of spatial interpolation (kriging), which differ in the degree of complexity of the first-guess field, are considered for mapping the seasonal average of daily precipitation for the period from 1 November 1981 to 31 January 1982 over a region in northern California at 1-km resolution. The different interpolation schemes are compared in terms of cross-validation statistics and the spatial characteristics of cross-validation errors. The results indicate that integration of low-atmosphere and terrain information in a geostatistical framework could lead to more accurate representations of the spatial distribution of rainfall than those found in traditional analyses based only on rain gauge data. The magnitude of this latter improvement, however, would depend on the density of the rain gauge stations, on the spatial variability of the precipitation field, and on the degree of correlation between rainfall and its predictors.

Corresponding author address: Phaedon C. Kyriakidis, Dept. of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, Ellison Hall 5710, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-4060. phaedon@geog.ucsb.edu

Save
  • Alpert, P. 1986. Mesoscale indexing of the distribution of orographic precipitation over high mountains. J. Appl. Meteor 25:532545.

  • Alpert, P. and H. Shafir. 1989a. A physical model to complement rainfall normals over complex terrain. J. Hydrol 110:5162.

  • Alpert, P. and H. Shafir. 1989b. Meso-γ-scale distribution of orographic precipitation: Numerical study and comparison with precipitation derived from radar measurements. J. Appl. Meteor 28:11051116.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Andrieu, H., M. N. French, V. Thauvin, and W. F. Krajewski. 1996:. Adaptation and application of a quantitative rainfall forecasting model in a mountainous region. J. Hydrol 184:243259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barros, A. P. and D. P. Lettenmaier. 1993. Dynamic modeling of the spatial distribution of precipitation in remote mountainous areas. Mon. Wea. Rev 121:11951214.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burns, J. I. 1953. Small-scale topographic effects on precipitation in San Dimas experimental forest. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 34:761767.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chilès, J. P. and P. Delfiner. 1999. Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty. John Wiley and Sons, 695 pp.

  • Chua, S. H. and R. L. Bras. 1982. Optimal estimators of mean area precipitation in regions of orographic influence. J. Hydrol 57:2348.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cressie, N. A. C. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley and Sons, 900 pp.

  • Daley, R. 1991. Atmospheric Data Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 457 pp.

  • Daly, C., R. P. Neilson, and D. L. Phillips. 1994. A statistical–topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. J. Appl. Meteor 33:140158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deutsch, C. V. and A. G. Journel. 1998. GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide. 2d ed. Oxford University Press, 368 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dirks, K. N., J. E. Hay, C. D. Stow, and D. Harris. 1998. High-resolution studies of rainfall on Norfolk Island. Part II: Interpolation of rainfall data. J. Hydrol 208:187193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Draper, N. R. and H. Smith. 1998. Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, 706 pp.

  • Entekhabi, D. and Coauthors, 1999. An agenda for land surface hydrology research and a call for the second International Hydrological Decade. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc 80:20432058.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Giorgi, F. and L. O. Mearns. 1991. Approaches to the simulation of regional climate change: A review. Rev. Geophys 29:191216.

  • Goovaerts, P. 1997. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press, 483 pp.

  • Goovaerts, P. 2000. Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall. J. Hydrol 228:113129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herman, A., V. B. Kumar, P. A. Arkin, and J. V. Kousky. 1997. Objectively determined 10-day African rainfall estimates created for famine early warning systems. Int. J. Remote Sens 18:21472159.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hevesi, J. A., A. L. Flint, and J. D. Istok. 1992. Precipitation estimation in mountainous terrain using multivariate geostatistics. Part II: Isohyetal maps. J. Appl. Meteor 31:677688.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Isaaks, E. and R. M. Srivastava. 1989. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, 561 pp.

  • Isakson, A. 1996. Rainfall distribution over central and southern Israel induced by large-scale moisture flux. J. Appl. Meteor 35:10631075.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Journel, A. G. and C. J. Huijbregts. 1978. Mining Geostatistics. Academic Press, 600 pp.

  • Kalnay, E. and Coauthors, 1996. The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc 77:437471.

  • Kim, J. and S-T. Soong. 1996. Simulation of a precipitation event in the western United States. Regional Impacts of Global Climate Change, S. J. Ghan et al., Eds., Battelle Press, 73–84.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kim, J., N. L. Miller, A. K. Guetter, and K. P. Georgakakos. 1998. River flow response to precipitation and snow budget in California during the 1994/95 winter. J. Climate 11:23762386.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kim, J., N. L. Miller, J. D. Farrara, and S-Y. Hong. 2000. A seasonal precipitation and stream flow hindcast and prediction study in the western United States during the 1997/98 winter season using a dynamic downscaling system. J. Hydrometeor 1:311329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leung, L. R., M. S. Wigmosta, S. J. Ghan, D. J. Epstein, and L. W. Vail. 1996. Application of a subgrid orographic precipitation/surface hydrology scheme to a mountain watershed. J. Geophys. Res 101:1280312817.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, N. L. and J. Kim. 1996. Numerical prediction of precipitation and river flow over the Russian River watershed during the January 1995 California storms. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc 77:101105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pandey, G. R., D. R. Cayan, and K. P. Georgakakos. 1999. Precipitation structure in the Sierra Nevada of California during winter. J. Geophys. Res 104:1201912030.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rhea, J. O. 1978. Orographic precipitation model for hydrometeorologic use. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, 199 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rutherford, I. D. 1972. Data assimilation by statistical interpolation of forecast error fields. J. Atmos. Sci 29:809815.

  • Sinclair, M. R. 1994. A diagnostic model for estimating orographic precipitation. J. Appl. Meteor 33:11631175.

  • Smith, R. B. 1979. The influence of mountains on the atmosphere. Advances in Geophysics Vol. 21, Academic Press,. . 87230.

  • Spreen, W. C. 1947. A determination of the effect of topography upon precipitation. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 28:285290.

  • Switzer, P. 1979. Statistical considerations in network design. Water Resour. Res 15:17121716.

  • Tabios, G. and J. Salas. 1985. A comparative analysis of techniques for spatial interpolation of precipitation. Water Resour. Bull 21:365380.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thiébaux, H. J. 1997. The power of duality in spatial–temporal estimation. J. Climate 10:567573.

  • Wackernagel, H. 1995. Multivariate Geostatistics. Springer-Verlag, 256 pp.

  • Wolfson, N. 1975. Topographical effects on standard normals of rainfall over Israel. Weather 30:138144.

  • Wotling, G., C. Bouvier, J. Danloux, and J-M. Fritsch. 2000. Regionalization of extreme precipitation distribution using the principal components of the topographic environment. J. Hydrol 233:86101.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 937 295 24
PDF Downloads 591 166 21