Advancements in Objective Multisatellite Tropical Cyclone Center Fixing*

Anthony J. Wimmers Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Anthony J. Wimmers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Christopher S. Velden Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by Christopher S. Velden in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

An improved version of the Automated Rotational Center Hurricane Eye Retrieval (ARCHER) tropical cyclone (TC) center-fixing algorithm, introduced here as “ARCHER-2,” is presented with a characterization of its accuracy and precision and a comparison with alternative methods. The algorithm is calibrated for 37- and 85–92-GHz microwave imagers; geostationary imagery at visible, near-infrared, and longwave infrared window channels; and scatterometer ambiguities. In addition to a center fix, ARCHER-2 produces a quantitative estimate of expected error that can be used automatically or manually to evaluate the suitability of a result. The median center-fix error ranges from 24 (using scatterometer) to 49 (using infrared window) km relative to the National Hurricane Center best track. Multisatellite, multisensor results can also be used together to produce a TC-track estimate that selects from the best of all of the available imagery in the ancillary “ARCHER-Track” product. The median error of ARCHER-Track varies between 17 and 38 km, depending on TC intensity and data latency. The bias of the product’s expected error varies between 0% and 12%, which translates to an average of only 4 km. When compared with operational, subjective center-fix estimates, the ARCHER-Track approach improves on 29%–43% of these cases at the tropical-depression and tropical-storm stages, at which further assistance is typically sought. This result demonstrates that ARCHER-2 and ARCHER-Track can complement and accelerate operational forecasting where needed and can furnish other automated TC-analysis methods with well-characterized center-fix information.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0098.s1.

Corresponding author address: Anthony J. Wimmers, Cooperative Institute of Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1225 W. Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706. E-mail: wimmers@ssec.wisc.edu

Abstract

An improved version of the Automated Rotational Center Hurricane Eye Retrieval (ARCHER) tropical cyclone (TC) center-fixing algorithm, introduced here as “ARCHER-2,” is presented with a characterization of its accuracy and precision and a comparison with alternative methods. The algorithm is calibrated for 37- and 85–92-GHz microwave imagers; geostationary imagery at visible, near-infrared, and longwave infrared window channels; and scatterometer ambiguities. In addition to a center fix, ARCHER-2 produces a quantitative estimate of expected error that can be used automatically or manually to evaluate the suitability of a result. The median center-fix error ranges from 24 (using scatterometer) to 49 (using infrared window) km relative to the National Hurricane Center best track. Multisatellite, multisensor results can also be used together to produce a TC-track estimate that selects from the best of all of the available imagery in the ancillary “ARCHER-Track” product. The median error of ARCHER-Track varies between 17 and 38 km, depending on TC intensity and data latency. The bias of the product’s expected error varies between 0% and 12%, which translates to an average of only 4 km. When compared with operational, subjective center-fix estimates, the ARCHER-Track approach improves on 29%–43% of these cases at the tropical-depression and tropical-storm stages, at which further assistance is typically sought. This result demonstrates that ARCHER-2 and ARCHER-Track can complement and accelerate operational forecasting where needed and can furnish other automated TC-analysis methods with well-characterized center-fix information.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-15-0098.s1.

Corresponding author address: Anthony J. Wimmers, Cooperative Institute of Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1225 W. Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706. E-mail: wimmers@ssec.wisc.edu

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (ZIP 19.6 MB)
Save
  • Cossuth, J. H., 2014: Exploring a comparative climatology of tropical cyclone core structures. Ph.D. dissertation, Florida State University, 201 pp. [Available online at http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/etd/8965/.]

  • Figa-Saldaña, J., J. J. W. Wilson, E. Attema, R. Gelsthorpe, M. R. Drinkwater, and A. Stoffelen, 2002: The advanced scatterometer (ASCAT) on the meteorological operational (MetOp) platform: A follow on for European wind scatterometers. Can. J. Remote Sens., 28, 404412, doi:10.5589/m02-035.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jiang, H., M. Kieper, and Y. Pei, 2014: Improvement to the satellite-based 37 GHz ring rapid intensification index. Presentation, 68th Interdepartmental Hurricane Conf./Tropical Cyclone Research Forum, College Park, MD, NOAA/Center for Weather and Climate Prediction, paper s02-02. [Available online at http://www.ofcm.gov/ihc14/presentations/Session2/s02-02jiang.pdf.]

  • Knapp, K. R., M. C. Kruk, D. H. Levinson, H. J. Diamond, and C. J. Neumann, 2010: The International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS): Unifying tropical cyclone data. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 363376, doi:10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kossin, J. P., T. L. Olander, and K. R. Knapp, 2013: Trend analysis with a new global record of tropical cyclone intensity. J. Climate, 26, 99609976, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00262.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Olander, T. L., and C. S. Velden, 2007: The advanced Dvorak technique: Continued development of an objective scheme to estimate tropical cyclone intensity using geostationary infrared satellite imagery. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 287298, doi:10.1175/WAF975.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rappaport, E. N., and Coauthors, 2009: Advances and challenges at the National Hurricane Center. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 395419, doi:10.1175/2008WAF2222128.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rozoff, C., C. Velden, J. Kossin, and J. Kaplan, 2015: Improvements in the probabilistic prediction of tropical cyclone rapid intensification with passive microwave observations. Wea. Forecasting, 30, 10161038, doi:10.1175/WAF-D-14-00109.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sitkowski, M., J. Kossin, and C. Rozoff, 2011: Intensity and structure changes during hurricane eyewall replacement cycles. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 38293847, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-11-00034.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Velden, C. S., and Coauthors, 2006: The Dvorak tropical cyclone intensity estimation technique: A satellite-based method that has endured for over 30 years. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87, 11951210, doi:10.1175/BAMS-87-9-1195.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wimmers, A. J., and C. S. Velden, 2007: MIMIC: A new approach to visualizing satellite microwave imagery of tropical cyclones. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88, 11871196, doi:10.1175/BAMS-88-8-1187.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wimmers, A. J., and C. S. Velden, 2010: Objectively determining the rotational center of tropical cyclones in passive microwave satellite imagery. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 20132034, doi:10.1175/2010JAMC2490.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1118 501 60
PDF Downloads 684 229 21