Polarimetric Radar–Based Estimates of Spatial Variability in Characteristic Sizes of Raindrops in Stratiform Rainfall

Sergey Y. Matrosov Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, and NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Sergey Y. Matrosov in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Polarimetric X-band radar measurements of differential reflectivity ZDR in stratiform rainfall were used for retrieving mean mass-weighted raindrop diameters Dm and estimating their spatial variability δDm at different scales. The ZDR data were calibrated and corrected for differential attenuation. The results revealed greater variability in Dm for larger spatial scales. Mean values of δDm were respectively around 0.32–0.34, 0.28–0.30, and 0.24–0.26 mm at scales of 20, 10, and 4.5 km, which are representative of footprints of various spaceborne sensors. For a given spatial scale, δDm decreases when the mean value of Dm increases. At the 20-km scale the decreasing trend exhibits a factor-of-1.7 decrease of δDm when the average Dm changes from 1 to 2 mm. Estimation data suggest that this trend diminishes as the spatial scale decreases. Measurement noise and other uncertainties preclude accurate estimations of Dm variability at smaller spatial scales because for many data points estimated variability values are equal to or less than the expected retrieval errors. Even though they are important for retrievals of absolute values of Dm, the details of the drop shape–size relation did not significantly affect estimates of size spatial variability. The polarization cross coupling in simultaneous transmission–simultaneous receiving measurement mode presents another limiting factor for accurate estimations of Dm. This factor, however, was not too severe in estimations of the size variability. There are indications that tuning the differential attenuation correction scheme might balance off some possible cross-coupling ZDR bias if differential phase accumulation is less than approximately 40°.

Corresponding author address: Sergey Y. Matrosov, R/PSD2, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305. E-mail: sergey.matrosov@noaa.gov

Abstract

Polarimetric X-band radar measurements of differential reflectivity ZDR in stratiform rainfall were used for retrieving mean mass-weighted raindrop diameters Dm and estimating their spatial variability δDm at different scales. The ZDR data were calibrated and corrected for differential attenuation. The results revealed greater variability in Dm for larger spatial scales. Mean values of δDm were respectively around 0.32–0.34, 0.28–0.30, and 0.24–0.26 mm at scales of 20, 10, and 4.5 km, which are representative of footprints of various spaceborne sensors. For a given spatial scale, δDm decreases when the mean value of Dm increases. At the 20-km scale the decreasing trend exhibits a factor-of-1.7 decrease of δDm when the average Dm changes from 1 to 2 mm. Estimation data suggest that this trend diminishes as the spatial scale decreases. Measurement noise and other uncertainties preclude accurate estimations of Dm variability at smaller spatial scales because for many data points estimated variability values are equal to or less than the expected retrieval errors. Even though they are important for retrievals of absolute values of Dm, the details of the drop shape–size relation did not significantly affect estimates of size spatial variability. The polarization cross coupling in simultaneous transmission–simultaneous receiving measurement mode presents another limiting factor for accurate estimations of Dm. This factor, however, was not too severe in estimations of the size variability. There are indications that tuning the differential attenuation correction scheme might balance off some possible cross-coupling ZDR bias if differential phase accumulation is less than approximately 40°.

Corresponding author address: Sergey Y. Matrosov, R/PSD2, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305. E-mail: sergey.matrosov@noaa.gov
Save
  • Barber, P., and C. Yeh, 1975: Scattering of electromagnetic waves by arbitrarily shaped dielectric bodies. Appl. Opt., 14, 28642872.

  • Brandes, E. A., G. Zhang, and J. Vivekanandan, 2005: Corrigendum. J. Appl. Meteor., 44, 186.

  • Beard, K. V., and C. Chuang, 1987: A new model for the equilibrium shape of raindrops. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 15091524.

  • Bringi, V. N., and V. Chandrasekar, 2001: Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar. Cambridge University Press, 636 pp.

  • Chandrasekar, V., A. Hou, E. Smith, V. N. Bringi, S. A. Rutledge, E. Gorgucci, W. A. Petersen, and G. Skofronick Jackson, 2008: Potential role of dual-polarization radar in the validation of satellite precipitation measurements: Rationale and opportunities. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 11271145.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doviak, R. J., V. Bringi, A. Ryzhkov, A. Zahrai, and D. Zrnic, 2000: Considerations for polarimetric upgrades to operational WSR-88D radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 17, 257278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, G. J., V. N. Bringi, and M. Thurai, 2008: Orientation angle distribution of drops after an 80-m fall using a 2D video disdrometer. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 25, 17171723.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hubbert, J. C., S. M. Ellis, M. Dixon, and G. Meymaris, 2010: Modeling, error analysis, and evaluation of dual-polarization variables obtained from simultaneous horizontal and vertical polarization transmit radar. Part I: Modeling and antenna errors. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 27, 15831598.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matrosov, S. Y., 2004: Depolarization estimates from linear H and V measurements with weather radars operating in simultaneous transmission–simultaneous receiving mode. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 21, 574583.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matrosov, S. Y., 2010: Evaluating polarimetric X-band radar rainfall estimators during HMT. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 27, 122134.

  • Matrosov, S. Y., D. E. Kingsmill, B. E. Martner, and F. M. Ralph, 2005: The utility of X-band polarimetric radar for quantitative estimates of rainfall parameters. J. Hydrometeor., 6, 248262.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matrosov, S. Y., R. Cifelli, P. C. Kennedy, S. W. Nesbitt, S. A. Rutledge, V. N. Bringi, and B. E. Martner, 2006: A comparative study of rainfall retrievals based on specific differential phase shifts at X- and S-band radar frequencies. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 23, 952963.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matrosov, S. Y., C. A. Clark, and D. A. Kingsmill, 2007: A polarimetric radar approach to identify rain, melting-layer, and snow regions for applying corrections to vertical profiles of reflectivity. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46, 154166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seliga, T. A., and V. N. Bringi, 1976: Potential use of radar differential reflectivity measurements at orthogonal polarizations for measuring precipitation. J. Appl. Meteor., 15, 6976.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sheppard, B. E., and P. I. Joe, 1994: Comparison of raindrop size distribution measurements by a Joss–Waldvogel disdrometer, a PMS 2DG spectrometer, and a POSS Doppler radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 11, 874887.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thurai, M., M. Szakall, V. N. Bringi, K. V. Beard, S. K. Mitra, and S. Borrmann, 2009: Drop shapes and axis ratio distributions: Comparisons between 2D video disdrometer and wind tunnel measurements. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 14271432.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ulbrich, C. W., 1983: Natural variations in the analytical form of the raindrop size distribution. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22, 17641775.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Y., and V. Chandrasekar, 2006: Polarization isolation requirements for linear dual-polarization weather radar in simultaneous transmission mode of operation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44, 20192028.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Willis, P. T., 1984: Functional fits to some observed drop size distributions and parameterizations of rain. J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 16481661.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, G., J. Vivekanandan, E. A. Brandes, R. Meneghini, and T. Kozu, 2003: The shape–slope relation in observed gamma raindrop size distributions: Statistical error or useful information? J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 20, 11061119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 71 34 3
PDF Downloads 36 22 2