Observations of Precipitation Size and Fall Speed Characteristics within Coexisting Rain and Wet Snow

Sandra E. Yuter Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Sandra E. Yuter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David E. Kingsmill Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by David E. Kingsmill in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Louisa B. Nance National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Louisa B. Nance in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Martin Löffler-Mang University of Applied Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany

Search for other papers by Martin Löffler-Mang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Ground-based measurements of particle size and fall speed distributions using a Particle Size and Velocity (PARSIVEL) disdrometer are compared among samples obtained in mixed precipitation (rain and wet snow) and rain in the Oregon Cascade Mountains and in dry snow in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado. Coexisting rain and snow particles are distinguished using a classification method based on their size and fall speed properties. The bimodal distribution of the particles’ joint fall speed–size characteristics at air temperatures from 0.5° to 0°C suggests that wet-snow particles quickly make a transition to rain once melting has progressed sufficiently. As air temperatures increase to 1.5°C, the reduction in the number of very large aggregates with a diameter > 10 mm coincides with the appearance of rain particles larger than 6 mm. In this setting, very large raindrops appear to be the result of aggregrates melting with minimal breakup rather than formation by coalescence. In contrast to dry snow and rain, the fall speed for wet snow has a much weaker correlation between increasing size and increasing fall speed. Wet snow has a larger standard deviation of fall speed (120%–230% relative to dry snow) for a given particle size. The average fall speed for observed wet-snow particles with a diameter ≥ 2.4 mm is 2 m s−1 with a standard deviation of 0.8 m s−1. The large standard deviation is likely related to the coexistence of particles of similar physical size with different percentages of melting. These results suggest that different particle sizes are not required for aggregation since wet-snow particles of the same size can have different fall speeds. Given the large standard deviation of fall speeds in wet snow, the collision efficiency for wet snow is likely larger than that of dry snow. For particle sizes between 1 and 10 mm in diameter within mixed precipitation, rain constituted 1% of the particles by volume within the isothermal layer at 0°C and 4% of the particles by volume for the region just below the isothermal layer where air temperatures rise from 0° to 0.5°C. As air temperatures increased above 0.5°C, the relative proportions of rain versus snow particles shift dramatically and raindrops become dominant. The value of 0.5°C for the sharp transition in volume fraction from snow to rain is slightly lower than the range from 1.1° to 1.7°C often used in hydrological models.

Corresponding author address: Prof. Sandra Yuter, Dept. of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, Box 8208, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695. Email: sandra_yuter@ncsu.edu

Abstract

Ground-based measurements of particle size and fall speed distributions using a Particle Size and Velocity (PARSIVEL) disdrometer are compared among samples obtained in mixed precipitation (rain and wet snow) and rain in the Oregon Cascade Mountains and in dry snow in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado. Coexisting rain and snow particles are distinguished using a classification method based on their size and fall speed properties. The bimodal distribution of the particles’ joint fall speed–size characteristics at air temperatures from 0.5° to 0°C suggests that wet-snow particles quickly make a transition to rain once melting has progressed sufficiently. As air temperatures increase to 1.5°C, the reduction in the number of very large aggregates with a diameter > 10 mm coincides with the appearance of rain particles larger than 6 mm. In this setting, very large raindrops appear to be the result of aggregrates melting with minimal breakup rather than formation by coalescence. In contrast to dry snow and rain, the fall speed for wet snow has a much weaker correlation between increasing size and increasing fall speed. Wet snow has a larger standard deviation of fall speed (120%–230% relative to dry snow) for a given particle size. The average fall speed for observed wet-snow particles with a diameter ≥ 2.4 mm is 2 m s−1 with a standard deviation of 0.8 m s−1. The large standard deviation is likely related to the coexistence of particles of similar physical size with different percentages of melting. These results suggest that different particle sizes are not required for aggregation since wet-snow particles of the same size can have different fall speeds. Given the large standard deviation of fall speeds in wet snow, the collision efficiency for wet snow is likely larger than that of dry snow. For particle sizes between 1 and 10 mm in diameter within mixed precipitation, rain constituted 1% of the particles by volume within the isothermal layer at 0°C and 4% of the particles by volume for the region just below the isothermal layer where air temperatures rise from 0° to 0.5°C. As air temperatures increased above 0.5°C, the relative proportions of rain versus snow particles shift dramatically and raindrops become dominant. The value of 0.5°C for the sharp transition in volume fraction from snow to rain is slightly lower than the range from 1.1° to 1.7°C often used in hydrological models.

Corresponding author address: Prof. Sandra Yuter, Dept. of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, Box 8208, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695. Email: sandra_yuter@ncsu.edu

Save
  • Andsager, K., K. V. Beard, and N. F. Laird, 1999: Laboratory measurements of the axis ratios for large raindrops. J. Atmos. Sci., 56 , 26732683.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balakrishnan, N., and D. S. Zrnić, 1990: Estimation of rain and hail rates in mixed-phase precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci., 47 , 565583.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barthazy, E., 1998: Microphysical properties of the melting layer. Ph.D. thesis, ETH, Zürich, 128 pp.

  • Bauer, P., J. P. V. Poiares Baptisa, and M. De Iulis, 1999: The effect of the melting layer on the microwave emission of clouds over the ocean. J. Atmos. Sci., 56 , 852867.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beard, K. V., 1985: Simple altitude adjustments to raindrop velocities for Doppler radar analysis. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 2 , 468471.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berry, E. X., and M. R. Pranger, 1974: Equations for calculating the terminal velocities of water drops. J. Appl. Meteor., 13 , 108113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borys, R. D., and M. A. Wetzel, 1997: Storm Peak Laboratory: A research, teaching, and service facility for the atmospheric sciences. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78 , 21152123.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brandes, E. A., V. Vivekanandan, J. D. Tuttle, and C. J. Kessinger, 1995: A study of thunderstorm microphysics with multiparameter radar and aircraft observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123 , 31293143.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drummond, F. J., R. R. Rogers, S. A. Cohn, W. L. Ecklund, D. A. Carter, and J. S. Wilson, 1996: A new look at the melting layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 53 , 759769.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Folland, C. K., 1988: Numerical models of the raingauge exposure problem, field experiments and an improved collector design. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 114 , 14851516.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heymsfield, A. J., S. Lewis, A. Bansemer, J. Iaquinta, L. M. Miloshevich, M. Kajikawa, C. Twothy, and M. Poellot, 2002: A general approach for deriving the properties of cirrus and stratiform ice properties. J. Atmos. Sci., 59 , 329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houze Jr., R. A., P. V. Hobbs, P. H. Herzegh, and D. B. Parsons, 1979: Size distributions of precipitation particles in frontal clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 36 , 156162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Iguchi, T., T. Kozu, R. Meneghini, J. Awaka, and K. Okamoto, 2000: Rain-profiling algorithm for TRMM precipitation radar. J. Appl. Meteor., 39 , 20382052.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joss, J., and E. G. Gori, 1978: Shapes of raindrop size distributions. J. Appl. Meteor., 17 , 10541061.

  • Lawson, R. P., R. E. Stewart, and L. J. Angus, 1998: Observations and numerical simulations of the origin and development of very large snowflakes. J. Atmos. Sci., 55 , 32093229.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lew, J. K., D. C. Montague, H. R. Pruppacher, and R. M. Rasmussen, 1986: A wind tunnel investigation of the rimming of snowflakes. Part II: Natural and synthetic aggregates. J. Atmos. Sci., 43 , 24102417.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lin, Y-L., R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, 1983: Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22 , 10651092.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Locatelli, J. D., and P. V. Hobbs, 1974: Fall speeds and masses of solid precipitation particles. J. Geophys. Res., 79 , 21852197.

  • Löffler-Mang, M., and J. Joss, 2000: An optical disdrometer for measuring size and velocity of hydrometeors. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 17 , 130139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Löffler-Mang, M., and U. Blahak, 2001: Estimation of the equivalent radar reflectivity factor from measured snow size spectra. J. Appl. Meteor., 40 , 843849.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marks, D., J. Kimball, D. Tingey, and T. Link, 1998: The sensitivity of snowmelt processes to climate conditions and forest cover during rain-on-snow: A case study of the 1996 Pacific Northwest flood. Hydrol. Processes, 12 , 15691587.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marshall, J. S., and W. Mc K. Palmer, 1948: The distribution of raindrops with size. J. Meteor., 5 , 165166.

  • Mitra, S. K., O. Vohl, M. Ahr, and H. R. Pruppacher, 1990: A wind tunnel and theoretical study of the melting behavior of atmospheric ice particles. IV: Experiment and theory for snow flakes. J. Atmos. Sci., 47 , 584591.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ohtake, T., 1969: Observations of size distributions of hydrometeors through the melting layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 26 , 545557.

  • Olson, W. S., P. Bauer, N. F. Viltard, D. E. Johnson, W-K. Tao, R. Meneghini, and L. Liao, 2001: A melting-layer model for passive/active microwave remote sensing applications. Part I: Model formulation and comparison with observations. J. Appl. Meteor., 40 , 11451163.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ralph, F. M., P. J. Nieman, D. W. van de Kamp, and D. C. Law, 1995: Using spectral moment data from NOAA’s 404-MHz radar wind profilers to observe precipitation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 76 , 17171739.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, P. L., 1982: On the graphical presentation of raindrop size data. Atmos.–Ocean, 20 , 416.

  • Steiner, M., O. Bousquet, R. A. Houze Jr., B. F. Smull, and M. Mancini, 2003: Airflow within major Alpine river valleys under heavy rainfall. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129 , 411431.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stewart, R. E., J. D. Marwitz, J. C. Pace, and R. E. Carbone, 1984: Characteristics through the melting layer of stratiform clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 41 , 32273237.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stoelinga, M. T., and Coauthors, 2003: Improvement of Microphysical Parameterizations through Observational Verification Experiments (IMPROVE). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84 , 18071826.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tao, W-K., and Coauthors, 2003: Microphysics, radiation and surface processes in the Goddard Cumulus Ensemble (GCE) model. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 82 , 97137.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, G. H., and R. R. Hatton, 1999: The Oregon Weather Book: A State of Extremes. Oregon State University Press, 242 pp.

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1956: Summary report of the snow investigations—Snow hydrology. North Pacific Division Rep., 437 pp. [Available online at http://www.crrel.usace.army.mil/icejams/Reports/1956%20Snow%Hydrology%20Report.htm.].

  • Waldvogel, A., 1974: The No jump in raindrop spectra. J. Atmos. Sci., 31 , 10671078.

  • Weber, B. L., D. B. Wuertz, D. C. Welsh, and R. McPeek, 1993: Quality controls for profiler measurements of winds and RASS temperatures. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 10 , 452464.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • White, A. B., J. R. Jordan, B. E. Martner, F. M. Ralph, and B. W. Bartram, 2000: Extending the dynamic range of an S-band radar for cloud and precipitation studies. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 17 , 12261234.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Willis, P. T., and A. J. Heymsfield, 1989: Structure of the melting layer in mesoscale convective system stratiform precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci., 46 , 20082025.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zikmunda, J., 1972: Fall velocities of spatial crystals and aggregates. J. Atmos. Sci., 29 , 15111515.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2151 748 36
PDF Downloads 1434 374 27