African Rainfall Climatology Version 2 for Famine Early Warning Systems

Nicholas S. Novella NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Prediction/Climate Prediction Center, Camp Springs, Maryland, and Wyle Information Systems, McLean, Virginia

Search for other papers by Nicholas S. Novella in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Wassila M. Thiaw NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Prediction/Climate Prediction Center, Camp Springs, Maryland

Search for other papers by Wassila M. Thiaw in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper describes a new gridded, daily 29-yr precipitation estimation dataset centered over Africa at 0.1° spatial resolution. Called the African Rainfall Climatology, version 2 (ARC2), it is a revision of the first version of the ARC. Consistent with the operational Rainfall Estimation, version 2, algorithm (RFE2), ARC2 uses inputs from two sources: 1) 3-hourly geostationary infrared (IR) data centered over Africa from the European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT) and 2) quality-controlled Global Telecommunication System (GTS) gauge observations reporting 24-h rainfall accumulations over Africa. The main difference with ARC1 resides in the recalibration of all Meteosat First Generation (MFG) IR data (1983–2005). Results show that ARC2 is a major improvement over ARC1. It is consistent with other long-term datasets, such as the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) and Climate Prediction Center (CPC) Merged Analysis of Precipitation (CMAP), with correlation coefficients of 0.86 over a 27-yr period. However, a marginal summer dry bias that occurs over West and East Africa is examined. Daily validation with independent gauge data shows RMSEs of 11.3, 13.4, and 14, respectively, for ARC2, Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis 3B42, version 6 (3B42v6), and the CPC morphing technique (CMORPH) for the West African summer season. The ARC2 RMSE is slightly higher for Ethiopia than those of CMORPH and 3B42v6. Both daily and monthly validations suggested that ARC2 underestimations may be attributed to the unavailability of daily GTS gauge reports in real time, and deficiencies in the satellite estimate associated with precipitation processes over coastal and orographic areas. However, ARC2 is expected to provide users with real-time monitoring of the daily evolution of precipitation, which is instrumental in improved decision making in famine early warning systems.

Corresponding author address: Nicholas Novella, NOAA/Climate Prediction Center, Development World Weather Bldg., 5200 Auth Rd., Camp Springs, MD 20746. E-mail: nicholas.novella@noaa.gov

Abstract

This paper describes a new gridded, daily 29-yr precipitation estimation dataset centered over Africa at 0.1° spatial resolution. Called the African Rainfall Climatology, version 2 (ARC2), it is a revision of the first version of the ARC. Consistent with the operational Rainfall Estimation, version 2, algorithm (RFE2), ARC2 uses inputs from two sources: 1) 3-hourly geostationary infrared (IR) data centered over Africa from the European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT) and 2) quality-controlled Global Telecommunication System (GTS) gauge observations reporting 24-h rainfall accumulations over Africa. The main difference with ARC1 resides in the recalibration of all Meteosat First Generation (MFG) IR data (1983–2005). Results show that ARC2 is a major improvement over ARC1. It is consistent with other long-term datasets, such as the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) and Climate Prediction Center (CPC) Merged Analysis of Precipitation (CMAP), with correlation coefficients of 0.86 over a 27-yr period. However, a marginal summer dry bias that occurs over West and East Africa is examined. Daily validation with independent gauge data shows RMSEs of 11.3, 13.4, and 14, respectively, for ARC2, Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis 3B42, version 6 (3B42v6), and the CPC morphing technique (CMORPH) for the West African summer season. The ARC2 RMSE is slightly higher for Ethiopia than those of CMORPH and 3B42v6. Both daily and monthly validations suggested that ARC2 underestimations may be attributed to the unavailability of daily GTS gauge reports in real time, and deficiencies in the satellite estimate associated with precipitation processes over coastal and orographic areas. However, ARC2 is expected to provide users with real-time monitoring of the daily evolution of precipitation, which is instrumental in improved decision making in famine early warning systems.

Corresponding author address: Nicholas Novella, NOAA/Climate Prediction Center, Development World Weather Bldg., 5200 Auth Rd., Camp Springs, MD 20746. E-mail: nicholas.novella@noaa.gov
Save
  • Adler, R. F., and Coauthors, 2003: The version-2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–present). J. Hydrometeor., 4, 11471167.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arkin, P. A., and B. N. Meisner, 1987: The relationship between large-scale convective rainfall and cold cloud over the Western Hemisphere during 1982–84. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 5174.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arkin, P. A., and P. Xie, 1994: The Global Precipitation Climatology Project: First Algorithm Intercomparison Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 75, 401419.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, M., P. Xie, J. Janowiak, and P. A. Arkin, 2002: Global land precipitation: A 50-yr analysis based on gauge observations. J. Hydrometeor., 3, 249266.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dinku, T., P. Ceccato, E. Grover-Kopec, M. Lemma, S. J. Connor, and C. F. Ropelewski, 2007: Validation of satellite rainfall products over East Africa’s complex topography. Int. J. Remote Sens., 28, 15031526.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • EUMETSAT, cited 2011a: Meteosat first generation calibration coefficients and conversion methods. [Available online at http://www.eumetsat.int/Home/Main/DataProducts/Calibration/MFGCalibration/index.htm?l=en.]

  • EUMETSAT, cited 2011b: Meteosat first generation user handbook. EUM/OPS/USR/10/1537, version V1A, Meteorological Archive and Retrieval Facility, Darmstadt, Germany, 40 pp. [Available online at http://www.eumetsat.int/groups/ops/documents/document/pdf_td06_marf.pdf.]

  • Ferraro, R. R., and G. F. Marks, 1995: The development of SSM/I rain-rate retrieval algorithms using ground-based radar measurements. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12, 775780.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ferraro, R. R., N. C. Grody, F. Weng, and A. Basist, 1996: An eight-year (1987–1994) time series of rainfall, clouds, water vapor, snow cover, and sea ice derived from SSM/I measurements. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 891906.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herman, A., V. Kumar, P. A. Arkin, and J. V. Kousky, 1997: Objectively determined 10-day African rainfall estimates created for famine early warning. Int. J. Remote Sens., 18, 21472159.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huffman, G. J., and D. T. Bolvin, 2009: GPCP version 2.1 combined precipitation data set documentation. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Laboratory for Atmospheres and Science Systems and Applications, Inc.

  • Huffman, G. J., and Coauthors, 1997: The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) combined precipitation dataset. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 520.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huffman, G. J., and Coauthors, 2007: The TRMM Mulisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. J. Hydrometeor., 8, 3855.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huffman, G. J., R. F. Adler, D. T. Bolvin, and E. Nelkin, 2010: The TRMM Multi-Satellite Precipitation Analysis. Satellite Rainfall Applications for Surface Hydrology, F. Hossian and M. Gebremichael, Eds., Springer, 3–22.

  • Jobard, I., F. Chopin, J. C. Berges, and R. Roca, 2011: An intercomparison of 10-day satellite precipitation products during West African monsoon. Int. J. Remote Sens., 32, 23532376.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joyce, R., and P. A. Arkin, 1997: Improving estimates of tropical and subtropical precipitation using the GOES precipitation index. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 14, 9971011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joyce, R., J. Janowiak, P. A. Arkin, and P. Xie, 2004: CMORPH: A method that produces global precipitation estimates from passive microwave and infrared data at high spatial and temporal resolution. J. Hydrometeor., 5, 487503.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Love, T. B., V. Kumar, P. Xie, and W. Thiaw, 2004: A 20-year daily Africa precipitation climatology using satellite and gauge data. Preprints, 14th Conf. on Applied Meteorology, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., P5.4. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/67484.pdf.]

  • Reynolds, R. W., 1988: A real-time global sea surface temperature analysis. J. Climate, 1, 7586.

  • Rudolf, B., W. Hauschild, W. Rueth, and U. Schneider, 1994: Terrestrial precipitation analysis: Operational method and required density of point measurements. Global Precipitations and Climate Change, M. Desbois and F. Désalmand, Eds., NATO ASI Series, Vol. 26, 173–186.

  • Semunegus, H., W. Berg, J. Bates, K. Knapp, and C. Kummerow, 2010: An extended and improved Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) period of record. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 424436.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shepard, D., 1968: A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly spaced data. Proc. 23rd National Conf. of American Computing Machinery, Princeton, NJ, Assoc. Computing Machinery, 517–524.

  • Vila, D., R. Ferraro, and R. Joyce, 2007: Evaluation and improvement of AMSU precipitation retrievals. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D20119, doi:10.1029/2007JD008617.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xie, P., and P. A. Arkin, 1995: An intercomparison of gauge observations and satellite estimates of monthly precipitation. J. Appl. Meteor., 34, 11431160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xie, P., and P. A. Arkin, 1996: Analyses of global monthly precipitation using gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model predictions. J. Climate, 9, 840858.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xie, P., and P. A. Arkin, 1997: Global precipitation: A 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model outputs. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 25372558.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhao, L., R. Ferraro, and D. Moore, 2000: Validation of NOAA-15 AMSU-A rain rate algorithms. Preprints, 10th Conf. on Satellite Meteorology and Oceanography, Long Beach, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 192–195.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 4917 878 119
PDF Downloads 1922 348 23