Impact of Climate Change on Crop Yield: A Case Study of Rainfed Corn in Central Illinois

Ximing Cai Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois

Search for other papers by Ximing Cai in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dingbao Wang Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois

Search for other papers by Dingbao Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Romain Laurent Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois

Search for other papers by Romain Laurent in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper assesses the effect of climate change on crop yield from a soil water balance perspective. The uncertainties of regional-scale climate models, local-scale climate variability, emissions scenarios, and crop growth models are combined to explore the possible range of climate change effects on rainfed corn yield in central Illinois in 2055. The results show that a drier and warmer summer during the corn growth season and wetter and warmer precrop and postcrop seasons will likely occur. Greater temperature and precipitation variability may lead to more variable soil moisture and crop yield, and larger soil moisture deficit and crop yield reduction are likely to occur more frequently. The increased water stress is likely to be most pronounced during the flowering and yield formation stages. The expected rainfed corn yield in 2055 is likely to decline by 23%–34%, and the probability that the yield may not reach 50% of the potential yield ranges from 32% to 70% if no adaptation measures are instituted. Among the multiple uncertainty sources, the greenhouse gas emissions projection may have the strongest effect on the risk estimate of crop yield reduction. The effects from the various uncertainties can be offset to some degree when the uncertainties are considered jointly. An ensemble of GCMs with an equal weight may overestimate the risk of soil moisture deficits and crop yield reduction in comparison with an ensemble of GCMs with different weight determined by the root-mean-square error minimization method. The risk estimate presented in this paper implies that climate change adaptation is needed to avoid reduced corn yields and the resulting profit losses in central Illinois.

Corresponding author address: Ximing Cai, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 205 N. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801. Email: xmcai@uiuc.edu

Abstract

This paper assesses the effect of climate change on crop yield from a soil water balance perspective. The uncertainties of regional-scale climate models, local-scale climate variability, emissions scenarios, and crop growth models are combined to explore the possible range of climate change effects on rainfed corn yield in central Illinois in 2055. The results show that a drier and warmer summer during the corn growth season and wetter and warmer precrop and postcrop seasons will likely occur. Greater temperature and precipitation variability may lead to more variable soil moisture and crop yield, and larger soil moisture deficit and crop yield reduction are likely to occur more frequently. The increased water stress is likely to be most pronounced during the flowering and yield formation stages. The expected rainfed corn yield in 2055 is likely to decline by 23%–34%, and the probability that the yield may not reach 50% of the potential yield ranges from 32% to 70% if no adaptation measures are instituted. Among the multiple uncertainty sources, the greenhouse gas emissions projection may have the strongest effect on the risk estimate of crop yield reduction. The effects from the various uncertainties can be offset to some degree when the uncertainties are considered jointly. An ensemble of GCMs with an equal weight may overestimate the risk of soil moisture deficits and crop yield reduction in comparison with an ensemble of GCMs with different weight determined by the root-mean-square error minimization method. The risk estimate presented in this paper implies that climate change adaptation is needed to avoid reduced corn yields and the resulting profit losses in central Illinois.

Corresponding author address: Ximing Cai, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 205 N. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801. Email: xmcai@uiuc.edu

Save
  • Adams, A., 1989: Global climate change and agriculture: An economic perspective. Amer. J. Agric. Econ., 71 , 12721279.

  • Alexandrov, V., J. Eitzinger, V. Cajic, and M. Oberforster, 2002: Potential impact of climate change on selected agricultural crops in northeastern Austria. Global Change Biol., 8 , 372389.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Andronova, N. G., and M. E. Schlesinger, 2001: Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivity. J. Geophys. Res., 106 (19) 2260522611.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brumbelow, K., and A. Georgakakos, 2001: An assessment of irrigation needs and crop yield for the United States under potential climate changes. J. Geophys. Res., 106 , (D21). 2738327406.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carter, T., M. Hulme, and M. Lal, 1999: Guidelines on the use of scenario data for climate impact and adaptation assessment, version 1. IPCC Tech. Rep., 77 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Changnon, S., and S. Hollinger, 2003: Problems in estimating impacts of future climate change on Midwestern corn yields. Climatic Change, 58 , 109118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dettinger, M. D., 2005: From climate-change spaghetti to climate-change distributions for 21st Century California. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Sci., 3 , 114. [Available online at http://repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews/vol3/iss1/art4].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DOE, cited. 2007: Scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric concentrations and review of integrated scenario development and application. Synthesis and assessment product 2.1. [Available online at http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/sap/sap2-1/default.php].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doorenbos, J., and A. H. Kassam, 1979: Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation Drainage Paper 33, 193 pp.

  • Eitzinger, J., Z. Zalud, V. Alexandrov, C. A. van Diepen, M. Trnka, M. Dubrovsky, D. Semerádova, and M. Oberforster, 2001: A local simulation study on the impact of climate change on winter wheat production in north-eastern Austria. Ecol. Econ., 52 , 199212.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eitzinger, J., M. Stastna, Z. Zalud, and M. Dubrovsky, 2003: A simulation study of the effect of soil water balance and water stress on winter wheat production under different climate change scenarios. Agric. Water Manage., 61 , 195217.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EPA, 1997: Climate changes and Illinois. Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation (2111), Environmental Protection Agency Rep. 230-F-97-008m, 4 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Forest, C., P. Stone, A. Sokolov, M. Allen, and M. Webster, 2002: Quantifying uncertainties in the climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations. Science, 295 , 113117.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gregory, J., R. Stouffer, S. Raper, P. Stott, and N. Rayner, 2002: An observationally based estimate of the climate sensitivity. J. Climate, 15 , 31173121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hu, Q., and G. Buyanovsky, 2003: Climate effects on corn yield in Missouri. J. Appl. Meteor., 42 , 16261635.

  • Huntingford, C., C. H. Lambert, J. H. C. Gash, C. M. Taylor, and A. J. Challinor, 2005: Aspects of climate change prediction relevant to crop productivity. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 360B , 19992009. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1748.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Illinois Climate Network, cited. 2005: Illinois State Water Survey. [Available online at http://www.isws.illinois.edu/warm/dataarchive.asp].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, R. N., 2000: Analyzing the risk of climate change using an irrigation demand model. Climate Res., 14 , 89100.

  • Laurent, R., and X. Cai, 2007: Uncertainty quantification for global climate models using the maximum entropy method. Climatic Change, 82 , 411435.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Long, S. P., E. A. Ainsworth, A. D. B. Leakey, J. Nösberger, and D. R. Ort, 2006: Food for thought: Lower-than-expected crop yield stimulation with rising CO2 concentrations. Science, 312 , 19181921.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacQueen, J., 1967: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press, 281–297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, J., T. Johns, M. Eagles, W. Ingram, and R. Davis, 2003: Towards the construction of climate change scenarios. Climatic Change, 41 , 547581.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nakicenovic, N., and R. Swart, Eds. 2000: Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, 570 pp.

  • NAST, 2000: Climate change impacts on the United States: The potential consequences of climate variability and change. National Assessment Synthesis Team Rep., 620 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • New, M., and M. Hulme, 2000: Representing uncertainty in climate change scenarios: A Monte-Carlo approach. Integr. Assess., 1 , 203213.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Park, W. I., and T. R. Sinclair, 1993: Consequences of climate and crop yield limits on the distribution of crop yields. Rev. Agric. Econ., 15 , 483493.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Raper, S., T. Wigley, and R. Warrick, 1996: Global sea-level rise: Past and future. Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Subsidence: Causes, Consequences, and Strategies, J. D. Milliman and B. U. Haq, Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, 11–46.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reilly, J. M., and Coauthors, 2003: U.S. agriculture and climate change: New results. Climatic Change, 57 , 4367.

  • Richter, G. M., and M. A. Semenov, 2005: Modelling impacts of climate change on wheat yields in England and Wales: Assessing drought risks. Agric. Syst., 84 , 7797.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Richter, G. M., A. Qi, M. A. Semenov, and K. W. Jaggard, 2006: Modelling the variability of UK sugar beet yields under climate change and husbandry adaptations. Soil Use Manage., 22 , 3947.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ruosteenoja, K. T., K. J. Carter, K. Jylhä, and H. Tuomenvirta, 2003: Future climate in world regions: An intercomparison of model-based projections for the new IPCC emission scenarios. Finnish Environment Institute, The Finnish Environment 644, 83 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Santer, B. D., T. M. L. Wigley, M. E. Schlesinger, and J. F. B. Mitchell, 1990: Developing climate scenarios from equilibrium GCM results. Max-Planck-Institute für Meteorologie Rep. 47, 31 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schimel, D., 2006: Climate change and crop yields: Beyond Cassandra. Science, 312 , 18891890.

  • Schlenker, W., and M. J. Roberts, 2006: Nonlinear effects of weather on crop yields. Rev. Agric. Econ., 28 , 391398.

  • Semenov, M. A., and J. R. Porter, 1995: Climatic variability and the modeling of crop yields. Agric. For. Meteor., 73 , 265283.

  • Semenov, M. A., and E. Barrow, 1997: Use of a stochastic weather generator in the development of climate change scenarios. Climatic Change, 35 , 397414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Semenov, M. A., R. J. Brooks, E. M. Barrow, and C. W. Richardson, 1998: Comparison of the WGEN and LARS-WG stochastic weather generators for diverse climates. Climate Res., 10 , 95107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomas, A., 2000: Climatic changes in yield index and soil water deficit trends in China. Agric. For. Meteor., 102 , 7181.

  • Tubiello, F. N., C. Rosenzweig, R. A. Goldberg, S. Jagtap, and J. W. Jones, 2002: Effects of climate change on U.S. crop production: Simulation results using two different GCM scenarios. Part I: Wheat, potato, maize, and citrus. Climate Res., 20 , 259270.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Dam, J. C., J. Huygen, J. G. Wesseling, R. A. Feddes, P. Kabat, P. E. V. Van Walsum, P. Groenendijk, and C. A. Van Diepen, 1997: Theory of SWAP, version 2.0: Simulation of water flow, solute transport and plant growth in the Soil-Water-Atmosphere-Plant environment. Department of Water Resources, Wageningen Agricultural University Rep. 71 and DLO Winand Staring Centre Tech. Document 45, 153 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, D., and X. Cai, 2007: Optimal estimation of irrigation schedule - An example of quantifying human interferences to hydrologic processes. Adv. Water Resour., 30 , 18441857.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Watson, R. T., and Coauthors, 2001: Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Cambridge University Press, 398 pp.

  • Webster, M., and Coauthors, 2003: Uncertainty analysis of climate change and policy response. Climatic Change, 61 , 295320.

  • Wigley, T., and S. Raper, 1987: Thermal expansion of sea water associated with global warming. Nature, 330 , 127131.

  • Wigley, T., and S. Raper, 1992: Implications for climate and sea level of revised IPCC emissions scenarios. Nature, 357 , 293300.

  • Wilks, D. S., and R. L. Wilby, 1999: The weather generation game: A review of stochastic weather models. Prog. Phys. Geogr., 23 , 329357.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williams, A., and Coauthors, 2001: Global climate change: Implications of extreme events for soil conservation strategies and crop production in the midwestern United States. Sustaining the Global Farm, D. E. Stott, R. H. Mohtar, and G. C. Steinhardt, Eds., International Soil Conservation Organization, 509–515.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1642 306 46
PDF Downloads 1275 193 30