Assessing Wind Data from Reanalyses for the Upper Midwest

Jacob J. Coburn Department of Geography, Environment and Society, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Search for other papers by Jacob J. Coburn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Wind is an important atmospheric variable that is receiving increased attention as the world seeks to shift from carbon-based fuels in order to mitigate climate change. This has resulted in increased need for more temporally and spatially continuous wind information, which is often met through the use of reanalysis data. However, limited work has been done to assess the long-term accuracy of the wind data against observations in the context of specific applications. This study focuses on the representation of daily and monthly average 10-m wind speed data in the upper Midwest by six global reanalysis datasets. The accuracy of the datasets was assessed using several measures of skill, as well as the associated wind speed distributions and long-term trends. While it was found that higher resolution and complexity in more recent generations of reanalyses produced more accurate simulations of wind in the region, important biases remained. High variability in the observed data resulted in lower correlations at the monthly time scale. As with previous research, linear trends calculated from the reanalyzed wind speeds were significantly underestimated compared to observed trends. While it is expected that future improvements in model resolution, physics, and data assimilation will further improve wind representation in reanalyses, accounting for the differences between the available datasets and their associated biases will be important for potential applications of the output, particularly wind resource assessment.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Jacob J. Coburn, cobur018@umn.edu

Abstract

Wind is an important atmospheric variable that is receiving increased attention as the world seeks to shift from carbon-based fuels in order to mitigate climate change. This has resulted in increased need for more temporally and spatially continuous wind information, which is often met through the use of reanalysis data. However, limited work has been done to assess the long-term accuracy of the wind data against observations in the context of specific applications. This study focuses on the representation of daily and monthly average 10-m wind speed data in the upper Midwest by six global reanalysis datasets. The accuracy of the datasets was assessed using several measures of skill, as well as the associated wind speed distributions and long-term trends. While it was found that higher resolution and complexity in more recent generations of reanalyses produced more accurate simulations of wind in the region, important biases remained. High variability in the observed data resulted in lower correlations at the monthly time scale. As with previous research, linear trends calculated from the reanalyzed wind speeds were significantly underestimated compared to observed trends. While it is expected that future improvements in model resolution, physics, and data assimilation will further improve wind representation in reanalyses, accounting for the differences between the available datasets and their associated biases will be important for potential applications of the output, particularly wind resource assessment.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Jacob J. Coburn, cobur018@umn.edu
Save
  • Azorin-Molina, C., and Coauthors, 2014: Homogenization and assessment of observed near-surface wind speed trends over Spain and Portugal, 1961–2011. J. Climate, 27, 36923712, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00652.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Azorin-Molina, C., J. Guijarro, T. Mcvicar, S. Vicente-Serrano, D. Chen, S. Jerez, and F. Espírito-Santo, 2016: Trends of daily peak wind gusts in Spain and Portugal, 1961–2014. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121, 10591078, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024485.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bett, P. E., H. Thornton, and R. Clark, 2013: European wind variability over 140 yr. Adv. Sci. Res., 10, 5158, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-10-51-2013.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bichet, A., M. Wild, D. Folini, and C. Schar, 2012: Causes for decadal variations of wind speed over land: Sensitivity studies with a global climate model. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L11701, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051685.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blunden, J., and D. Arndt, 2016: State of the Climate in 2015. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97, SiS275, https://doi.org/10.1175/2016BAMSStateoftheClimate.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carta, J., S. Velázquez, and P. Cabrera, 2013: A review of measure-correlate-predict (MCP) methods used to estimate long-term wind characteristics at a target site. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 27, 362400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.004.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cheng, X., and Coauthors, 2016: Implications of East Asian Summer and winter monsoons for interannual aerosol variations over central-eastern China. Atmos. Environ., 129, 218228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.037.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clark, R., P. Bett, H. Thornton, and A. Scaife, 2017: Skillful seasonal predictions for the European energy industry. Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 024002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa57ab.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Compo, G., and Coauthors, 2011: The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 128, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.776.

  • Decker, M., M. Brunke, Z. Wang, K. Sakaguchi, X. Zeng, and M. Bosilovich, 2012: Evaluation of the reanalysis products from GSFC, NCEP, and ECMWF using flux tower observations. J. Climate, 25, 19161944, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00004.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dee, D. P., and Coauthors, 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Delignette-Muller, M. L., and C. Dutang, 2015: Fitdistrplus: An R package for fitting distributions. J. Stat. Software, 64, 134, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v064.i04.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fisher, S., J. Schoof, C. Lant, and M. Therrell, 2013: The effects of geographical distribution on the reliability of wind energy. Appl. Geogr., 40, 8389, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.01.010.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fu, G., J. Yu, Y. Zhang, S. Hu, R. Ouyang, and W. Liu, 2011: Temporal variation of wind speed in China for 1961–2007. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 104, 313324, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-010-0348-x.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fujiwara, M., and Coauthors, 2017: Introduction to the SPARC Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S-RIP) and overview of the reanalysis systems. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14171452, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1417-2017.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gelaro, R., and Coauthors, 2017: The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Climate, 30, 54195454, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gudmundsson, L., 2016: Qmap: Statistical transformations for post-processing climate model output, version1.0-4. R package, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/qmap/index.html.

  • Gunturu, U. B., and C. Schlosser, 2012: Characterization of wind power resource in the United States. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 96879702, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9687-2012.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • He, Y., A. Monahan, C. Jones, A. Dai, S. Biner, D. Caya, and K. Winger, 2010: Probability distributions of land surface wind speeds over North America. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D04103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010708.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Högström, U., and A. Smedman, 2004: Accuracy of sonic anemometers: laminar wind-tunnel calibrations compared to atmospheric in situ calibrations against a reference instrument. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 111, 3354, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BOUN.0000011000.05248.47.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Izumi, Y., and M. Barad, 1970: Wind Speed as Measured by Cup and Sonic Anemometers and Influenced by Tower Structure. J. Appl. Meteor., 9, 851856, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1970)009<0851:WSAMBC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jung, J., and R. Broadwater, 2014: Current status and future advances for wind speed and power forecasting. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 31, 762777, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.054.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaiser-Weiss, A. K., F. Kaspar, V. Heene, M. Borsche, D. G. H. Tan, P. Poli, A. Obregon, and H. Gregow, 2015: Comparison of regional and global reanalysis near-surface winds with station observations over Germany. Adv. Sci. Res., 12, 187198, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-12-187-2015.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kanamitsu, M., W. Ebisuzaki, J. Woollen, S. Yang, J. Hnilo, M. Fiorino, and G. Potter, 2002: NCEP-DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 16311643, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirchmeier, M., D. Lorenz, and D. Vimont, 2014: Statistical downscaling of daily wind speed variations. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 53, 660675, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0230.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirchner-Bossi, N., R. García-Herrera, L. Prieto, and R. Trigo, 2015: A long-term perspective of wind power output variability. Int. J. Climatol., 35, 26352646, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4161.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klink, K., 1999: Climatological mean and interannual variance of United States surface wind speed, direction and velocity. Int. J. Climatol., 19, 471488, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199904)19:5<471::AID-JOC367>3.0.CO;2-X.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klink, K., 2002: Trends and interannual variability of wind speed distributions in Minnesota. J. Climate, 15, 33113317, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<3311:TAIVOW>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klink, K., 2007: Atmospheric circulation effects on wind speed variability at turbine height. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46, 445456, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2466.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kobayashi, S., and Coauthors, 2015: The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General specifications and basic characteristics. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 93, 548, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2015-001.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kriesche, P., and A. Schlosser, 2014: The association of large-scale climate variability and teleconnections on wind energy resource over Europe and its intermittency. Energy Procedia, 59, 270277, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.377.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krogh, S., J. Pomeroy, and J. McPhee, 2015: Physically based mountain hydrological modeling using reanalysis data in Patagonia. J. Hydrometeor., 16, 172193, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-0178.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krueger, O., F. Schenk, F. Feser, and R. Weisse, 2013: Inconsistencies between long-term trends in storminess derived from the 20CR reanalysis and observations. J. Climate, 26, 868874, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00309.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kubik, M. L., D. Brayshaw, P. Coker, and J. Barlow, 2013: Exploring the role of reanalysis data in simulating regional wind generation variability over Northern Ireland. Renew. Energy, 57, 558561, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.02.012.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kumar, D., V. Mishra, and A. Ganguly, 2015: Evaluating wind extremes in CMIP5 climate models. Climate Dyn., 45, 441453, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2306-2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, X., S. Zhong, X. Bian, and W. Heilman, 2010: Climate and climate variability of the wind power resources in the Great Lakes Region of the United States. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D18107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013415.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liléo, S., and O. Petrik, 2011: Investigation on the use of NCEP/NCAR, MERRA and NCEP/CFSR reanalysis data in wind resource analysis. European Wind Energy Conf. and Exhibition, Brussels, Belgium, EWEA, 181185.

  • Lindsay, R., M. Wensnahan, A. Schweiger, and J. Zhang, 2014: Evaluation of seven different atmospheric reanalysis products in the Arctic. J. Climate, 27, 25882606, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00014.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lott, J. N., 2004: The quality control of the Integrated Surface Hourly database. 14th Conf. on Applied Climatology, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 7.8, https://ams.confex.com/ams/84Annual/techprogram/paper_71929.htm.

  • Lott, J. N., and R. Baldwin, 2002: The FCC Integrated Surface Hourly database, a new resource of global climate data. 13th Symp. on Global Change and Climate Variations, Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 6.2, https://ams.confex.com/ams/annual2002/webprogram/Paper27792.html.

  • McVicar, T. R., and Coauthors, 2012: Global review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind speeds: Implications for evaporation. J. Hydrol., 416–417, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.024.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mesinger, F., and Coauthors, 2006: North American Regional Reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87, 343360, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-3-343.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mizukami, N., and Coauthors, 2016: Implications of the methodological choices for hydrologic portrayals of climate change over the contiguous United States: Statistically downscaled forcing data and hydrologic models. J. Hydrometeor., 17, 7398, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0187.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nadolski, V., 1998: Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS) user’s guide. NOAA Doc., 74 pp., https://www.weather.gov/media/asos/aum-toc.pdf.

  • Olauson, J., and M. Bergkvist, 2015: Modelling the Swedish wind power production using MERRA reanalysis data. Renewable Energy, 76, 717725, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.085.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parker, W. S., 2016: Reanalyses and observations: What’s the difference? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97, 15651572, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00226.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pirazzoli, P. A., and A. Tomasin, 2003: Recent near-surface wind changes in the central Mediterranean and Adriatic areas. Int. J. Climatol., 23, 963973, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.925.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pryor, S. C., and J. Ledolter, 2010: Addendum to “Wind speed trends over the contiguous United States.” J. Geophys. Res., 115, D10103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013281.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pryor, S. C., and Coauthors, 2009: Wind speed trends over the contiguous United States. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D14105, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011416.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pryor, S. C., R. J. Barthelmie, and J. T. Schoof, 2012: Past and future wind climates over the contiguous USA based on the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program model suite. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D19119, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017449.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • R Core Team, 2017: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.R-project.org/.

  • Rienecker, M., and Coauthors, 2011: MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications. J. Climate, 24, 36243648, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rose, S., and J. Apt, 2015: What can reanalysis data tell us about wind power? Renewable Energy, 83, 963969, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.05.027.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rose, S., and J. Apt, 2016: Quantifying sources of uncertainty in reanalysis derived wind speed. Renewable Energy, 94, 157165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.028.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rust, H., O. Mestre, and V. Venema, 2008: Fewer jumps, less memory: Homogenized temperature records and long memory. J. Geophys. Res., 113, 18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009919.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saha, S., and Coauthors, 2010: The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 10151057, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schoof, J. T., and S. Pryor, 2014: Assessing the fidelity of AOGCM-simulated relationships between large-scale modes of climate variability and wind speeds. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 97199734, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021601.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sharp, E., P. Dodds, M. Barrett, and C. Spataru, 2015: Evaluating the accuracy of CFSR reanalysis hourly wind speed forecasts for the UK, using in situ measurements and geographical information. Renewable Energy, 77, 527538, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.12.025.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, A., L. Neal, and R. Vose, 2011: The Integrated Surface Database: Recent developments and partnerships. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92, 704708, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS3015.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smits, A., A. Tank, and G. Können, 2005: Trends in storminess over the Netherlands, 1962–2002. Int. J. Climatol., 25, 13311344, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1195.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Toledo, C., R. Chávez-arroyo, L. Loera, and O. Probst, 2015: A surface wind speed map for Mexico Based on NARR and observational data. Meteor. Appl., 22, 666678, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1500.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vanvyve, E., L. Monache, A. Monaghan, and J. Pinto, 2015: Wind resource estimates with an analog ensemble approach. Renewable Energy, 74, 761773, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.060.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vautard, R., J. Cattiaux, P. Yiou, J. Thépaut, and P. Ciais, 2010: Northern Hemisphere atmospheric stilling partly attributed to an increase in surface roughness. Nat. Geosci., 3, 756761, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo979.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wan, H., X. Wang, and V. Swail, 2010: Homogenization and trend analysis of Canadian near-surface wind speeds. J. Climate, 23, 12091225, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3200.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, L., Y. Feng, R. Chan, and V. Isaac, 2016: Inter-comparison of extra-tropical cyclone activity in nine reanalysis datasets. Atmos. Res., 181, 133153, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.06.010.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wieringa, J., 1980: A revaluation of the Kansas mast influence on measurements of stress and cup anemometer overspeeding. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 18, 411430, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119497.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yu, L., S. Zhong, X. Bian, and W. Heilman, 2015: Temporal and spatial variability of wind resources in the United States as derived from the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. J. Climate, 28, 11661183, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00322.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yu, L., S. Zhong, X. Bian, and W. Heilman, 2016: Climatology and trend of wind power resources in China and its surrounding regions: A revisit using Climate Forecast System Reanalysis data. Int. J. Climatol., 36, 21732188, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4485.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 570 182 30
PDF Downloads 501 136 19