Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Study and Tests of Improved Rain Estimates from the TRMM Precipitation Radar

Franck Ferreira Centre d'étude des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires, Velizy, France

Search for other papers by Franck Ferreira in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Paul Amayenc Centre d'étude des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires, Velizy, France

Search for other papers by Paul Amayenc in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Stéphane Oury Centre d'étude des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires, Velizy, France

Search for other papers by Stéphane Oury in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Jacques Testud Centre d'étude des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires, Velizy, France

Search for other papers by Jacques Testud in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Nov 2001
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<1878:SATOIR>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1878–1899
Restricted access

Abstract

Rain rate R estimation from the 2A-25 profiling algorithm of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) precipitation radar (PR) is analyzed in two ways. Standard results from the operating version-5 algorithm are compared with those from the previous version 4. Also, various adjustments of the involved rain relationships in version 4 are explored, which leads to the proposal of two alternatives to the standard rain rate (Rstd-V4). The first one, (RN0), is based on N*0-scaled relations exploiting the concept of normalized Γ-shaped drop size distributions; the second one, (RkR), relies on using constant R–k instead of constant R–Z relation as in the standard, where Z is reflectivity and k is attenuation coefficient. Error analysis points out a lower sensitivity of the alternative estimates to errors in radar calibration, or initial relations, than the standard. Results from a set of PR data, over ocean and land, show that the version-4 alternatives, and version-5 standard (Rstd-V5), produce more rain than the version-4 standard, which may correct for some reported underestimation. These approaches are tested via point-to-point comparisons of 3D PR-derived Z and R fields (versions 4 and 5) with “reference” fields derived from airborne dual-beam radar on board a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration P3-42 aircraft in Hurricanes Bonnie and Brett, for good cases of TRMM overpasses over the ocean. In the comparison domains, Bonnie is dominated by stratiform rain, and Brett includes convective and stratiform rain. In stratiform rain, the mean difference in Z, accounting for different frequencies and scanning geometries of both radars, lies within the uncertainty margin of residual errors in the radar calibrations. Also, the PR mean rain-rate estimates, RkR and Rstd-V5, agree fairly well with the P3 estimate, RP3, whereas Rstd-V4 and RN0 respectively underestimate and overestimate RP3. In convective rain (Brett case), the PR estimates of Z and R largely exceed the P3 counterparts. It is suggested that this may result from a corruption of the surface-reference estimation of the total path attenuation caused by strong surface winds.

Corresponding author address: Franck Ferreira, Centre d'étude des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires (CETP), 10-12 Avenue de l'Europe, 78140 Vélizy, France. Franck.Ferreira@cetp.ipsl.fr

Abstract

Rain rate R estimation from the 2A-25 profiling algorithm of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) precipitation radar (PR) is analyzed in two ways. Standard results from the operating version-5 algorithm are compared with those from the previous version 4. Also, various adjustments of the involved rain relationships in version 4 are explored, which leads to the proposal of two alternatives to the standard rain rate (Rstd-V4). The first one, (RN0), is based on N*0-scaled relations exploiting the concept of normalized Γ-shaped drop size distributions; the second one, (RkR), relies on using constant R–k instead of constant R–Z relation as in the standard, where Z is reflectivity and k is attenuation coefficient. Error analysis points out a lower sensitivity of the alternative estimates to errors in radar calibration, or initial relations, than the standard. Results from a set of PR data, over ocean and land, show that the version-4 alternatives, and version-5 standard (Rstd-V5), produce more rain than the version-4 standard, which may correct for some reported underestimation. These approaches are tested via point-to-point comparisons of 3D PR-derived Z and R fields (versions 4 and 5) with “reference” fields derived from airborne dual-beam radar on board a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration P3-42 aircraft in Hurricanes Bonnie and Brett, for good cases of TRMM overpasses over the ocean. In the comparison domains, Bonnie is dominated by stratiform rain, and Brett includes convective and stratiform rain. In stratiform rain, the mean difference in Z, accounting for different frequencies and scanning geometries of both radars, lies within the uncertainty margin of residual errors in the radar calibrations. Also, the PR mean rain-rate estimates, RkR and Rstd-V5, agree fairly well with the P3 estimate, RP3, whereas Rstd-V4 and RN0 respectively underestimate and overestimate RP3. In convective rain (Brett case), the PR estimates of Z and R largely exceed the P3 counterparts. It is suggested that this may result from a corruption of the surface-reference estimation of the total path attenuation caused by strong surface winds.

Corresponding author address: Franck Ferreira, Centre d'étude des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires (CETP), 10-12 Avenue de l'Europe, 78140 Vélizy, France. Franck.Ferreira@cetp.ipsl.fr

Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Amayenc, P., M. Marzoug, and J. Testud. 1993. Analysis of cross-beam resolution effects in rainfall profile retrieval from a spaceborne radar. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 31:417–425.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • CAMEX-3, cited 1998. Camex-3 Web site. [Available online at http://ghrc.msfc.nasa.gov/camex3.].

  • Dou, X., J. Testud, P. Amayenc, and R. Black. 1999a. The parameterization of rain for a weather radar. C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. II: Terre Planetes. Sci 328:577–582.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dou, X., J. Testud, P. Amayenc, and R. Black. 1999b. The concept of “normalized” gamma distribution to describe raindrop spectra, and its use to parameterize rain relations. Preprints, 29th Int. Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Montreal, PQ Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 625–628.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Durden, S. L. and Z. S. Haddad. 1998. Comparison of radar rainfall retrieval algorithms in convective rain during TOGA COARE. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol 15:1091–1096.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Durden, S. L., E. Im, K. Li, W. Ricketts, A. Tannier, and W. Wilson. 1994. ARMAR: An airborne rain-mapping radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol 11:727–947.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Foote, G. B. and P. S. du Toit. 1969. Terminal velocity of raindrops aloft. J. Appl. Meteor 8:249–253.

  • Hitschfeld, W. and J. Bordan. 1954. Errors inherent in the radar measurement of rainfall at attenuating wavelengths. J. Meteor 11:58–67.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Iguchi, T. and R. Meneghini. 1994. Intercomparison of single-frequency methods for retrieving a vertical rain profile from airborne or spaceborne radar data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol 11:1507–1516.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Iguchi, T., T. Kozu, R. Meneghini, J. Awaka, and K. Okamoto. 2000. Rain profiling algorithm for the TRMM precipitation radar. J. Appl. Meteor 39:2038–2052.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kozu, T. and T. Iguchi. 1999. Nonuniform beamfilling correction for spaceborne rain radar rainfall measurement: Implications from TOGA COARE radar data analysis. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol 16:1722–1735.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kozu, T., T. Iguchi, K. Shimizu, and N. Kashiwagi. 1999. Estimation of raindrop size distribution parameters using statistical relations between multi-parameter rainfall remote sensing data. Preprints, 29th Int. Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Montreal, PQ, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 689–692.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kummerow, C. and Coauthors,. . 2000. The status of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) after two years in orbit. J. Appl. Meteor 39:1965–1982.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Marécal, M., T. Tani, P. Amayenc, K. Klapisz, E. Obligis, and N. Viltard. 1997. Rain relations inferred from microphysical data in TOGA COARE and their use to test a rain profiling method from radar measurements at Ku-band. J. Appl. Meteor 36:1629–1646.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Marshall, J. S. and W. M. K. Palmer. 1948. The distribution of raindrops with size. J. Meteor 5:165–166.

  • Marzoug, M. and P. Amayenc. 1994. A class of single- and dual-frequency algorithms for rain rate profiling from a spaceborne radar. Part I: Principle and tests from numerical simulations. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol 11:1480–1506.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Meneghini, R. and D. Atlas. 1986. Simultaneous ocean cross section and rainfall measurements from space with nadir-looking radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol 3:400–413.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Meneghini, R. and K. Nakamura. 1990. Range profiling of the rain rate by an airborne weather radar. Remote Sens. Environ 31:193–200.

  • Meneghini, R., J. Eckerman, and D. Atlas. 1983. Determination of rain rate from a spaceborne radar using measurement of total attenuation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens 21:38–43.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Meneghini, R., T. Iguchi, T. Kozu, L. Liao, K. Okamoto, J. A. Jones, and J. Kiatkowski. 2000. Use of the surface reference technique for path attenuation estimates from the TRMM precipitation radar. J. Appl. Meteor 39:2053–2070.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Oury, S., J. Testud, and V. Marécal. 1999. Estimate of precipitation from the dual-beam airborne radars in TOGA COARE. Part I: The K–Z relationships derived from the stereo- and quad-beam analysis. J. Appl. Meteor 38:156–174.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Oury, S., X. Dou, and J. Testud. 2000. Estimate of precipitation from the dual-beam airborne radars in TOGA COARE. Part II: Precipitation efficiency in the February 1993 MCS. J. Appl. Meteor 39:2371–2384.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tani, T. and P. Amayenc. 1998. Comparison of rain profiling methods from ARMAR data in TOGA COARE with a view to a possible use with the TRMM radar. J. Appl. Meteor 37:1600–1618.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Testud, J., E. Le Bouar, E. Obligis, and M. Ali-Mehenni. 2000. The rain profiling algorithm applied to polarimetric weather radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol 17:332–356.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Testud, J., S. Oury, X. Dou, P. Amayenc, and R. Black. 2001. The concept of normalized distribution to describe raindrop spectra: A tool for cloud physics and cloud remote sensing. J. Appl. Meteor 40:1118–1140.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ulaby, F. T., R. K. Moore, and A. K. Fung. 1982. Microwave Remote Sensing. Vol. 2. Addison-Wesley, 1064 pp.

  • Ulbrich, C. W. 1983. Natural variations in the analytical form of the raindrop size distribution. J. Climate Appl. Meteor 22:1204–1215.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Webster, P. J. and R. Lukas. 1992. TOGA COARE: The Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Response Experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc 73:1377–1416.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 275 106 2
PDF Downloads 35 10 0