Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Urban Dispersion Modeling: Comparison with Single-Building Measurements

Steve R. Diehl Advanced Engineering and Sciences, ITT Corporation, Colorado Springs, Colorado

Search for other papers by Steve R. Diehl in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Donald A. Burrows Advanced Engineering and Sciences, ITT Corporation, Colorado Springs, Colorado

Search for other papers by Donald A. Burrows in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Eric A. Hendricks Advanced Engineering and Sciences, ITT Corporation, Colorado Springs, Colorado

Search for other papers by Eric A. Hendricks in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Robert Keith Advanced Engineering and Sciences, ITT Corporation, Colorado Springs, Colorado

Search for other papers by Robert Keith in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Dec 2007
Collections:
Joint Urban 2003 Experiment (JU2003)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/2006JAMC1300.1
Page(s):
2180–2191
Restricted access

Abstract

Two models have been developed to predict airflow and dispersion in urban environments. The first model, the Realistic Urban Spread and Transport of Intrusive Contaminants (RUSTIC) model, is a fast-running urban airflow code that rapidly converges to a numerical solution of a modified set of the compressible Navier–Stokes equations. RUSTIC uses the k–ω turbulence model with a buoyancy production term to handle atmospheric stability effects. The second model, “MESO,” is a Lagrangian particle transport and dispersion code that predicts concentrations of a released chemical or biological agent in urban or rural areas. As a preliminary validation of the models, concentrations simulated by MESO are compared with experimental data from wind-tunnel testing of dispersion around both a multistory rectangular building and a single-story L-shaped building. For the rectangular building, trace gas is forced out at the base of the downwind side, whereas for the L-shaped building, trace gas is forced out of a side door in the inner corner of the “L.” The MESO–RUSTIC combination is set up with the initial conditions of the wind-tunnel experiment, and the steady-state concentrations simulated by the models are compared with the wind-tunnel data. For the multistory building, a dense set of detector locations was available downwind at ground level. For the L-shaped building, concentration data were available at three heights in a lateral plane at a distance of one building height downwind of the lee side. A favorable comparison between model simulations and test data is shown for both buildings.

Corresponding author address: Steve R. Diehl, Advanced Engineering and Sciences, ITT Corporation, 5009 Centennial Blvd., Colorado Springs, CO 80907. Email: steve.diehl@itt.com

This article included in the Urban 2003 Experiment (JU2003) special collection.

Abstract

Two models have been developed to predict airflow and dispersion in urban environments. The first model, the Realistic Urban Spread and Transport of Intrusive Contaminants (RUSTIC) model, is a fast-running urban airflow code that rapidly converges to a numerical solution of a modified set of the compressible Navier–Stokes equations. RUSTIC uses the k–ω turbulence model with a buoyancy production term to handle atmospheric stability effects. The second model, “MESO,” is a Lagrangian particle transport and dispersion code that predicts concentrations of a released chemical or biological agent in urban or rural areas. As a preliminary validation of the models, concentrations simulated by MESO are compared with experimental data from wind-tunnel testing of dispersion around both a multistory rectangular building and a single-story L-shaped building. For the rectangular building, trace gas is forced out at the base of the downwind side, whereas for the L-shaped building, trace gas is forced out of a side door in the inner corner of the “L.” The MESO–RUSTIC combination is set up with the initial conditions of the wind-tunnel experiment, and the steady-state concentrations simulated by the models are compared with the wind-tunnel data. For the multistory building, a dense set of detector locations was available downwind at ground level. For the L-shaped building, concentration data were available at three heights in a lateral plane at a distance of one building height downwind of the lee side. A favorable comparison between model simulations and test data is shown for both buildings.

Corresponding author address: Steve R. Diehl, Advanced Engineering and Sciences, ITT Corporation, 5009 Centennial Blvd., Colorado Springs, CO 80907. Email: steve.diehl@itt.com

This article included in the Urban 2003 Experiment (JU2003) special collection.

Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Allwine, K. J., M. J. Leach, L. W. Stockham, J. S. Shinn, R. P. Hosker, J. F. Bowers, and J. C. Pace, 2004: Overview of Joint Urban 2003—An atmospheric dispersion study in Oklahoma City. Preprints, Symp. on Planning, Nowcasting, and Forecasting in the Urban Zone and Eighth Symp. on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, J7.1.

  • Brook, D. R., N. V. Felton, C. M. Clem, D. C. H. Strickland, I. H. Griffiths, R. D. Kingdon, D. J. Hall, and J. M. Hargrave, 2003: Validation of the urban dispersion model (UDM). Int. J. Environ. Pollut., 20 , 1–6. 11–21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Burrows, D., R. Keith, S. Diehl, and E. Hendricks, 2004a: A fast-running urban airflow model. Preprints, 13th Conf. on the Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology with the Air and Waste Management Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 6.1.

  • Burrows, D., R. Keith, S. Diehl, and E. Hendricks, 2004b: A study of turbulent kinetic energy produced by buildings in an urban central business district. Preprints, 13th Conf. on the Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology with the Air and Waste Management Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, J3.1.

  • Burrows, D., E. A. Hendricks, S. R. Diehl, and R. Keith, 2007: Modeling turbulent flow in an urban central business district. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46 , 2147–2164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Camelli, F. E., S. R. Hanna, and R. Loehner, 2004: Simulation of the MUST Field Experiment using the FEFLO-URBAN CFD model. Preprints, Fifth Symp. on the Urban Environment, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 13.12.

  • Castro, I. P., I. R. Cowan, and A. G. Robins, 1999: Simulations of flow and dispersion around buildings. J. Aerosp. Eng., 12 , October. 145–160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chan, S. T., and J. M. Leach, 2004: Large eddy simulation of an Urban 2000 experiment with various time-dependent forcing. Preprints, Fifth Symp. on the Urban Environment, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 13.3.

  • Cowan, I. R., I. P. Castro, and A. G. Robins, 1997: Numerical considerations for simulations of flow and dispersion around buildings. J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodyn., 67–68 , 535–545.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Diehl, S. R., D. T. Smith, and M. Sydor, 1982: Random-walk simulation of gradient transfer processes applied to dispersion of stack emissions from coal-fired power plants. J. Appl. Meteor., 21 , 69–83.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Durbin, P. A., 1996: On the k–ε stagnation point anomaly. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 17 , 89–90.

  • Fluent, 2005: 6.2 user’s manual. [Available online at http://www.fluent.com.].

  • Franzese, P., A. K. Luhar, and M. S. Borgas, 1999: An efficient Lagrangian stochastic model of vertical dispersion in the convective boundary layer. Atmos. Environ., 33 , 2337–2345.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hall, D., A. Spanton, I. Griffiths, M. Hargrave, and S. Walker, 2003: The Urban Dispersion Model (UDM): Version 2.2 technical documentation, release 1.1. Tech. Rep. DSTL/TR04774, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, United Kingdom, 106 pp.

  • Hanna, S., 2004: Evaluation of the FLACS CFD model with MUST data. Preprints, Fifth Symp. on the Urban Environment, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 13.13.

  • Hendricks, E. A., S. R. Diehl, D. A. Burrows, and R. Keith, 2007: Evaluation of a fast-running urban dispersion modeling system using Joint Urban 2003 field data. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46 , 2165–2179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kaplan, H., and N. Dinar, 1996: A Lagrangian dispersion model for calculating concentration distribution within a built-up domain. Atmos. Environ., 30 , 4197–4207.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Karppinen, A., J. Kukkonen, T. Elolahde, M. Konttinen, T. Koskentalo, and E. Rantakrans, 2000: A modeling system for predicting urban air pollution, model description and applications in the Helsinki metropolitan area. Atmos. Environ., 34 , 3723–3733.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lien, F. S., and E. Yee, 2004: Numerical modelling of the turbulent flow developing within and over a 3-D building array, Part 1. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 112 , 427–466.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lien, F. S., E. Yee, and Y. Cheng, 2004: Simulation of mean flow and turbulence over a 2D building array using high-resolution CFD and a distributed drag force approach. J. Wind Eng. Indust. Aerodyn., 92 , 117–158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Luhar, A. K., and R. E. Britter, 1989: A random walk model for dispersion in inhomogenous turbulence in a convective boundary layer. Atmos. Environ., 23 , 1911–1924.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Marsaglia, G., and T. A. Bray, 1964: A convenient method of generating normal variables. SIAM Rev., 6 , 260–264.

  • McGrath, E. J., and D. C. Irving, 1975: Techniques for efficient Monte Carlo simulation. Vol. II. Prepared for the Office of Naval Research (Code 462), Dept. of the Navy, Doc. ORNL-RISC-38 (Vol. II), 119 pp.

  • Medic, G., and P. A. Durbin, 2002: Toward improved prediction of heat transfer on turbine blades. J. Turbomachinery, 124 , 187–192.

  • Press, W. H., B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, 1988: Numerical Recipes in C. Cambridge University Press, 735 pp.

  • Riddle, A., D. Carruthers, A. Sharpe, C. McHugh, and J. Stocker, 2004: Comparisons between FLUENT and ADMS for atmospheric dispersion modeling. Atmos. Environ., 38 , 1029–1038.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schatzmann, M., 2005: Compilation of Experimental Data for Validation of Microscale Dispersion Models (CEDVAL). Environmental Windtunnel Laboratory (EWL). Meteorological Institute, Hamburg University. [Available online at http://www.mi.uni-hamburg.de/Introduction.433.0.html.].

  • Seinfeld, J. H., and S. N. Pandis, 1998: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. John Wiley and Sons, 1325 pp.

  • Slinn, W. G. N., 1977: Some approximations for the wet and dry removal of particles and gases from the atmosphere. Water Air Soil Pollut., 7 , 513–543.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Strebel, D. E., D. R. Landis, K. F. Huemmrich, J. A. Newcomer, and B. W. Meeson, 1998: The FIFE data publication experiment. J. Atmos. Sci., 55 , 1277–1283.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thomson, D. J., and M. R. Montgomery, 1994: Reflected boundary conditions for random walk models of dispersion in non-Gaussian turbulence. Atmos. Environ., 28 , 1981–1987.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Van Ulden, A. P., and A. A. M. Holtslag, 1983: The stability of the atmospheric surface layer during nighttime. Preprints, Sixth Symp. on Turbulence and Diffusion, Boston, MA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 257–260.

  • Watson, E. J., 1962: Primitive polynomials (Mod 2). Math. Comput. Amer. Math. Soc., 16 , 368.

  • Wilcox, D. C., 1998: Turbulence Modeling For CFD. 2d ed. DCW Industries, Inc., 537 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 720 256 14
PDF Downloads 230 32 2