Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Development and Evaluation of a Coupled Photosynthesis-Based Gas Exchange Evapotranspiration Model (GEM) for Mesoscale Weather Forecasting Applications

Dev Niyogi Department of Agronomy, and Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Search for other papers by Dev Niyogi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Kiran Alapaty Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C

Search for other papers by Kiran Alapaty in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Sethu Raman Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Sethu Raman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Fei Chen National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Fei Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 2009
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC1662.1
Page(s):
349–368
Restricted access

Abstract

Current land surface schemes used for mesoscale weather forecast models use the Jarvis-type stomatal resistance formulations for representing the vegetation transpiration processes. The Jarvis scheme, however, despite its robustness, needs significant tuning of the hypothetical minimum-stomatal resistance term to simulate surface energy balances. In this study, the authors show that the Jarvis-type stomatal resistance/transpiration model can be efficiently replaced in a coupled land–atmosphere model with a photosynthesis-based scheme and still achieve dynamically consistent results. To demonstrate this transformative potential, the authors developed and coupled a photosynthesis, gas exchange–based surface evapotranspiration model (GEM) as a land surface scheme for mesoscale weather forecasting model applications. The GEM was dynamically coupled with a prognostic soil moisture–soil temperature model and an atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) model. This coupled system was then validated over different natural surfaces including temperate C4 vegetation (prairie grass and corn field) and C3 vegetation (soybean, fallow, and hardwood forest) under contrasting surface conditions (such as different soil moisture and leaf area index). Results indicated that the coupled model was able to realistically simulate the surface fluxes and the boundary layer characteristics over different landscapes. The surface energy fluxes, particularly for latent heat, are typically within 10%–20% of the observations without any tuning of the biophysical–vegetation characteristics, and the response to the changes in the surface characteristics is consistent with observations and theory. This result shows that photosynthesis-based transpiration/stomatal resistance models such as GEM, despite various complexities, can be applied for mesoscale weather forecasting applications. Future efforts for understanding the different scaling parameterizations and for correcting errors for low soil moisture and/or wilting vegetation conditions are necessary to improve model performance. Results from this study suggest that the GEM approach using the photosynthesis-based soil vegetation atmosphere transfer (SVAT) scheme is thus superior to the Jarvis-based approaches. Currently GEM is being implemented within the Noah land surface model for the community Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Advanced Research Version Modeling System (ARW) and the NCAR high-resolution land data assimilation system (HRLDAS), and validation is under way.

* The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Dev Niyogi, Department of Agronomy, and Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Email: climate@purdue.edu

Abstract

Current land surface schemes used for mesoscale weather forecast models use the Jarvis-type stomatal resistance formulations for representing the vegetation transpiration processes. The Jarvis scheme, however, despite its robustness, needs significant tuning of the hypothetical minimum-stomatal resistance term to simulate surface energy balances. In this study, the authors show that the Jarvis-type stomatal resistance/transpiration model can be efficiently replaced in a coupled land–atmosphere model with a photosynthesis-based scheme and still achieve dynamically consistent results. To demonstrate this transformative potential, the authors developed and coupled a photosynthesis, gas exchange–based surface evapotranspiration model (GEM) as a land surface scheme for mesoscale weather forecasting model applications. The GEM was dynamically coupled with a prognostic soil moisture–soil temperature model and an atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) model. This coupled system was then validated over different natural surfaces including temperate C4 vegetation (prairie grass and corn field) and C3 vegetation (soybean, fallow, and hardwood forest) under contrasting surface conditions (such as different soil moisture and leaf area index). Results indicated that the coupled model was able to realistically simulate the surface fluxes and the boundary layer characteristics over different landscapes. The surface energy fluxes, particularly for latent heat, are typically within 10%–20% of the observations without any tuning of the biophysical–vegetation characteristics, and the response to the changes in the surface characteristics is consistent with observations and theory. This result shows that photosynthesis-based transpiration/stomatal resistance models such as GEM, despite various complexities, can be applied for mesoscale weather forecasting applications. Future efforts for understanding the different scaling parameterizations and for correcting errors for low soil moisture and/or wilting vegetation conditions are necessary to improve model performance. Results from this study suggest that the GEM approach using the photosynthesis-based soil vegetation atmosphere transfer (SVAT) scheme is thus superior to the Jarvis-based approaches. Currently GEM is being implemented within the Noah land surface model for the community Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Advanced Research Version Modeling System (ARW) and the NCAR high-resolution land data assimilation system (HRLDAS), and validation is under way.

* The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Dev Niyogi, Department of Agronomy, and Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Email: climate@purdue.edu

Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Alapaty, K., J. Pleim, S. Raman, D. Niyogi, and D. Byun, 1997a: Simulation of atmospheric boundary layer processes using local- and nonlocal-closure schemes. J. Appl. Meteor., 36 , 214–233.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Alapaty, K., S. Raman, and D. Niyogi, 1997b: Uncertainty in specification of surface characteristics: A study of prediction errors in the boundary layer. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 82 , 473–500.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Alapaty, K., N. Seaman, D. Niyogi, and A. Hanna, 2001: Assimilating surface data to improve the accuracy of atmospheric boundary layer simulations. J. Appl. Meteor., 40 , 2068–2082.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Alfieri, J. G., D. Niyogi, P. D. Blanken, F. Chen, M. A. LeMone, K. Mitchell, M. B. Ek, and A. Kumar, 2008: Estimation of the minimum canopy resistance for croplands and grasslands using data from the 2002 International H2O Project. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136 , 4452–4469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Anderson, N., J. Norman, T. Meyers, and G. Diak, 2000: An analytical model for estimating canopy transpiration and carbon assimilation fluxes based on canopy light use efficiency. Agric. For. Meteor., 101 , 265–289.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Baldocchi, D., 1992: A Lagrangian random-walk model for simulating water vapor, CO2, and sensible heat flux densities and scalar profiles over and within a soybean canopy. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 61 , 113–144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Baldocchi, D., and Coauthors, 2001: FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem–scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 82 , 2415–2434.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ball, J., I. Woodrow, and J. Berry, 1987: A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. Progress in Photosynthesis Research, Vol. 4, J. Biggins, Ed., Martinus Nijhoff, 221–224.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Blackadar, A., 1976: Modeling the nocturnal boundary layer. Proc. Third Symp. on Atmospheric Turbulence, Diffusion, and Air Quality, Raleigh, NC, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 46–49.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bosilovich, M., and W. Sun, 1995: Formulation and verification of a land surface parameterization for atmospheric models. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 73 , 321–341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Calvet, J-C., J. Noilhan, J. Roujean, P. Bessemoulin, M. Cabelguenne, A. Olioso, and J. Wigneron, 1998: An interactive vegetation SVAT model tested against data from six contrasting sites. Agric. For. Meteor., 92 , 73–95.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Calvet, J., and Coauthors, 1999: MUREX: A land surface field experiment to study the annual cycle of the energy and water budgets. Ann. Geophys., 17 , 838–854.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chang, H., A. Kumar, D. Niyogi, U. C. Mohanty, F. Chen, and J. Dudhia, 2009: The role of land surface processes on the mesoscale simulation of the July 26, 2005 heavy rain event over Mumbai, India. Global Planet. Change, in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, F., and J. Dudhia, 2001: Coupling an advanced land surface/hydrology model with the Penn State/NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129 , 569–585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, F., and Coauthors, 1996: Modeling of land surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with FIFE observations. J. Geophys. Res., 101 , 7251–7268.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Clapp, R., and G. Hornberger, 1978: Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties. Water Resour. Res., 14 , 601–604.

  • Colello, G., C. Grivet, P. Sellers, and J. Berry, 1998: Modeling of energy, water, and CO2 flux in a temperate grassland ecosystem with SiB2: May–October 1987. J. Atmos. Sci., 55 , 1141–1169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Collatz, J., J. Ball, C. Grivet, and J. Berry, 1991: Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: A model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agric. For. Meteor., 54 , 107–136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Collatz, J., M. Ribas-Carbo, and J. Berry, 1992: Coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model for leaves of C4 plants. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 19 , 519–538.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cooter, E., and D. Schwede, 2000: Sensitivity of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration multilayer model to instrument error and parameterization uncertainty. J. Geophys. Res., 105 , 6695–6704.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cowan, I., 1982: Regulation of water use in relation to carbon gain in higher plants. Physiological Plant Ecology II, O. Lange et al., Eds., Vol. 12B, Encylopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Springer-Verlag, 589–615.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cox, P., R. Betts, C. Bunton, R. Essery, P. Rowntree, and J. Smith, 1999: The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity. Climate Dyn., 15 , 183–203.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dai, Y., and Coauthors, 2003: The Common Land Model. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84 , 1013–1023.

  • Dang, Q., H. Margolis, and J. Collatz, 1998: Parameterization and testing of a coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model for boreal trees. Tree Physiol., 18 , 141–153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Deardorff, J., 1978: Efficient prediction of ground surface temperature and moisture with inclusion of a layer of vegetation. J. Geophys. Res., 83 , 1889–1903.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ek, M. B., K. E. Mitchell, Y. Lin, E. Rogers, P. Grunmann, V. Koren, G. Gayno, and J. D. Tarpley, 2003: Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model. J. Geophys. Res., 108 , 8851. doi:10.1029/2002JD003296.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Farquhar, G., S. von Caemmerer, and J. Berry, 1980: A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 149 , 78–90.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Feddema, J. J., K. W. Oleson, G. B. Bonan, L. O. Mearns, L. E. Buja, G. A. Meehl, and W. M. Washington, 2005: The importance of land-cover change in simulating future climates. Science, 310 , 1674–1678.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Finkelstein, P., T. Ellestad, J. Clarke, T. Meyers, D. Schwede, E. Hebert, and J. Neal, 2000: Ozone and sulfur dioxide dry deposition to forests: Observations and model evaluation. J. Geophys. Res., 105 , 15365–15378.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Goudriaan, J., H. van Laar, H. van Keulen, and W. Lovwerse, 1985: Photosynthesis, CO2 and plant production. Wheat Growth and Modeling, W. Day and R. K. Atkin, Eds., NATO ASI Series A, Vol. 86, Plenum Press, 107–122.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gu, L., and Coauthors, 2007: Influences of biomass heat and biochemical energy storages on the land surface fluxes and radiative temperature. J. Geophys. Res., 112 , D02107. doi:10.1029/2006JD007425.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Holt, T., D. Niyogi, F. Chen, M. A. LeMone, K. Manning, and A. L. Qureshi, 2006: Effect of land–atmosphere interactions on the IHOP 24–25 May 2002 convection case. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134 , 113–133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Idso, S. B., R. D. Jackson, R. J. Reginato, B. A. Kimball, and F. S. Nakayama, 1975: The dependence of bare soil albedo on soil water content. J. Appl. Meteor., 14 , 109–113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jacobs, C., 1994: Direct impact of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on regional transpiration. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, 179 pp.

  • Jarvis, P., 1976: The interpretation of leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 273B , 593–610.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jones, H. G., 1998: Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. J. Exp. Bot., 49 , 387–398.

  • Kim, J., and S. B. Verma, 1991: Modeling canopy photosynthesis: Scaling up from a leaf to canopy in a temperate grassland ecosystem. Agric. For. Meteor., 57 , 187–208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kumar, A., F. Chen, D. Niyogi, K. Manning, M. Ek, and K. Mitchell, 2007: Impact of canopy resistance formulation on the long-term evolution of soil moisture and evaporation. Preprints, 21st Conf. on Hydrology, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 4.5. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/87ANNUAL/techprogram/paper_116815.htm.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kumar, A., F. Chen, D. Niyogi, K. Manning, M. Ek, K. Mitchell, and J. G. Alfieri, 2008: Integrating a photosynthesis-based canopy resistance model and new MODIS-based data to improve the presentation of vegetation transpiration in the Noah land surface model. Preprints, 22nd Conf. on Hydrology, New Orleans, LA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., J3.1. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/131425.pdfm.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • LeMone, M. A., and Coauthors, 2007: NCAR/CU surface, soil, and vegetation observations during the International H20 Project 2002 Field Campaign. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88 , 65–81.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • LeMone, M. A., M. Tewari, F. Chen, J. G. Alfieri, and D. Niyogi, 2008: Evaluation of the Noah land surface model using data from a fair-weather IHOP_2002 day with heterogeneous surface fluxes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136 , 4915–4941.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Leuning, R., 1990: Modeling stomatal behavior and photosynthesis of Eucalyptus grand. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 17 , 150–175.

  • Maier-Maercker, U., 1998: Dynamics of change in stomatal response and water status of Picea abies during a persistent drought period: A contribution to the traditional view of plant water relations. Tree Physiol., 18 , 211–222.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Makela, A., F. Berninger, and P. Hari, 1996: Optimal control of gas exchange during drought: Theoretical analysis. Ann. Bot., 77 , 461–467.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Masson, V., J-L. Champeaux, F. Chauvin, C. Meriguet, and R. Lacaze, 2003: A global database of land surface parameters at 1-km resolution in meteorological and climate models. J. Climate, 16 , 1261–1282.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McCaughey, J. H., 1985: Energy balance storage terms in a mature mixed forest at Petawawa, Ontario—A case study. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 31 , 89–101. doi:10.1007/BF00120036.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Meyers, T., P. Finkelstein, J. Clarke, T. Ellestad, and P. Sims, 1998: A multilayer model for inferring dry deposition using standard meteorological measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 103 , 22645–22661.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nikolov, N., W. Massman, and A. Schoettle, 1995: Coupling biochemical and biophysical processes at the leaf level: An equilibrium photosynthesis model for leaves of C3 plants. Ecol. Model., 80 , 205–235.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Niyogi, D., and S. Raman, 1997: Comparison of four different stomatal resistance schemes using FIFE data. J. Appl. Meteor., 36 , 903–917.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Niyogi, D., and S. Raman, 2001: Numerical modeling of gas deposition and bi-directional surface-atmosphere exchanges in mesoscale air pollution systems. Mesoscale Atmospheric Dispersion, E. Z. Boybeyi, Ed., Advances in Air Pollution, Vol. 9, WIT, 424–484.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Niyogi, D., S. Raman, A. Prabhu, U. Kumar, and S. S. Joshi, 1997: Direct estimation of stomatal resistance for meteorological applications. Geophys. Res. Lett., 24 , 1771–1774.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Niyogi, D., S. Raman, and K. Alapaty, 1998: Comparison of four different stomatal resistance schemes using FIFE observations. Part II: Analysis of terrestrial biospheric–atmospheric interactions. J. Appl. Meteor., 37 , 1301–1320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Niyogi, D., S. Raman, and K. Alapaty, 1999: Uncertainty in the specification of surface characteristics, Part 2: Hierarchy of interaction explicit statistical analysis. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 91 , 341–366.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Niyogi, D., T. Holt, S. Zhong, P. C. Pyle, and J. Basara, 2006: Urban and land surface effects on the 30 July 2003 mesoscale convective system event observed in the Southern Great Plains. J. Geophys. Res., 111 , D19107. doi:10.1029/2005JD006746.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Noilhan, J., and S. Planton, 1989: A simple parameterization of land surface processes for meteorological models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117 , 536–549.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Paw U, K., 1987: Mathematical analysis of the operative temperature and energy budget. J. Therm. Biol., 3 , 227–233.

  • Pielke Sr., R. A., and D. Niyogi, 2009: The role of landscape processes within the climate system. Landform—Structure, Evolution, Process Control: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Landforms Organised by the Research Training Group 437, Vol. 115, J. C. Otto and R. Dikaum, Eds., Springer, in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pielke Sr., R. A., G. Marland, R. A. Betts, T. N. Chase, J. L. Eastman, J. O. Niles, D. Niyogi, and S. Running, 2002: The influence of land-use change and landscape dynamics on the climate system: Relevance to climate change policy beyond the radiative effect of greenhouse gases. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 360A , 1705–1719.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pitman, A. J., 2003: The evolution of, and revolution in, land surface schemes designed for climate models. Int. J. Climatol., 23 , 479–510. doi:10.1002/joc.893.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pleim, J., and A. Xiu, 1995: Development and testing of a surface flux planetary boundary layer model with explicit soil moisture parameterization for applications in mesoscale models. J. Appl. Meteor., 34 , 16–32.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Polley, H., J. Norman, T. Arkebauer, E. Walter-Shea, and D. Greegor, 1992: Leaf-gas exchange of Andropogon Gerardii Vitman, Panicum Virgatum L., and Sorgastrum Nutans (L.) Nash in a Tallgrass prairie. J. Geophys. Res., 97 , 18837–18844.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schulze, E., F. Kelliher, C. Korner, J. Lloyd, and R. Leuning, 1994: Relationships among maximum stomatal conductance, ecosystem surface conductance, carbon assimilation rate, and plant nitrogen nutrition: A global ecology scaling exercise. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 25 , 629–660.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sellers, P., F. Hall, G. Asrar, D. Strebel, and R. Murphy, 1992: An overview of the First International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project (ISLSCP) Field Experiment (FIFE). J. Geophys. Res., 97 , 18345–18371.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sellers, P. J., and Coauthors, 1996: A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. Part I: Model formulation. J. Climate, 9 , 676–705.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Su, H., K. Paw U, and R. Shaw, 1996: Development of a coupled leaf and canopy model for the simulation of plant–atmosphere interaction. J. Appl. Meteor., 35 , 734–748.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • van Heemst, H. D. J., 1988: Plant data values required for simple crop growth simulation models: Review and bibliography. Simulation Reps. CABO-TT 17, Centre for Agrobiological Research, Department of Theoretical Production Ecology, Agricultural University, 100 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wilson, K., D. Baldocchi, and P. Hanson, 2000a: Spatial and seasonal variability of photosynthetic parameters and their relationship to leaf nitrogen in a deciduous forest. Tree Physiol., 20 , 565–578.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wilson, K., D. Baldocchi, and P. Hanson, 2000b: Quantifying stomatal and non stomatal limitations to carbon assimilation resulting from leaf aging and drought in mature deciduous tree species. Tree Physiol., 20 , 787–797.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wilson, K., and Coauthors, 2002: Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites. Agric. For. Meteor., 113 , 223–243.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 769 346 229
PDF Downloads 336 98 6