Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

A High-Resolution Simulation of the Year 2003 for Germany Using the Regional Model COSMO

Martin Kücken Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany

Search for other papers by Martin Kücken in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Detlef Hauffe Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany

Search for other papers by Detlef Hauffe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Hermann Österle Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany

Search for other papers by Hermann Österle in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Oct 2012
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0186.1
Page(s):
1889–1903
Restricted access

Abstract

In this article, the authors examine the effect of a high-resolution grid (grid resolution lower than 3 km) in the context of a realistic climate simulation. For this purpose global simulation results of the German Weather Service were dynamically downscaled in a one-way nesting approach to 2.8 km using the regional forecast model of the Consortium for Small-Scale Modeling (COSMO) of the German Weather Service. The simulations were performed for the region of central Europe in 2003. In particular, the authors investigate whether COSMO adequately handles extreme events such as the persistent drought and heat of the summer of 2003. Comparisons of the simulated atmospheric conditions in terms of 2-m temperature, mean sea level pressure, and precipitation demonstrated a good correspondence to their associated observational data. Simulation results and observed data are both given as time series at locations such as grid cells or station locations. By cluster analysis a representation of the spatial structure for observation data and simulation results is found. The kappa statistic evaluates how well the two spatial structures correspond to each other. The different kappa variants are helpful to diagnose where shortcomings of the simulation results are located.

Corresponding author address: Martin Kücken, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Telegraphenberg A 31, Potsdam, D 14473, Germany. E-mail: mug.kuecken@t-online.de

Abstract

In this article, the authors examine the effect of a high-resolution grid (grid resolution lower than 3 km) in the context of a realistic climate simulation. For this purpose global simulation results of the German Weather Service were dynamically downscaled in a one-way nesting approach to 2.8 km using the regional forecast model of the Consortium for Small-Scale Modeling (COSMO) of the German Weather Service. The simulations were performed for the region of central Europe in 2003. In particular, the authors investigate whether COSMO adequately handles extreme events such as the persistent drought and heat of the summer of 2003. Comparisons of the simulated atmospheric conditions in terms of 2-m temperature, mean sea level pressure, and precipitation demonstrated a good correspondence to their associated observational data. Simulation results and observed data are both given as time series at locations such as grid cells or station locations. By cluster analysis a representation of the spatial structure for observation data and simulation results is found. The kappa statistic evaluates how well the two spatial structures correspond to each other. The different kappa variants are helpful to diagnose where shortcomings of the simulation results are located.

Corresponding author address: Martin Kücken, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Telegraphenberg A 31, Potsdam, D 14473, Germany. E-mail: mug.kuecken@t-online.de
Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Altman, D. G., 1991: Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall, 611 pp.

  • Arakawa, A., and V. R. Lamb, 1977: Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of UCLA general circulation model. Methods in Computational Physics, J. Chang, Ed., Vol. 17, Academic Press 173–265.

  • Backhaus, K., B. Erichson, W. Plinke, and R. Weiber, 2003: Clusteranalyse (Cluster analysis). Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung (Multivariate Analysis Methods: An Applications-Oriented Introduction). Springer-Verlag, 479–542.

  • Böhm, U., M. Kücken, W. Ahrens, A. Block, D. Hauffe, K. Keuler, B. Rockel, and A. Will, 2006: CLM—The climate version of LM: Brief description and long-term applications. COSMO Newsletter, No. 6, Consortium for Small-Scale Modeling, 225–235.

  • Cohen, J. A., 1960: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scale. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 20, 37–46.

  • Crewson, P. E., 2001: A correction for unbalanced kappa tables. Tech. Rep., American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, 4 pp. [Available online at http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi26/p194-26.pdf.]

  • Davis, H. C., 1976: A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 102, 405–418.

  • Davis, H. C., 1983: Limitations of some common lateral boundary schemes used in regional NWP models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 111, 1002–1012.

  • Doms, G., and U. Schättler, 2002: A description of the nonhydrostatic regional COSMO-Model. Part I: Dynamics and numerics. Tech. Rep., The COSMO Consortium, 146 pp. [Available online at http://www.cosmo-model.org/content/model/documentation/core/cosmoDyncsNumcs.pdf.]

  • Doms, G., and Coauthors, 2007: A description of the nonhydrostatic regional COSMO Model. Part II: Physical parameterizations. Tech. Rep., The COSMO Consortium, 139 pp. [Available online at http://www.cosmo-model.org/content/model/documentation/core/cosmoPhysParamtr.pdf.]

  • Dutton, J. A., 1976: The Ceaseless Wind. McGraw-Hill, 579 pp.

  • Easterling, W. E., L. O. Mearns, C. J. Hays, and D. Marx, 2001: Comparison of agricultural impacts of climate change calculated from high and low resolution climate change scenarios: Part II. Accounting for adaptation and CO2 direct effects. Climatic Change, 51, 173–197.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fernau, M. E., and P. J. Samson, 1990: Use of cluster analysis to define periods of similar meteorology and precipitation chemistry in eastern North America. Part I: Transport patterns. J. Appl. Meteor., 29, 735–750.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gordon, N. T., J. R. Norris, C. P. Weaver, and S. A. Klein, 2005: Cluster analysis of cloud regimes and characteristic dynamics of midlatitude synoptic systems in observations and a model. J. Geophys. Res., 110, D15S17, doi:10.1029/2004JD005027.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Grossman-Clarke, S., J. A. Zehnder, T. Loridan, and C. S. B. Grimmond, 2010: Contribution of land use changes to near-surface air temperatures during recent summer extreme heat events in the Phoenix metropolitan area. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 1649–1664.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hagen, A., 2002: Comparison of maps containing nominal data. Research Institute for Knowledge Systems Tech Rep., 46 pp. [Available from RIVM project: MAP-SOR S/550002/01/RO, Order No. 143699.]

  • Herzog, H.-J., U. Schubert, G. Vogel, A. Fiedler, and R. Kirchner, 2002: LLM—The high resolving nonhydrostatic simulation model in the DWD—Project LITFASS. Part I: Modelling technique and simulation method. Tech. Rep., Deutscher Wetterdienst, 68 pp. [Available online at http://www.cosmo-model.org/content/model/documentation/techReports/docs/techReport04.pdf.]

  • Hollweg, H.-D., and Coauthors, 2008: Ensemble simulations over Europe with the regional climate model CLM forced with IPCC AR4 global scenarios. Tech. Rep., Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, 152 pp. [Available online at http://www.dkrz.de/Klimaforschung/konsortial/clm/MaD_TechRep3_CLM__1_.pdf.]

  • Jackson, C., M. Sen, and P. Stoffa, 2004: An efficient stochastic Bayesian approach to optimal parameter and uncertainty estimation for climate model predictions. J. Climate, 17, 2828–2841.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kücken, M., F.-W. Gerstengarbe, and B. Orlowsky, 2009: A combination of cluster analysis and kappa statistic for the evaluation of climate model results. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 48, 1757–1765.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Majewski, D., D. Liermann, P. Prohl, B. Ritter, M. Buchhold, T. Hanisch, G. Paul, and W. Wergen, 2002: The operational global icosahedral–hexagonal gridpoint model GME: Description and high-resolution tests. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 319–338.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mearns, L. O., W. Easterling, C. Hays, and D. Marx, 2001: Comparison of agricultural impacts of climate change calculated from high and low resolution climate change scenarios: Part I. The uncertainty due to spatial scale. Climatic Change, 51, 131–172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mills, E., 2009: A global review of insurance industry responses to climate change. Geneva Pap., 34, 323–359.

  • Monserud, R., and R. Leemans, 1992: Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic. Ecol. Modell., 62, 275–293.

  • NAGLIB, cited 2002: NAG C Library Manual (Mark 7). Numerical Algorithms Group. [Available online at http://www.nag.com/numeric/cl/manual/html/CLlibrarymanual.asp.]

  • Österle, H., P. C. Werner, and F.-W. Gerstengarbe, cited 2006: Qualitätsprüfung, Ergänzung und Homogenisierung der täglichen Datenreihen in Deutschland, 1951–2003: Ein neuer Datensatz (Quality inspection, amendment, and homogenization of the daily data files in Germany, 1951–2003: A new dataset). Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research Tech Rep. [Available online at http://www.meteo.physik.uni-muenchen.de/dkt/poster.html.]

  • Pontius, R. G., 2000: Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 66, 1011–1016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ritter, B., and J.-F. Geleyn, 1992: A comprehensive radiation scheme for numerical weather prediction models with potential applications in climate simulations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 303–325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schättler, U., 2009: A description of the nonhydrostatic regional COSMO-Model. Part V: Preprocessing: Initial and boundary data for the COSMO-Model. Tech. Rep., The COSMO Consortium, 147 pp. [Available online at http://www.cosmo-model.org/content/model/documentation/core/cosmoInt2lm.pdf.]

  • Schättler, U., G. Doms, and C. Schraff, 2009: A description of the nonhydrostatic regional COSMO-Model. Part VII: User’ s guide. Tech. Rep., The COSMO Consortium, 147 pp. [Available online at http://www.cosmo-model.org/content/model/documentation/core/cosmoUserGuide.pdf.]

  • Schönwiese, C.-D., T. Staeger, and S. Trömel, 2004: The hot summer 2003 in Germany: Some preliminary results of a statistical time series analysis. Meteor. Z., 13, 323–327.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stott, P. A., D. A. Stone, and M. R. Allen, 2004: Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003. Nature, 432, 610–614.

  • Tiedke, M., 1989: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 1779–1799.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wicker, L., and W. Skamarock, 2002: Time-splitting methods for elastic models using forward time schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2088–2097.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • WMO, 1957: Meteorology—A three-dimensional science: Second session of the commission for aerology. WMO Bull., IV, 134–138.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 152 41 2
PDF Downloads 41 10 1