Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Source Characterization with a Genetic Algorithm–Coupled Dispersion–Backward Model Incorporating SCIPUFF

Christopher T. Allen Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, and Applied Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Christopher T. Allen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Sue Ellen Haupt Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, and Applied Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by Sue Ellen Haupt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
George S. Young Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by George S. Young in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Mar 2007
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2459.1
Page(s):
273–287
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

This paper extends the approach of coupling a forward-looking dispersion model with a backward model using a genetic algorithm (GA) by incorporating a more sophisticated dispersion model [the Second-Order Closure Integrated Puff (SCIPUFF) model] into a GA-coupled system. This coupled system is validated with synthetic and field experiment data to demonstrate the potential applicability of the coupled model to emission source characterization. The coupled model incorporating SCIPUFF is first validated with synthetic data produced by SCIPUFF to isolate issues related directly to SCIPUFF’s use in the coupled model. The coupled model is successful in characterizing sources even with a moderate amount of white noise introduced into the data. The similarity to corresponding results from previous studies using a more basic model suggests that the GA’s performance is not sensitive to the dispersion model used. The coupled model is then tested using data from the Dipole Pride 26 field tests to determine its ability to characterize actual pollutant measurements despite the stochastic scatter inherent in turbulent dispersion. Sensitivity studies are run on various input parameters to gain insight used to produce a multistage process capable of a higher-quality source characterization than that produced by a single pass. Overall, the coupled model performed well in identifying approximate locations, times, and amounts of pollutant emissions. These model runs demonstrate the coupled model’s potential application to source characterization for real-world problems.

Corresponding author address: Sue Ellen Haupt, The Pennsylvania State University Applied Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 30, State College, PA 16804-0030. Email: seh19@psu.edu

Abstract

This paper extends the approach of coupling a forward-looking dispersion model with a backward model using a genetic algorithm (GA) by incorporating a more sophisticated dispersion model [the Second-Order Closure Integrated Puff (SCIPUFF) model] into a GA-coupled system. This coupled system is validated with synthetic and field experiment data to demonstrate the potential applicability of the coupled model to emission source characterization. The coupled model incorporating SCIPUFF is first validated with synthetic data produced by SCIPUFF to isolate issues related directly to SCIPUFF’s use in the coupled model. The coupled model is successful in characterizing sources even with a moderate amount of white noise introduced into the data. The similarity to corresponding results from previous studies using a more basic model suggests that the GA’s performance is not sensitive to the dispersion model used. The coupled model is then tested using data from the Dipole Pride 26 field tests to determine its ability to characterize actual pollutant measurements despite the stochastic scatter inherent in turbulent dispersion. Sensitivity studies are run on various input parameters to gain insight used to produce a multistage process capable of a higher-quality source characterization than that produced by a single pass. Overall, the coupled model performed well in identifying approximate locations, times, and amounts of pollutant emissions. These model runs demonstrate the coupled model’s potential application to source characterization for real-world problems.

Corresponding author address: Sue Ellen Haupt, The Pennsylvania State University Applied Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 30, State College, PA 16804-0030. Email: seh19@psu.edu

Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Biltoft, C. A., 1998: Dipole Pride 26: Phase II of Defense Special Weapons Agency transport and dispersion model validation. Dugway Proving Ground Doc. DPG-FR-98-001, prepared for Defense Threat Reduction Agency by Meteorology and Obscurants Divisions, 76 pp.

  • Cartwright, H. M., and S. P. Harris, 1993: Analysis of the distribution of airborne pollution using GAs. Atmos. Environ., 27A , 1783–1791.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chang, J. C., P. Franzese, K. Chayantrakom, and S. R. Hanna, 2003: Evaluations of CALPUFF, HPAC, and VLSTRACK with two mesoscale field datasets. J. Appl. Meteor., 42 , 453–466.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chow, F. K., B. Kosovic, and S. T. Chan, 2006: Source inversion for contaminant plume dispersion in urban environments using building-resolving simulations. Preprints, Sixth Symp. on the Urban Environment, Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 1–9.

  • Cox, R. M., J. Sontowski, R. N. Fry, C. M. Dougherty, and T. J. Smith, 1998: Wind and diffusion modeling for complex terrain. J. Appl. Meteor., 37 , 996–1009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Goldberg, D. E., 1989: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, 412 pp.

  • Haupt, R. L., and S. E. Haupt, 2004: Practical Genetic Algorithms. 2d ed. with CD. John Wiley and Sons, 255 pp.

  • Haupt, S. E., 2005: A demonstration of coupled receptor/dispersion modeling with a genetic algorithm. Atmos. Environ., 39 , 7181–7189.

  • Haupt, S. E., G. S. Young, and C. T. Allen, 2006: Validation of a receptor/dispersion model coupled with a genetic algorithm using synthetic data. J. Appl. Meteor., 45 , 476–490.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Holland, J. H., 1975: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. The University of Michigan Press, 211 pp.

  • Pasquill, F., 1961: The estimation of the dispersion of windborne material. Meteor. Mag., 90 , 33–49.

  • Robins, P., and P. Thomas, 2005: Non-linear Bayesian CBRN source term estimation. Eighth Int. Conf. on Information Fusion, Philadelphia, PA, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

  • Sykes, R. I., and R. S. Gabruk, 1997: A second-order closure model for the effect of averaging time on turbulent plume dispersion. J. Appl. Meteor., 36 , 1038–1045.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sykes, R. I., W. S. Lewellen, and S. F. Parker, 1986: A Gaussian plume model of atmospheric dispersion based on second-order closure. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 25 , 322–331.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sykes, R. I., S. F. Parker, D. S. Henn, C. P. Cerasoli, and L. P. Santos, 1998: PC-SCIPUFF version 1.2PD technical documentation. Titan Research and Technology Division ARAP Rep. 718, 172 pp.

  • Watson, T. B., R. E. Keislar, B. Reese, D. H. George, and C. A. Biltoft, 1998: The Defense Special Weapons Agency Dipole Pride 26 field experiment. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Tech. Memo. ERL ARL-225, 90 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1190 574 226
PDF Downloads 502 87 8