Coupling between the University of California, Davis, Advanced Canopy–Atmosphere–Soil Algorithm (ACASA) and MM5: Preliminary Results for July 1998 for Western North America

R. David Pyles Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, Davis, California

Search for other papers by R. David Pyles in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bryan C. Weare Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, Davis, California

Search for other papers by Bryan C. Weare in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kyaw Tha Paw U Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, Davis, California

Search for other papers by Kyaw Tha Paw U in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
William Gustafson Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, Davis, California

Search for other papers by William Gustafson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The University of California, Davis, Advanced Canopy–Atmosphere–Soil Algorithm (ACASA) is coupled to the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Mesoscale Model (MM5) as a land surface scheme. Simulations for July 1998 over western North America show that this coupling, the first between a mesoscale model and a land surface model of this complexity, is successful. Comparisons among model output, National Centers for Environmental Prediction–NCAR reanalysis fields, and station data show that MM5–ACASA generally reproduces near-surface temperature in a realistic fashion, but with a stronger diurnal cycle than observations suggest. A control run using the existing Louis/European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts land surface formulation produces unrealistically low temperatures associated with high latent heating and precipitation amounts over much of the model domain. Simulations of heat and moisture fluxes using the Biosphere–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) are generally comparable to ACASA, but near-surface air temperatures reveal excessively warm conditions. Low specific-humidity values over land in both MM5–ACASA and MM5–BATS simulations and low oceanic values in all three simulations suggest a possible dry bias in MM5. Comparison statistics between modeled near-surface climatological behavior and associated fluxes at three sites show that MM5–ACASA, out of the three simulations, agrees most with observations. Sensitivity tests show that MM5 is generally more sensitive to the choice of surface scheme than it is to soil moisture initialization. Comparisons of mean carbon dioxide fluxes reveal that ACASA can be a useful tool in examining the terrestrial carbon cycle.

Corresponding author address: R. David Pyles, Dept. of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, Hoagland Hall, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616. rdpyles@ucdavis.edu

Abstract

The University of California, Davis, Advanced Canopy–Atmosphere–Soil Algorithm (ACASA) is coupled to the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Mesoscale Model (MM5) as a land surface scheme. Simulations for July 1998 over western North America show that this coupling, the first between a mesoscale model and a land surface model of this complexity, is successful. Comparisons among model output, National Centers for Environmental Prediction–NCAR reanalysis fields, and station data show that MM5–ACASA generally reproduces near-surface temperature in a realistic fashion, but with a stronger diurnal cycle than observations suggest. A control run using the existing Louis/European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts land surface formulation produces unrealistically low temperatures associated with high latent heating and precipitation amounts over much of the model domain. Simulations of heat and moisture fluxes using the Biosphere–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) are generally comparable to ACASA, but near-surface air temperatures reveal excessively warm conditions. Low specific-humidity values over land in both MM5–ACASA and MM5–BATS simulations and low oceanic values in all three simulations suggest a possible dry bias in MM5. Comparison statistics between modeled near-surface climatological behavior and associated fluxes at three sites show that MM5–ACASA, out of the three simulations, agrees most with observations. Sensitivity tests show that MM5 is generally more sensitive to the choice of surface scheme than it is to soil moisture initialization. Comparisons of mean carbon dioxide fluxes reveal that ACASA can be a useful tool in examining the terrestrial carbon cycle.

Corresponding author address: R. David Pyles, Dept. of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, Hoagland Hall, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616. rdpyles@ucdavis.edu

Save
  • Buermann, W., J. Dong, X. Zeng, R. B. Myneni, and R. E. Dickinson. 2001. Evaluation of the utility of satellite-based vegetation leaf area index data for climate simulations. J. Climate 14:35363551.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burk, S. D. and W. T. Thompson. 1989. A vertically nested regional numerical prediction model with second-order closure physics. Mon. Wea. Rev. 117:23052324.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, T. H. Coauthors,. 1997. Cabauw experimental results from the Project for Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes. J. Climate 10:11941215.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dickinson, R. E., A. Henderson-Sellers, and P. J. Kennedy. 1993. Biosphere–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) version 1E as coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-387+STR, 72 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dudhia, J. 1993. A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model: Validation tests and simulation on an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev. 121:14931513.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fast, J. D., B. L. O'steen, and R. P. Addis. 1995. Advanced atmospheric modeling for emergency response. J. Appl. Meteor. 34:626649.

  • Goldstein, A., J. Panek, G. Schade, Y. Qi, and R. Cohen. cited 2000. Observations at the Blodgett forest site. [Available online at http://public.ornl.gov/ameriflux/Participants/Sites/Map/index.cfm.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer. 1995. A description of the Fifth Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398-STR, 117 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Henderson-Sellers, A. and C. Ciret. 2000. Regional interactions of climate and ecosystems. IGBP/GAIM Rep. 3, 53 pp. [Available online at http://gaim.unh.edu/Products/Reports/Report_3/.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kalnay, E. Coauthors,. 1996. The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 77:437471.

  • Mo, K. C. and R. W. Higgins. 1996. Large-scale atmospheric moisture transport as evaluated in the NCEP/NCAR and the NASA/DAO reanalyses. J. Climate 9:15311545.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oechel, W. cited 2000. Observations at the Sky Oaks forest site. [Available online at http://public.ornl.gov/ameriflux/Participants/Sites/Map/index.cfm.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Paw U, K. T. 1997. The modeling and analysis of crop canopy interactions with the atmosphere under global climatic change conditions. J. Agric. Meteor. 53:419428.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Paw U, K. T., M. Falk, and K. Bible. cited 2002. Microclimate data at the Wind River Canopy Crane Facility. [Available online with permission from the University of Washington at http://depts.washington.edu/wrccrf/metdata/microclimate.html.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pyles, R. D. 2000. The development and testing of the UCD Advanced Canopy–Atmosphere–Soil Algorithm (ACASA) for use in climate prediction and field studies. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Davis, 194 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pyles, R. D., B. C. Weare, and K. T. Paw U. 2000. The UCD Advanced-Canopy–Atmosphere–Soil Algorithm (ACASA): Comparisons with observations from different climate and vegetation regimes. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 126:29512980.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sellers, P. J. Coauthors,. 1997. Modeling the exchanges of energy, water, and carbon between continents and the atmosphere. Science 275:502509.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steffen, K. and T. de Maria. 1996. Surface energy fluxes of Arctic winter sea ice in Barrow Strait. J. Appl. Meteor. 35:20672079.

  • Wilson, K. Coauthors,. 2002. Energy budget closure at FLUXNET sites. Agric. For. Meteor. 113:223243.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 211 54 2
PDF Downloads 50 18 0