Using Climate Forecasts for Drought Management

Anne C. Steinemann Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Evans School of Public Affairs, and The Water Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by Anne C. Steinemann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

Drought hazards, and the ability to mitigate them with advance warning, offer potentially valuable applications of climate forecast products. Yet the value is often untapped, owing to the gap between climate science and societal decisions. This study bridged that gap; it determined forecast needs among water managers, translated forecasts to meet those needs, and shaped drought decision making to take advantage of forecasts. NOAA Climate Prediction Center (CPC) seasonal precipitation outlooks were converted into a forecast precipitation index (FPI) tailored for water managers in the southeastern United States. The FPI expresses forecasts as a departure from the climatological normal and is consistent with other drought indicators. Evaluations of CPC seasonal forecasts issued during 1995–2000 demonstrated positive skill for drought seasons in the Southeast. In addition, using evaluation criteria of water managers, 88% of forecasts for drought seasons would have appropriately prompted drought responses. Encouraged by these evaluations, and the understandability of the FPI, state water managers started using the forecasts in 2001 for deciding whether to pay farmers to suspend irrigation. Economic benefits of this forecast information were estimated at $100–$350 million in a state-declared drought year (2001, 2002) and $5–$30 million in the other years (2003, 2004). This study provides four main contributions: 1) an investigation of the needs and potential benefits of seasonal forecast information for water management, 2) a method for translating the CPC forecasts into a format needed by water managers, 3) the integration of forecast information into agency decision making, and 4) the economic valuation of that forecast information.

Corresponding author address: Anne C. Steinemann, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-2700. Email: acstein@u.washington.edu

Abstract

Drought hazards, and the ability to mitigate them with advance warning, offer potentially valuable applications of climate forecast products. Yet the value is often untapped, owing to the gap between climate science and societal decisions. This study bridged that gap; it determined forecast needs among water managers, translated forecasts to meet those needs, and shaped drought decision making to take advantage of forecasts. NOAA Climate Prediction Center (CPC) seasonal precipitation outlooks were converted into a forecast precipitation index (FPI) tailored for water managers in the southeastern United States. The FPI expresses forecasts as a departure from the climatological normal and is consistent with other drought indicators. Evaluations of CPC seasonal forecasts issued during 1995–2000 demonstrated positive skill for drought seasons in the Southeast. In addition, using evaluation criteria of water managers, 88% of forecasts for drought seasons would have appropriately prompted drought responses. Encouraged by these evaluations, and the understandability of the FPI, state water managers started using the forecasts in 2001 for deciding whether to pay farmers to suspend irrigation. Economic benefits of this forecast information were estimated at $100–$350 million in a state-declared drought year (2001, 2002) and $5–$30 million in the other years (2003, 2004). This study provides four main contributions: 1) an investigation of the needs and potential benefits of seasonal forecast information for water management, 2) a method for translating the CPC forecasts into a format needed by water managers, 3) the integration of forecast information into agency decision making, and 4) the economic valuation of that forecast information.

Corresponding author address: Anne C. Steinemann, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-2700. Email: acstein@u.washington.edu

Save
  • Agrawala, S., K. Broad, and D. H. Guston, 2001: Integrating climate forecasts and societal decision making: Challenges to an emergent boundary organization. Sci. Technol. Human Values, 26 , 454477.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint River Basin Commission, 2002: ACF allocation formula agreement. Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint River Basin Draft Proposal, 60 pp.

  • Barnston, A. G., and Coauthors, 1994: Long-lead seasonal forecasts—Where do we stand? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 75 , 20972114.

  • Barnston, A. G., Y. He, and D. A. Unger, 2000: A forecast product that maximizes utility for state-of-the-art seasonal climate prediction. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81 , 12711279.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Briggs, W. M., and D. S. Wilks, 1996: Estimating monthly and seasonal distributions of temperature and precipitation using the new CPC long-range forecasts. J. Climate, 9 , 818826.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Callahan, B., E. Miles, and D. Fluharty, 1999: Policy implications of climate forecasting for water resources management in the Pacific Northwest. Policy Sci., 32 , 269293.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carbone, G. J., and K. Dow, 2005: Water resource management and drought forecasts in South Carolina. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 41 , 145155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Department of Natural Resources, cited. 2000: Flint River drought protection. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division, 16 pp. [Available online at http://www.gaepd.org/Files_PDF/rules/rules_exist/391-3-28.pdf.].

  • Kerr, B., cited. 2003: Georgia drought management plan. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, 23 pp. [Available online at http://www.georgiaplanning.com/watertoolkit/Documents/WaterConservationDroughtManagement/DroughtMgtPlanFinal03.pdf.].

  • Hartmann, H. C., T. C. Pagano, S. Sorooshian, and R. Bales, 2002: Confidence builders: Evaluating seasonal climate forecasts from user perspectives. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83 , 683698.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lins, H. F., and E. Z. Stakhiv, 1998: Managing the nation’s water in a changing climate. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 34 , 12551264.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McKee, T. B., N. J. Doesken, and J. Kleist, 1993: The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scale. Preprints, Eighth Conf. on Applied Climatology, Anaheim, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 179–184.

  • National Climatic Data Center, cited. 2006: Billion dollar U.S. weather disasters. [Available online at http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/reports/billionz.html.].

  • Nicholls, N., 1999: Cognitive illusions, heuristics, and climate prediction. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80 , 13851397.

  • Pagano, T. C., H. C. Hartmann, and S. Sorooshian, 2001: Using climate forecasts for water management: Arizona and the 1997-2001 El Niño. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 37 , 11391153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Potts, J. M., C. K. Folland, I. T. Jolliffe, and D. Sexton, 1996: Revised “LEPS” scores for assessing climate model simulations and long-range forecasts. J. Climate, 9 , 3453.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pulwarty, R., and K. T. Redmond, 1997: Climate and salmon restoration in the Columbia River Basin. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78 , 381397.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schneider, J. M., and J. D. Garbrecht, 2003: Regional utility of NOAA/CPC seasonal climate precipitation forecasts. Proc. Symp. on Watershed Management and Restoration, World Water & Environmental Resources Congress, Philadelphia, PA, Environmental and Water Resources Institute of the ASCE, 370.

  • Steinemann, A., 2003a: Drought indicators and triggers: A stochastic approach to evaluation. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 39 , 12171234.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Steinemann, A., cited. 2003b: Drought indicators and triggers. Georgia Drought Management Plan, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, 19–22. [Available online at http://www.georgiaplanning.com/watertoolkit/Documents/WaterConservationDroughtManagement/DroughtMgtPlanFinal03.pdf.].

  • Stern, P. C., and W. E. Easterling, 1999: Making Climate Forecasts Matter. National Research Council, National Academy Press, 175 pp.

  • Ward, M. H., and C. K. Folland, 1991: Prediction of seasonal rainfall in the north Nordeste of Brazil using eigenvectors of sea-surface temperature. Int. J. Climatol., 11 , 711743.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wernstedt, K., and R. Hersh, 2002: Climate forecasts in flood planning: Promise and ambiguity. J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 38 , 17031713.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilks, D. S., 1995: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. Academic Press, 467 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1636 845 360
PDF Downloads 522 123 9