Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Daily Simulation of Ozone and Fine Particulates over New York State: Findings and Challenges

C. Hogrefe New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York

Search for other papers by C. Hogrefe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
W. Hao New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York

Search for other papers by W. Hao in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
K. Civerolo New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York

Search for other papers by K. Civerolo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
J.-Y. Ku New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York

Search for other papers by J.-Y. Ku in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
G. Sistla New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York

Search for other papers by G. Sistla in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
R. S. Gaza New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York

Search for other papers by R. S. Gaza in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
L. Sedefian New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York

Search for other papers by L. Sedefian in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
K. Schere Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Search for other papers by K. Schere in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
A. Gilliland Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Search for other papers by A. Gilliland in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
R. Mathur Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

Search for other papers by R. Mathur in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jul 2007
Collections:
NOAA/EPA Golden Jubilee
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2520.1
Page(s):
961–979
Restricted access

Abstract

This study investigates the potential utility of the application of a photochemical modeling system in providing simultaneous forecasts of ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) over New York State. To this end, daily simulations from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model for three extended time periods during 2004 and 2005 have been performed, and predictions were compared with observations of ozone and total and speciated PM2.5. Model performance for 8-h daily maximum O3 was found to be similar to other forecasting systems and to be better than that for the 24-h-averaged total PM2.5. Both pollutants exhibited no seasonal differences in model performance. CMAQ simulations successfully captured the urban–rural and seasonal differences evident in observed total and speciated PM2.5 concentrations. However, total PM2.5 mass was strongly overestimated in the New York City metropolitan area, and further analysis of speciated observations and model predictions showed that most of this overprediction stems from organic aerosols and crustal material. An analysis of hourly speciated data measured in Bronx County, New York, suggests that a combination of uncertainties in vertical mixing, magnitude, and temporal allocation of emissions and deposition processes are all possible contributors to this overprediction in the complex urban area. Categorical evaluation of CMAQ simulations in terms of exceeding two different threshold levels of the air quality index (AQI) again indicates better performance for ozone than PM2.5 and better performance for lower exceedance thresholds. In most regions of New York State, the routine air quality forecasts based on observed concentrations and expert judgment show slightly better agreement with the observed distributions of AQI categories than do CMAQ simulations. However, CMAQ shows skill similar to these routine forecasts in terms of capturing the AQI tendency, that is, in predicting changes in air quality conditions. Overall, the results presented in this study reveal that additional research and development is needed to improve CMAQ simulations of PM2.5 concentrations over New York State, especially for the New York City metropolitan area. On the other hand, because CMAQ simulations capture urban–rural concentration gradients and day-to-day fluctuations in observed air quality despite systematic overpredictions in some areas, it would be useful to develop tools that combine CMAQ’s predictive capability in terms of spatial concentration gradients and AQI tendencies with real-time observations of ambient pollutant levels to generate forecasts with higher temporal and spatial resolutions (e.g., county level) than those of techniques based exclusively on monitoring data.

Corresponding author address: Christian Hogrefe, Bureau of Air Quality Analysis and Research, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 625 Broadway, Albany, NY 12233-3259. Email: chogrefe@dec.state.ny.us

This article included in the NOAA/EPA Golden Jubilee special collection.

Abstract

This study investigates the potential utility of the application of a photochemical modeling system in providing simultaneous forecasts of ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) over New York State. To this end, daily simulations from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model for three extended time periods during 2004 and 2005 have been performed, and predictions were compared with observations of ozone and total and speciated PM2.5. Model performance for 8-h daily maximum O3 was found to be similar to other forecasting systems and to be better than that for the 24-h-averaged total PM2.5. Both pollutants exhibited no seasonal differences in model performance. CMAQ simulations successfully captured the urban–rural and seasonal differences evident in observed total and speciated PM2.5 concentrations. However, total PM2.5 mass was strongly overestimated in the New York City metropolitan area, and further analysis of speciated observations and model predictions showed that most of this overprediction stems from organic aerosols and crustal material. An analysis of hourly speciated data measured in Bronx County, New York, suggests that a combination of uncertainties in vertical mixing, magnitude, and temporal allocation of emissions and deposition processes are all possible contributors to this overprediction in the complex urban area. Categorical evaluation of CMAQ simulations in terms of exceeding two different threshold levels of the air quality index (AQI) again indicates better performance for ozone than PM2.5 and better performance for lower exceedance thresholds. In most regions of New York State, the routine air quality forecasts based on observed concentrations and expert judgment show slightly better agreement with the observed distributions of AQI categories than do CMAQ simulations. However, CMAQ shows skill similar to these routine forecasts in terms of capturing the AQI tendency, that is, in predicting changes in air quality conditions. Overall, the results presented in this study reveal that additional research and development is needed to improve CMAQ simulations of PM2.5 concentrations over New York State, especially for the New York City metropolitan area. On the other hand, because CMAQ simulations capture urban–rural concentration gradients and day-to-day fluctuations in observed air quality despite systematic overpredictions in some areas, it would be useful to develop tools that combine CMAQ’s predictive capability in terms of spatial concentration gradients and AQI tendencies with real-time observations of ambient pollutant levels to generate forecasts with higher temporal and spatial resolutions (e.g., county level) than those of techniques based exclusively on monitoring data.

Corresponding author address: Christian Hogrefe, Bureau of Air Quality Analysis and Research, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 625 Broadway, Albany, NY 12233-3259. Email: chogrefe@dec.state.ny.us

This article included in the NOAA/EPA Golden Jubilee special collection.

Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Binkowski, F. S., and S. J. Roselle, 2003: Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model aerosol component 1. Model description, 2003. J. Geophys. Res., 108 .4183, doi:10.1029/2001JD001409.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Black, T., 1994: The new NMC mesoscale Eta Model: Description and forecast examples. Wea. Forecasting, 9 , 265–278.

  • Byun, D. W., and K. L. Schere, 2006: Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Appl. Mech. Rev., 59 , 51–77.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cai, C., 2006: Implementation and performance evaluation of an air quality forecast modeling system (AQFMS) for northeastern USA. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Albany, 175 pp.

  • Cai, C., and Coauthors, 2002: An experimental Air Quality Forecast Modeling System (AQFMS) for the northeast United States: A demonstration study. Preprints, Fourth Conf. on Atmospheric Chemistry: Urban, Regional, and Global-Scale Impacts of Air Pollutants, Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 4.2.

  • Chang, M. E., and C. A. Cardelino, 2000: An application of the Urban Airshed Model to forecasting next-day peak ozone concentrations in Atlanta, Georgia. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 50 , 2010–2024.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davidson, P. M., N. Seaman, K. Schere, R. A. Wayland, J. L. Hayes, and K. F. Carey, 2004: National air quality forecasting capability: First steps toward implementation. Preprints, Sixth Conf. on Atmospheric Chemistry: Air Quality in Megacities, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, J2.10.

  • Dye, T., C. P. MacDonald, and C. B. Anderson, 2000: Air quality forecasting for the spare the air program in Sacramento, California: Summary of four years of ozone forecasting. Preprints, 11th Joint Conf. on the Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology with the Air and Waste Management Association, Long Beach, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 396–402.

  • Gaza, R. S., 1998: Mesoscale meteorology and high ozone in the northeast United States. J. Appl. Meteor., 37 , 961–967.

  • Hogrefe, C., S. T. Rao, P. Kasibhatla, W. Hao, G. Sistla, R. Mathur, and J. McHenry, 2001: Evaluating the performance of regional-scale photochemical modeling systems: Part II—Ozone predictions. Atmos. Environ., 35 , 4175–4188.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kang, D., B. K. Eder, A. F. Stein, G. A. Grell, S. E. Peckham, and J. McHenry, 2005: The New England air quality forecasting pilot program: Development of an evaluation protocol and performance benchmark. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 55 , 1782–1796.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Malm, W. C., B. A. Schichtel, M. L. Pitchford, L. L. Ashbaugh, and R. A. Eldred, 2004: Spatial and monthly trends in speciated fine particle concentration in the United States. J. Geophys. Res., 109 .D03306, doi:10.1029/2003JD003739.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mathur, R., and Coauthors, 2004: Adaptation and applications of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system for real-time air quality forecasting during the summer of 2004. Extended Abstracts, Models-3 Conf., Chapel Hill, NC, Community Modeling and Analysis System, 4 pp. [Available online at http://www.cmascenter.org/conference/2004/abstracts/Forecasting/mathur_abstract.pdf.].

  • McHenry, J. N., N. Seaman, C. Coats, D. Stauffer, A. Lario-Gibbs, J. Vukovich, E. Hayes, and N. Wheeler, 2000: The NCSC-PSU numerical air quality prediction project: Initial evaluation, status, and prospects. Preprints, 11th Joint Conf. on the Applications of Air Pollution Meteorology with the Air and Waste Management Association, Long Beach, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 403–408.

  • McHenry, J. N., W. F. Ryan, N. Seaman, C. Coats, J. Pudykiewicz, S. Arunachalam, and J. Vukovich, 2004: A real-time Eulerian photochemical model forecast system: Overview and initial ozone forecast performance in the northeast U.S. corridor. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85 , 525–548.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McKeen, S., and Coauthors, 2005: Assessment of an ensemble of seven real-time ozone forecasts over eastern North America during the summer of 2004. J. Geophys. Res., 110 .D21307, doi:10.1029/2005JD005858.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McQueen, J., and Coauthors, 2004: Update of the Eta-CMAQ forecast model run at NCEP operations and its performance for the summer 2004. Extended Abstracts, Models-3 Conf., Chapel Hill, NC, Community Modeling and Analysis System, 9 pp. [Available online at http://www.cmascenter.org/conference/2004/abstracts/Forecasting/mcqueen_abstract.pdf.].

  • Morris, R. E., D. E. McNally, T. W. Tesche, G. Tonnesen, J. W. Boylan, and P. Brewer, 2005: Preliminary evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model for 2002 over the Southeastern United States. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 55 , 1694–1708.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • NYSDEC, cited. 2005: Today’s Air Quality Index (AQI) forecast for New York State. [Available online at http://www.dec.ny.gov/cfmx/extapps/aqi/index.cfm.].

  • Otte, T. L., G. Pouliot, and J. E. Pleim, 2004: PREMAQ: A new pre-processor to CMAQ for air quality forecasting. Extended Abstracts, Models-3 Conf., Chapel Hill, NC, Community Modeling and Analysis System, 4 pp. [Available online at http://www.cmascenter.org/conference/2004/abstracts/Forecasting/otte_abstract1.pdf.].

  • Otte, T. L., and Coauthors, 2005: Linking the Eta Model with the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system to build a national air quality forecasting system. Wea. Forecasting, 20 , 367–384.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pierce, T., C. Geron, G. Pouliot, E. Kinnee, and J. Vukovich, 2002: Integration of the Biogenic Emission Inventory System (BEIS3) into the Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system. Preprints, 12th Joint Conf. on the Application of Air Pollution Meteorology with the Air and Waste Management Association, Norfolk, VA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., J85–J86.

  • Pleim, J. E., and R. Mathur, 2005: Diagnostic evaluation, sensitivity analyses, and new development in the CMAQ air quality forecast system. Preprints, Seventh Conf. on Atmospheric Chemistry, San Diego, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 4.7.

  • Pouliot, G., 2005: The emission processing system for the ETA/CMAQ air quality forecast system. Preprints, Seventh Conf. on Atmospheric Chemistry, San Diego, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 4.5.

  • Pouliot, G., S. He, and T. Pierce, 2003: Recent advances in the modeling of airborne substances. Extended Abstracts, Models-3 Conf., Research Triangle Park, NC, Community Modeling and Analysis System, 4 pp. [Available online at http://www.cmascenter.org/conference/2003/session2/pouliot_abstract.pdf.].

  • Rao, V., N. Frank, A. Rush, and F. Dimmick, 2003: Chemical speciation of PM2.5 in urban and rural areas. EPA National Air Quality and Emission Trends Report, 12 pp. [Available online at http://www.epa.gov/air/airtrends/aqtrnd03/pdfs/2_chemspecofpm25.pdf.].

  • Ryan, W. F., C. Piety, and E. D. Luebehusen, 2000: Air quality forecasts in the Mid-Atlantic region: Current practice and benchmark skill. Wea. Forecasting, 15 , 46–60.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schwab, J. J., J. Spicer, K. L. Demerjian, J. L. Ambs, and H. D. Felton, 2004a: Long-term field characterization of TEOM and modified TEOM samplers in urban and rural New York State locations. J. Air Waste Manage., 54 , 1264–1280.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schwab, J. J., H. D. Felton, and K. L. Demerjian, 2004b: Aerosol chemical composition in New York State from integrated filter samples: Urban/rural and seasonal contrasts. J. Geophys. Res., 109 .D16S05, doi:10.1029/2003JD004078.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Turpin, B. J., and J. J. Huntzicker, 1995: Identification of secondary organic aerosol episodes and quantification of primary and secondary organic aerosol concentrations during SCAQS. Atmos. Environ., 23 , 3527–3544.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Turpin, B. J., and H-J. Lim, 2001: Species contributions to PM2.5 mass concentrations: revisiting common assumptions for estimating organic mass. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 35 , 602–610.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • U.S. EPA, 1999: Guideline for reporting of daily air quality—Air quality index (AQI). EPA-454/R-99-010, 29 pp.

  • U.S. EPA, 2002: Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) for relating Federal Reference Method (FRM) and continuous PM2.5 measurements to report an Air Quality Index (AQI). EPA-454/B-02-002, 102 pp.

  • U.S. EPA, 2003a: Guidelines for developing an air quality (ozone and PM2.5) forecasting program. EPA-456/R-03-002, 126 pp.

  • U.S. EPA, 2003b: User’s guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2 mobile source emission factor model. EPA-420/R-03-010, 262 pp.

  • Vaughan, V., and Coauthors, 2004: A numerical daily air quality forecast system for the Pacific Northwest. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85 , 549–561.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 893 307 23
PDF Downloads 260 87 7