Evaluation of Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit Tropical-Cyclone Intensity and Size Estimation Algorithms

Julie L. Demuth Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, and Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Julie L. Demuth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Mark DeMaria in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John A. Knaff Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by John A. Knaff in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Thomas H. Vonder Haar Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, and Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Thomas H. Vonder Haar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU) data are used to provide objective estimates of 1-min maximum sustained surface winds, minimum sea level pressure, and the radii of 34-, 50-, and 64-kt (1 kt ≡ 0.5144 m s−1) winds in the northeast, southeast, southwest, and northwest quadrants of tropical cyclones. The algorithms are derived from AMSU temperature, pressure, and wind retrievals from all tropical cyclones in the Atlantic and east Pacific basins during 1999–2001. National Hurricane Center best-track intensity and operational radii estimates are used as dependent variables in a multiple-regression approach. The intensity algorithms are evaluated for the developmental sample using a jackknife procedure and independent cases from the 2002 hurricane season. Jackknife results for the maximum winds and minimum sea level pressure estimates are mean absolute errors (MAE) of 11.0 kt and 6.7 hPa, respectively, and rmse of 14.1 kt and 9.3 hPa, respectively. For cases with corresponding reconnaissance data, the MAE are 10.7 kt and 6.1 hPa, and the rmse are 14.9 kt and 9.2 hPa. The independent cases for 2002 have errors that are only slightly larger than those from the developmental sample. Results from the jackknife evaluation of the 34-, 50-, and 64-kt radii show mean errors of 30, 24, and 14 n mi, respectively. The results for the independent sample from 2002 are generally comparable to the developmental sample, except for the 64-kt wind radii, which have larger errors. The radii errors for the 2002 sample with aircraft reconnaissance data available are all comparable to the errors from the jackknife sample, including the 64-kt radii.

Corresponding author address: Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA, CIRA/Colorado State University, West Laporte Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80523. mark.demaria@noaa.gov

Abstract

Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU) data are used to provide objective estimates of 1-min maximum sustained surface winds, minimum sea level pressure, and the radii of 34-, 50-, and 64-kt (1 kt ≡ 0.5144 m s−1) winds in the northeast, southeast, southwest, and northwest quadrants of tropical cyclones. The algorithms are derived from AMSU temperature, pressure, and wind retrievals from all tropical cyclones in the Atlantic and east Pacific basins during 1999–2001. National Hurricane Center best-track intensity and operational radii estimates are used as dependent variables in a multiple-regression approach. The intensity algorithms are evaluated for the developmental sample using a jackknife procedure and independent cases from the 2002 hurricane season. Jackknife results for the maximum winds and minimum sea level pressure estimates are mean absolute errors (MAE) of 11.0 kt and 6.7 hPa, respectively, and rmse of 14.1 kt and 9.3 hPa, respectively. For cases with corresponding reconnaissance data, the MAE are 10.7 kt and 6.1 hPa, and the rmse are 14.9 kt and 9.2 hPa. The independent cases for 2002 have errors that are only slightly larger than those from the developmental sample. Results from the jackknife evaluation of the 34-, 50-, and 64-kt radii show mean errors of 30, 24, and 14 n mi, respectively. The results for the independent sample from 2002 are generally comparable to the developmental sample, except for the 64-kt wind radii, which have larger errors. The radii errors for the 2002 sample with aircraft reconnaissance data available are all comparable to the errors from the jackknife sample, including the 64-kt radii.

Corresponding author address: Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA, CIRA/Colorado State University, West Laporte Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80523. mark.demaria@noaa.gov

Save
  • Bankert, R. L. and P. M. Tag. 2002. An automated method to estimate tropical cyclone intensity using SSM/I imagery. J. Appl. Meteor. 41:461472.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnes, S. 1964. A technique for maximizing details in numerical weather map analysis. J. Appl. Meteor. 3:396409.

  • Brown, D. P. and J. L. Franklin. 2002. Accuracy of pressure–wind relationships and Dvorak satellite intensity estimates for tropical cyclones determined from recent reconnaissance-based “best track” data. Preprints, 25th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, San Diego, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 458–459.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brueske, K. F. and C. S. Velden. 2003. Satellite-based tropical cyclone intensity estimation using the NOAA-KLM series Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU). Mon. Wea. Rev. 131:687697.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Depperman, C. E. 1947. Notes on the origin and structure of Philippine typhoons. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 28:399404.

  • Dvorak, V. F. 1975. Tropical cyclone intensity analysis and forecasting from satellite imagery. Mon. Wea. Rev. 103:420430.

  • Dvorak, V. F. 1984. Tropical cyclone intensity analysis using satellite data. NOAA Tech. Rep. NESDIS 11, 47 pp. [Available from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Sills Bldg., 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goldberg, M. D., D. S. Crosby, and L. Zhou. 2001. The limb adjustment of AMSU-A observations: Methodology and validation. J. Appl. Meteor. 40:7083.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, W. L., V. J. Cardone, W. J. Pierson, J. Zec, L. P. Rice, A. Cox, and W. B. Sylvester. 1999. NSCAT high-resolution surface wind measurements in Typhoon Violet. J. Geophys. Res. 104:1124711259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kidder, S. Q. 1979. Determination of tropical cyclone surface pressure and winds from satellite microwave data. Ph.D. dissertation, Colorado State University, 87 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kidder, S. Q. and T. H. Vonder Haar. 1995. Satellite Meteorology: An Introduction. Academic Press, 466 pp.

  • Kidder, S. Q., W. M. Gray, and T. H. Vonder Haar. 1978. Estimating tropical cyclone central pressure and outer winds from satellite microwave data. Mon. Wea. Rev. 106:14581464.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kidder, S. Q., W. M. Gray, and T. H. Vonder Haar. 1980. Tropical cyclone outer surface winds derived from satellite microwave sounder data. Mon. Wea. Rev. 108:144152.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kidder, S. Q., M. D. Goldberg, R. M. Zehr, M. DeMaria, J. F. W. Purdom, C. S. Velden, N. C. Grody, and S. J. Kusselson. 2000. Satellite analysis of tropical cyclones using the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 81:12411259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knaff, J. A., R. M. Zehr, M. D. Goldberg, and S. Q. Kidder. 2000. An example of temperature structure differences in two cyclone systems from the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit. Wea. Forecasting 15:476483.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Linstid, B. 2000. An algorithm for the correction of corrupted AMSU temperature data in tropical cyclones. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Mathematics, Colorado State University, 24 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merrill, R. T. 1995. Simulations of physical retrieval of tropical cyclone thermal structure using 55-GHz band passive microwave observations from polar-orbiting satellites. J. Appl. Meteor. 34:773787.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schwerdt, R. W., F. P. Ho, and R. R. Watkins. 1979. Meteorological criteria for standard project hurricane and probable maximum hurricane wind fields, Gulf and East Coasts of the United States. NOAA Tech. Rep. NWS 23, 317 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spencer, R. W. and W. D. Braswell. 2001. Atlantic tropical cyclone monitoring with AMSU-A: Estimation of maximum sustained wind speeds. Mon. Wea. Rev. 129:15181532.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Velden, C. S., T. L. Olander, and R. M. Zehr. 1998. Development of an objective scheme to estimate tropical cyclone intensity from digital geostationary satellite infrared imagery. Wea. Forecasting 13:172186.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weatherford, C. and W. M. Gray. 1988. Typhoon structure as revealed by aircraft reconnaissance. Part II: Structural variability. Mon. Wea. Rev. 116:10441056.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 718 173 11
PDF Downloads 486 119 7