Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

A MODIS-Based Global 1-km Maximum Green Vegetation Fraction Dataset

Patrick D. Broxton Department of Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Search for other papers by Patrick D. Broxton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Xubin Zeng Department of Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Search for other papers by Xubin Zeng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
William Scheftic Department of Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Search for other papers by William Scheftic in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Peter A. Troch Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Search for other papers by Peter A. Troch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Aug 2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0356.1
Page(s):
1996–2004
Restricted access

Abstract

Global land-cover data are widely used in regional and global models because land cover influences land–atmosphere exchanges of water, energy, momentum, and carbon. Many models use data of maximum green vegetation fraction (MGVF) to describe vegetation abundance. MGVF products have been created in the past using different methods, but their validation with ground sites is difficult. Furthermore, uncertainty is introduced because many products use a single year of satellite data. In this study, a global 1-km MGVF product is developed on the basis of a “climatology” of data of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) normalized difference vegetation index and land-cover type, which removes biases associated with unusual greenness and inaccurate land-cover classification for individual years. MGVF shows maximum annual variability from 2001 to 2012 for intermediate values of average MGVF, and the standard deviation of MGVF normalized by its mean value decreases nearly monotonically as MGVF increases. In addition, there are substantial differences between this climatology and MGVF data from the MODIS Continuous Fields (CF) Collection 3, which is currently used in the Community Land Model. Although the CF data only use 2001 MODIS data, many of these differences cannot be explained by usage of different years of data. In particular, MGVF as based on CF data is usually higher than that based on the MODIS climatology from this paper. It is difficult to judge which product is more realistic because of a lack of ground truth, but this new MGVF product is more consistent than the CF data with the MODIS leaf area index product (which is also used to describe vegetation abundance in models).

Corresponding author address: Patrick Broxton, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, 1118 E. 4th St., The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0081. E-mail: broxtopd@email.arizona.edu

Abstract

Global land-cover data are widely used in regional and global models because land cover influences land–atmosphere exchanges of water, energy, momentum, and carbon. Many models use data of maximum green vegetation fraction (MGVF) to describe vegetation abundance. MGVF products have been created in the past using different methods, but their validation with ground sites is difficult. Furthermore, uncertainty is introduced because many products use a single year of satellite data. In this study, a global 1-km MGVF product is developed on the basis of a “climatology” of data of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) normalized difference vegetation index and land-cover type, which removes biases associated with unusual greenness and inaccurate land-cover classification for individual years. MGVF shows maximum annual variability from 2001 to 2012 for intermediate values of average MGVF, and the standard deviation of MGVF normalized by its mean value decreases nearly monotonically as MGVF increases. In addition, there are substantial differences between this climatology and MGVF data from the MODIS Continuous Fields (CF) Collection 3, which is currently used in the Community Land Model. Although the CF data only use 2001 MODIS data, many of these differences cannot be explained by usage of different years of data. In particular, MGVF as based on CF data is usually higher than that based on the MODIS climatology from this paper. It is difficult to judge which product is more realistic because of a lack of ground truth, but this new MGVF product is more consistent than the CF data with the MODIS leaf area index product (which is also used to describe vegetation abundance in models).

Corresponding author address: Patrick Broxton, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, 1118 E. 4th St., The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0081. E-mail: broxtopd@email.arizona.edu
Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Barlage, M., and X. Zeng, 2004: The effects of observed fractional vegetation cover on the land surface climatology of the Community Land Model. J. Hydrometeor., 5, 823–830, doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0823:TEOOFV>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bonan, G. B., 1996: A land surface model (LSM version 1.0) for ecological, hydrological, and atmospheric studies: Technical description and user’s guide. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-417+STR, 150 pp. [Available online at http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/assets/technotes/TECH-NOTE-000-000-000-229.pdf.]

  • Broxton, P. D., X. Zeng, D. Sulla-Menashe, and P. A. Troch, 2014: A global land cover climatology using MODIS data. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 53, 1593–1605, doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0270.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Carlson, T. N., and D. A. Ripley, 1997: On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index. Remote Sens. Environ., 62, 241–252, doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00104-1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, F., and J. Dudhia, 2001: Coupling an advanced land surface–hydrology model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 569–585, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dai, Y., and Coauthors, 2003: The Common Land Model. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84, 1013–1023, doi:10.1175/BAMS-84-8-1013.

  • Deardorff, J. W., 1978: Efficient prediction of ground surface temperature and moisture, with inclusion of a layer of vegetation. J. Geophys. Res., 83, 1889–1903, doi:10.1029/JC083iC04p01889.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • DeFries, R. S., J. R. G. Townshend, and M. C. Hansen, 1999: Continuous fields of vegetation characteristics at the global scale at 1-km resolution. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 16 911–16 923, doi:10.1029/1999JD900057.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dickinson, R. E., A. Henderson-Sellers, P. J. Kennedy, and M. F. Wilson, 1986: Biosphere–Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) for the NCAR Community Climate Model. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-275+STR, 69 pp. [Available online at http://nldr.library.ucar.edu/repository/assets/technotes/TECH-NOTE-000-000-000-527.pdf.]

  • Ek, M. B., K. E. Mitchell, Y. Lin, E. Rogers, P. Grunmann, V. Koren, G. Gayno, and J. D. Tarpley, 2003: Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta Model. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8851, doi:10.1029/2002JD003296.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fensholt, R., and I. Sandholt, 2005: Evaluation of MODIS and NOAA AVHRR vegetation indices with in situ measurements in a semi-arid environment. Int. J. Remote Sens., 26, 2561–2594, doi:10.1080/01431160500033724.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Friedl, M. A., D. Sulla-Menashe, B. Tan, A. Schneider, N. Ramankutty, A. Sibley, and X. Huang, 2010: MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sens. Environ., 114, 168–182, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gutman, G., and A. Ignatov, 1998: The derivation of the green vegetation fraction from NOAA/AVHRR data for use in numerical weather prediction models. Int. J. Remote Sens., 19, 1533–1543, doi:10.1080/014311698215333.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hadley, N. F., and S. R. Szarek, 1981: Productivity of desert ecosystems. Bioscience, 31,747–753, doi:10.2307/1308782.

  • Hansen, M. C., R. S. DeFries, J. R. G. Townshend, R. A. Sohlberg, C. Dimiceli, and M. Carroll, 2002: Towards an operational MODIS continuous field of percent tree cover algorithm: Examples using AVHRR and MODIS data. Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 303–319, doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00079-2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hansen, M. C., R. S. DeFries, J. R. G. Townshend, M. Carroll, C. Dimiceli, and R. A. Sohlberg, 2003: Global percent tree cover at a spatial resolution of 500 meters: First results of the MODIS vegetation continuous fields algorithm. Earth Interact., 7, doi:10.1175/1087-3562(2003)007<0001:GPTCAA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Huete, A., K. Didan, T. Miura, E. P. Rodriguez, X. Gao, and L. G. Ferreira, 2002: Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 195–213, doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Koster, R. D., and Coauthors, 2004: Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science, 305, 1138–1140, doi:10.1126/science.1100217.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lawrence, P. J., and T. N. Chase, 2007: Representing a new MODIS consistent land surface in the Community Land Model (CLM 3.0). J. Geophys. Res., 112, G01023, doi:10.1029/2006JG000168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Leprieur, C., M. M. Verstraete, and B. Pinty, 1994: Evaluation of the performance of various vegetation indices to retrieve vegetation cover from AVHRR data. Remote Sens. Rev., 10, 265–284, doi:10.1080/02757259409532250.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Miller, J., M. Barlage, X. Zeng, H. Wei, K. Mitchell, and D. Tarpley, 2006: Sensitivity of the NCEP/Noah land surface model to the MODIS green vegetation fraction data set. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L13404, doi:10.1029/2006GL026636.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Myneni, R. B., and Coauthors, 2002: Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data. Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 214–231, doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00074-3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Purevdorj, Ts., R. Tateishi, T. Ishiyama, and Y. Honda, 1998: Relationships between percent vegetation cover and vegetation indices. Int. J. Remote Sens., 19, 3519–3535, doi:10.1080/014311698213795.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sellers, P. J., S. O. Los, C. J. Tucker, C. O. Justice, D. A. Dazlich, G. J. Collatz, and D. A. Randall, 1996: A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. Part II: Generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters from satellite data. J. Climate, 9, 706–737, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<0706:ARLSPF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Townshend, J. R. G., 1992: Improved global data for land applications: A proposal for a new high resolution data set. International Geosphere-Biosphere Program Global Change Rep. 20, 87 pp.

  • Tucker, C. J., 1979: Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens. Environ., 8, 127–150, doi:10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Weiss, J. L., D. S. Gutzler, J. E. A. Coonrod, and C. N. Dahm, 2004: Seasonal and inter-annual relationships between vegetation and climate in central New Mexico, USA. J. Arid Environ., 57, 507–534, doi:10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00113-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wittich, K.-P., 1997: Some simple relationships between land-surface emissivity, greenness and the plant cover fraction for use in satellite remote sensing. Int. J. Biometeor., 41, 58–64, doi:10.1007/s004840050054.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zeng, X., R. E. Dickinson, A. Walker, M. Shaikh, R. DeFries, and J. Qi, 2000: Derivation and evaluation of global 1-km fractional vegetation cover data for land modeling. J. Appl. Meteor., 39, 826–839, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<0826:DAEOGK>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zeng, X., P. Rao, R. DeFries, and M. C. Hansen, 2003: Interannual variability and decadal trend of global fractional vegetation cover from 1982 to 2000. J. Appl. Meteor., 42, 1525–1530, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1525:IVADTO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zeng, X., M. Barlage, C. Castro, and K. Fling, 2010: Comparison of land–precipitation coupling strength using observations and models. J. Hydrometeor., 11, 979–994, doi:10.1175/2010JHM1226.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1135 395 60
PDF Downloads 862 215 19