Impact of Gauge Representative Error on a Radar Rainfall Uncertainty Model

Qiang Dai Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment, Ministry of Education, and School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China, and Water and Environmental Management Research Centre, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, and Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing, China

Search for other papers by Qiang Dai in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Qiqi Yang Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment, Ministry of Education, and School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China

Search for other papers by Qiqi Yang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jun Zhang Water and Environmental Management Research Centre, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Jun Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Shuliang Zhang Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment, Ministry of Education, and School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China

Search for other papers by Shuliang Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

In modeling the radar rainfall uncertainty, rain gauge measurement is generally regarded as the areal “true” rainfall. However, the inconsistent scales between radar and gauge may introduce a new uncertainty (also known as gauge representative uncertainty), which is erroneously identified as radar rainfall uncertainty and therefore called pseudouncertainty. It is crucial to comprehend what percentage of the estimated radar rainfall uncertainty actually stems from such pseudouncertainty rather than radar rainfall itself. For this reason, based on a fully formulated radar rainfall uncertainty model, this study aims to explore how the gauge representative error affects the distribution, spatial dependence, and temporal dependence of hourly accumulated radar rainfall uncertainty, and consequently affects the produced radar rainfall uncertainty band. Three group scenarios that delineate various degrees of gauge representative errors were designed to configure and run the uncertainty model. In the setting of a long-term analysis (almost 7 years) of the Brue catchment in the United Kingdom, we found that the gauge representative error affected the simulation of the marginal distribution of radar rainfall error, and had a considerable effect on temporal dependence estimation of radar rainfall uncertainty. The spread of the rainfall uncertainty band decreased with the growth of the gauge density in a radar pixel. The scenario with the lowest representative error only had 78% uncertainty spread of the scenario that has the largest error. This indicated there was a large impact of the representative error on radar rainfall uncertainty models. It is hoped that more catchments with diverse climate and geographical conditions and more radar data with various spatial scales could be explored by the research community to further investigate this crucial issue.

© 2018 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Shuliang Zhang, zhangshuliang@njnu.edu.cn

Abstract

In modeling the radar rainfall uncertainty, rain gauge measurement is generally regarded as the areal “true” rainfall. However, the inconsistent scales between radar and gauge may introduce a new uncertainty (also known as gauge representative uncertainty), which is erroneously identified as radar rainfall uncertainty and therefore called pseudouncertainty. It is crucial to comprehend what percentage of the estimated radar rainfall uncertainty actually stems from such pseudouncertainty rather than radar rainfall itself. For this reason, based on a fully formulated radar rainfall uncertainty model, this study aims to explore how the gauge representative error affects the distribution, spatial dependence, and temporal dependence of hourly accumulated radar rainfall uncertainty, and consequently affects the produced radar rainfall uncertainty band. Three group scenarios that delineate various degrees of gauge representative errors were designed to configure and run the uncertainty model. In the setting of a long-term analysis (almost 7 years) of the Brue catchment in the United Kingdom, we found that the gauge representative error affected the simulation of the marginal distribution of radar rainfall error, and had a considerable effect on temporal dependence estimation of radar rainfall uncertainty. The spread of the rainfall uncertainty band decreased with the growth of the gauge density in a radar pixel. The scenario with the lowest representative error only had 78% uncertainty spread of the scenario that has the largest error. This indicated there was a large impact of the representative error on radar rainfall uncertainty models. It is hoped that more catchments with diverse climate and geographical conditions and more radar data with various spatial scales could be explored by the research community to further investigate this crucial issue.

© 2018 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Shuliang Zhang, zhangshuliang@njnu.edu.cn
Save
  • AghaKouchak, A., A. Bárdossy, and E. Habib, 2010: Conditional simulation of remotely sensed rainfall data using a non-Gaussian v-transformed copula. Adv. Water Resour., 33, 624634, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.02.010.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anagnostou, E. N., W. F. Krajewski, and J. Smith, 1999: Uncertainty quantification of mean-areal radar-rainfall estimates. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 16, 206215, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<0206:UQOMAR>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnston, A. G., 1991: An empirical method of estimating raingage and radar rainfall measurement bias and resolution. J. Appl. Meteor., 30, 282296, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1991)030<0282:AEMOER>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bell, V., and R. Moore, 2000: The sensitivity of catchment runoff models to rainfall data at different spatial scales. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 653667, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-653-2000.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Borga, M., F. Tonelli, R. J. Moore, and H. Andrieu, 2002: Long-term assessment of bias adjustment in radar rainfall estimation. Water Resour. Res., 38, 1226, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000555.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bringi, V., M. Rico-Ramirez, and M. Thurai, 2011: Rainfall estimation with an operational polarimetric C-band radar in the United Kingdom: Comparison with a gauge network and error analysis. J. Hydrometeor., 12, 935954, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-10-05013.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ciach, G. J., 2003: Local random errors in tipping-bucket rain gauge measurements. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 20, 752759, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)20<752:LREITB>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ciach, G. J., and W. F. Krajewski, 1999a: On the estimation of radar rainfall error variance. Adv. Water Resour., 22, 585595, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(98)00043-8.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ciach, G. J., and W. F. Krajewski, 1999b: Radar–rain gauge comparisons under observational uncertainties. J. Appl. Meteor., 38, 15191525, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<1519:RRGCUO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ciach, G. J., W. F. Krajewski, and G. Villarini, 2007: Product-error-driven uncertainty model for probabilistic quantitative precipitation estimation with NEXRAD data. J. Hydrometeor., 8, 13251347, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JHM814.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collier, C., and P. James, 1986: On the development of an integrated weather radar data processing system. Preprints, 23rd Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Snowmass, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95–98.

  • Dai, Q., and D. Han, 2014: Exploration of discrepancy between radar and gauge rainfall estimates driven by wind fields. Water Resour. Res., 50, 85718588, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015794.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dai, Q., D. Han, M. A. Rico-Ramirez, and T. Islam, 2013: The impact of raindrop drift in a three-dimensional wind field on a radar–gauge rainfall comparison. Int. J. Remote Sens., 34, 77397760, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2013.826838.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dai, Q., D. Han, M. A. Rico-Ramirez, and T. Islam, 2014a: Modelling radar-rainfall estimation uncertainties using elliptical and Archimedean copulas with different marginal distributions. Hydrol. Sci. J., 59, 19922008, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.865841.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dai, Q., D. Han, M. A. Rico-Ramirez, and P. K. Srivastava, 2014b: Multivariate distributed ensemble generator: A new scheme for ensemble radar precipitation estimation over temperate maritime climate. J. Hydrol., 511, 1727, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.016.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dai, Q., M. A. Rico-Ramirez, D. Han, T. Islam, and S. Liguori, 2015: Probabilistic radar rainfall nowcasts using empirical and theoretical uncertainty models. Hydrol. Processes, 29, 6679, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10133.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dai, Q., M. Bray, L. Zhuo, T. Islam, and D. Han, 2017: A scheme for rain gauge network design based on remotely sensed rainfall measurements. J. Hydrometeor., 18, 363379, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0136.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Germann, U., M. Berenguer, D. Sempere-Torres, and M. Zappa, 2009: REAL—Ensemble radar precipitation estimation for hydrology in a mountainous region. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 445456, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.375.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Habib, E., and L. Qin, 2013: Application of a radar-rainfall uncertainty model to the NWS multi-sensor precipitation estimator products. Meteor. Appl., 20, 276286, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.301.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Habib, E., W. F. Krajewski, V. Nespor, and A. Kruger, 1999: Numerical simulation studies of rain gage data correction due to wind effect. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 19 72319 733, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900228.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Habib, E., G. J. Ciach, and W. F. Krajewski, 2004: A method for filtering out raingauge representativeness errors from the verification distributions of radar and raingauge rainfall. Adv. Water Resour., 27, 967980, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.08.003.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Habib, E., A. V. Aduvala, and E. A. Meselhe, 2008: Analysis of radar-rainfall error characteristics and implications for streamflow simulation uncertainty. Hydrol. Sci. J., 53, 568587, https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.3.568.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, W., M. A. Rico-Ramirez, and S. Krämer, 2015: Classification and correction of the bright band using an operational C-band polarimetric radar. J. Hydrol., 531, 248258, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.011.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hasan, M. M., A. Sharma, F. Johnson, G. Mariethoz, and A. Seed, 2014: Correcting bias in radar ZR relationships due to uncertainty in point rain gauge networks. J. Hydrol., 519, 16681676, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.060.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hasan, M. M., A. Sharma, F. Johnson, G. Mariethoz, and A. Seed, 2016a: Merging radar and in situ rainfall measurements: An assessment of different combination algorithms. Water Resour. Res., 52, 83848398, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018441.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hasan, M. M., A. Sharma, G. Mariethoz, F. Johnson, and A. Seed, 2016b: Improving radar rainfall estimation by merging point rainfall measurements within a model combination framework. Adv. Water Resour., 97, 205218, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.09.011.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirstetter, P.-E., G. Delrieu, B. Boudevillain, and C. Obled, 2010: Toward an error model for radar quantitative precipitation estimation in the Cévennes–Vivarais region, France. J. Hydrol., 394, 2841, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.01.009.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirstetter, P.-E., J. J. Gourley, Y. Hong, J. Zhang, S. Moazamigoodarzi, C. Langston, and A. Arthur, 2015: Probabilistic precipitation rate estimates with ground-based radar networks. Water Resour. Res., 51, 14221442, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015672.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krajewski, W. F., G. Villarini, and J. A. Smith, 2010: Radar-rainfall uncertainties: Where are we after thirty years of effort? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 8794, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2747.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marshall, J., W. Hitschfeld, and K. Gunn, 1955: Advances in radar weather. Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 2, Academic Press, 1–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60310-6.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Michelson, D. B., 2004: Systematic correction of precipitation gauge observations using analyzed meteorological variables. J. Hydrol., 290, 161177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.10.005.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moore, R., D. Jones, D. Cox, and V. Isham, 2000: Design of the HYREX raingauge network. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 521530, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-521-2000.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nikahd, A., M. Hashim, and M. J. Nazemosadat, 2016: A review of uncertainty sources on weather ground-based radar for rainfall estimation. Appl. Mech. Mater., 254–271, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.818.254.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Qi, Y., J. Zhang, P. Zhang, and Q. Cao, 2013: VPR correction of bright band effects in radar QPEs using polarimetric radar observations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 36273633, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50364.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rico-Ramirez, M., I. Cluckie, G. Shepherd, and A. Pallot, 2007: A high-resolution radar experiment on the island of Jersey. Meteor. Appl., 14, 117129, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.13.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rico-Ramirez, M., S. Liguori, and A. Schellart, 2015: Quantifying radar-rainfall uncertainties in urban drainage flow modelling. J. Hydrol., 528, 1728, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.057.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sandford, C., 2015: Correcting for wind drift in high resolution radar rainfall products: A feasibility study. J. Hydrol., 531, 284295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.023.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seo, B. C., L. K. Cunha, and W. F. Krajewski, 2013: Uncertainty in radar-rainfall composite and its impact on hydrologic prediction for the eastern Iowa flood of 2008. Water Resour. Res., 49, 27472764, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20244.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Villarini, G., P. V. Mandapaka, W. F. Krajewski, and R. J. Moore, 2008: Rainfall and sampling uncertainties: A rain gauge perspective. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11102, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009214.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Villarini, G., B.-C. Seo, F. Serinaldi, and W. F. Krajewski, 2014: Spatial and temporal modeling of radar rainfall uncertainties. Atmos. Res., 135–136, 91101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.09.007.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Y., J. Zhang, P.-L. Chang, and Q. Cao, 2015: Radar vertical profile of reflectivity correction with TRMM observations using a neural network approach. J. Hydrometeor., 16, 22302247, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0136.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wheater, H., and Coauthors, 2000: Spatial-temporal rainfall fields: Modelling and statistical aspects. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 581601, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-581-2000.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wood, S., D. Jones, and R. Moore, 2000a: Accuracy of rainfall measurement for scales of hydrological interest. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 531543, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-531-2000.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wood, S., D. Jones, and R. Moore, 2000b: Static and dynamic calibration of radar data for hydrological use. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 545554, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-545-2000.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xie, X., R. Evaristo, S. Troemel, P. Saavedra, C. Simmer, and A. Ryzhkov, 2016: Radar observation of evaporation and implications for quantitative precipitation and cooling rate estimation. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 33, 17791792, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0244.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 411 118 4
PDF Downloads 378 92 5