Optimally Merging Precipitation to Minimize Land Surface Modeling Errors

M. Tugrul Yilmaz George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia

Search for other papers by M. Tugrul Yilmaz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Paul Houser George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia

Search for other papers by Paul Houser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Roshan Shrestha Center for Research on Environment and Water, Calverton, Maryland

Search for other papers by Roshan Shrestha in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Valentine G. Anantharaj Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi

Search for other papers by Valentine G. Anantharaj in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper introduces a new method to improve land surface model skill by merging different available precipitation datasets, given that an accurate land surface parameter ground truth is available. Precipitation datasets are merged with the objective of improving terrestrial water and energy cycle simulation skill, unlike most common methods in which the merging skills are evaluated by comparing the results with gauge data or selected reference data. The optimal merging method developed in this study minimizes the simulated land surface parameter (soil moisture, temperature, etc.) errors using the Noah land surface model with the Nelder–Mead (downhill simplex) method. In addition to improving the simulation skills, this method also impedes the adverse impacts of single-source precipitation data errors. Analysis has indicated that the results from the optimally merged precipitation product have fewer errors in other land surface states and fluxes such as evapotranspiration (ET), discharge R, and skin temperature T than do simulation results obtained by forcing the model using the precipitation products individually. It is also found that, using this method, the true knowledge of soil moisture information minimized land surface modeling errors better than the knowledge of other land surface parameters (ET, R, and T). Results have also shown that, although it does not have the true precipitation information, the method has associated heavier weights with the precipitation product that has intensity, amount, and frequency that are similar to those of the true precipitation.

Corresponding author address: M. Tugrul Yilmaz, 4400 University Dr., Fairfax, VA 22030. Email: myilmaz1@gmu.edu

This article included in the International Precipitation Working Group (IPWG) special collection.

Abstract

This paper introduces a new method to improve land surface model skill by merging different available precipitation datasets, given that an accurate land surface parameter ground truth is available. Precipitation datasets are merged with the objective of improving terrestrial water and energy cycle simulation skill, unlike most common methods in which the merging skills are evaluated by comparing the results with gauge data or selected reference data. The optimal merging method developed in this study minimizes the simulated land surface parameter (soil moisture, temperature, etc.) errors using the Noah land surface model with the Nelder–Mead (downhill simplex) method. In addition to improving the simulation skills, this method also impedes the adverse impacts of single-source precipitation data errors. Analysis has indicated that the results from the optimally merged precipitation product have fewer errors in other land surface states and fluxes such as evapotranspiration (ET), discharge R, and skin temperature T than do simulation results obtained by forcing the model using the precipitation products individually. It is also found that, using this method, the true knowledge of soil moisture information minimized land surface modeling errors better than the knowledge of other land surface parameters (ET, R, and T). Results have also shown that, although it does not have the true precipitation information, the method has associated heavier weights with the precipitation product that has intensity, amount, and frequency that are similar to those of the true precipitation.

Corresponding author address: M. Tugrul Yilmaz, 4400 University Dr., Fairfax, VA 22030. Email: myilmaz1@gmu.edu

This article included in the International Precipitation Working Group (IPWG) special collection.

Save
  • Adler, R. F., and Coauthors, 2003: The version-2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–present). J. Hydrometeor., 4 , 11471167.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arpe, K., 1991: The hydrological cycle in the ECMWF short range forecasts. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans, 16 , (1–2). 3359.

  • Benjamin, S. G., and Coauthors, 2002: RUC20—The 20-km version of the Rapid Update Cycle. NOAA Tech. Memo. OAR FSL-28, 32 pp.

  • Cosgrove, B. A., and Coauthors, 2003: Real-time and retrospective forcing in the North American Land Data Assimilation Systems (NLDAS) project. J. Geophys. Res., 108 , 8842. doi:10.1029/2002JD003118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dai, A. G., 2006: Precipitation characteristics in eighteen coupled climate models. J. Climate, 19 , 46054630.

  • Ebert, E. E., J. E. Janowiak, and C. Kidd, 2007: Comparison of near-real-time precipitation estimates from satellite observations and numerical models. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88 , 4764.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fekete, B. M., C. J. Vorosmarty, J. O. Roads, and C. J. Willmott, 2004: Uncertainties in precipitation and their impacts on runoff estimates. J. Climate, 17 , 294304.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fulton, R. A., J. P. Breidenbach, D-J. Seo, D. A. Miller, and T. O’Bannon, 1998: The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm. Wea. Forecasting, 13 , 377395.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gottschalck, J., J. Meng, M. Rodell, and P. Houser, 2005: Analysis of multiple precipitation products and preliminary assessment of their impact on Global Land Data Assimilation System land surface states. J. Hydrometeor., 6 , 573598.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huffman, G. J., R. F. Adler, M. M. Morrissey, D. T. Bolvin, S. Curtis, R. Joyce, B. McGavock, and J. Susskind, 2001: Global precipitation at one-degree daily resolution from multisatellite observations. J. Hydrometeor., 2 , 3650.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huffman, G. J., and Coauthors, 2007: The TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA): Quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. J. Hydrometeor., 8 , 3855.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joseph, R., T. M. Smith, M. R. P. Sapiano, and R. Ferraro, 2009: A new high-resolution satellite-derived precipitation dataset for climate studies. J. Hydrometeor., 10 , 935952.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joyce, R. J., J. E. Janowiak, P. A. Arkin, and P. Xie, 2004: CMORPH: A method that produces global precipitation estimates from passive microwave and infrared data at high spatial and temporal resolution. J. Hydrometeor., 5 , 487503.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kidd, C., D. R. Kniveton, M. C. Todd, and T. J. Bellerby, 2003: Satellite rainfall estimation using combined passive microwave and infrared algorithms. J. Hydrometeor., 4 , 10881104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kubota, T., and Coauthors, 2007: Global precipitation map using satellite-borne microwave radiometers by the GSMaP project: Production and validation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 45 , 22592275.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mechoso, C. R., and Coauthors, 2006: VOCALS modeling plan. VAMOS Ocean–Cloud–Atmosphere–Land Study Document, 42 pp. [Available online at http://www.eol.ucar.edu/projects/vocals/documentation/VOCALS_Modeling_0906.pdf].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nelder, J. A., and R. Mead, 1965: A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J., 7 , 308313.

  • Nijssen, B., G. M. O’Donnell, D. P. Lettenmaier, D. Lohmann, and E. F. Wood, 2001: Predicting the discharge of global rivers. J. Climate, 14 , 33073323.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sorooshian, S., K-L. Hsu, X. Gao, H. V. Gupta, B. Imam, and D. Braithwaite, 2000: Evaluation of PERSIANN system satellite–based estimates of tropical rainfall. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81 , 20352046.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sun, Y., S. Solomon, A. Dai, and R. Portmann, 2006: How often does it rain? J. Climate, 19 , 916934.

  • Tian, Y., C. D. Peters-Lidard, B. J. Choudhury, and M. Garcia, 2007: Multitemporal analysis of TRMM-based satellite precipitation products for land data assimilation applications. J. Hydrometeor., 8 , 11651183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turk, F. J., and S. D. Miller, 2005: Toward improved characterization of remotely sensed precipitation regimes with MODIS/AMSR-E blended data techniques. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 43 , 10591069.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turk, F. J., G. Mostovoy, and V. G. Anantharaj, 2010: Soil moisture sensitivity to NRL-blend high resolution precipitation products: Analysis of simulations with two land surface models. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wei, J., P. A. Dirmeyer, and Z. Guo, 2008: Sensitivities of soil wetness simulation to uncertainties in precipitation and radiation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35 , L15703. doi:10.1029/2008GL034494.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xie, P., and P. A. Arkin, 1997: Global precipitation: A 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model outputs. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78 , 25392558.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xie, P., J. E. Janowiak, P. A. Arkin, R. Adler, A. Gruber, R. Ferraro, G. J. Huffman, and S. Curtis, 2003: GPCP pentad precipitation analyses: An experimental dataset based on gauge observations and satellite estimates. J. Climate, 16 , 21972214.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 5164 4758 37
PDF Downloads 188 46 7