The RheaG Weather Generator Algorithm: Evaluation in Four Contrasting Climates from the Iberian Peninsula

Daniel Nadal-Sala Ecology Section, Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Search for other papers by Daniel Nadal-Sala in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Carlos A. Gracia Ecology Section, Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, and Center for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain

Search for other papers by Carlos A. Gracia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Santiago Sabaté Ecology Section, Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, and Center for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain

Search for other papers by Santiago Sabaté in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

This paper describes the assumptions, equations, and procedures of the RheaG weather generator algorithm (WGA). RheaG was conceived for the generation of robust daily meteorological time series, whether in static or transient climate conditions. Here we analyze its performance in four Iberian locations—Bilbao, Barcelona, Madrid, and Sevilla—with differentiated climate characteristics. To validate the RheaG WGA, we compared observed and generated meteorological time series’ statistical properties of precipitation, maximum temperature, and minimum temperature for all four locations. We also compared observed and simulated rain events spell length probabilities in all four locations. Finally, RheaG includes two weather generation procedures: one in which monthly mean values for meteorological variables are unconstrained and one in which they are constrained according to a predefined baseline climate variability. Here, we compare the two weather generation procedures included in RheaG using the observed data from Barcelona. Our results present a high agreement in the statistical properties and the rain spell length probabilities between observed and generated meteorological time series. Our results show that RheaG accurately reproduces seasonal patterns of the observed meteorological time series for all four locations, and it is even able to differentiate two climatic seasons in Bilbao that are also present in the observed data. We find a trade-off between generation procedures in which the unconstrained procedure better reproduces the variability of monthly and yearly precipitation than the constrained one, but the constrained procedure is able to keep the same climatic signal across meteorological time series. Thus, the first procedure is more accurate, but the latter is able to maintain spatial autocorrelation among generated meteorological time series.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0170.s1.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Daniel Nadal-Sala, d_nadal@ub.edu

Abstract

This paper describes the assumptions, equations, and procedures of the RheaG weather generator algorithm (WGA). RheaG was conceived for the generation of robust daily meteorological time series, whether in static or transient climate conditions. Here we analyze its performance in four Iberian locations—Bilbao, Barcelona, Madrid, and Sevilla—with differentiated climate characteristics. To validate the RheaG WGA, we compared observed and generated meteorological time series’ statistical properties of precipitation, maximum temperature, and minimum temperature for all four locations. We also compared observed and simulated rain events spell length probabilities in all four locations. Finally, RheaG includes two weather generation procedures: one in which monthly mean values for meteorological variables are unconstrained and one in which they are constrained according to a predefined baseline climate variability. Here, we compare the two weather generation procedures included in RheaG using the observed data from Barcelona. Our results present a high agreement in the statistical properties and the rain spell length probabilities between observed and generated meteorological time series. Our results show that RheaG accurately reproduces seasonal patterns of the observed meteorological time series for all four locations, and it is even able to differentiate two climatic seasons in Bilbao that are also present in the observed data. We find a trade-off between generation procedures in which the unconstrained procedure better reproduces the variability of monthly and yearly precipitation than the constrained one, but the constrained procedure is able to keep the same climatic signal across meteorological time series. Thus, the first procedure is more accurate, but the latter is able to maintain spatial autocorrelation among generated meteorological time series.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0170.s1.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Daniel Nadal-Sala, d_nadal@ub.edu

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 176 KB)
Save
  • Ailliot, P., D. Allard, V. Monbet, and P. Naveau, 2015: Stochastic weather generators: An overview of weather type models. J. Soc. Fr. Stat., 156, 101113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allen, R. G., 1995: Evaluation of procedures for estimating mean monthly solar radiation from air temperature. Food and Agricultural Organization.

  • Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith, 1998: Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, 290 pp.

  • Buishand, T. A., 1978: Some remarks on the use of daily rainfall models. J. Hydrol., 36, 295308, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(78)90150-6.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bürger, G., 1997: On the disaggregation of climatological means and anomalies. Climate Res., 8, 183194, https://doi.org/10.3354/cr008183.

  • Burton, A., H. J. Fowler, S. Blenkinsop, C. G. Kilsby, 2010: Downscaling transient climate change using a Neyman–Scott rectangular pulses stochastic rainfall model. J. Hydrol., 381, 1832, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.031.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burton, A., V. Glenis, M. R. Jones, and C. G. Kilsby, 2013: Models of daily rainfall cross-correlation for the United Kingdom. Environ. Modell. Softw., 49, 2233, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.001.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caskey, J., 1963: A Markov chain model for the probability of precipitation occurrence in intervals of various length. Mon. Wea. Rev., 91, 298301, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0298:AMCMFT>2.3.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, J., F. Brissette, and R. Leconte, 2012: WeaGETS—A Matlab-based daily scale weather generator for generating precipitation and temperature. Procedia Environ. Sci., 13, 22222235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.211.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Duffie, J. A., and W. A. Beckman, 1991: Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. Wiley, 944 pp.

  • Fowler, H. J., and C. G. Kilsby, 2007: Using regional climate model data to simulate historical and future river flows in northwest England. Climatic Change, 80, 337367, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9117-3.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gabriel, K. R., and J. Neumann, 1962: A Markov chain model for daily rainfall occurrence at Tel Aviv. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 88, 9095, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49708837511.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Geng, S., 1986: A simple method for generating daily rainfall data. Agric. For. Meteor., 36, 363376, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(86)90014-6.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hargreaves, G. H., and Z. A. Samani, 1982: Estimating potential evapotranspiration. J. Irrig. Drain. Div., 108, 225230.

  • Hawkins, D. M., 2004: The problem of overfitting. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 44, 112, https://doi.org/10.1021/ci0342472.

  • Hutchinson, M. F., 1986: Methods of generation of weather sequences. Agricultural Environments, A. H. Bunting, Ed., C.A.B. International, 149–157.

  • IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, 1535 pp., https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Katz, R. W., 1981: On some criteria for estimating the order of a Markov chain. Technometrics, 23, 243249, https://doi.org/10.2307/1267787.

  • Kilsby, C. G., and Coauthors, 2007: A daily weather generator for use in climate change studies. Environ. Modell. Software, 22, 17051719, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.02.005.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kimball, J. S., S. W. Running, and R. Nemani, 1997: An improved method for estimating surface humidity from daily minimum temperature. Agric. For. Meteor., 85, 8798, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(96)02366-0.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mearns, L. O., R. W. Katz, and S. H. Schneider, 1984: Extreme high-temperature events: Changes in their probabilities with changes in mean temperature. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 23, 16011613, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<1601:EHTECI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Onof, C., R. E. Chandler, A. Kakou, P. Northrop, H. S. Wheater, and V. Isham, 2000: Rainfall modeling using Poisson-cluster processes: A review of developments. Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 14, 384411, https://doi.org/10.1007/s004770000043.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • R Core Team, 2017: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Richardson, C. W., 1981: Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation. Water Resour. Res., 17, 182190, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR017i001p00182.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Richardson, C. W., and D. A. Wright, 1984: WGEN: A model for generating daily weather variables. U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service ARS-8, 83 pp.

  • Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., D. R. Cox, and V. Isham, 1987: Some models for rainfall based on stochastic point processes. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 410A, 269288, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1987.0039.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Semenov, M., and R. Brooks, 1999: Spatial interpolation of the LARS-WG stochastic weather generator in Great Britain. Climate Res., 11, 137148, https://doi.org/10.3354/cr011137.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sonnadara, D. U., and R. D. Jayewardene, 2015: A Markov chain probability model to describe wet and dry patterns of weather at Colombo. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 119, 333340, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1117-z.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spencer, J. W., 1971: Fourier series representation of the position of the sun. Search, 2, 172.

  • Stern, R. D., 1980: The calculation of probability distributions for models of daily precipitation. Arch. Meteor. Geophys. Bioklimatol., 28, 137147, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02243841.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilks, D. S., and R. L. Wilby, 1999: The weather generation game: A review of stochastic weather models. Prog. Phys. Geogr., 23, 329357, https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339902300302.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wood, A. W., L. R. Leung, V. Sridhar, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2004: Hydrologic implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Climatic Change, 62, 189216, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000013685.99609.9e.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 591 178 46
PDF Downloads 380 50 1