Combined Observational and Model Investigations of the Z–LWC Relationship in Stratocumulus Clouds

A. Khain The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

Search for other papers by A. Khain in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. Pinsky The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

Search for other papers by M. Pinsky in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. Magaritz The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

Search for other papers by L. Magaritz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
O. Krasnov International Research Centre for Telecommunications-transmission and Radar, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

Search for other papers by O. Krasnov in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research Centre for Telecommunications-transmission and Radar, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

Search for other papers by H. W. J. Russchenberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

In situ measurements indicate the complexity and nonunique character of radar reflectivity–liquid water content (Z–LWC) relationships in stratocumulus and cumulus clouds. Parameters of empirical (statistical) Z–LWC dependences vary within a wide range. Respectively, the accuracy of retrieval algorithms remains low. This situation is partially related to the fact that empirical algorithms and parameters are often derived without a corresponding understanding of physical mechanisms responsible for the formation of the Z–LWC diagrams. In this study, the authors investigate the processes of formation of the Z–LWC relationships using a new trajectory ensemble model of the cloud-topped boundary layer (BL). In the model, the entire volume of the BL is covered by Lagrangian parcels advected by a turbulent-like velocity field. The time-dependent velocity field is generated by a turbulent model and obeys the correlation turbulent laws. Each Lagrangian parcel represents the “cloud parcel model” with an accurate description of processes of diffusion growth–evaporation of aerosols and droplets and droplet collisions. The fact that parcels are adjacent to each other allows one to calculate sedimentation of droplets and precipitation (drizzle) formation. The characteristic parcel size is 50 m; the number of parcels is 1840. The model calculates droplet size distributions (DSDs), as well as their moments (e.g., aerosol and drop concentration, mass content, radar reflectivity) in each parcel. In the course of the model integration, Z–LWC relationships are calculated for each parcel, as well as the scattering diagram including all parcels. The model reproduces in situ observed types of the Z–LWC relationships. It is shown that different regimes represent different stages of cloud evolution: diffusion growth, beginning of drizzle formation, and stage of heavy drizzle, respectively. The large scattering of the Z–LWC relationships is found to be an inherent property of any drizzling cloud. Different zones on the Z–LWC diagram are related to cloud volumes located at different levels within a cloud and having different DSD. This finding allows for improvement of retrieval algorithms.

Corresponding author address: Alexander Khain, The Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel. Email: khain@vms.huji.ac.il

Abstract

In situ measurements indicate the complexity and nonunique character of radar reflectivity–liquid water content (Z–LWC) relationships in stratocumulus and cumulus clouds. Parameters of empirical (statistical) Z–LWC dependences vary within a wide range. Respectively, the accuracy of retrieval algorithms remains low. This situation is partially related to the fact that empirical algorithms and parameters are often derived without a corresponding understanding of physical mechanisms responsible for the formation of the Z–LWC diagrams. In this study, the authors investigate the processes of formation of the Z–LWC relationships using a new trajectory ensemble model of the cloud-topped boundary layer (BL). In the model, the entire volume of the BL is covered by Lagrangian parcels advected by a turbulent-like velocity field. The time-dependent velocity field is generated by a turbulent model and obeys the correlation turbulent laws. Each Lagrangian parcel represents the “cloud parcel model” with an accurate description of processes of diffusion growth–evaporation of aerosols and droplets and droplet collisions. The fact that parcels are adjacent to each other allows one to calculate sedimentation of droplets and precipitation (drizzle) formation. The characteristic parcel size is 50 m; the number of parcels is 1840. The model calculates droplet size distributions (DSDs), as well as their moments (e.g., aerosol and drop concentration, mass content, radar reflectivity) in each parcel. In the course of the model integration, Z–LWC relationships are calculated for each parcel, as well as the scattering diagram including all parcels. The model reproduces in situ observed types of the Z–LWC relationships. It is shown that different regimes represent different stages of cloud evolution: diffusion growth, beginning of drizzle formation, and stage of heavy drizzle, respectively. The large scattering of the Z–LWC relationships is found to be an inherent property of any drizzling cloud. Different zones on the Z–LWC diagram are related to cloud volumes located at different levels within a cloud and having different DSD. This finding allows for improvement of retrieval algorithms.

Corresponding author address: Alexander Khain, The Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel. Email: khain@vms.huji.ac.il

Save
  • Albrecht, B. A., C. S. Bretherton, D. Johnson, W. Scubert, and A. S. Frisch, 1995: The Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment—ASTEX. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 76 , 889904.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Atlas, D., 1954: The estimation of cloud content by radar. J. Meteor., 11 , 309317.

  • Austin, P., Y. Wang, R. Pincus, and V. Kujala, 1995: Precipitation in stratocumulus clouds: Observational and modeling results. J. Atmos. Sci., 52 , 23292352.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baedi, R. J. P., J. J. M. de Wit, H. W. J. Russchenberg, J. S. Erkelens, and J. P. V. Poiares Baptista, 2000: Estimating effective radius and liquid water content from radar and lidar based on the CLARE’98 data-set. Phys. Chem. Earth, 25B , 10571062.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bott, A., 1998: A flux method for the numerical solution of the stochastic collection equation. J. Atmos. Sci., 55 , 22842293.

  • Brenguier, J. L., and Coauthors, 2000: An overview of the AGE-2 CLOUDY COLUMN Closure Experiment. Tellus, 52B , 814826.

  • Crewell, S., and Coauthors, 2004: The BALTEX BRIDGE Campaign: An integrated approach for a better understanding of clouds. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85 , 15651584.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Duynkerke, P. G., H. Zhang, and P. J. Jonker, 1995: Microphysical and turbulent structure of nocturnal stratocumulus as observed during ASTEX. J. Atmos. Sci., 52 , 27632777.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Erlick, C., A. Khain, M. Pinsky, and Y. Segal, 2005: The effect of wind velocity fluctuations on drop spectrum broadening in stratocumulus clouds. Atmos. Res., 75 , 1545.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ESA, 1999: CLARE’98: Cloud Lidar and Radar Experiment. ESTEC Int. Workshop Proc. WPP-170, Noordwijk, the Netherlands, European Space Research and Technology Center, 239 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Feingold, G., S. M. Kreidenweis, and Y. Zhang, 1998: Stratocumulus processing of gases and cloud condensation nuclei 1. Trajectory ensemble model. J. Geophys. Res., 103 , D16. 1952719542.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fox, N. I., and A. J. Illingworth, 1997: The retrieval of stratocumulus cloud properties by ground-based cloud radar. J. Appl. Meteor., 36 , 485492.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frisch, A. S., C. W. Fairall, and J. B. Snider, 1995: Measurement of stratus cloud and drizzle parameters in ASTEX with a Kα-band Doppler radar and a microwave radiometer. J. Atmos. Sci., 52 , 27882799.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harrington, J. Y., G. Feingold, and W. R. Cotton, 2000: Radiative impacts on the growth of a population of drops within simulated summertime arctic stratus. J. Atmos. Sci., 57 , 766785.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hobbs, P. V., D. A. Bowdle, and L. F. Radke, 1985: Particles in the lower troposphere over the high plains of the United States. Part II: Cloud condensation nuclei. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 24 , 13581369.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Khain, A. P., M. Ovtchinnikov, M. Pinsky, A. Pokrovsky, and H. Krugliak, 2000: Notes on the state-of-the-art numerical modeling of cloud microphysics. Atmos. Res., 55 , 159224.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kollias, P., and B. Albrecht, 2000: The turbulence structure in a continental stratocumulus cloud from millimeter-wavelength radar observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 57 , 24172434.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krasnov, O. A., and H. W. J. Russchenberg, 2002: The relation between the radar to lidar ratio and the effective radius of droplets in water clouds: An analysis of statistical models and observed drop size distributions. Preprints, 11th Conf. on Cloud Physics, Ogden, UT, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P2.18.

  • Krasnov, O. A., and H. W. J. Russchenberg, 2005: A synergetic radar-lidar technique for the LWC retrieval in water clouds: Description and application to the Cloudnet data. Preprints, 32nd Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Albuquerque, NM, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 11R.7.

  • LeMone, M. A., 1990: Some observations of vertical velocity skewness in the convective planetary boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 47 , 11631169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lenschow, D. H., J. C. Wyngaard, and W. T. Pennell, 1980: Mean-field and second-moment budgets in a baroclinic, convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 37 , 13131326.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lothon, M., D. H. Lenschow, D. Leon, and G. Vali, 2004: Turbulence measurements in marine stratocumulus with airborne Doppler radar. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131 , 20632080.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martin, G. M., D. W. Johnson, and A. Spice, 1994: The measurements and parameterization of effective radius of droplets in warm stratocumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 51 , 18231842.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • O’Connor, E. J., R. Hogan, A. Illingworth, and J. L. Brenguier, 2004: Characteristics of drizzling and non-drizzling stratocumulus as revealed by vertical pointing cloud radar and lidar. Proc. 14th Int. Conf. on Clouds and Precipitation, Bologna, Italy, ICCP, 612–615.

  • Pinsky, M., and A. Khain, 2002: Effects of in-cloud nucleation and turbulence on droplet spectrum formation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128 , 501533.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pinsky, M., A. Khain, and M. Shapiro, 2001: Collision efficiency of drops in a wide range of Reynolds numbers: Effects of pressure on spectrum evolution. J. Atmos. Sci., 58 , 742764.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pinsky, M., A. Khain, L. Magaritz, N. BenMoshe, A. Sterkin, O. Krasnov, and H. W. J. Russchenberg, 2006: A novel trajectory ensemble model of stratiform cloud and its possible applications. Preprints, 12th Conf. on Cloud Physics and Precipitation, Madison, WI, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 3.1.

  • Pinsky, M., L. Magaritz, A. Khain, O. Krasnov, and A. Sterkin, 2008: Investigation of droplet size distributions and drizzle formation using a new trajectory ensemble model. Part I: Model description and first results in a nonmixing limit. J. Atmos. Sci., in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ramanathan, V., P. J. Crutzen, J. T. Kiehl, and D. Rosenfeld, 2001: Aerosols, climate, and the hydrological cycle. Science, 294 , 21192124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Respondek, P. S., A. I. Flossmann, R. R. Alheit, and H. R. Pruppacher, 1995: A theoretical study of the wet removal of atmospheric pollutants. Part V: The uptake, redistribution, and deposition of (NH4)2SO4 by a convective cloud containing ice. J. Atmos. Sci., 52 , 21212132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rizvi, S. R. H., E. L. Bensman, T. S. V. Vijaya Kumar, A. Chakraborty, and T. N. Krishnamurti, 2002: Impact of CAMEX-3 data on the analysis and forecasts of Atlantic hurricanes. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 79 , 1332.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sauvageot, H., and J. Omar, 1987: Radar reflectivity of cumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 4 , 264272.

  • Segal, Y., and A. Khain, 2006: Dependence of droplet concentration on aerosol conditions in different cloud types: Application to droplet concentration parameterization of aerosol conditions. J. Geophys. Res., 111 .D15204, doi:10.1029/2005JD006561.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Segal, Y., A. Khain, M. Pinsky, and A. Sterkin, 2004: Effects of atmospheric aerosol on precipitation in cumulus clouds as seen from 2000-bin cloud parcel microphysical model: Sensitivity study with cloud seeding applications. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130 , 561582.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stevens, B., G. Feingold, W. R. Cotton, and R. L. Walko, 1996: Elements of the microphysical structure of numerically simulated nonprecipitating stratocumulus. J. Atmos. Sci., 53 , 9801006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stevens, B., W. R. Cotton, G. Feingold, and C. Moeng, 1998: Large-eddy simulations of strongly precipitating, shallow, stratocumulus-topped boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci., 55 , 36163638.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stevens, B., and Coauthors, 2003a: Dynamics and chemistry of maritime stratocumulus—DYCOMS-II. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84 , 579593.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stevens, B., and Coauthors, 2003b: On entrainment rates in nocturnal maritime stratocumulus. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129 , 34693492.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stevens, B., G. Vali, K. Comstock, R. Wood, M. C. van Zanten, P. H. Austin, C. S. Bretherton, and D. H. Lenshow, 2005: Pockets of open cells and drizzle in marine stratocumulus. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86 , 5157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VanZanten, M. C., and B. Stevens, 2005: Observations of the structure of heavily precipitating maritime stratocumulus. J. Atmos. Sci., 62 , 43274342.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VanZanten, M. C., B. Stevens, G. Vali, and D. H. Lenschow, 2005: Observations of drizzle in nocturnal marine stratocumulus. J. Atmos. Sci., 62 , 88106.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wolf, D. A., H. W. J. Russchenberg, and L. P. Ligthart, 2000: Radar reflection from clouds: Gigahertz backscatter cross sections and Doppler spectra. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 48 , 254259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 861 448 132
PDF Downloads 347 90 9