The Shear Layer above and in Urban Canopies

Pablo Huq College of Marine and Earth Studies, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware

Search for other papers by Pablo Huq in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Louis A. White College of Marine and Earth Studies, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware

Search for other papers by Louis A. White in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alejandro Carrillo College of Marine and Earth Studies, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware
Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

Search for other papers by Alejandro Carrillo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jose Redondo Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

Search for other papers by Jose Redondo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Seshu Dharmavaram DuPont Company, Wilmington, Delaware

Search for other papers by Seshu Dharmavaram in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Steven R. Hanna Hanna Consultants, Kennebunkport, Maine

Search for other papers by Steven R. Hanna in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

The nature and role of the shear layer, which occurs at the level of the average building height in urban canopies, are poorly understood. Velocity data are analyzed to determine the characteristics of the shear layer of the urban canopy, defined as the broad, linear segment of the mean velocity profile in a region of high shear. Particle image velocimetry measurements in a water tunnel were undertaken to resolve velocity profiles for urban canopies of two geometries typical of Los Angeles, California, and New York City, New York, for which the aspect ratios (average building height-to-width ratio) H/wb are 1 and 3, respectively. The shear layers evolve with distance differently: For H/wb = 1 the urban canopy shear layer extends quickly from above the building height to ground level, whereas for H/wb = 3 the urban canopy shear layer remains elevated at the vicinity of the building height, only reaching to a depth of z/H ∼ 0.5 far downstream. Profiles of the mean velocity gradient also differ from each other for urban canopies associated with H/wb of 1 or 3. Values of shear dU/dz increase toward ground level for an urban canopy associated with H/wb = 1. For an urban canopy associated with H/wb = 3, localized peaks of shear dU/dz exist at the building height and at ground level, with values of shear decreasing to zero at building midheight and far above the building height. A consequence of the different forms of the shear layers of the two urban canopies is that the ground-level dispersion coefficient is likely to be greater for urban canopies associated with H/wb = 1 than for those associated with H/wb = 3 because of an increased ventilation and exchange mechanism for cities such as Los Angeles relative to cities such as New York City that possess urban canyons.

Corresponding author address: Pablo Huq, College of Marine and Earth Studies, University of Delaware, Robinson Hall, Newark, DE 19716. Email: huq@udel.edu

Abstract

The nature and role of the shear layer, which occurs at the level of the average building height in urban canopies, are poorly understood. Velocity data are analyzed to determine the characteristics of the shear layer of the urban canopy, defined as the broad, linear segment of the mean velocity profile in a region of high shear. Particle image velocimetry measurements in a water tunnel were undertaken to resolve velocity profiles for urban canopies of two geometries typical of Los Angeles, California, and New York City, New York, for which the aspect ratios (average building height-to-width ratio) H/wb are 1 and 3, respectively. The shear layers evolve with distance differently: For H/wb = 1 the urban canopy shear layer extends quickly from above the building height to ground level, whereas for H/wb = 3 the urban canopy shear layer remains elevated at the vicinity of the building height, only reaching to a depth of z/H ∼ 0.5 far downstream. Profiles of the mean velocity gradient also differ from each other for urban canopies associated with H/wb of 1 or 3. Values of shear dU/dz increase toward ground level for an urban canopy associated with H/wb = 1. For an urban canopy associated with H/wb = 3, localized peaks of shear dU/dz exist at the building height and at ground level, with values of shear decreasing to zero at building midheight and far above the building height. A consequence of the different forms of the shear layers of the two urban canopies is that the ground-level dispersion coefficient is likely to be greater for urban canopies associated with H/wb = 1 than for those associated with H/wb = 3 because of an increased ventilation and exchange mechanism for cities such as Los Angeles relative to cities such as New York City that possess urban canyons.

Corresponding author address: Pablo Huq, College of Marine and Earth Studies, University of Delaware, Robinson Hall, Newark, DE 19716. Email: huq@udel.edu

Save
  • Britter, R. E., and S. R. Hanna, 2003: Flow and dispersion in urban areas. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 35 , 469496.

  • Brown, G. L., and A. Roshko, 1974: On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech., 64 , 775816.

  • Brown, M. J., R. Lawson, D. DeCroix, and R. Lee, 2000: Mean flow and turbulence measurements around a 2-day array of buildings in a wind tunnel. Preprints, 11th Joint Conf. on the Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology with the Air and Waste Management Association, Long Beach, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 35–40.

  • Brown, M. J., H. Khalsa, M. Nelson, and D. Boswell, 2004: Street canyon flow patterns in a horizontal plane: Measurements from the Joint Urban 2003 field experiment. Preprints, Fifth Symp. on the Urban Environment, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 3.1. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/AFAPURBBIO/techprogram/session_16806.htm].

  • Counihan, J., 1969: An improved method of simulating an atmospheric boundary layer in a wind tunnel. Atmos. Environ., 3 , 197214.

  • Dobre, A., S. J. Arnold, R. J. Smalley, J. W. D. Boddy, J. F. Barlow, A. S. Tomlin, and S. E. Belcher, 2005: Flow field measurements in the proximity of an urban intersection in London, UK. Atmos. Environ., 39 , 46474657.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Finnigan, J. J., 2000: Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 32 , 519571.

  • Ghisalberti, M., and H. M. Nepf, 2002: Mixing layers and coherent structures in vegetated aquatic flows. J. Geophys. Res., 107 .3011, doi:10.1029/2001JC000871.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, D. J., R. Macdonald, S. Walker, and A. M. Spanton, 1996: Measurements of dispersion within simulated urban arrays—A small scale study. BRE Client Rep. CR 178/96.

  • Ho, C., and P. Huerre, 1984: Perturbed free shear layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 16 , 365424.

  • Jackson, P. S., 1981: On the displacement height in the logarithmic velocity profile. J. Fluid Mech., 111 , 1525.

  • Jimenez, J., 2004: Turbulent flows over rough walls. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 36 , 173196.

  • Kaimal, J. C., and J. J. Finnigan, 1994: Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows: Their Structure and Measurement. Oxford University Press, 289 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kastner-Klein, P., and M. W. Rotach, 2004: Mean flow and turbulence characteristics in an urban roughness sublayer. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 111 , 5584.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kundu, P. K., and I. M. Cohen, 2004: Fluid Mechanics. 3d ed. Elsevier, 484 pp.

  • MacDonald, R. W., R. F. Griffiths, and D. J. Hall, 1998: An improved method for the estimation of surface roughness of obstacle arrays. Atmos. Environ., 32 , 18571864.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meroney, R. N., 1990: Fluid dynamics of flow over hills/mountains—Insights obtained through physical modeling. Atmospheric Processes over Complex Terrain, Meteor. Monogr., No. 45, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 145–171.

  • Oke, T. R., 1987: Boundary Layer Climates. 2d ed. Routledge, 435 pp.

  • Raupach, M. R., J. J. Finnigan, and Y. Brunet, 1996: Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: The mixing layer analogy. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 78 , 351382.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rotach, M. W., 1995: Profiles of turbulence statistics in and above an urban canyon. Atmos. Environ., 29 , 14731486.

  • Rotach, M. W., and Coauthors, 2005: Bubble—An urban boundary layer meteorology project. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 81 , 231261.

  • Roth, M., 2000: Review of atmospheric turbulence over cities. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126 , 941990.

  • Schatzmann, M., and B. Leitl, 2002: Validation and application of obstacle-resolving urban dispersion models. Atmos. Environ., 36 , 48114821.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shaw, R. H., R. H. Silversides, and G. W. Thurtell, 1974: Some observations of turbulence and turbulent transport within and above plant canopies. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 5 , 429449.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yee, E., D. J. Wilson, and B. W. Zelt, 1993: Probability distributions of concentration fluctuations of a weakly diffusive passive plume in a turbulent boundary layer. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 64 , 321354.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 457 235 50
PDF Downloads 225 57 9