A Description and Evaluation of U.S. Climate Reference Network Standardized Soil Moisture Dataset

Ronald D. Leeper Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites–North Carolina, North Carolina State University, and NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Information, Asheville, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Ronald D. Leeper in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jesse E. Bell Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites–North Carolina, North Carolina State University, and NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Information, Asheville, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Jesse E. Bell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Michael A. Palecki NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Information, Asheville, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Michael A. Palecki in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The interpretation of in situ or remotely sensed soil moisture data for drought monitoring is challenged by the sensitivity of these observations to local soil characteristics and seasonal precipitation patterns. These challenges can be overcome by standardizing soil moisture observations. Traditional approaches require a lengthy record (usually 30 years) that most soil monitoring networks lack. Sampling techniques that combine hourly measurements over a temporal window have been used in the literature to generate historical references (i.e., climatology) from shorter-term datasets. This sampling approach was validated on select U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) stations using a Monte Carlo analysis, which revealed that shorter-term (5+ years) hourly climatologies were similar to longer-term (10+ year) hourly means. The sampling approach was then applied to soil moisture observations from the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN). The sampling method was used to generate multiple measures of soil moisture (mean and median anomalies, standardized median anomaly by interquantile range, and volumetric) that were converted to percentiles using empirical cumulative distribution functions. Overall, time series of soil moisture percentile were very similar among the differing measures; however, there were times of year at individual stations when soil moisture percentiles could have substantial deviations. The use of soil moisture percentiles and counts of threshold exceedance provided more consistent measures of hydrological conditions than observed soil moisture. These results suggest that hourly soil moisture observations can be reasonably standardized and can provide consistent measures of hydrological conditions across spatial and temporal scales.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Ronald D. Leeper, ronnieleeper@cicsnc.org

Abstract

The interpretation of in situ or remotely sensed soil moisture data for drought monitoring is challenged by the sensitivity of these observations to local soil characteristics and seasonal precipitation patterns. These challenges can be overcome by standardizing soil moisture observations. Traditional approaches require a lengthy record (usually 30 years) that most soil monitoring networks lack. Sampling techniques that combine hourly measurements over a temporal window have been used in the literature to generate historical references (i.e., climatology) from shorter-term datasets. This sampling approach was validated on select U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) stations using a Monte Carlo analysis, which revealed that shorter-term (5+ years) hourly climatologies were similar to longer-term (10+ year) hourly means. The sampling approach was then applied to soil moisture observations from the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN). The sampling method was used to generate multiple measures of soil moisture (mean and median anomalies, standardized median anomaly by interquantile range, and volumetric) that were converted to percentiles using empirical cumulative distribution functions. Overall, time series of soil moisture percentile were very similar among the differing measures; however, there were times of year at individual stations when soil moisture percentiles could have substantial deviations. The use of soil moisture percentiles and counts of threshold exceedance provided more consistent measures of hydrological conditions than observed soil moisture. These results suggest that hourly soil moisture observations can be reasonably standardized and can provide consistent measures of hydrological conditions across spatial and temporal scales.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Ronald D. Leeper, ronnieleeper@cicsnc.org
Save
  • Applequist, S., A. Arguez, I. Durre, M. F. Squires, R. S. Vose, and X. Yin, 2012: 1981–2010 U.S. hourly normals. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 16371640, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00173.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arguez, A., I. Durre, S. Applequist, R. S. Vose, M. F. Squires, X. Yin, R. R. Heim Jr., and T. W. Owen, 2012: NOAA’s 1981–2010 U.S. Climate Normals: An overview. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 16871697, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00197.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bell, J. E., R. Sherry, and Y. Luo, 2010: Changes in soil water dynamics due to variation in precipitation and temperature: An ecohydrological analysis in a tallgrass prairie. Water Resour. Res., 46, W03523, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007908.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bell, J. E., and Coauthors, 2013: U.S. Climate Reference Network soil moisture and temperature observations. J. Hydrometeor., 14, 977988, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0146.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bell, J. E., R. D. Leeper, M. A. Palecki, E. Coopersmith, T. Wilson, R. Bilotta, and S. Embler, 2015: Evaluation of the 2012 drought with a newly established national soil monitoring network. Vadose Zone J., 14, vzj2015.02.0023, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2015.02.0023.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bonan, G. B., and L. M. Stillwell-Soller, 1998: Soil water and the persistence of floods and droughts in the Mississippi River Basin. Water Resour. Res., 34, 26932701, https://doi.org/10.1029/98WR02073.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brocca, L., R. Morbidelli, F. Melone, and T. Moramarco, 2007: Soil moisture spatial variability in experimental areas of central Italy. J. Hydrol., 333, 356373, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.004.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brocca, L., and Coauthors, 2014: Soil as a natural rain gauge: Estimating global rainfall from satellite soil moisture data. J. Geophys. Res., 119, 51285141, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021489.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coopersmith, E. J., M. H. Cosh, J. E. Bell, V. Kelly, M. Hall, M. A. Palecki, and M. Temimi, 2016: Deploying temporary networks for upscaling of sparse network stations. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 52, 433444, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2016.07.013.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coopersmith, E. J., J. E. Bell, K. Benedict, J. Shriber, O. McCotter, and M. H. Cosh, 2017: Relating coccidioidomycosis (valley fever) incidence to soil moisture conditions. GeoHealth, 1, 5163, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GH000033.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crow, W. T., M. J. van Den Berg, G. F. Huffman, and T. Pellarin, 2011: Correcting rainfall using satellite-based surface soil moisture retrievals: The Soil Moisture Analysis Rainfall Tool (SMART). Water Resour. Res., 47, W08521, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010576.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diamond, H. J., and Coauthors, 2013: U.S. Climate Reference Network after one decade of operations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 485498, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00170.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dirmeyer, P. A., 2011: The terrestrial segment of soil moisture–climate coupling. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L16702, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048268.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ejem, E. A., D. N. Dike, L. C. Njoku, U. Onwuka, C. C. Igboanusi, and U. N. Moneke, 2017: Analysis of factors of delay in road construction and other projects in Imo state. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Res. Tech., 6, 454460.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Findell, K. L., and E. A. B. Eltahir, 1997: An analysis of the relationship between spring soil moisture and summer rainfall, based on direct observations from Illinois. Water Resour. Res., 33, 725735, https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR03756.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ford, T. W., Q. Wang, and S. M. Quiring, 2016: The observation record length necessary to generate robust soil moisture percentiles. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 55, 21312149, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0143.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Groffman, P. M., P. Kareiva, S. Carter, N. B. Grimm, J. Lawler, M. Mack, V. Matzek, and H. Tallis, 2014: Ecosystems, biodiversity, and ecosystem services. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment, J. M. Melillo, T. C. Richmond, and G. W. Yohe, Eds., 195–219. U.S. Global Change Research Program, https://doi.org/10.7930/J0TD9V7H.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Guo, Z., and P. A. Dirmeyer, 2013: Interannual variability of land–atmosphere coupling strength. J. Hydrometeor., 14, 16361646, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0171.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hayes, M. J., M. D. Svoboda, B. D. Wardlow, M. C. Anderson, and F. Kogan, 2012: Drought monitoring: Historical and current perspectives. Remote Sensing of Drought: Innovative Monitoring Approaches, B. D. Wardlow, M. C. Anderson, and J. P. Verdin, Eds., CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 1–19.

  • Heim, R. R., 2002: A review of 20th century drought indices used in the United States. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 11491165, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-83.8.1149.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hong, S., and E. Kalnay, 2000: Role of sea surface temperature and soil-moisture feedback in the 1998 Oklahoma, Texas drought. Nature, 408, 842844, https://doi.org/10.1038/35048548.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leeper, D. R., E. J. Bell, C. Vines, and M. Palecki, 2017: An evaluation of the North American Regional Reanalysis simulated soil moisture conditions during the 2011–13 drought period. J. Hydrometeor., 18, 515527, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0132.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Manns, H. R., A. A. Berg, P. R. Bullock, and H. McNarin, 2014: Impact of soil surface characteristics on soil water content variability in agricultural fields. Hydrol. Processes, 28, 43404351, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10216.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mishra, V. R., and K. Cherkauer, 2010: Retrospective droughts in the crop growing season: Implications to corn and soybean yield in the Midwestern United States. Agric. For. Meteor., 150, 10301045, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.04.002.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mo, K. C., 2011: Drought onset and recovery over the United States. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D20106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016168.

  • Mo, K. C., and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2015: Heat wave flash droughts in decline. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 28232829, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064018.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ochsner, T. E., and Coauthors, 2013: State of the art in large-scale soil moisture monitoring. Soil. Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 77, 18881919, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2013.03.0093.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Otkin, J. A., M. Shafer, M. Svoboda, B. Wardlow, M. C. Anderson, C. Hain, and J. Basara, 2015: Facilitating the use of drought early warning information through interactions with agricultural stakeholders. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 96, 10731077, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00219.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Otkin, J. A., and Coauthors, 2016: Assessing the evolution of soil moisture and vegetation conditions during the 2012 United States flash drought. Agric. For. Meteor., 218–219, 230242, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.12.065.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Palecki, M. A., and J. E. Bell, 2013: U.S. Climate Reference Network soil moisture observations with triple redundancy: Measurement variability. Vadose Zone J., 12, vzj2012.0158, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2012.0158.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schaefer, G. L., M. H. Cosh, and T. J. Jackson, 2007: The USDA natural resources conservation service soil climate analysis network (SCAN). J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 24, 20732077, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHA930.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schär, C., D. Luthi, and U. Beyerle, 1999: The soil–precipitation feedback: A process study with a regional climate model. J. Climate, 12, 722741, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0722:TSPFAP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seyfried, M. S., and L. E. Grant, 2007: Temperature effects on soil dielectric properties measured at 50 MHz. Vadose Zone J., 6, 759765, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2006.0188.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Seyfried, M. S., L. E. Grant, E. Du, and K. Humes, 2005: Dielectric loss and calibration of the Hydra Probe soil water sensor. Vadose Zone J., 4, 10701079, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2004.0148.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Soulé, T. P., 1990: Spatial patterns of multiple drought types in the contiguous United States: A seasonal comparison. Climate Res., 1, 1321, https://doi.org/10.3354/cr001013.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Svoboda, M., and Coauthors, 2002: The Drought Monitor. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 11811190, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-83.8.1181.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thorpe, D., and E. P. Karan, 2008: Method for calculating schedule delay considering weather conditions. Proc. 24th Annual ARCOM Conf., Cardiff, United Kingdom, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 809–818.

  • West, J. M., S. H. Julius, P. Kareiva, C. Enquist, J. J. Lawler, B. Petersen, A. E. Johnson, and M. R. Shaw, 2009: U.S. natural resources and climate change: Concepts and approaches for management adaptation. Environ. Manage., 44, 10011021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9345-1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wright, A. J., J. P. Walker, and V. R. N. Pauwels, 2018: Identification of hydrologic models, optimized parameters, and rainfall inputs consistent with in situ streamflow and rainfall and remotely sensed soil moisture. J. Hydrometeor., 19, 13051320, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0240.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, W., M. A. Geller, and R. E. Dickinson, 2002: The response of soil moisture to long-term variability of precipitation. J. Hydrometeor., 3, 604613, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0604:TROSMT>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xia, Y., T. W. Ford, Y. Wu, S. M. Quiring, and M. B. Ek, 2015: Automated quality control of in situ soil moisture from the North American Soil Moisture Database using NLDAS-2 products. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 54, 12671282, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0275.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 954 362 58
PDF Downloads 605 127 7