Multiple-Scattering-Induced “Ghost Echoes” in GPM DPR Observations of a Tornadic Supercell

Alessandro Battaglia National Center for Earth Observation, and Earth Observation Science, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Alessandro Battaglia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kamil Mroz National Center for Earth Observation, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Kamil Mroz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Simone Tanelli Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

Search for other papers by Simone Tanelli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Frederic Tridon Earth Observation Science, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Frederic Tridon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Pierre-Emmanuel Kirstetter Advanced Radar Research Center, National Weather Center, and NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Pierre-Emmanuel Kirstetter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Evidence of multiple-scattering-induced pulse stretching for the signal of both frequencies of the Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) on the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Core Observatory satellite is presented on the basis of collocated ground-based WSR-88D S-band observations of an extreme case: a tornadic supercell. The ground-based observations clearly show a tilted convective core with a so-called bounded weak-echo region—that is, locations where precipitation is absent or extremely light at the ground while large amounts of liquid or frozen precipitation are present aloft. The satellite observations in this region show reflectivity profiles that extend all the way to the surface despite the absence of near-surface precipitation: these are here referred to as “ghost echoes.” Furthermore, the Ku- and Ka-band profiles exhibit similar slopes, which is a typical sign that the observed power is almost entirely due to multiple scattering. A novel microphysical retrieval that is based on triple-frequency (S–Ku–Ka) observations shows that a dense ice core located between 4 and 14 km with particle sizes exceeding 2.5 cm and integrated ice contents exceeding 7.0 kg m−2 is the source of the ghost echoes of the signal in the lower layers. The level of confidence of this assessment is strengthened by the availability of the S-band data, which provide the necessary additional constraints to the radar retrieval that is based on DPR data. This study shows not only that multiple-scattering contributions may become predominant at Ka already very high up in the atmosphere but also that they play a key role at Ku band within the layers close to the surface. As a result, extreme caution must be paid even in the interpretation of Ku-based retrievals (e.g., the TRMM PR dataset or any DPR retrievals that are based on the assumption that Ku band is not affected by multiple scattering) when examining extreme surface rain rates that occur in the presence of deep dense ice layers.

Denotes Open Access content.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.

Corresponding author address: Alessandro Battaglia, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom. E-mail: ab474@le.ac.uk

Abstract

Evidence of multiple-scattering-induced pulse stretching for the signal of both frequencies of the Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) on the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Core Observatory satellite is presented on the basis of collocated ground-based WSR-88D S-band observations of an extreme case: a tornadic supercell. The ground-based observations clearly show a tilted convective core with a so-called bounded weak-echo region—that is, locations where precipitation is absent or extremely light at the ground while large amounts of liquid or frozen precipitation are present aloft. The satellite observations in this region show reflectivity profiles that extend all the way to the surface despite the absence of near-surface precipitation: these are here referred to as “ghost echoes.” Furthermore, the Ku- and Ka-band profiles exhibit similar slopes, which is a typical sign that the observed power is almost entirely due to multiple scattering. A novel microphysical retrieval that is based on triple-frequency (S–Ku–Ka) observations shows that a dense ice core located between 4 and 14 km with particle sizes exceeding 2.5 cm and integrated ice contents exceeding 7.0 kg m−2 is the source of the ghost echoes of the signal in the lower layers. The level of confidence of this assessment is strengthened by the availability of the S-band data, which provide the necessary additional constraints to the radar retrieval that is based on DPR data. This study shows not only that multiple-scattering contributions may become predominant at Ka already very high up in the atmosphere but also that they play a key role at Ku band within the layers close to the surface. As a result, extreme caution must be paid even in the interpretation of Ku-based retrievals (e.g., the TRMM PR dataset or any DPR retrievals that are based on the assumption that Ku band is not affected by multiple scattering) when examining extreme surface rain rates that occur in the presence of deep dense ice layers.

Denotes Open Access content.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.

Corresponding author address: Alessandro Battaglia, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom. E-mail: ab474@le.ac.uk
Save
  • Amitai, E., W. Petersen, X. Llort, and S. Vasiloff, 2012: Multiplatform comparisons of rain intensity for extreme precipitation events. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 50, 675686, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2011.2162737.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Battaglia, A., and C. Simmer, 2008: How does multiple scattering affect the spaceborne W-band radar measurements at ranges close to and crossing the sea-surface range? IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 46, 16441651, doi:10.1109/TGRS.2008.916085.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Battaglia, A., M. O. Ajewole, and C. Simmer, 2006: Evaluation of radar multiple scattering effects from a GPM perspective. Part II: Model results. J. Appl. Meteor., 45, 16481664, doi:10.1175/JAM2425.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Battaglia, A., J. M. Haynes, T. L’Ecuyer, and C. Simmer, 2008: Identifying multiple-scattering affected profiles in CloudSat observations over the oceans. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D00A17, doi:10.1029/2008JD009960.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Battaglia, A., S. Tanelli, S. Kobayashi, D. Zrnic, R. Hogan, and C. Simmer, 2010: Multiple-scattering in radar systems: A review. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 111, 917947, doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.11.024.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Battaglia, A., S. Tanelli, G. Heymsfield, and L. Tian, 2014: The dual wavelength ratio knee: A signature of multiple scattering in airborne Ku–Ka observations. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 53, 17901808, doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0341.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Battaglia, A., S. Tanelli, K. Mroz, and F. Tridon, 2015: Multiple scattering in observations of the GPM Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar: Evidence and impact on retrievals. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 120, 40904101, doi:10.1002/2014JD022866.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bluestein, H. B., and Coauthors, 2014: Radar in atmospheric sciences and related research: Current systems, emerging technology, and future needs. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 18501861, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00079.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bringi, V. N., and V. Chandrasekar, 2001: Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar: Principles and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 266 pp.

  • Crum, T., and R. Alberty, 1993: The WSR-88D and the WSR-88D Operational Support Facility. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 74, 16691687, doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1993)074<1669:TWATWO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamada, A., Y. Murayama, and Y. N. Takayabu, 2014: Regional characteristics of extreme rainfall extracted from TRMM PR measurements. J. Climate, 27, 81518169, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00107.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamada, A., Y. N. Takayabu, C. Liu, and E. J. Zipser, 2015: Weak linkage between the heaviest rainfall and tallest storms. Nat. Commun., 6, 6213, doi:10.1038/ncomms7213.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heinselman, P. L., and A. V. Ryzhkov, 2006: Validation of polarimetric hail detection. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 839850, doi:10.1175/WAF956.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hogan, R. J., 2008: Fast lidar and radar multiple-scattering models: Part I: Small-angle scattering using the photon variance–covariance method. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 36213635, doi:10.1175/2008JAS2642.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hogan, R. J., and A. Battaglia, 2008: Fast lidar and radar multiple-scattering models: Part 2: Wide-angle scattering using the time-dependent two-stream approximation. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 36363651, doi:10.1175/2008JAS2643.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hou, A. Y., and Coauthors, 2014: The Global Precipitation Measurement mission. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 701722, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houze, R. A., 1993: Cloud Dynamics. International Geophysics Series, Vol. 53, Academic Press, 573 pp.

  • Iguchi, T., T. Kozu, J. Kwiatkowski, R. Meneghini, J. Awaka, and K. Okamoto, 2009: Uncertainties in the rain profiling algorithm for the TRMM Precipitation Radar. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 87A, 130, doi:10.2151/jmsj.87A.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Im, E., S. Durden, S. Tanelli, and K. Pak, 2006: Early results on cloud profiling radar post-launch calibration and operations. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp. 2006, Denver, CO, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 93–96, doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2006.29.

  • Kirstetter, P.-E., Y. Hong, J. J. Gourley, M. Schwaller, W. Petersen, and J. Zhang, 2013: Comparison of TRMM 2A25 products, version 6 and version 7, with NOAA/NSSL ground radar–based National Mosaic QPE. J. Hydrol., 14, 661669, doi:10.1175/JHM-D-12-030.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • L’Ecuyer, T. S., and G. L. Stephens, 2002: An estimation-based precipitation retrieval algorithm for attenuating radars. J. Appl. Meteor., 41, 272285, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0272:AEBPRA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marzano, F. S., L. Roberti, S. Di Michele, A. Mugnai, and A. Tassa, 2003: Modeling of apparent radar reflectivity due to convective clouds at attenuating wavelengths. Radio Sci., 38, 1002, doi:10.1029/2002RS002 613.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meneghini, R., and L. Liao, 2013: Modified Hitschfeld–Bordan equations for attenuation-corrected radar rain reflectivity: Application to nonuniform beamfilling at off-nadir incidence. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 30, 11491160, doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00192.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meneghini, R., H. Kim, L. Liao, J. A. Jones, and J. M. Kwiatkowski, 2015: An initial assessment of the surface reference technique applied to data from the Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) on the GPM satellite. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 32, 22812296, doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0044.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, S. D., and G. L. Stephens, 1999: Multiple scattering effects in the lidar pulse stretching problem. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 22 20522 219, doi:10.1029/1999JD900481.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitrescu, C., T. L. Ecuyer, J. Haynes, S. Miller, and J. Turk, 2010: CloudSat precipitation profiling algorithm—Model description. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 9911003, doi:10.1175/2009JAMC2181.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rodgers, C. D., 2000: Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice. Series on Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Vol. 2, World Scientific, 238 pp.

  • Ryzhkov, A. V., M. R. Kumjian, S. M. Ganson, and P. Zhang, 2013: Polarimetric radar characteristics of melting hail. Part II: Practical implications. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 52, 28712886, doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-13-074.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Short, D. A., R. Meneghini, A. E. Emory, and M. R. Schwaller, 2015: Reduction of nonuniform beamfilling effects by multiple constraints: A simulation study. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 32, 21142124, doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0021.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tanelli, S., G. F. Sacco, S. L. Durden, and Z. S. Haddad, 2012: Impact of non-uniform beam filling on spaceborne cloud and precipitation radar retrieval algorithms. Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere, Clouds, and Precipitation IV, T. Hayasaki, K. Nakamura, and E. Im, Eds., International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE Proceedings, Vol. 8523), doi:10.1117/12.977375.

  • Tanelli, S., A. Battaglia, S. L. Durden, G. F. Sacco, O. Sy, F. Tridon, K. Mroz, and P.-E. Kirstetter, 2015: Detection and use of multiple scattering and non-uniform beam filling in DPR data. Extended Abstracts, Precipitation Measuring Mission Science Team Meeting, Annapolis, MD, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. [Available upon request via e-mail from .]

  • Ulbrich, C. W., and D. Atlas, 1982: Hail parameter relations: A comprehensive digest. J. Appl. Meteor., 21, 2243, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1982)021<0022:HPRACD>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 528 151 19
PDF Downloads 489 91 8