Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Assimilating Surface Data to Improve the Accuracy of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Simulations

Kiran Alapaty MCNC-Environmental Programs, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Kiran Alapaty in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Nelson L. Seaman Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Nelson L. Seaman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Devdutta S. Niyogi Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Devdutta S. Niyogi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Adel F. Hanna MCNC-Environmental Programs, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Adel F. Hanna in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Nov 2001
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<2068:ASDTIT>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
2068–2082
Restricted access

Abstract

Large errors in atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) simulations can be caused by inaccuracies in the specification of surface characteristics in addition to assumptions and simplifications made in boundary layer formulations or other model deficiencies. For certain applications, such as air quality studies, these errors can have significant effects. To reduce such errors, a continuous surface data assimilation technique is developed. In this technique, surface-layer temperature and water vapor mixing ratio are directly assimilated by using the analyzed surface data. Then, the difference between the observations and model results is used to calculate adjustments to the surface fluxes of sensible and latent heat. These adjustments are then used to calculate a new estimate of the ground temperature, thereby affecting the simulated surface fluxes on the subsequent time step. This indirect data assimilation is applied simultaneously with the direct assimilation of surface data in the model's lowest layer, thereby maintaining greater consistency between the ground temperature and the surface-layer mass-field variables. A one-dimensional model was used to study the improvements that result from applying this technique for ABL simulations in two cases. It was found that application of the new technique led to significant reductions in ABL modeling errors.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Kiran Alapaty, MCNC-Environmental Programs, P.O. Box 12889, 3021 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2889. alapaty@ncsc.org

Abstract

Large errors in atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) simulations can be caused by inaccuracies in the specification of surface characteristics in addition to assumptions and simplifications made in boundary layer formulations or other model deficiencies. For certain applications, such as air quality studies, these errors can have significant effects. To reduce such errors, a continuous surface data assimilation technique is developed. In this technique, surface-layer temperature and water vapor mixing ratio are directly assimilated by using the analyzed surface data. Then, the difference between the observations and model results is used to calculate adjustments to the surface fluxes of sensible and latent heat. These adjustments are then used to calculate a new estimate of the ground temperature, thereby affecting the simulated surface fluxes on the subsequent time step. This indirect data assimilation is applied simultaneously with the direct assimilation of surface data in the model's lowest layer, thereby maintaining greater consistency between the ground temperature and the surface-layer mass-field variables. A one-dimensional model was used to study the improvements that result from applying this technique for ABL simulations in two cases. It was found that application of the new technique led to significant reductions in ABL modeling errors.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Kiran Alapaty, MCNC-Environmental Programs, P.O. Box 12889, 3021 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2889. alapaty@ncsc.org

Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Alapaty, K. and R. Mathur. 1998. Effects of atmospheric boundary layer mixing representations on vertical distribution of passive and reactive tracers. Meteor. Atmos. Phys 69:101–118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Alapaty, K., J. E. Pleim, S. Raman, D. S. Niyogi, and D. W. Byun. 1997a:. Simulation of atmospheric boundary layer processes using local- and nonlocal-closure schemes. J. Appl. Meteor 36:214–233.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Alapaty, K., S. Raman, and D. S. Niyogi. 1997b. Uncertainty in the specification of surface characteristics: A case study of prediction errors in the boundary layer. Bound.-Layer Meteor 82:473–500.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Blumenthal, D. L. and Coauthors,. 1993. Field program plan for the San Joaquin Valley Air Quality Study (SJVAQS) and the atmospheric utility signatures, predictions, and experiments program. Valley Air Pollution Study Agency Rep. STI-98020-1241-FR.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bouttier, F., J-F. Mahfouf, and J. Noilhan. 1993. Sequential assimilation of soil moisture from atmospheric low-level parameters. Part I: Sensitivity and calibration studies. J. Appl. Meteor 32:1335–1351.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Carlson, T. N. and F. E. Boland. 1978. Analysis of urban-rural canopy using a surface heat flux/temperature model. J. Appl. Meteor 17:998–1013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, F. and J. Dudhia. 2001. Coupling an advanced land surface–hydrology model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Mon. Wea. Rev 129:569–585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, F. and Coauthors,. . 1996. Modeling of land-surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with FIFE observations. J. Geophys. Res 101:7251–7268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, F., Z. Janjic, and K. Mitchell. 1997. Impact of atmospheric surface layer parameterization in the new land-surface scheme of the NCEP Mesoscale Eta numerical model. Bound.-Layer Meteor 85:391–421.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stuaffer. 1994. A description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note TN-398+STR, 138 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Idso, S., R. Jackson, B. Kimball, and F. Nakayama. 1975. The dependence of bare soil albedo on soil water content. J. Appl. Meteor 14:109–113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lohmann, U., N. McFarlane, L. Levkov, K. Abdella, and F. Albers. 1999. Comparing different cloud schemes of a single column model by using mesoscale forcing and nudging technique. J. Climate 12:438–461.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mahfouf, J. F. 1991. Analysis of soil moisture from near-surface parameters: A feasibility study. J. Appl. Meteor 30:1534–1547.

  • McNider, R. T., A. J. Song, D. M. Casey, P. J. Wetzel, W. L. Crosson, and R. M. Rabin. 1994. Toward a dynamic–thermodynamic assimilation of satellite surface temperature in numerical atmospheric models. Mon. Wea. Rev 122:2784–2803.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Monin, A. S. and A. M. Yaglom. 1971. Statistical Fluid Mechanics. Vol. I. MIT Press, 468–504.

  • Niyogi, D., S. Raman, and K. Alapaty. 1999. Uncertainty in specification of surface characteristics. Part II: Hierarchy of interaction—explicit statistical analysis. Bound.-Layer Meteor 91:341–366.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Noilhan, J. and S. Planton. 1989. A simple parameterization of land surface processes for meteorological models. Mon. Wea. Rev 117:536–549.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pleim, J. E. and J. S. Chang. 1992. A non-local closure model for vertical mixing in the convective boundary layer. Atmos. Environ 26A:965–981.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pleim, J. E. and A. Xiu. 1995. Development and testing of a surface flux planetary boundary layer model with explicit soil moisture parameterization for applications in mesoscale models. J. Appl. Meteor 34:16–32.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ruggiero, F. H., K. D. Sashegyi, R. V. Madala, and S. Raman. 1996:. The use of surface observations in four-dimensional data assimilation in a mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Rev 124:1018–1033.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ruggiero, F. H., G. D. Modica, and A. E. Lipton. 2000. Assimilation of satellite imager data and surface observations to improve analysis of circulations forced by cloud shading contrasts. Mon. Wea. Rev 128:434–448.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Russell, A. G. and R. Dennis. 2000. NARSTO critical review of photochemical models and modeling. Atmos. Environ 34:2283–2324.

  • Seaman, N. L. 2000. Meteorological modeling for air quality assessments. Atmos. Environ 34:2231–2259.

  • Seaman, N. L., D. R. Stauffer, and A. M. Lario-Gibbs. 1995. A multiscale four-dimensional data assimilation system applied in the San Joaquin Valley during SARMAP. Part I: Modeling design and basic performance characteristics. J. Appl. Meteor 34:1739–1754.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sellers, P. J., F. G. Hall, G. Asrar, D. E. Strebel, and R. E. Murphy. 1992. An overview of the First International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project (ISLSCP) Field Experiment (FIFE). J. Geophys. Res 97:18345–18371.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sistla, G., N. Zhou, W. Hao, J-K. Ku, S. T. Rao, R. Bornstein, F. Freedman, and P. Thunis. 1996. Effects of uncertainties in meteorological inputs on Urban Airshed Model predictions and ozone control strategies. Atmos. Environ 30:2011–2025.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stauffer, D. R. and N. L. Seaman. 1990. Use of four-dimensional data assimilation in a limited area mesoscale model. Part I: Experiments with synoptic-scale data. Mon. Wea. Rev 118:1250–1277.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stauffer, D. R. and N. L. Seaman. 1994. Multiscale four-dimensional data assimilation. J. Appl. Meteor 33:416–434.

  • Stauffer, D. R., N. L. Seaman, and F. S. Binkowski. 1991. Use of four-dimensional data assimilation in a limited-area mesoscale model. Part II: Effects of data assimilation within the planetary boundary layer. Mon. Wea. Rev 119:734–754.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 203 56 1
PDF Downloads 54 22 1