Intercomparison of Single-Column Numerical Models for the Prediction of Radiation Fog

Thierry Bergot Météo-France, Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Toulouse, France

Search for other papers by Thierry Bergot in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Enric Terradellas Instituto Nacional de Meteorología, Barcelona, Spain

Search for other papers by Enric Terradellas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joan Cuxart Department de Fisica, Universitat de les Iles Balears, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Joan Cuxart in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Antoni Mira Department de Fisica, Universitat de les Iles Balears, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Antoni Mira in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Olivier Liechti Analysen und Konzepte, Winterthur, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Olivier Liechti in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mathias Mueller Institute of Meteorology, Climatology, and Remote Sensing, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Mathias Mueller in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Niels Woetmann Nielsen Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for other papers by Niels Woetmann Nielsen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The short-term forecasting of fog is a difficult issue that can have a large societal impact. Radiation fog appears in the surface boundary layer, and its evolution is driven by the interactions between the surface and lower layers of the atmosphere. Current NWP models poorly forecast the life cycle of fog, and improved NWP models are needed before improving the prediction of fog. Six numerical model simulations are compared for two cases from the Paris-Charles de Gaulle (Paris-CdG) fog field experiment. This intercomparison includes both operational and research models, which have significantly different vertical resolutions and physical parameterizations. The main goal of this intercomparison is to identify the capabilities of the various models to forecast fog accurately. An attempt is made to identify the main reasons behind the differences among the various models. This intercomparison reveals that considerable differences among models exist in the surface boundary layer before the fog onset, particularly in cases with light winds. The lower-resolution models crudely forecast the nocturnal inversion, the strong inversion at the top of the fog layer, and the interactions between soil and atmosphere. This intercomparison further illustrates the importance of accurate parameterizations of dew deposition and gravitational settling on the prediction of fog.

Corresponding author address: T. Bergot, Météo-France, CNRM/GMME, 42, Avenue G. Coriolis, F-31057 Toulouse CEDEX, France. Email: thierry.bergot@meteo.fr

Abstract

The short-term forecasting of fog is a difficult issue that can have a large societal impact. Radiation fog appears in the surface boundary layer, and its evolution is driven by the interactions between the surface and lower layers of the atmosphere. Current NWP models poorly forecast the life cycle of fog, and improved NWP models are needed before improving the prediction of fog. Six numerical model simulations are compared for two cases from the Paris-Charles de Gaulle (Paris-CdG) fog field experiment. This intercomparison includes both operational and research models, which have significantly different vertical resolutions and physical parameterizations. The main goal of this intercomparison is to identify the capabilities of the various models to forecast fog accurately. An attempt is made to identify the main reasons behind the differences among the various models. This intercomparison reveals that considerable differences among models exist in the surface boundary layer before the fog onset, particularly in cases with light winds. The lower-resolution models crudely forecast the nocturnal inversion, the strong inversion at the top of the fog layer, and the interactions between soil and atmosphere. This intercomparison further illustrates the importance of accurate parameterizations of dew deposition and gravitational settling on the prediction of fog.

Corresponding author address: T. Bergot, Météo-France, CNRM/GMME, 42, Avenue G. Coriolis, F-31057 Toulouse CEDEX, France. Email: thierry.bergot@meteo.fr

Save
  • Benjamin, S. G., G. A. Grell, J. M. Brown, and T. G. Smirnova, 2004: Mesoscale weather prediction with the RUC hybrid isentropic–terrain-following coordinate model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132 , 473–494.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bergot, T., and D. Guedalia, 1994: Numerical forecasting of radiation fog. Part I: Numerical model and sensitivity tests. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122 , 1218–1230.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bergot, T., D. Carrer, J. Noilhan, and P. Bougeault, 2005: Improved site-specific numerical prediction of fog and low clouds: A feasibility study. Wea. Forecasting, 20 , 627–646.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boone, A. A., 2000: Modélisation des processus hydrologiques dans le schéma de surface ISBA: Inclusion d’un reservoir hydrologique, du gel et modélisation de la neige (Modeling of hydrologic processes in the ISBA surface scheme: Inclusion of a hydrologic reservoir, freezing, and modeling of snow). Ph.D. thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, 252 pp.

  • Boone, A. A., J. C. Calvet, and J. Noilhan, 1999: The inclusion of a third soil layer in land surface scheme using the force–restore method. J. Appl. Meteor., 38 , 1611–1630.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bougeault, P., and P. Lacarrere, 1989: Parameterization of orography-induced turbulence in a mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117 , 1872–1890.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, F., Z. Janjic, and K. Mitchell, 1997: Impact of atmospheric surface-layer parameterization in the new land-surface scheme of the NCEP Mesoscale Eta-Model. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 85 , 391–421.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clark, D. A., 2002: The 2001 demonstration of automated cloud forecast guidance products for San Francisco International Airport. Preprints, 10th Conf. on Aviation, Range, and Aerospace Meteorology, Portland, OR, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, JP1.26.

  • Cuxart, J., P. Bougeault, and J. L. Redelsperger, 2000: A turbulence scheme allowing for mesoscale and large-eddy simulations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126 , 1–30.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Duynkerke, P. G., 1991: Radiation fog: A comparison of model simulation with detailed observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119 , 324–341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ek, M. B., K. E. Mitchell, Y. Lin, E. Rogers, P. Grumnann, V. Koren, G. Gayno, and J. D. Tarpley, 2003: Implementation of NOAH land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational Mesoscale Eta Model. J. Geophys. Res., 108 .8851, doi:10.1029/2002JD003296.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Estournel, C., and D. Guedalia, 1987: A new parameterization of eddy diffusivities for nocturnal boundary layer modeling. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 39 , 191–203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fowler, T. L., M. J. Pocernigh, and J. T. Braid, 2006: Quality assessment of the national ceiling and visibility analysis product. Preprints, 12th Conf. on Aviation, Range, and Aerospace Meteorology, Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, J1.4.

  • Horst, T. W., and J. C. Doran, 1986: Nocturnal drainage flow on simple slopes. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 3 , 263–286.

  • Lafore, J-P., and Coauthors, 1998: The Méso-NH atmospheric simulation system. Part I: Adiabatic formulation and control simulations. Ann. Geophys., 16 , 90–109.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lenschow, D. H., X. S. Li, C. J. Lu, and B. B. Stankov, 1988: The stably stratified boundary layer over Great Plains. Part I: Mean and turbulence structure. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 42 , 95–121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liechti, O., 2002: REGTHERM convection model with local winds. Technical Soaring, Vol. 26, Soaring Society of America, Inc., 2–5.

  • Liechti, O., and B. Neininger, 1994: ALPTHERM: A PC-based convection model for complex topography. Technical Soaring, Vol. 18, Soaring Society of America, Inc., 73–78.

  • Mahrt, L., 1985: Vertical structure and turbulence in the very stable boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 42 , 2333–2349.

  • Mahrt, L., 1999: Stratified atmospheric boundary layers. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 90 , 375–396.

  • Morcrette, J-J., 1991: Radiation and cloud radiative properties in the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts forecasting system. J. Geophys. Res., 96 , 9121–9132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mueller, M. D., M. Masbou, A. Bott, and Z. Janjic, 2005: Fog prediction with parameterized microphysics. Proc. WWRP Int. Symp. on Nowcasting and Very Short-Range Forecasting, Toulouse, France, World Weather Research Program, CD-ROM, 6.26.

  • Musson-Genon, L., 1987: Numerical simulation of a fog event with a one-dimensional boundary layer model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115 , 592–607.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Noilhan, J., and S. Planton, 1989: A simple parameterization of land surface processes for meteorological models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117 , 536–549.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sass, B. H., 1997: Reduction of numerical noise connected to the parameterization of cloud and condensation processes in the HIRLAM model. HIRLAM Newsletter 29, HIRLAM, 37–45.

  • Sass, B. H., L. Rontu, and P. Raisanen, 1994: HIRLAM-2 radiation scheme: Documentation and tests. HIRLAM Tech. Rep. 16, 42 pp.

  • Sass, B. H., N. W. Nielsen, J. U. Jorgensen, B. Amstrup, M. Kmit, and K. S. Mogensen, 2002: The operational DMI-HIRLAM system. DMI Tech. Rep. 02.05, 60 pp. [Available online at http://www.dmi.dk.].

  • Terradellas, E., M. R. Soler, E. Ferreres, and M. Bravo, 2005: Analysis of oscillations in the stable atmospheric boundary layer using wavelet methods. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 114 , 489–518.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Terradellas, E., and D. Cano, 2006: Assessment of the fog and low clouds forecasts produced by the H1D single column model. Abstract, Sixth Annual Meeting of EMS, Ljubjana, Slovenia, European Meteorological Society, E.M.S. 2006-A-00220. [Available online at http://www.cosis.net/abstracts/EMS2006/00220/EMS2006-A-00220.pdf.].

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1580 1003 315
PDF Downloads 505 86 5