Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Assessing Maize and Peanut Yield Simulations with Various Seasonal Climate Data in the Southeastern United States

D. W. Shin Center for Ocean–Atmospheric Prediction Studies, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by D. W. Shin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
G. A. Baigorria Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Search for other papers by G. A. Baigorria in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Y-K. Lim Center for Ocean–Atmospheric Prediction Studies, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by Y-K. Lim in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
S. Cocke Center for Ocean–Atmospheric Prediction Studies, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by S. Cocke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
T. E. LaRow Center for Ocean–Atmospheric Prediction Studies, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by T. E. LaRow in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
James J. O’Brien Center for Ocean–Atmospheric Prediction Studies, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by James J. O’Brien in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
James W. Jones Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Search for other papers by James W. Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Apr 2010
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2293.1
Page(s):
592–603
Restricted access

Abstract

A comprehensive evaluation of crop yield simulations with various seasonal climate data is performed to improve the current practice of crop yield projections. The El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-based historical data are commonly used to predict the upcoming season crop yields over the southeastern United States. In this study, eight different seasonal climate datasets are generated using the combinations of two global models, a regional model, and a statistical downscaling technique. One of the global models and the regional model are run with two different convective schemes. These datasets are linked to maize and peanut dynamic models to assess their impacts on crop yield simulations and are then compared with the ENSO-based approach. Improvement of crop yield simulations with the climate model data is varying, depending on the model configuration and the crop type. Although using the global climate model data directly provides no improvement, the dynamically and statistically downscaled data show increased skill in the crop yield simulations. A statistically downscaled operational seasonal climate model forecast shows statistically significant (at the 5% level) interannual predictability in the peanut yield simulation. Since the yield amount simulated by the dynamical crop model is highly sensitive to wet/dry spell sequences (water stress) during the growing season, fidelity in simulating the precipitation variability is essential.

Corresponding author address: D. W. Shin, Center for Ocean–Atmospheric Prediction Studies, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2840. Email: shin@coaps.fsu.edu

Abstract

A comprehensive evaluation of crop yield simulations with various seasonal climate data is performed to improve the current practice of crop yield projections. The El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-based historical data are commonly used to predict the upcoming season crop yields over the southeastern United States. In this study, eight different seasonal climate datasets are generated using the combinations of two global models, a regional model, and a statistical downscaling technique. One of the global models and the regional model are run with two different convective schemes. These datasets are linked to maize and peanut dynamic models to assess their impacts on crop yield simulations and are then compared with the ENSO-based approach. Improvement of crop yield simulations with the climate model data is varying, depending on the model configuration and the crop type. Although using the global climate model data directly provides no improvement, the dynamically and statistically downscaled data show increased skill in the crop yield simulations. A statistically downscaled operational seasonal climate model forecast shows statistically significant (at the 5% level) interannual predictability in the peanut yield simulation. Since the yield amount simulated by the dynamical crop model is highly sensitive to wet/dry spell sequences (water stress) during the growing season, fidelity in simulating the precipitation variability is essential.

Corresponding author address: D. W. Shin, Center for Ocean–Atmospheric Prediction Studies, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2840. Email: shin@coaps.fsu.edu

Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Baigorria, G. A., J. W. Jones, D. W. Shin, A. Mishra, and J. J. O’Brien, 2007: Assessing uncertainties in crop model simulations using daily bias-corrected regional circulation model outputs. Climate Res., 34 , 211–222.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Baigorria, G. A., J. W. Jones, and J. J. O’Brien, 2008: Potential predictability of crop yield using an ensemble climate forecast by a regional circulation model. Agric. For. Meteor., 148 , 1353–1361.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Boote, K. J., W. Jones, G. Hoogenboom, and N. B. Pickering, 1998: The CROPGRO model for rain legumes. Understanding Options for Agricultural Production, G. Y. Tsuji, G. Hoogenboom, and P. K. Thornton, Eds., Kluwer Academic, 79–98.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cabrera, V. E., D. Solis, G. A. Baigorria, and D. Letson, 2009: Managing climate variability in agricultural analysis. Ocean Circulation and El Niño: New Research, J. A. Long and D. S. Wells, Eds., Nova Science, 163–179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Challinor, A. J., and T. R. Wheeler, 2008: Crop yield reduction in the tropics under climate change: Processes and uncertainties. Agric. For. Meteor., 148 , 343–356.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cocke, S., and T. E. LaRow, 2000: Seasonal predictions using a regional spectral model embedded within a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128 , 689–708.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cocke, S., T. E. LaRow, and D. W. Shin, 2007: Seasonal rainfall predictions over the southeast United States using the Florida State University nested regional spectral model. J. Geophys. Res., 112 , D04106. doi:10.1029/2006JD007535.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dubrovsky, M., Z. Zalud, and M. Stastna, 2000: Sensitivity of CERES-maize yields to statistical structure of daily weather series. Climatic Change, 46 , 447–472.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fraisse, C. W., and Coauthors, 2006: AgClimate: A climate forecast information system for agricultural risk management in the southeastern USA. Comput. Electron. Agric., 53 , 13–27.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hansen, J. W., 2002: Realizing the potential benefits of climate prediction to agriculture: Issues, approaches, challenges. Agric. Syst., 74 , 309–330.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Higgins, R. W., A. Leetmaa, Y. Xue, and A. Barnston, 2000: Dominant factors influencing the seasonal predictability of U.S. precipitation and surface air temperature. J. Climate, 13 , 3994–4017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jones, J. W., J. W. Hansen, F. S. Royce, and C. D. Messina, 2000: Potential benefits of climate forecasting to agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 82 , 169–184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jones, J. W., and Coauthors, 2003: The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur. J. Agron., 18 , 235–265.

  • Lim, Y-K., D. W. Shin, S. Cocke, T. E. LaRow, J. T. Schoof, J. J. O’Brien, and E. P. Chassignet, 2007: Dynamically and statistically downscaled seasonal simulations of maximum surface air temperature over the southeastern Unites States. J. Geophys. Res., 112 , D24102. doi:10.1029/2007JD008764.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pan, H-L., and W-S. Wu, 1994: Implementing a mass-flux convective parameterization package for the NMC Medium Range Forecast Model. Preprints, 10th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Portland, OR, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 96–98.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Paz, J. O., and Coauthors, 2007: Development of an ENSO-based irrigation decision support tool for peanut production in the southeastern US. Comput. Electron. Agric., 55 , 28–35.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Phillips, J. G., M. A. Cane, and C. Rosenzweig, 1998: ENSO, seasonal rainfall patterns, and simulated maize yield variability in Zimbabwe. Agric. For. Meteor., 90 , 39–50.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Richardson, C. W., and D. A. Wright, 1984: WGEN: A model for generating daily weather variables. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Publication ARS-8, 83 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ritchie, J. T., U. Singh, D. C. Godwin, and W. T. Bowen, 1998: Cereal growth, development and yield. Understanding Options for Agricultural Production, G. Y. Tsuji, G. Hoogenboom, and P. K. Thornton, Eds., Kluwer Academic, 79–98.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rizza, F., F. W. Badeck, L. Cattivelli, O. Lidestri, N. Di Fonzo, and A. M. Stanca, 2004: Use of a water stress index to identify barley genotypes adapted to rainfed and irrigated conditions. Crop Sci., 44 , 2127–2137.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Robertson, A. W., A. V. M. Ines, and J. W. Hansen, 2007: Downscaling of seasonal precipitation for crop simulation. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46 , 677–693.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ropelewski, C. F., and M. S. Halpert, 1986: North American precipitation and temperature patterns associated with the El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Mon. Wea. Rev., 114 , 2352–2362.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rosmond, T. E., 1992: The design and testing of the Navy operational global atmospheric system. Wea. Forecasting, 7 , 262–272.

  • Saha, S., and Coauthors, 2006: The NCEP Climate Forecast System. J. Climate, 19 , 3483–3517.

  • Schoof, J. T., D. W. Shin, S. Cocke, T. E. LaRow, Y-K. Lim, and J. J. O’Brien, 2009: Dynamically and statistically downscaled seasonal temperature and precipitation hindcast ensembles for the southeastern USA. Int. J. Climatol., 29 , 243–257.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Semenov, M. A., and F. J. Doblas-Reyes, 2007: Utility of dynamical seasonal forecasts in predicting crop yield. Climate Res., 34 , 71–81.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shin, D. W., S. Cocke, T. E. LaRow, and J. J. O’Brien, 2005: Seasonal surface air temperature and precipitation in the FSU climate model coupled to the CLM2. J. Climate, 18 , 3217–3228.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shin, D. W., J. G. Bellow, T. E. LaRow, S. Cocke, and J. J. O’Brien, 2006: The role of an advanced land model in seasonal dynamical downscaling for crop model application. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 45 , 686–701.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shin, D. W., S-D. Kang, S. Cocke, T-Y. Goo, and H-D. Kim, 2008: Seasonal probability of precipitation forecasts using a weighted ensemble approach. Int. J. Climatol., 28 , 1971–1976.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tolika, K., P. Maheras, M. Vafiadis, H. A. Flocasc, and A. Arseni-Papadimitriou, 2007: Simulation of seasonal precipitation and raindays over Greece: A statistical downscaling technique based on artificial neural networks (ANNs). Int. J. Climatol., 27 , 861–881.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1114 689 188
PDF Downloads 413 57 10