ENSO Normals: A New U.S. Climate Normals Product Conditioned by ENSO Phase and Intensity and Accounting for Secular Trends

Anthony Arguez NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Information, Asheville, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Anthony Arguez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anand Inamdar Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites–North Carolina, North Carolina State University, Asheville, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Anand Inamdar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michael A. Palecki NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Information, Asheville, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Michael A. Palecki in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Carl J. Schreck Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites–North Carolina, North Carolina State University, Asheville, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Carl J. Schreck in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Alisa H. Young NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Information, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Alisa H. Young in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Climate normals are traditionally calculated every decade as the average values over a period of time, often 30 years. Such an approach assumes a stationary climate, with several alternatives recently introduced to account for monotonic climate change. However, these methods fail to account for interannual climate variability [e.g., El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO)] that systematically alters the background state of the climate similar to climate change. These effects and their uncertainties are well established, but they are not reflected in any readily available climate normals datasets. A new high-resolution set of normals is derived for the contiguous United States that accounts for ENSO and uses the optimal climate normal (OCN)—a 10-yr (15 yr) running average for temperature (precipitation)—to account for climate change. Anomalies are calculated by subtracting the running means and then compositing into 5 ENSO phase and intensity categories: Strong La Niña, Weak La Niña, Neutral, Weak El Niño, and Strong El Niño. Seasonal composites are produced for each of the five phases. The ENSO normals are the sum of these composites with the OCN for a given month. The result is five sets of normals, one for each phase, which users may consult with respect to anticipated ENSO outcomes. While well-established ENSO patterns are found in most cases, a distinct east–west temperature anomaly pattern emerges for Weak El Niño events. This new product can assist stakeholders in planning for a broad array of possible ENSO impacts in a changing climate.

For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Anthony Arguez, anthony.arguez@noaa.gov

Abstract

Climate normals are traditionally calculated every decade as the average values over a period of time, often 30 years. Such an approach assumes a stationary climate, with several alternatives recently introduced to account for monotonic climate change. However, these methods fail to account for interannual climate variability [e.g., El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO)] that systematically alters the background state of the climate similar to climate change. These effects and their uncertainties are well established, but they are not reflected in any readily available climate normals datasets. A new high-resolution set of normals is derived for the contiguous United States that accounts for ENSO and uses the optimal climate normal (OCN)—a 10-yr (15 yr) running average for temperature (precipitation)—to account for climate change. Anomalies are calculated by subtracting the running means and then compositing into 5 ENSO phase and intensity categories: Strong La Niña, Weak La Niña, Neutral, Weak El Niño, and Strong El Niño. Seasonal composites are produced for each of the five phases. The ENSO normals are the sum of these composites with the OCN for a given month. The result is five sets of normals, one for each phase, which users may consult with respect to anticipated ENSO outcomes. While well-established ENSO patterns are found in most cases, a distinct east–west temperature anomaly pattern emerges for Weak El Niño events. This new product can assist stakeholders in planning for a broad array of possible ENSO impacts in a changing climate.

For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Anthony Arguez, anthony.arguez@noaa.gov
Save
  • AgroClimate, 2016: Climatology. Southeast Climate Consortium, http://agroclimate.org/tools/climatology/.

  • Arguez, A., and R. S. Vose, 2011: The definition of the standard WMO climate normal: The key to deriving alternative climate normals. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92, 699704, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS2955.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arguez, A., R. S. Vose, and J. Dissen, 2013: Alternative climate normals: Impacts to the energy industry. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 915917, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00155.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ashok, K., S. K. Behera, S. A. Rao, H. Weng, and T. Yamagata, 2007: El Niño Modoki and its possible teleconnection. J. Geophys. Res., 112, C11007, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003798.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnston, A. G., and C. F. Ropelewski, 1992: Prediction of ENSO episodes using canonical correlation analysis. J. Climate, 5, 13161345, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005<1316:POEEUC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnston, A. G., M. Chelliah, and S. B. Goldenberg, 1997: Documentation of a highly ENSO-related SST region in the equatorial Pacific. Atmos.–Ocean, 35, 367383, https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1997.9649597.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chiodi, A. M., and D. E. Harrison, 2013: El Niño impacts on seasonal U.S. atmospheric circulation, temperature, and precipitation anomalies: The OLR-Event perspective. J. Climate, 26, 822837, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00097.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CPC, 2012: ENSO temperature and precipitation composites. NOAA, accessed 1 June 2018, https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/ENSO/composites/.

  • CPC, 2018: Cold & warm episodes by season. NOAA, accessed 1 June 2018, http://origin.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/ONI_v5.php.

  • Daly, C., M. Halbleib, J. I. Smith, W. P. Gibson, M. K. Doggett, G. H. Taylor, J. Curtis, and P. A. Pasteris, 2008: Physiographically sensitive mapping of temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Int. J. Climatol., 28, 20312064, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1688.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dourte, D. R., E. Gelcer, O. Uryasev, C. G. Staub, D. D. Barreto, and C. W. Fraisse, 2017: Gridded, monthly rainfall and temperature climatology for El Niño Southern Oscillation impacts in the United States. Int. J. Climatol., 37, 22002208, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4820.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Durre, I., M. J. Menne, B. E. Gleason, T. G. Houston, and R. S. Vose, 2010: Comprehensive automated quality assurance of daily surface observations. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 49, 16151633, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2375.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fan, Y., and H. van den Dool, 2008: A global monthly land surface air temperature analysis for 1948–present. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D01103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000723.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guo, Y.-Y., M. Ting, Z. Wen, and D. E. Lee, 2017: Distinct patterns of tropical Pacific SST anomaly and their impacts on North American climate. J. Climate, 30, 52215241, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0488.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoell, A., M. Hoerling, J. Eischeid, K. Wolter, R. Dole, J. Perlwitz, T. Xu, and L. Cheng, 2016: Does El Niño intensity matter for California precipitation? Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 819825, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067102.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Horel, J. D., and J. M. Wallace, 1981: Planetary-scale atmospheric phenomena associated with the Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 109, 813829, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1981)109<0813:PSAPAW>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, J., H. M. van den Dool, and A. G. Barnston, 1996: Long-lead seasonal temperature prediction using optimal climate normals. J. Climate, 9, 809817, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<0809:LLSTPU>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, B., and Coauthors, 2017: Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature, version 5 (ERSSTv5): Upgrades, validations, and intercomparisons. J. Climate, 30, 81798205, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0836.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ji, M., D. W. Behringer, and A. Leetmaa, 1998: An improved coupled model for ENSO prediction and implications for ocean initialization. Part II: The coupled model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 10221034, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1022:AICMFE>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnson, N. C., 2013: How many ENSO flavors can we distinguish? J. Climate, 26, 48164827, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00649.1.

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437471, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • L’Heureux, M., G. D. Bell, and M. S. Halpert, 2018: ENSO and the tropical Pacific [in “State of the Climate in 2017”]. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 99, S102S104, https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2018BAMSStateoftheClimate.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, H.-T., 2017: Outgoing longwave radiation (OLR)—Monthly. NOAA’s Climate Data Record Program Climate Algorithm Theoretical Basis Doc. CDRP-ATBD-0097, 46 pp., https://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/sds/cdr/CDRs/Outgoing%20Longwave%20Radiation%20-%20Monthly/AlgorithmDescription_01B-06.pdf.

  • Livezey, R. E., K. Y. Vinnikov, M. M. Timofeyeva, R. Tinker, and H. M. van den Dool, 2007: Estimation and extrapolation of climate normals and climatic trends. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46, 17591776, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1666.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mann, M. E., 2004: On smoothing potentially non-stationary climate time series. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L07214, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019569.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCabe, G. J., M. A. Palecki, and J. L. Betancourt, 2004: Pacific and Atlantic Ocean influences on multidecadal drought frequency in the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 41364141, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0306738101.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Menne, M. J., and C. N. Williams Jr., 2009: Homogenization of temperature series via pairwise comparisons. J. Climate, 22, 17001717, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2263.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Menne, M. J., I. Durre, R. S. Vose, B. E. Gleason, and T. G. Houston, 2012: An overview of the Global Historical Climatology Network-Daily Database. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 29, 897910, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00103.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mo, K. C., 2010: Interdecadal modulation of the impact of ENSO on precipitation and temperature over the United States. J. Climate, 23, 36393656, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3553.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Paek, H., J. Y. Yu, and C. Qian, 2017: Why were the 2015/2016 and 1997/1998 extreme El Niños different? Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 18481856, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071515.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rasmusson, E. M., and T. H. Carpenter, 1982: Variations in tropical sea surface temperature and surface wind fields associated with the Southern Oscillation/El Niño. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 354384, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110<0354:VITSST>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ropelewski, C. F., and M. S. Halpert, 1986: North American precipitation and temperature patterns associated with the El Niño/ Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Mon. Wea. Rev., 114, 23522362, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114<2352:NAPATP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ropelewski, C. F., and M. S. Halpert, 1987: Global and regional scale precipitation patterns associated with the El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 16061626, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<1606:GARSPP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ropelewski, C. F., and M. S. Halpert, 1989: Precipitation patterns associated with the high index phase of the Southern Oscillation. J. Climate, 2, 268284, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1989)002<0268:PPAWTH>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ropelewski, C. F., and M. S. Halpert, 1996: Quantifying Southern Oscillation–precipitation relationships. J. Climate, 9, 10431059, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<1043:QSOPR>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schreck, C. J., L. Shi, J. P. Kossin, and J. J. Bates, 2013: Identifying the MJO, equatorial waves, and their impacts using 32 years of HIRS upper-tropospheric water vapor. J. Climate, 26, 14181431, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00034.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Siler, N., Y. Kosaka, S.-P. Xie, and X. Li, 2017: Tropical ocean contributions to California’s surprisingly dry El Niño of 2015/16. J. Climate, 30, 10 06710 079, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0177.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trenberth, K. E., 1997: The definition of El Niño. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 27712777, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<2771:TDOENO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van Loon, H., and R. A. Madden, 1981: The Southern Oscillation. Part I: Global associations with pressure and temperature in northern winter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 109, 11501162, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1981)109<1150:TSOPIG>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vose, R. S., and Coauthors, 2014: Improved historical temperature and precipitation time series for U.S. climate divisions. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 53, 12321251, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0248.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walker, G. T., and E. W. Bliss, 1932: World Weather V. Mem. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 4 (36), 5384.

  • Walker, G. T., and E. W. Bliss, 1937: World Weather VI. Mem. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 4 (39), 119139.

  • Wilks, D. S., and R. E. Livezey, 2013: Performance of alternative “normals” for tracking climate changes, using homogenized and nonhomogenized seasonal U.S. surface temperatures. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 52, 16771687, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-026.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wolter, K., and M. S. Timlin, 2011: El Niño/Southern Oscillation behaviour since 1871 as diagnosed in an extended multivariate ENSO index (MEI.ext). Int. J. Climatol., 31, 10741087, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2336.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 872 333 32
PDF Downloads 612 182 23